Abstract
Fibrosarcoma can occur at all ages (Fig. 12.1) and in all sites (Fig. 12.2). Before the era of immunohistochemistry, fibrosarcoma was a very fashionable diagnosis and represented one of the most common types of soft tissue sarcoma. With the development of immunohistochemical and molecular techniques, it is now rare for a sarcoma to be termed as fibrosarcoma, which by its name implies fibroblasts as the cell of origin. With increasing sophistication in diagnosis, more and more subtypes of fibroblastic sarcomas are now appreciated, all relatively rare tumors, but some show distinct molecular aberrations. While surgery for essentially all and radiation for some patients remain the standard of care for primary therapy for any of these soft tissue sarcomas, there has been less experience with each of these subtypes of tumors with respect to chemotherapy than with more common diagnoses. Beyond dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, recommendations presented here are provisional and should be considered a starting point for prospective and hopefully multicenter clinical trials including patients with these diagnoses.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Keywords
- Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
- Low grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (of Evans)
- Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma
- Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor
- Infantile fibrosarcoma
- Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma
- Adult fibrosarcoma
- Translocation
- PDGF
- ALK
- INI1
Fibrosarcoma can occur at all ages (Fig. 12.1) and in all sites (Fig. 12.2). Before the era of immunohistochemistry, fibrosarcoma was a very fashionable diagnosis and represented one of the most common types of soft tissue sarcoma. With the development of immunohistochemical and molecular techniques, it is now rare for a sarcoma to be termed as fibrosarcoma, which by its name implies fibroblasts as the cell of origin. With increasing sophistication in diagnosis, more and more subtypes of fibroblastic sarcomas are now appreciated, all relatively rare tumors, but some show distinct molecular aberrations. While surgery for essentially all and radiation for some patients remain the standard of care for primary therapy for any of these soft tissue sarcomas, there has been less experience with each of these subtypes of tumors with respect to chemotherapy than with more common diagnoses. Beyond dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, recommendations presented here are provisional and should be considered a starting point for prospective and hopefully multicenter clinical trials including patients with these diagnoses.
1 Outcome
2 Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP ) is the most common of the fibrosarcomas overall. It presents in middle age (Fig. 12.5) and at essentially any anatomic site (Fig. 12.6). DFSP is a superficial sarcoma involving dermis and subcutis, with a distinctive horizontal rather than vertical growth and associated with a high rate of local recurrence. Rare DFSP will metastasize, usually after at least a decade of recurrences and degeneration to a fibrosarcomatous variant. Deaths from disease are uncommon and limited to those people with the development of metastatic disease.
DFSP is characterized by CD34 positivity and the presence of a recurrent t(17;22), resulting in a COL1A1-PDGFB fusion [1]. By FISH or karyotype, one can visualize the distinct amplification of the fusion gene, as a ring or marker chromosome, containing multiple copies of the translocation product [2]. Clinically it typically presents as a plaque-like lesion, and microscopically, the tumor is composed of monotonous spindle cells arranged in a storiform pattern. The transformation of DFSP to fibrosarcoma is seen in 10–15 % of cases, which increases the metastatic risk [3]. A pigmented form of disease (Bednar tumor) and a version found in children (giant cell fibroblastoma) are also characterized by the same translocation and behave similarly biologically [4]. For unclear reasons, multifocal DFSP is observed in some patients with adenosine deaminase deficiency (ADA) [5], whose gene locus is located on chromosome 20.
Primary surgery is the standard of care, without adjuvant radiation. There is a high risk of local recurrence of the tumor, and wide margins are generally advocated. One school of thought has led to use of Mohs micrographic surgery for this diagnosis, especially when the tumor occurs on the head and neck area as a primary site (Fig. 12.7); however, this surgical technique is inadequate and often accompanied by local recurrence. Adjuvant radiation, while not generally recommended for primary disease, should be considered for recurrent disease. Castle et al reported on 53 patients (45 % had 1 or more prior recurrence) treated with surgery and RT. With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the 10-year local control was 93 % [6].
For recurrent disease, our experience is that standard doxorubicin and ifosfamide are strikingly ineffective. In contrast, as with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), imatinib can be very useful for disease recurrence [7–10]. In our experience the median time to progression is shorter than that seen for GIST but important palliation can be achieved with imatinib. We have observed some benefit from other tyrosine kinase inhibitors in DFSP as well, but none that stands out as particularly meaningful in terms of durability of response (Tables 12.1 and 12.2). Given the surprising activity of PDGF receptor monoclonal antibody olaratumab in a clinical trial with doxorubicin in unselected sarcomas [11], the biology of DFSP begs the question of the utility of this agent in recurrent DFSP.
2.1 Outcome
Outcome is predicted based on fibrosarcomatous presentation, margin status, and depth of invasion. Local disease-free survival is shown in Fig. 12.8 and disease-specific survival for those presenting with primary lesions in Fig. 12.9.
