Skip to main content

Charting the Development of Human Rights Law Through the CRPD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Abstract

International human rights law is an increasingly articulate legal regime that applies core human rights principles to populations subject to historic disadvantage and to thematically focused areas. Since the adoption of the International Bill of Human Rights, the human rights system has evolved not only in content but also in institutional structures and mechanisms. Consequently, the human rights system has witnessed an increase in its attendant lawmaking potential. The adoption of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD or Convention) reflects this accretion. One of its core mandates is to channel and make applicable existing human rights obligations to the specific lived experiences of persons with disabilities. Indeed, the call for a disability-specific treaty arose largely due to the eliding—explicitly or programmatically—of disability rights from the scope and content of otherwise universal protection accorded to all persons under the international human rights system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), UNGA Resolution 61/106 (2007).

  2. 2.

    Lord and Stein (2008), p. 456 (noting that the “Convention sets forth a host of general obligations familiar to human rights treaties”). See also Quinn (2009).

  3. 3.

    Stein (2007).

  4. 4.

    See Ulfstein (2005), p. 145 (applying the “living treaty regime” notion to the evolution of institutional arrangements in environmental regimes).

  5. 5.

    Stein and Lord (2009b), p. 495.

  6. 6.

    Geisinger (2002).

  7. 7.

    For a literature review of expressive law, see Geisinger and Stein (2007). For an initial assessment of the expressive value of the CRPD, see Stein and Lord (2009a), p. 17. For an initial assessment of the expressive effect of American disability law, see Stein (2004).

  8. 8.

    An account of the expressive law value of human rights treaties is set forth in Geisinger and Stein (2008).

  9. 9.

    See, e.g., CRPD, supra note 1, Article 8 (requiring States Parties “to adopt immediate, effective and appropriate measures…[t]o raise awareness throughout society, including at the family level, regarding persons with disabilities, and to foster respect for the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities…”). For an example of human rights education tools fostering the expressive value of the CRPD, see Lord et al. (2007).

  10. 10.

    CRPD, supra note 1, at Preamble para. (k) (expressing concern that “persons with disabilities continue to face barriers in their participation as equal members of society and violations of their human rights in all parts of the world”).

  11. 11.

    International legal scholars since Grotius appreciate the international system as a social system, Grotius (1625). Moreover, the highly influential New Haven School of international law rests on the view of law as a social process. See, e.g., Lasswell and McDougal (1992). On the narrower understanding of international law as a process, see especially Higgins (1994).

  12. 12.

    See Finnemore (1996) suggesting that the effects of norms are shared understandings according to which actor identities and interests are shaped.

  13. 13.

    Stein and Lord (2012), p. 27.

  14. 14.

    See, e.g., UN Charter, at Article 1, para. 3 (expressing a core purpose of the UN to “achieve international cooperation in solving problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion”).

  15. 15.

    See, e.g., UDHR, UNGA Resolution 217A (III), Articles 1-2, UN GAOR, 3d Sess., UN Doc. A/810 (Dec 12, 1948) (proclaiming that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights” and are “entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status”).

  16. 16.

    See UN Press Release (2006) “Lauding disability convention as ‘dawn of a new era’ UN urges speedy ratification” http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20975&Cr=disab (summarizing statements made on the adoption of the Convention and heralding its significance for persons with disabilities and for the development of international human rights law). Accessed July 12, 2015.

  17. 17.

    While human rights treaty bodies have elicited general principles to guide the interpretation of human rights treaties, they have been discerned from the texts as a whole as they do not have specific provisions outlining general principles. For example, the CRC Committee has identified four main principles to guide its interpretation of the CRC. These include Article 2 (non-discrimination); Article 3, para. 1 (best interests of the child); Article 6 (right to life and maximum possible survival and development); and Article 12 (respect for the views of the child and participation). CRC, UNGA Resolution 44/25, Annex, 44 UN GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 167, UN Doc. A/44/49 (1989), entered into force Sept 2, 1990.

  18. 18.

    Stein and Lord (2008a); Lord (2004c).

  19. 19.

    Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities, Report of the Working Group to the Ad Hoc Committee, UN Doc. A/AC.265/2004/WG.1, para. 1 (Jan 27, 2004). The Working Group included 12 DPOs, see id. at para. 2. For a consideration of NGOs’ participation in the early negotiations of the CRPD, see Lord (2004b).

  20. 20.

    Lord (2009), p. 226.

  21. 21.

