Skip to main content

Managing Mosques in the Netherlands: Constitutional versus Culturalist Secularism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Secularisms in a Postsecular Age?

Abstract

This chapter engages with the emergent ethnographic study of secular practice by focusing on how local bureaucracies manage Muslim public presence in the Netherlands, particularly the construction of new mosques and the amplifying of the Muslim call to prayer. Whereas the public debate about mosque issues is often dominated by what we call a ‘culturalist’ or ‘nativist’ form of secularism, in practice bureaucrats are often led by a ‘constitutional secularism’ that protects the constitutional rights of Dutch Muslims. Constitutional secularism is one way of tackling Islamophobia and protecting the rights of religious minorities in general. Moving beyond the critique of secularism, we show that the ethnographic study of actual secular practice remains crucially important to avoid monolithic text-based understandings of the secular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    What we call constitutional secularism is close to what Bader (2007) describes as liberal-democratic constitutionalism. Bader avoids the term secularism because it has become too cacophonous to use in a clear way (2012). In the Netherlands, secularism is currently often equated with ‘the separation of church and state’ (de scheiding van kerk en staat), which is in fact not mentioned in the Dutch Constitution.

  2. 2.

    We are aware that for Habermas (1989) the public sphere is not a given reality but a project, and therefore never fully public, which implies that it is only from an ideal position that one can claim that secularism does or does not permit a Habermasian public sphere.

Bibliography

  • Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, Veit. 2007. Secularism or Democracy? Associational Governance of Religious Diversity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Post-secularism or Liberal-Democratic Constitutionalism? Erasmus Law Review 5(1): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, Sindre. 2009. Contesting Secularism/s: Secularism and Islam in the Work of Talal Asad. Anthropological Theory 9(2): 188–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekers, Daan. 2015. Precarious Piety. Pursuits of Faith among Young Muslims and Christians in the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, VU University Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernts, Ton, and Joantine Berghuijs. 2016. God in Nederland 1966–2015. Utrecht: Ten Have.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, Rajeev. 1999. Secularism and Its Critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. States, Religious Diversity, and the Crisis of Secularism. The Hedgehog Review 12(3): 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, John R. 2009. Can Islam Be French? Pluralism and Pragmatism in a Secularist State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, John, Christophe Bertossi, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Mona Lena Krook. 2014. European States and their Muslim Citizens. The Impact of Institutions on Perceptions and Boundaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2006. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Empire and Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannell, Fenella. 2010. The Anthropology of Secularism. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabashi, Hamid. 2013. Being a Muslim in the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschkind, Charles. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic Counterpublics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBrien, Julie, and Mathijs Pelkmans. 2008. Turning Marx on His Head: Missionaries, “Extremists” and Archaic Secularists in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Critique of Anthropology 28(1): 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modood, Tariq. 2015. State-Religion Connections and Multicultural Citizenship. In Religion, Secularism, and Constitutional Democracy, ed. Jean Cohen and Cecile Laborde, 182–203. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navaro-Yashin, Yael. 2002. Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Anuradha Dingwaney, and Rajeswari Sunder Rajan. 2007. The Crisis of Secularism in India. London and Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, Thirukodikaval Nilakanta. 2009. The Future of Secularism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamimi Arab, Pooyan. 2015. ‘A Minaret of Light’: Transducing the Islamic Call to Prayer? Material Religion 11(2): 136–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 2002. Modern Social Imaginaries. Public Culture 14(1): 91–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Valk, Ineke. 2012. Islamofobie en Discriminatie. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Monitor Moslim Discriminatie. Amsterdam: Imes Report Series, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkaaik, Oskar. 2009. Ritueel Burgerschap: Een Essay over Nationalisme en Secularisme in Nederland. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Designing the ‘Anti-Mosque’: Identity, Religion and Affect in Contemporary European Mosque Design. Social Anthropology 20(1): 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Michael, Jonathan VanAntwerpen, and Craig Calhoun. 2010. Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Isaac. 2014. Religion Out Loud: Religious Sound, Public Space, and American Pluralism. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verkaaik, O., Arab, P.T. (2017). Managing Mosques in the Netherlands: Constitutional versus Culturalist Secularism. In: Mapril, J., Blanes, R., Giumbelli, E., Wilson, E. (eds) Secularisms in a Postsecular Age?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43726-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics