Abstract
The post-communist region furnishes students of democratization with a fertile field for investigation. Countries of the region span almost the entire spectrum of possible outcomes in terms of political regimes. Three decades ago, all of Eurasia and Eastern Europe slumbered in a hyper-authoritarian deep freeze. Now the region includes some of the world’s most open polities (e.g. Estonia) and some of its most closed (e.g. Uzbekistan), as well as everything in between. Empirical investigation suggests that several big background variables that are often considered drivers of democratization are indeed strongly associated with cross-national variation in regime outcomes in the region. But structure is not destiny; the performance of some countries contradicts the expectations raised by conventional theories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Abrams, N. A., & Fish, M. S. (2015). Policies first, institutions second: Lessons from Estonia’s economic reforms. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(6), 491–513.
Alachonvič, A. (2015, August 26). How Russia’s subsidies save the Belarusian economy. Belarus Digest. http://belarusdigest.com/story/how-russias-subsidies-save-belarusian-economy-23118. Retrieved February 2016.
Babeck, W., Fish, S., Reichenbecher, Z. (2012). Rewriting a constitution: Georgia’s shift toward Europe. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Brinks, D., & Coppedge, M. (2006). Diffusion is no illusion: neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 463–489.
Bunce, V. (2000). Comparative democratization: big and bounded generalizations. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6–7), 703–734.
Diamond, L. (1992). Economic development and democracy reconsidered. American Behavioral Scientist, 35(4–5), 450–499.
Dimitrova, A., & Pridham, G. (2004). International actors and democracy promotion in Eastern Europe: the integration model and its limits. Democratization, 11(5), 91–112.
Fish, M. S. (1995). Democracy from scratch: opposition and regime in the new Russian revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fish, M. S. (1998). Mongolia: democracy without prerequisites. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 127–141.
Fish, M. S. (2005). Democracy derailed in Russia: the failure of open politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fish, M. S. (2006). Stronger legislatures, stronger democracies. Journal of Democracy, 17(1), 5–20.
Fish, M. S. (2011). Are Muslims distinctive? A look at the evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fish, M. S., & Wittenberg, J. (2009). Failed democratization. In C. W. Haerpfer, P. Bernhagen, R. F. Inglehart, C. Welzel (Eds.), Democratization (pp. 249–265). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hofmann, E. T. (2011, July 7). Reflections on Orthodoxy and the Construction of Civil Society and Democracy in Russia. Washington, DC: The Kennan Institute of the Woodrow Wilson Center. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/reflections-orthodoxy-and-the-construction-civil-society-and-democracyrussia. Retrieved January 2016.
Horowitz, D. L. (1996). Comparing democratic systems. In L. Diamond & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The global resurgence of democracy (2nd ed., pp. 143–149). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Jones Luong, P., & Weinthal, E. (2010). Oil is not a curse: ownership structure and institutions in Soviet successor states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kopstein, J., & Reilly, D. A. (2000). Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the post-communist world. World Politics, 53(1), 1–37.
Linz, J. J., & Valenzuela, A. (Eds.) (1994). The failure of presidential democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1981). Political man: the social bases of politics (Exp. ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited: 1993 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 1–22.
Lussier, D. N. (2016). Constraining Elites in Russia and Indonesia: Political Participation and Regime Survival. New York: Cambridge University Press
Lussier, D. N., & Fish, M. S. (2012). Indonesia: the benefits of civic engagement. Journal of Democracy, 23(1), 70–84.
Mainwaring, S., & Shugart, M. S. (Eds.) (1997). Presidential democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Møller, J. (2009). Post-communist regime change: a comparative study. New York: Routledge.
Papanikolaou, A. (2012). The mystical as political: democracy and non-radical orthodoxy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Petrovic, M. (2013). The democratic transition of post-communist Europe: in the shadow of post-communist differences and uneven Europeanization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pop-Eleches, G. (2007). Historical legacies and post-communist regime change. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 908–926.
Radelet, S. (2010). Emerging Africa: how seventeen countries are leading the way. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
Ross, M. L. (2013). The oil curse: how petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Samuels, R. J. (2003) Machiavelli’s children: leaders and their legacies in Italy and Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Stepan, A., & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: parliamentarism versus presidentialism. World Politics, 46(1), 1–22.
Varieties of Democracy. (2016). V-Dem data version 6. https://v-dem.net/en/data/data-version-6/. Retrieved February 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fish, M.S. (2017). Chapter 1: What Has a Quarter Century of Post-Communism Taught Us About the Correlates of Democracy?. In: Fish, M., Gill, G., Petrovic, M. (eds) A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43437-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43437-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43436-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43437-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)