    CRPD, supra note 1, at Preamble para. (o).

  22. 22.

    See UN Press Release (2006) “Lauding disability convention as ‘dawn of a new era’ UN urges speedy ratification” http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=20975&Cr=disab (summarizing statements made on the adoption of the CRPD and heralding its significance for persons with disabilities and for the development of international human rights law). Accessed July 12, 2015.

  23. 23.

    Quinn and Degener (2002).

  24. 24.

    CRPD, supra note 1, at Article 3(a) (expressing a fundamental principle as “[r]espect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one's own choices, and independence of persons”).

  25. 25.

    See CRPD, supra note 1, at Article 12.

  26. 26.

    For a general treatment of how process affects substance in the context of deciding fundamental issues impacting persons with disabilities, see Minow (1985).

  27. 27.

    CEDAW, UNGA Resolution 34/180, 34 UN GAOR Supp. No. 46, UN Doc. A/RES/34/46 (Dec 18, 1979).

  28. 28.

    Lord et al. (2010).

  29. 29.

    CRPD, supra note 1, at Preamble.

  30. 30.

    See id.

  31. 31.

    See id. See also Lord (2015b), p. 200.

  32. 32.

    CRPD, supra note 1.

  33. 33.

    See Lord and Stein (2009).

  34. 34.

    Lord (2015a).

  35. 35.

    Lord (2012a). Lord and Stein (2016a).

  36. 36.

    OP-CEDAW, UNGA Resolution 54/4, 54 UN GAOR Supp. No. 49, UN Doc. A/RES/54/49 (Oct 15, 1999).

  37. 37.

    CRC, UNGA Resolution 44/25, 44 UN GAOR Supp. No. 49, UN Doc. A/RES/44/49 (Nov 20, 1989).

  38. 38.

    OP-CRC-AC, UNGA Resolution 54/263, 54 UN GAOR Supp. No. 49, UN Doc. A/RES/54/49, Annex I (May 25, 2000).

  39. 39.

    OP-CRC-SC, UNGA Resolution 54/263, 54 UN GAOR Supp. No. 49, UN Doc. A/RES/54/263, Annex II (May 25, 2000).

  40. 40.

    See generally Edwards (2003), pp. 46–80.

  41. 41.

    Lord (2014), pp. 155–178. See also Lord and Stein (2015).

  42. 42.

    CRPD, supra note 1 at Article 11.

  43. 43.

    On the interrelationship between human rights and IHL, see International Committee of the Red Cross, IHL and Human Rights, http://www.icrc.org/eng/war-and-law/ihl-other-legal-regmies/ihl-human-rights/index.jsp (“International humanitarian law and international human rights law are two distinct but complementary bodies of law. They are both concerned with the protection of the life, health and dignity of individuals. IHL applies in armed conflict while human rights law applies at all times, in peace and in war.”). Accessed July 12, 2015.

  44. 44.

    CRPD, supra note 1 at Article 5.

  45. 45.

    What little there is concentrates on humanitarian protection in the context of refugees and IDPs. See, e.g., Lord and Stein (2012); Lord and Stein (2011), p. 31.

  46. 46.

    Rome Statute of the ICC, UN Doc. A/CONF.183.9, Article 7 (July 17, 1998) (“‘[C]rime against humanity’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: … (h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectively on … gender”).

  47. 47.

    UN Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Report of the detailed findings of the commission of inquiry on human rights in the DPRK, UN Doc. A/HRC/25/63 (Feb 7, 2014). For commentary on the invisibility of disability-based persecution in the work of the Commission, see Lord and Won (2014).

  48. 48.

    Lord (2004a).

  49. 49.

    Stein et al. (2009).

  50. 50.

    Stein (2007).

  51. 51.

    Lord et al. (2012).

  52. 52.

    Stein (2006); Daniels (2008).

  53. 53.

    Kayess and French (2008), p. 15.

  54. 54.

    See, Lord (2012b); Stein and Tolchin (2014); Quinn et al. (2014).

  55. 55.

    See CRPD, supra note 1, at Article 4.

  56. 56.

    See CRPD, supra note 1.

  57. 57.

    Lord (2015a).

  58. 58.

    See, e.g., Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, adopted Sept 18, 1997, 2056 UNTS 241, 36 ILM 1507 (1997), entered into force Mar 1, 1999, at Article 11; International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, especially in Africa, adopted June 17, 1994, 1954 UNTS 3, 33 ILM 1332, entered into force Dec 26, 1996, Article 22; UN Framework Convention Climate Change, adopted May 9, 1992, 31 ILM 849 (1992), entered into force Mar 21, 1994, Articles 10 and 14, para. 2.

