Abstract
Environmental factors have long been known to be able to affect immune response from both animal studies and human studies. Over the past few decades, many efforts have been made to understand the interaction between various environmental factors, genetic factors, and the development of immune pathologies, such as allergic/autoimmune disease. An overview summary of the current knowledge about this complicated multicircuit control of the immune response is shown in Figure 2. The environmental factors and stressors related with mission to space include: microgravity, ecologically and environmentally closed systems, prolonged isolation, acute physical strain (such as during launch or landing), radiation, changes in sheer forces, as well as other variables that might have not been recognized yet. These environmental factors could each individually affect immune function, but they could also be interactive during spaceflight to alter immunity.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Telomere Length
- Environmental Exposure
- Extreme Environmental Condition
- Dopamine Receptor Gene
- Immune Pathology
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Environmental factors have long been known to be able to affect immune responses from both animal and human studies (Glover-Kerkvliet 1995; Monteleone et al. 2012; Rook 2013; Tedeschi et al. 2003). Over the past few decades, many efforts have been made to understand the interaction between various environmental factors, genetic factors, and the development of immune pathologies, such as allergic/autoimmune disease (Andiappan et al. 2014; Lau et al. 2014; Barne et al. 2013; Kauffmann and Demenais 2012; Willis-Owen and Valdar 2009). The environmental factors and stressors related with missions to space include: microgravity, ecologically and environmentally closed systems, prolonged isolation, acute physical strain (such as during launch or landing), radiation, changes in blood sheer forces, as well as other variables that might have not been recognized yet (Sonnenfeld et al. 2003; Gueguinou et al. 2009; Crucian and Sams 2009). These environmental factors could each individually affect immune functions, but they could also be interactive during spaceflight to alter immunity (Gueguinou et al. 2009; Crucian and Sams 2009).
Many studies of gene-environment interaction have indicated that individuals often vary in their susceptibility to environmental influences (Hunter 2005). Among others, two specific genetic polymorphisms, the serotonin transporter gene 5-HTTLPR and the dopamine receptor gene DRD4, have been widely studied. They have long been regarded as “vulnerability genes,” since carriers of particular alleles have higher risk of developing certain psychological problems or physiological disorders including inflammatory diseases in the face of adversity. However, more recent evidence indicates that they should more appropriately be treated as “plasticity genes” because carriers of the putative risk alleles seem to be especially susceptible to environmental influences either adverse influences or also favorable ones (Belsky and Hartman 2014). For 5-HTTLPR, it has been reported that in the case of Caucasian children under 18 years of age, short-allele carriers are more susceptible than long-allele carriers to both positive and negative developmental experiences (van Ijzendoorn et al. 2012). For DRD4, increased susceptibility has been found in the 7-repeat allele carriers with social circumstances such as maternal positivity and prosocial behavior, contextual stress and support, and several other kinds of environmental influences (Belsky and Hartman 2014).
Although genetic factor plays an important role in deciding reactions to environmental influences, interestingly, a recent systems-level analysis of 210 healthy twins has revealed that the human immune system is mainly “shaped” by environment, with a generally limited influence of genetic factors (Brodin et al. 2015). Environment, often described as combination of multiple “environmental exposures” is defined as “non-genetic” factor in the broad sense. Compared to the fast development of human genome sequencing tools for examining individual susceptibility through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), only a limited number of tools or methods are available so far for performing exposure assessments. Given that autoimmunity, chronic infection, and other chronic diseases develop predominantly from a combination of environmental exposures with restrained genetic background influences, the ability to measure and to describe environmental exposures becomes particularly demanding to understand the effects of specific environmental exposures on human health. Environmental exposures, if we only consider the external factors based on traditional understanding of environment, can be categorized as specific ones and general ones. Specific exposures may refer to radiation, infectious agents, environmental contaminants, air pollutions, diet, lifestyle factors (e.g., tobacco, alcohol), occupation, and medical interventions (Wild 2012). These factors have been the main focus of epidemiological studies seeking a link between environmental risk factors with chronic immune disease. For general exposures, they include the broader social, economic, and psychological influences on each person, for example, social status, education level, financial condition, physiological or psychological stress, geographic environment, and climate (Wild 2012). All these specific and general environmental exposures work together and may to a certain extent formulate the major causes of a large number of human disorders.
For space exploration, space travelers are exposed to many extreme environmental conditions, and for future interplanetary space exploration, such as Mars mission, astronauts can be exposed to a completely strange environment, which means new and more complex combinations of conditions of “environmental exposure.” How could these “environmental exposures” affect the human immune system and the health conditions? This is a critical and challenging question waiting for illumination. The main challenge here is to identify, to understand, and to elucidate the interaction between one type of exposure and the corresponding immune responses to that exposure. Knowledge achieved from this aspect can not only imply the link between an exposure and a disorder, but also provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of how an exposure might be applying its effects, which may add to the mass of evidence in allocating causality to an exposure-disease association and shed light on prevention strategies through modulation of specific identified mechanistic pathways. To investigate interactions between exposure, mechanism, and disease has become one of the emerging directions for biomarker discovery (Vineis and Perera 2007).
Space exploration, as mentioned in this volume, provides many extreme environmental conditions. The capability of addressing the interaction between exposure, mechanism, and health problem might yield innovative insights into how seemingly distinct risk factors, such as psychosocial stress (e.g., Yi 2015; Basner et al 2014), diet that is too salty (e.g., Yi et al. 2015) or too sweet, immune suppression, or immune hypersensitivity, act to produce similar health problems (Terry et al. 2011; Thayer and Kuzawa 2011). With an integrative systems biology approach in this regard, evaluations of psychosocial stress have been reported to be correlated with inflammation and telomere length, contributing evidence of how seemingly unrelated risk factors may act through shared biological pathways (Wild 2012).