3 Low-Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (Also Termed Evans Tumor)
Evans tumor is uncommon and occurs in young patients, (Fig. 12.10) involving the deep soft tissues of limbs or head and neck area (Figs. 12.11 and 12.12). Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) was first described by Dr. Harry Evans at MD Anderson in 1987, as a deceptively bland low-grade tumor that has the ability to metastasize (Fig. 12.13). Metastases can be observed even decades after initial diagnosis. The diagnosis is often challenging due to its bland phenotype, which mimic benign conditions, such as desmoid, SFT, perineurioma. The diagnosis is confirmed by MUC4 immunoreactivity [12] and genetics, by demonstrating the characteristic t(7;16)(q34;p11) involving FUS-CREB3L2 (or CREB3L1 in isolated cases) [12–14]. There is some histologic and genetic overlap of these tumors with sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas, see later [15].
Primary treatment is wide local excision with negative margins. Adjuvant radiation is reserved for positive margins or tumors with a high risk of local recurrence.
Regarding systemic therapy for metastatic disease, the long survival of even those with metastatic disease makes it difficult to recommend doxorubicin-based therapy (e.g., pegylated liposomal doxorubicin ), although we have seen at least minor responses in treated patients. Hopefully systemic agents that are less toxic that can be administered for a long period time can help achieve meaningful palliation for patients (Table 12.3). As with other slowly progressing metastatic sarcomas, we suggest attempting to match toxicity of any proposed therapy to the aggressiveness of the metastatic disease. Given that Evans tumor and sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma have distinct chromosomal rearrangements, it is hoped that epigenetic targets will have an impact on these diagnoses in the future. In the meantime, patients are prime candidates for clinical trials of novel agents.
3.1 Outcome
Local recurrence occurs (Fig. 12.14) but is uncommon and death from such tumors is relatively uncommon.
4 Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma
Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF ) is another rare version of fibrosarcoma that falls in the same spectrum with low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) on the basis of shared chromosomal translocations in a subset of tumors, but follows a much more aggressive clinical course, with a significantly higher metastatic rate and disease-related mortality [16, 17].
SEF is usually a sarcoma of deep soft tissues of the extremities, but paraspinal and intracranial locations have been also reported [18]. Histology shows monotonous epithelioid cells with scant amphophilic cytoplasm, arranged in sheets or cords, separated by refractile collagenous columns (H&E, ×400) (Fig. 12.15).
SEFs are often MUC4(+), which appears to help in the differential diagnosis with other fibrosarcomas [19]. Two-thirds of sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas harbor EWSR1-CREB3L1 fusions, followed by EWSR1-CREB3L2 in one-third of cases, with only rare examples of FUS-CREBL1 [15, 20]. In contrast, hybrid tumors with both elements of Evans tumor and sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma show mainly t(7;16) resulting in FUS-CREB3L2 [15].
Primary therapy is surgery alone; radiation may be considered for larger primary tumors. Regarding systemic therapy for recurrent disease, we have observed minor responses to anthracycline-based therapy (again typically pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, given the slow changing nature of the tumor) (Table 12.4). A case report indicated activity of irinotecan in a patient with metastatic SEF [21], suggesting that agents active in refractory Ewing sarcoma, e.g., irinotecan–temozolomide or cyclophosphamide–topotecan, could be considered for metastatic SEF. These data would be worth reporting even on a case-by-case basis at present, given the lack of any retrospective data on this issue.
5 Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT ) is a distinctive neoplasm composed of myofibroblastic-type cells intimately associated with a lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate. IMT can occur ubiquitously at any anatomic site, but show a predilection for lung, soft tissue, and viscera of children and young adults. Approximately half of the IMT harbor a clonal translocation involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-receptor tyrosine kinase , resulting in ALK overexpression, which can be detected by IHC. In the most comprehensive analysis to date, Lovly et al showed 85 % of IMT contain translocations in ALK, ROS1, or PDGFRB, filling in the gap for many of the previously ALK translocation negative tumors. RET can also be translocated in some tumors [22, 23]. ALK expression by immunohistochemistry correlates often, but not always, with ALK translocation. Interestingly, 90 % of the ALK fusion-negative IMT occurred in adults, while the reverse was true in children [23].
Regarding systemic therapy, a case report of a patient with ALK(+) IMT responded to crizotinib, an inhibitor of ALK, MET, and ROS1, while a patient with an ALK(-) IMT did not respond, as proof of principle of the utility of ALK inhibitors in patients with this diagnosis [24]. Resistance in this responding patient to the ALK inhibitor crizotinib has already been identified in a manner similar to that seen with imatinib and KIT in GIST [25]. A patient with no ALK translocation had a ROS1 translocation and had a radiological response to crizotinib. The presence of a PDGFRB translocation in one IMT suggests the use of multitargeted oral kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, though this has not been tested. Glucocorticoids may be useful for the inflammatory component of this tumor [26], but there are only case reports of systemic therapy for this diagnosis (Table 12.5).