  59. 59.

    CRPD, supra note 1, at Article 40. Stein and Lord (2010).

  60. 60.

    Lord and Stein (2016b).

  61. 61.

    See, e.g., International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, especially in Africa, cit.; UN Framework Convention Climate Change, cit., Articles 10 and 14, para. 2.

  62. 62.

    See Stein and Lord (2008b), p. 109.

  63. 63.

    CRPD, at Article 33, para. 1. See de Beco (2011, 2013).

  64. 64.

    Id. at Article 33, para. 1.

  65. 65.

    Id. at Article 33, para. 2.

  66. 66.

    Id. at Article 33, para. 3.

  67. 67.

    Lord and Stein (2014), p. 97.

  68. 68.

    Global meetings include those convened by the Harvard Law School Project on Disability to work out details of the monitoring proposal submitted to the Sixth Ad Hoc Committee session, supra note 10, available at http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2005/12/02_disabilities.php (webpage announcement); and to discuss implementation more generally, available at http://www.law.harvard.edu/media/2007/02/16/hrpdisabilityconv.rm (webcast of public statements). Regional meetings include a September 27, 2007 convening by the Asia Pacific Forum on National Rights Institutions to discuss national level monitoring and implementation, available at http://www.asiapacificforum.net/news/now-the-real-work-starts-implementing-the-un-disability-convention.html, and a historic public forum held on September 5, 2007, in Seoul, Korea at which Asia Pacific NHRIs discussed monitoring and implementation with representatives of worldwide DPOs, see Asia Pacific Forum (2015) Now the real work starts: implementing the UN Disability Convention. In: Asia Pacific Forum News. Asia Pacific Forum. http://www.asiapacificforum.net/news/now-the-real-work-starts-implementing-the-un-disability-convention.html. Accessed July 12, 2015.

  69. 69.

    Quinn and Flynn (2012).

  70. 70.

    The MDGs were derived from the Millennium Declaration, adopted at the conference that has since become the centerpiece for achievement the goals of the Declaration. UNGA Resolution 55/2, UN Millennium Declaration. http://www.unmilleniumproject.org/documents/ares552e.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2015. The official UN website for the MDGs sets forth all eight MDGs as derived from the Millennium Declaration and identifies key targets and benchmarks, along with successes. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals. Accessed July 12, 2015.

  71. 71.

    For a discussion of the MDGs and their implicit, but unstated, link to disability issues, see Lord and Guernsey (2005).

  72. 72.

    See MDGs at Millennium Development Goal 1 (calling for the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger by 2017).

  73. 73.

    See id. at Millennium Development Goal 6 (calling for efforts to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases).

  74. 74.

    See id. at Millennium Development Goal 2 (calling for the achievement of universal primary education).

  75. 75.

    Stein et al. (2013), p. 274.

  76. 76.

    Especially the World Bank as a UN specialized agency. See Stein and Stein (2014).

  77. 77.

    CRPD, at Article 31, para. 1.

  78. 78.

    Id. at Article 31, para. 1 (a-b).

  79. 79.

    Stein and Lord (2010).

  80. 80.

    Kenya, for example, reports less than one percent of its population as having a disability compared to 20 percent in New Zealand. See Mont (2007).

  81. 81.

    Centers for Disease Control (2015) Washington Group on Disability Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/citygroup.htm. Accessed July 12, 2015.

  82. 82.

    See, e.g., International Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, especially in Africa, cit., Article 16 (providing for the detailed integration and coordination of the collection, analysis and exchange of data and information of matters relevant to the treaty).

  83. 83.

    ECtHR, Alajos Kiss v. Hungary, Application No. 38832/06, judgment of May 20, 2010; CRPD Committee, Zsolt Bujdosó and five others v. Hungary, CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011. Both cases were initiated by members of the Harvard Law School Project on Disability and later supported in interventions by the same, highlighting the need for coordinated activity by civil society in order to forward the CRPD’s mandates.

  84. 84.

    Lazar and Stein (2016).

  85. 85.

    Fiala-Butora et al. (2014); Lord et al. (2014).

  86. 86.

    Stein (2010), p. 77; Lord et al. (2009), p. 71.

