Abstract
In light of the findings detailed in the empirical chapters, the concluding chapter returns to the questions of what constitutes good parenthood and who defines the concept. It highlights the consequences of combining a family studies and childhood studies approach, and reflects on the contrast between Denmark and Sweden, and the UK. It offers some thoughts on how these research findings can be used to progress thinking about good parenthood and argues for the merit of placing parent-child relationships centre stage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brighouse, H., and A. Swift. 2014. Family values: The ethics of parent-child relationships. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carver, N. 2014. “Displaying genuineness: Cultural translation in the drafting of marriage narratives for immigration applications and appeals.” Families, Relationships and Societies 3: 271–286.
Dermott, E., and M. Pomati. 2016. “‘Good’ parenting practices: How important are poverty, education and time pressure?” Sociology 50(1): 125–142.
Faircloth, C., and E. Lee. 2010. “Introduction: Changing parenting culture” Sociological Research Online 15(4). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/1.html. Accessed 16 May 2016.
Field, F. 2010. The foundation years: Preventing poor children becoming poor adults. London: Cabinet Office.
Finch, J. 2007. “Displaying families.” Sociology 41: 65–81.
Giddens, A. 1998. The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilding, M. 2010. “Reflexivity over and above convention: The new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family.” British Journal of Sociology 61(4): 757–777.
Gillies, V. 2010. “Is poor parenting a class issue? Contextualising anti-social behaviour and family life.” In Is parenting a class issue? edited by M. Klett-Davies, 44–61. London: Family and Parenting Institute.
Haynes, J., and E. Dermott. 2011. “Displaying mixedness.” In Displaying families, edited by E. Dermott and J. Seymour, 145–159. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McIntosh, I., N. Dorrer, S. Punch, and R. Emond. 2011. “I know we can’t be a family, but as close as you can get: Displaying families within an institutional context.” In Displaying families, edited by E. Dermott and J. Seymour, 175–196. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morgan, D. 1996. Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity.
Morgan, D. 2011. Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Raemakers, S., and A. Vandezande. 2013. “‘Parents need to become independent problem solvers’: A critical reading of the current parenting culture through the case of Triple P.” Ethics and Education 8(1): 77–88.
Seymour, J. 2011. “Family hold back: Displaying families in the single-location home/workplace.” In Displaying families, edited by E. Dermott and J. Seymour, 160–174. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
UNICEF. 2013. Child Well-being in Rich Countries: A Comparative Overview. Florence: UNICEF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dermott, E. (2016). Doing Good Parenthood: Reflexivity, Practices, and Relationships. In: Sparrman, A., Westerling, A., Lind, J., Dannesboe, K. (eds) Doing Good Parenthood. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46774-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46774-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46773-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46774-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)