6 Infantile Fibrosarcoma
Infantile fibrosarcoma most commonly occurs before age 1 (Fig. 12.16). Infantile fibrosarcoma carries a characteristic translocation, t(12;15)(p13;q25), encoding ETV6-NTRK3, which is also found in congenital mesoblastic nephroma [27, 28]. A recurrent NCOA2 gene rearrangement has been reported in a pathologically and clinically similar tumor, infantile spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma [29].
Despite its very rapid growth, children can do well with complete resection alone, avoiding radiation and chemotherapy. Chemotherapy can be considered if resection would be particularly morbid, with some positive results with an anthracycline- and alkylating-free regimen (Table 12.6) [30]. Chemotherapy for high-grade pediatric sarcomas, as commonly used for Ewing sarcoma or rhabdomyosarcoma, may be employed as well. A child with an infantile fibrosarcoma with a TRK3 translocation responded to a pan-TRK inhibitor [31], confirming the therapeutic relevance of this target in this rare pediatric tumor. Clinical trials will hopefully expand upon this hopeful initial result.
7 Myxoinflammatory Fibroblastic Sarcoma /Inflammatory Myxohyaline Tumor of Distal Extremities
Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma is recognized as a separate entity based on both histology and anatomic location, nearly always found from the wrists and ankles distally [32, 33]. A characteristic t(1;10)(p22;q24) translocation, sometimes unbalanced, involving translocations of genes MGEA5 and TGFBR3 has been identified [34, 35], and is also seen in the unusual benign tumor hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor [36, 37]. Both diagnoses also appear to have amplification of VGLL3 and other genes from chromosome 3p12. Notably, the translocation attaches the genes head to head, so that they are not part of the same fusion gene product. Metastases are rare, so conservative management with complete resection is the standard of care (e.g., ray amputation). Tejwani et al reported on 16 patients with primary disease treated with surgery and radiation (n = 13), none developed local recurrence [38]. Chemotherapy remains an unknown in this tumor (Table 12.7).
8 Adult-Type Fibrosarcoma
The adult-type fibrosarcoma is now a diagnosis of exclusion, after other immunohistochemical and/or molecular analyses have ruled out other sarcoma diagnoses (Fig. 12.17). Given the change in the diagnostic landscape for this tumor, it is hard to recommend adjuvant chemotherapy and anything other than standard chemotherapy agents or clinical trials for patients with metastatic disease (Table 12.8). More careful genomic analysis of this histology will hopefully identify molecular abnormalities to help us classify and better treat this sarcoma subset.
References
Pedeutour F, Simon MP, Minoletti F, et al. Translocation, t(17;22)(q22;q13), in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a new tumor-associated chromosome rearrangement. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1996;72:171–4.
Pedeutour F, Coindre JM, Sozzi G, et al. Supernumerary ring chromosomes containing chromosome 17 sequences. A specific feature of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans? Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1994;76:1–9.
Bowne WB, Antonescu CR, Leung DH, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathologic analysis of patients treated and followed at a single institution. Cancer. 2000;88:2711–20.
Maire G, Martin L, Michalak-Provost S, et al. Fusion of COL1A1 exon 29 with PDGFB exon 2 in a der(22)t(17;22) in a pediatric giant cell fibroblastoma with a pigmented Bednar tumor component. Evidence for age-related chromosomal pattern in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and related tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2002;134:156–61.
Kesserwan C, Sokolic R, Cowen EW, et al. Multicentric dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in patients with adenosine deaminase-deficient severe combined immune deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:762–9.e1.
Castle KO, Guadagnolo BA, Tsai CJ, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: long-term outcomes of 53 patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:585–90.
Rubin BP, Schuetze SM, Eary JF, et al. Molecular targeting of platelet-derived growth factor B by imatinib mesylate in a patient with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3586–91.
McArthur GA, Demetri GD, van Oosterom A, et al. Molecular and clinical analysis of locally advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with imatinib: Imatinib Target Exploration Consortium Study B2225. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:866–73.
Maki RG, Awan RA, Dixon RH, et al. Differential sensitivity to imatinib of 2 patients with metastatic sarcoma arising from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Int J Cancer. 2002;100:623–6.
Heinrich MC, Joensuu H, Demetri GD, et al. Phase II, open-label study evaluating the activity of imatinib in treating life-threatening malignancies known to be associated with imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2717–25.
Tap WD, Jones RL, Chmielowski B, et al. A randomized phase Ib/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of olaratumab (IMC-3G3), a human anti-platelet-derived growth factor {alpha} (PDGFR{alpha}) monoclonal antibody, with or without doxorubicin (Dox), in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:10501. ASCO Meeting Abstracts.
Doyle LA, Moller E, Dal Cin P, et al. MUC4 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:733–41.
Reid R, de Silva MV, Paterson L, et al. Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma and hyalinizing spindle cell tumor with giant rosettes share a common t(7;16)(q34;p11) translocation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1229–36.
Mertens F, Fletcher CD, Antonescu CR, et al. Clinicopathologic and molecular genetic characterization of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and cloning of a novel FUS/CREB3L1 fusion gene. Lab Invest. 2005;85:408–15.
Prieto-Granada C, Zhang L, Chen HW, et al. A genetic dichotomy between pure sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF) and hybrid SEF/low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma: a pathologic and molecular study of 18 cases. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2015;54:28–38.
Guillou L, Benhattar J, Gengler C, et al. Translocation-positive low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma: clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of a series expanding the morphologic spectrum and suggesting potential relationship to sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: a study from the French Sarcoma Group. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1387–402.
Antonescu CR, Rosenblum MK, Pereira P, et al. Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: a study of 16 cases and confirmation of a clinicopathologically distinct tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:699–709.
Bilsky MH, Schefler AC, Sandberg DI, et al. Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas involving the neuraxis: report of three cases. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:956–9; discussion 959–60.
Doyle LA, Wang WL, Dal Cin P, et al. MUC4 is a sensitive and extremely useful marker for sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: association with FUS gene rearrangement. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1444–51.
Arbajian E, Puls F, Magnusson L, et al. Recurrent EWSR1-CREB3L1 gene fusions in sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:801–8.
Pan CH, Han XQ, Li JS. CPT-11 chemotherapy rescued a patient with atypical sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma from emergent condition. Chin J Cancer Res. 2012;24:253–6.
Lovly CM, Gupta A, Lipson D, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors harbor multiple potentially actionable kinase fusions. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:889–95.
Antonescu CR, Suurmeijer AJ, Zhang L, et al. Molecular characterization of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors with frequent ALK and ROS1 gene fusions and rare novel RET rearrangement. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:957–67.
Butrynski JE, D’Adamo DR, Hornick JL, et al. Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1727–33.
Sasaki T, Okuda K, Zheng W, et al. The neuroblastoma-associated F1174L ALK mutation causes resistance to an ALK kinase inhibitor in ALK-translocated cancers. Cancer Res. 2010;70:10038–43.
Dagash H, Koh C, Cohen M, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the pancreas: a case report of 2 pediatric cases—steroids or surgery? J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1839–41.
Rubin BP, Chen CJ, Morgan TW, et al. Congenital mesoblastic nephroma t(12;15) is associated with ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion: cytogenetic and molecular relationship to congenital (infantile) fibrosarcoma. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:1451–8.
Knezevich SR, McFadden DE, Tao W, et al. A novel ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion in congenital fibrosarcoma. Nat Genet. 1998;18:184–7.
Mosquera JM, Sboner A, Zhang L, et al. Recurrent NCOA2 gene rearrangements in congenital/infantile spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2013;52:538–50.
Orbach D, Rey A, Cecchetto G, et al. Infantile fibrosarcoma: management based on the European experience. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:318–23.
Doebele RC, Davis LE, Vaishnavi A, et al. An oncogenic NTRK fusion in a patient with soft-tissue sarcoma with response to the tropomyosin-related kinase inhibitor LOXO-101. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:1049–57.
Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG. Acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma: a low-grade tumor of the hands and feet. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:911–24.
Montgomery EA, Devaney KO, Giordano TJ, et al. Inflammatory myxohyaline tumor of distal extremities with virocyte or Reed-Sternberg-like cells: a distinctive lesion with features simulating inflammatory conditions, Hodgkin’s disease, and various sarcomas. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:384–91.
Lambert I, Debiec-Rychter M, Guelinckx P, et al. Acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma with unique clonal chromosomal changes. Virchows Arch. 2001;438:509–12.
Hallor KH, Sciot R, Staaf J, et al. Two genetic pathways, t(1;10) and amplification of 3p11-12, in myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma, haemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumour, and morphologically similar lesions. J Pathol. 2009;217:716–27.
Wettach GR, Boyd LJ, Lawce HJ, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of a hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;182:140–3.
Antonescu CR, Zhang L, Nielsen GP, et al. Consistent t(1;10) with rearrangements of TGFBR3 and MGEA5 in both myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma and hemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumor. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50:757–64.
Tejwani A, Kobayashi W, Chen YL, et al. Management of acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma. Cancer. 2010;116:5733–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brennan, M.F., Antonescu, C.R., Alektiar, K.M., Maki, R.G. (2016). Fibrosarcoma and Its Variants. In: Management of Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41906-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41906-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41904-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41906-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)