Table of Cases

  • CRPD Committee 20.09.2013, Communication No. 4/2011, Zsolt Bujdosó and five others v Hungary, CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011

    Google Scholar 

  • ECtHR 20.05.2010, Application No. 38832/06, Alajos Kiss v Hungary, IHRL 3619 (ECHR 2010)

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Daniels N (2008) Setting limits fairly: learning to share resources for health. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beco G (2011) Article 33 (2) of the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Another role for national human rights institutions? Neth Q Hum Rights 29:84–106

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beco G (ed) (2013) Article 33 of the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: national structures for the implementation and monitoring of the convention. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards A (2003) Age and gender dimensions in international refugee law. In: Feller E, Turk V, Nicholson F (eds) Refugee protection in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 46–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala-Butora J, Stein MA, Lord JE (2014) The democratic life of the union: toward equal voting participation for Europeans with disabilities. Harv Int Law Journ 55(1):71–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore M (1996) National interests in international society. Cornell Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisinger A (2002) A belief change theory of expressive law. Iowa Law Rev 88(1):35–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisinger A, Stein MA (2007) A theory of expressive international law. Vanderbilt Law Rev 60(1):77–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisinger A, Stein MA (2008) Rational choice, reputation, and human rights treaties. U Mich Law Rev 106:1129–1142

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotius H (1625) De jure belli ac pacis: Libre tres. In: Scott JB (ed) (1925) Classics of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins R (1994) Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayess R, French P (2008) Out of darkness into light? Introducing the Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Hum Rights Law Rev 8(1):1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell H, McDougal M (1992) Jurisprudence for a free society. Kluwer Academic, Hingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar J, Stein MA (eds) (2017) Disability, human rights, and information technology. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE (2004a) Genocide, crimes against humanity and human rights abuses against people with disabilities. In: Shelton DL (ed) Encyclopedia of genocide and crimes against humanity. Macmillan Reference USA, Thomson Gale, Detroit, New York and others

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE (2004b) Mirror, mirror on the wall: voice accountability and NGOs in human rights standard setting. Seton Hall J Dipl Int Relat 5:93

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE (2004c) NGO participation in human rights law and process. ILSA J Int Comp Law 10:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE (2009) Participatory justice, the UN disability human rights Convention, and the right to participate in sport, recreation, and play. In: Kumpuvuori J, Scheinin M (eds) The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: multidisciplinary perspectives. VIKE, Helsinki, p 226

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE (2012a) HIV/AIDS, disability and discrimination: a thematic guide on inclusive law, policy and programming. One Billion Strong, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE (2012b) Screened out of existence: the Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and selective screening policies. Int J Disabil Commun Rehabil 12(2). http://www.ijdcr.ca/VOL12_02/articles/lord.shtml. Accessed 12 July 2015

  • Lord JE (2014) International humanitarian law and disability: paternalism, protection or rights? In: Gill M, Schlund-Vials C (eds) Disability, human rights and the limits of humanitarianism. Ashgate, Burlington, pp 155–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE (2015a) Accessing socio-economic rights: the rights of persons with disabilities. In: Langford M, Reidel E (eds) Equality and socio-economic rights: international law in context. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE (2015b) Deaf identity and rights in Africa: advancing equality through the Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. In: Cooper AC, Rashid KK (eds) Citizenship, politics, difference: perspectives from Sub-Saharan signed language communities. Gallaudet University Press, Washington, p 200

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Guernsey KN (2005) Inclusive development and the comprehensive and integral international convention on the protection and promotion of the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. Paper contributed at 5th session of the ad hoc committee of the International Disability and Development Consortium, January 2005. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahc5docs/ahc5iddc.doc. Accessed 12 July 2015

  • Lord JE, Stein MA (2008) The domestic incorporation of human rights law and the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Wash Law Rev 83:449–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA (2009) Social rights and the relational value of the rights to participate in sport, recreation, and play. Boston Univ Int Law J 27:249–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA (2011) Human rights and humanitarian assistance for refugees and internally displaced persons with disabilities. In: Plessis IG, Van Reenan T (eds) Aspects of disability law in Africa. Pretoria University Law Press, Pretoria, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA (2012) Implications of the UN disability Convention for refugees and internally displaced persons with disabilities. Ariz J Int Comp Law 28:401

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA (2014) Prospects and practices for CRPD implementation in Africa. In: Ngwena C, Viljoen F (eds) African YB on disability rights, vol 1. Pretoria University Law Press, Pretoria, p 97

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA (2015) Peacebuilding and reintegrating ex-combatants with disabilities. Int’l J H R 19:277