Exposure of humans, animals, and cell cultures to spaceflight conditions has resulted in aberrance of immune responses (Gueguinou et al. 2009; Crucian and Sams 2009). Although cellular immunity has been shown to be primarily influenced, changes in humoral immune responses after spaceflight have also been observed (Gueguinou et al. 2009; Crucian and Sams 2009). Both the innate and adaptive immune systems were affected, characterized by changes in “cytokine production, leukocyte blastogenesis, NK cell and macrophage activity and production, antibody production, and enzyme functions in pathways important for immune functions” (Sonnenfeld 2013). Several recent studies have consistently indicated alterations in neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte populations (cell population numbers and function), altered expression of antibody variable heavy chain genes, and others in response to spaceflight conditions (Gueguinou et al. 2009; Crucian and Sams 2009). However, the question of which of the factors are responsible for the spaceflight-induced alterations of the immune functions has to be elucidated and some of which would be discussed in more detail in the following chapters.
References
Andiappan AK, Puan KJ, Lee B, Nardin A, Poidinger M et al (2014) Allergic airway diseases in a tropical urban environment are driven by dominant mono-specific sensitization against house dust mites. Allergy 69:501–509
Barne C, Alexis NE, Bernstein JA, Cohn JR, Demain JG et al (2013) Climate change and our environment: the effect on respiratory and allergic disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 1:137–141
Basner M, Dinges DF, Mollicone DJ, Savelev I, Ecker AJ, Di Antonio A, Jones CW, Hyder EC, Kan K, Morukov BV, Sutton JP (2014) Psychological and behavioral changes during confinement in a 520-day simulated interplanetary mission to mars. PLoS One 9, e93298
Belsky J, Hartman S (2014) Gene-environment interaction in evolutionary perspective: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. World Psychiatry 13:87–89
Brodin P, Jojic V, Gao T, Bhattacharya S, Angel CJ et al (2015) Variation in the human immune system is largely driven by non-heritable influences. Cell 160:37–47
Crucian B, Sams C (2009) Immune system dysregulation during spaceflight: clinical risk for exploration-class missions. J Leukoc Biol 86:1017–1018
Glover-Kerkvliet J (1995) Environmental assault on immunity. Environ Health Perspect 103:236–239
Gueguinou N, Huin-Schohn C, Bascove M, Bueb JL, Tschirhart E et al (2009) Could spaceflight-associated immune system weakening preclude the expansion of human presence beyond Earth’s orbit? J Leukoc Biol 86:1027–1038
Hunter DJ (2005) Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet 6:287–298
Kauffmann F, Demenais F (2012) Gene-environment interactions in asthma and allergic diseases: challenges and perspectives. J Allergy Clin Immunol 130:1229–1240; quiz 1241–1222
Lau MY, Dharmage SC, Burgess JA, Lowe AJ, Lodge CJ et al (2014) CD14 polymorphisms, microbial exposure and allergic diseases: a systematic review of gene-environment interactions. Allergy 69:1440–1453
Monteleone I, MacDonald TT, Pallone F, Monteleone G (2012) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in inflammatory bowel disease: linking the environment to disease pathogenesis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 28:310–313
Rook GA (2013) Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment: an ecosystem service essential to health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:18360–18367
Sonnenfeld G. (2012) Space flight modifies T cell activation—role of microgravity. Journal of Leukocyte Biology vol. 92(6);1125–1126
Sonnenfeld G, Butel JS, Shearer WT (2003) Effects of the space flight environment on the immune system. Rev Environ Health 18:1–17
Tedeschi A, Barcella M, Bo GA, Miadonna A (2003) Onset of allergy and asthma symptoms in extra-European immigrants to Milan, Italy: possible role of environmental factors. Clin Exp Allergy 33:449–454
Terry MB, Delgado-Cruzata L, Vin-Raviv N, Wu HC, Santella RM (2011) DNA methylation in white blood cells: association with risk factors in epidemiologic studies. Epigenetics 6:828–837
Thayer ZM, Kuzawa CW (2011) Biological memories of past environments: epigenetic pathways to health disparities. Epigenetics 6:798–803
van Ijzendoorn MH, Belsky J, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ (2012) Serotonin transporter genotype 5HTTLPR as a marker of differential susceptibility? A meta-analysis of child and adolescent gene-by-environment studies. Transl Psychiatry 2, e147
Vineis P, Perera F (2007) Molecular epidemiology and biomarkers in etiologic cancer research: the new in light of the old. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:1954–1965
Wild CP (2012) The exposome: from concept to utility. Int J Epidemiol 41:24–32
Willis-Owen SA, Valdar W (2009) Deciphering gene-environment interactions through mouse models of allergic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 123:14–23; quiz 24–15
Yi B (2015) Kinetics of stress-induced trafficking of blood immune cells and alterations of viral shedding under the exposure of acute stressors in healthy human subjects. Psychoneuroendocrinology 61:78
Yi B, Titze J, Chouker A (2015) Dietary sodium intake and risk of cardiovascular disease. JAMA Intern Med 175:1578–1579
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yi, B., Choukèr, A. (2016). The Immune System and Man-Environment Interaction: A General Understanding. In: The Immune System in Space: Are we prepared?. SpringerBriefs in Space Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41466-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41466-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41464-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41466-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)