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA (2016a) Critical social and economic issues of development and human rights: disability. In: Marks SP, Rajagopal B (eds) Research handbook on human rights and development (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA (2016b) The Committee on the rights of persons with disabilities. In: Alston P, Mégret F (eds) The United Nations and human rights: a critical appraisal. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Won JC (2014) Missed opportunity? UN report describes human rights abuses but leaves out the status of the disabled. Korean Quarterly

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE et al (2007) Human rights. YES! http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/edumat/hreduseries/TB6/. Accessed 12 July 2015

  • Lord JE, Stein MA, Waterstone ME (2009) Natural disasters and people with disabilities. In: Malloy RP (ed) Law and recovery from natural disaster: Hurricane Katrina. Ashgate, Burlington, p 71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA, Stein PJ (2010) The law and politics of US participation in the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. In: Quinn G, Waddington L (eds) European yearbook of disability law, vol 2. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp 29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA, Tolchin DW (2012) Equal access to health care under the UN disability rights Convention. In: Rhodes R, Battin M, Silvers A (eds) Medicine and social justice: essays on the distribution and care, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord JE, Stein MA, Fiala-Butora J (2014) Facilitating an equal right to vote for persons with disabilities. J Hum Rights Pract 6(1):115–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minow M (1985) Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe. Univ Mich J Law Reform 18:933

    Google Scholar 

  • Mont D (2007) Measuring disability prevalence. SP Discussion Paper No. 0706. Disability and Development Team. HDNSP, World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn G (2009) The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: towards a new international politics of disability. Tex J Civ Lib Civ Rights 15:33–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn G, Degener T (2002) Human rights and disability. http://ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HRDisability.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2015

  • Quinn G, Flynn E (2012) Transatlantic borrowings: the past and future of EU non-discrimination law and policy on the ground of disability. Am J Comp Law 60(1):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn G, de Paor A, Blanck P (2014) Genetic discrimination: transatlantic perspectives on the case for a European level legal response. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA (2004) Under the empirical radar: an initial expressive law analysis of the ADA. Virginia Law Rev 90:1151–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA (2006) Distributive justice and disability. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA (2007) Disability human rights. Calif Law Rev 95:75–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA (2010) Ensuring respect for the rights of people with disabilities. In: Pang VO, Fernekes W, Nelson J (eds) The human impact of natural disasters: issues for the inquiry-based classroom. National Council for the Social Studies, Silver Spring, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Lord JE (2008a) Participatory justice, and the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Tex J Civ Lib Civ Rights 13(2):167–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Lord JE (2008b) The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities as a vehicle for social transformation. In: National monitoring mechanisms of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos de México, Network of the Americas & Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, p 109

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Lord JE (2009a) Future prospects for the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. In: Arnardóttir OM, Quinn G (eds) The UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Brill, Leiden, pp 17–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Lord JE (2009b) The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: process, substance, and prospects. In: Isa FG, De Feyter K (eds) International protection of human rights: achievements and challenges. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, p 495

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Lord JE (2010) Monitoring the Committee on the rights of persons with disabilities: innovations, lost opportunities, and future potential. Hum Rights Quart 32(3):689–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Lord JE (2012) Forging effective international agreements: lessons from the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. In: Heymann J, Cassola A (eds) Making equal rights real: taking effective action to overcome global challenges. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Stein PJ (2014) Disability, development, and human rights: a mandate and framework for international financial institutions. UC Davis Law Rev 47:1231–1278

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Tolchin DW (2014) The Convention on the rights of people with disabilities: what is at stake for phychiatrists and the patients we serve. Phys Med Rehabil J 6(4):356–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Stein PJ, Weiss D, Lang R (2009) Health care and the UN disability rights Convention. Lancet 374(9704):1796–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein MA, Lord JE, McClain-Nhlapo C (2013) Education and HIV/AIDS: disability rights and inclusive development. In: Langford M, Sumner A, Yamin AE (eds) Millennium development goals and human rights: past, present and future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 274

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ulfstein G (2005) Reweaving the fabric of international law? Patterns of consent in environmental framework agreements. In: Wolfrum R, Roben V (eds) Developments of international law in treaty making. Springer, Berlin, p 145

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet E. Lord .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lord, J.E., Stein, M.A. (2017). Charting the Development of Human Rights Law Through the CRPD. In: Della Fina, V., Cera, R., Palmisano, G. (eds) The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43790-3_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43790-3_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43788-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43790-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics