Abstract
Nanoparticles used as drug nanocarriers offer unique possibilities to overcome cellular barriers in order to improve the delivery of various molecules, including biomacromolecules such as nucleic acids or proteins. Depending on nanoparticle characteristics and the type of cells considered, various mechanisms of internalization may occur, as well as subsequent intracellular trafficking pathways. Understanding these pathways may have important pharmacological implications. This chapter will review the main nanoparticle internalization and trafficking mechanisms and their experimental characterizations, allowing to understand how they are affected by nanoparticle physicochemical properties. The phagocytosis pathway will first be described, being increasingly well characterized and understood, which has allowed several successes in the treatment of some cancers and infectious diseases. In contrast, other non-phagocytic pathways encompass various complex mechanisms, such as clathrin-mediated endocytosis, caveolae-mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis. Although more challenging to control for pharmaceutical drug delivery applications, they are actively investigated in order to tailor nanocarriers able to deliver anticancer agents, nucleic acids, proteins, and peptides for therapeutic applications.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Caveolae
- Caveolae-mediated endocytosis
- Clathrin
- Clathrin-mediated endocytosis
- Endocytosis
- Endosome
- Internalization
- Intracellular trafficking
- Lysosome
- Macropinocytosis
- Opsonization
- Phagocytosis
- Pinocytosis
- Receptor-mediated endocytosis
1 Introduction
In order to be active, a drug has to reach the relevant pharmacological target, which means undergoing a complex series of interactions with the cells of the body. When this target is located inside diseased cells, the therapeutic molecule must generally: (1) cross one or various biological membranes (e.g., mucosa, epithelium, endothelium) before (2) reaching the target cell and diffusing through the plasma membrane to (3) finally gain access to the appropriate organelle where the biological target is located. Deviating from this ideal path may decrease the drug efficiency but also entail side effects and toxicity.
More than 30 years ago, the idea emerged to tailor carriers small enough to ferry the active substance to the target cell and its relevant subcellular compartment. In the seventies, the proof of concept has been done that submicronic lipid vesicles known as liposomes (Black and Gregoriadis 1974), as well as synthetic polymer nanoparticles (Couvreur et al. 1977), were able to concentrate into cells, molecules that did not diffuse intracellularly. It became clear that such ‘nanocarriers’ had a great potential for the targeted delivery of drugs. Today, such approach is exploited to optimize the intracellular delivery of many small molecules, but also macromolecules like nucleic acids, peptides, or proteins.
Depending on nanoparticle characteristics and the type of cells considered, various mechanisms of internalization may occur, as well as subsequent intracellular trafficking pathways. Understanding these pathways may have important pharmacological implications. This chapter will review the main nanoparticle internalization and trafficking mechanisms and their experimental characterizations, allowing to understand how they are affected by nanoparticle physicochemical properties. The phagocytosis pathway will first be described, being increasingly well characterized and understood, which has allowed several successes in the treatment of some cancers and infectious diseases. In contrast, other non-phagocytic pathways encompass various complex mechanisms, such as clathrin-mediated endocytosis , caveolae -mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis . The intracellular fate will vary accordingly, which has important implications for intracellular drug delivery.
2 Nanoparticle Internalization and Trafficking Routes Occurring in Cells
Depending on the nature of the cells concerned, and the physicochemical properties of the nanocarriers, different endocytosis modes may occur (Fig. 1): phagocytosis or other endocytic routes, i.e., mainly macropinocytosis, clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis .
2.1 Phagocytosis
Phagocytosis occurs mostly in specialized cells, also called professional phagocytes: macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and dendritic cell (Aderem and Underhill 1999). In particular, macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system (RES, also known as mononuclear phagocytic system) are the major phagocytes involved in the uptake of nanoparticles and have been by far the most studied for drug delivery purposes.
The phagocytic pathway of entry into cells can be described using three distinct steps:
-
1.
Recognition by opsonization in the bloodstream. Opsonization is an important process occurring before the phagocytosis itself. It consists in tagging the foreign nanoparticles by proteins called opsonins, making the former visible to macrophages. This typically takes place in the bloodstream rapidly after introduction of the particles (Alexis et al. 2008). Major opsonins include immunoglubulins (Ig) G (and M) as well as complement components (C3, C4, C5) (Frank and Fries 1991; Vonarbourg et al. 2006), in addition to other blood serum proteins (including laminin, fibronectin, C-reactive protein, type-I collagen) (Owens and Peppas 2006).
-
2.
Opsonized particles then attach to macrophage surface through specific receptor-ligand interactions. The major and best-studied receptors for this purpose include the Fc receptors (FcR) and the complement receptors (CR). FcRs bind to the constant fragment of particle-adsorbed immunoglobulins, while CRs mostly bind to C3 fragments (Aderem and Underhill 1999; Groves et al. 2008). Other receptors including the mannose/fructose and scavengers receptors can be involved in the phagocytosis (Aderem and Underhill 1999). Receptor ligation is the beginning of a signaling cascade mediated by Rho-familiy GTPases (Caron and Hall 1998) which triggers actin assembly, forming pseudopodia that zipper up around the particle to engulf it.
-
3.
The resulting phagosome, having a minimum size of 250 nm (Alberts et al. 2002), ferries the particle throughout the cytoplasm. As actin is depolymerized from the phagosome, the newly denuded vacuole membrane becomes accessible to early endosomes (Swanson and Baer 1995). Through a series of fusion and fission events, the vacuolar membrane and its contents mature, fusing with late endosomes and ultimately lysosomes to form a phagolysosome. The rate of these events depends on the surface properties of the ingested particle, typically from half to several hours (Aderem and Underhill 1999). The phagolysosomes acidify and acquire many enzymes, including esterases and cathepsins (Claus et al. 1998), leading to the degradation of biodegradable or bioerodible particle material.
2.2 Other Endocytic Pathways
The non-phagocytic endocytosis has been traditionally referred to as pinocytosis , literally ‘cell drinking’, i.e., uptake of fluids and solutes, as opposed to ‘cell eating’, i.e., uptake of solid particles for phagocytosis. This terminology may not be relevant for the study of the nanoparticle-cell interaction, since solid particles, due to their small size, can be internalized through these non-phagocytic pathways. Unlike phagocytosis, restricted to specialized cells, other endocytic pathways occur in virtually all cells by four main mechanisms: clathrin-mediated endocytosis , caveolae-mediated endocytosis , macropinocytosis and other clathrin- and caveolae-independent endocytosis.
2.2.1 Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis
Endocytosis via clathrin-coated pits, or clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), occurs constitutively in all mammalian cells, and fulfills crucial physiological roles, including nutrient uptake and intracellular communication (Schmid 1997; Di Fiore and De Camilli 2001). For most cell types, CME serves as the main mechanism of internalization for macromolecules and plasma membrane constituents. CME via specific receptors-ligand interaction is the best-described mechanism (to such extent that it was previously referred to as receptor-mediated endocytosis (RME)); however, it is now clear that alternative nonspecific endocytosis via clathrin-coated pits also exists (as well as receptor-mediated but clathrin-independent endocytosis). The CME internalization pathway (either receptor-dependent or independent) is associated to degradation of the endocyted material in lysosomes . This should be taken into account with respect to degradation of the nanocarrier but also of fragile cargo molecules.
Receptor-dependent CME is one of the best-characterized endocytic mechanisms. It is a shared pathway for the internalization of a variety of ligand-receptor complexes (Mukherjee et al. 1997). Many ligands have been used for this purpose, including low-density lipoprotein (LDL), transferrin, epidermal growth factor (EGF) (Bareford and Swaan 2007; Chavanpatil et al. 2006).
The endocytosis typically occurs in a membrane region enriched in the clathrin protein. The formation of an endocytosis vacuole is driven by assembly of a basket-like structure (Kanaseki and Kadota 1969) formed by polymerization of clathrin units, which deforms the membrane into a coated pit. Some receptors, like the LDL receptors, are concentrated in these clathrin-coated pits, while others receptors like the transferrin and EGF receptors become concentrated upon ligand binding (Mukherjee et al. 1997). The fission of the vesicle, requiring the GTPase dynamin, leads to so-called clathrin-coated vesicles. The uncoating of the vesicles later allows the recycling of clathrin units (Conner and Schmid 2003). Some ligands are also recycled, as transferrin and riboflavin (Bareford and Swaan 2007). The resulting endocytic vesicle may have an average size of 100 (Bareford and Swaan 2007) or 120 nm (Conner and Schmid 2003). This vesicle delivers its cargo to early endosomes, which are acidified (pH ~6) (Al-Awqati 1986). Some receptors and ligands dissociate at this stage and are recycled for another round of delivery (e.g., LDL receptor, transferrin and its receptor). The early endosomes then mature into late endosomes (pH ~5) which, after fusion with prelysosomal vesicles containing acid hydrolases, generate a harsh environment prone to degradation of the internalized cargo (Mukherjee et al. 1997; Bareford and Swaan 2007).
In the case of polarized cells, the recycled molecules can either return to the membrane from which they were internalized, or they can cross the cell and be delivered to the opposite membrane in a process called transcytosis (Matter and Mellman 1994). Transcytosis of transferrin is of particular importance in the case if endothelial cells forming the blood–brain barrier (BBB) (Jones and Shusta 2007).
Another CME mechanism, involving nonspecific adsorptive pinocytosis , has been simply referred to as fluid-phase endocytosis by some authors (Sun et al. 2004). Compounds absorbed by this pathway avoid direct binding with membrane constituents, but often display nonspecific charges and hydrophobic interactions with the cell membrane. Fluid entry occurs via clathrin-coated vesicles as described above, internalizing also receptor-ligands located in these pits, together with extracellular fluid and its content (Bareford and Swaan 2007). Apart from the different modes of interaction with the membrane, the major specificity of this pathway is a slower internalization rate compared to the receptor-dependent CME (Strømhaug et al. 1997).
2.2.2 Caveolae-Mediated Endocytosis
Although CME is the predominant endocytosis mechanism in most cells, alternative pathways have been also identified, in particular the caveolae-mediated endocytosis (CvME). Caveolae are characteristic flask-shaped membrane invaginations, having a size generally reported in the lower end of the 50–100 nm range (Mukherjee et al. 1997; Bareford and Swaan 2007; Conner and Schmid 2003; van Oss 1978), typically 50–80 nm. They are lined by caveolin, a dimeric protein, and enriched with cholesterol and sphingolipids (Mayor and Pagano 2007). Caveolae are particularly abundant in endothelial cells, where they can constitute 10–20 % of the cell surface (Conner and Schmid 2003), but also smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts (Chen et al. 1997). CvME are involved in endocytosis and trancytosis of various proteins; they also constitute a port of entry for viruses (typically the SV40 virus) (Cheng et al. 2006), and receive increasing attention for drug delivery applications using nanocarriers.
Unlike CME, CvME is a highly regulated process, involving complex signaling, which may be driven by the cargo itself (Bareford and Swaan 2007; Conner and Schmid 2003). After binding to the cell surface, particles move along the plasma membrane to caveolae invaginations, where they may be maintained through receptor-ligand interactions (Bareford and Swaan 2007). The fission of caveolae from the membrane, mediated by the GTPase dynamin (Parton and Simons 2007), then generates the cytosolic caveolar vesicle which does not contain any enzymatic cocktail (this pathway is employed by many pathogens to escape degradation by lysosomal enzymes) (Chen et al. 1997). The use of nanocarriers exploiting CvME may therefore be advantageous to by-pass the lysosomal degradation pathway when the carried drug (e.g., peptides, proteins, nucleic acids, etc.) is highly sensitive to enzymes.
On the whole, the uptake kinetics of CvME is known to occur at a much slower rate than that of CME (Marsh and Helenius 2006). Ligands known to be internalized by CvME include folic acid (Oh et al. 1998), albumin (Rejman et al. 2005) and cholesterol (Bareford and Swaan 2007).
2.2.3 Macropinocytosis
Macropinocytosis is another type of clathrin-independent endocytosis pathway (Chang et al. 1992), occurring in many cells including macrophages (Mukherjee et al. 1997). It accompanies the membrane ruffling and is induced especially upon stimulation by growth factors or other signals (Mukherjee et al. 1997; Conner and Schmid 2003). Macropinocytosis occurs via the formation of actin-driven membrane protrusions, similarly to phagocytosis. However, in this case, the protrusions do not zipper up along the ligand-coated particle; instead, they collapse onto and fuse with the plasma membrane (Conner and Schmid 2003). This generates large endocytic vesicles, called macropinosomes, which sample the extracellular milieu and have a size generally higher than 1 µm (Conner and Schmid 2003) [and sometimes as large as 5 µm (Mukherjee et al. 1997)]. The intracellular fate of macropinosomes varies depending on the cell type, but in most cases, they acidify and shrink. They may eventually fuse with lysosomal compartments or recycle their content to the surface (Mukherjee et al. 1997). Macropinosomes have not been reported to contain any specific coating, nor to concentrate receptors (Schnitzer 2001). This endocytic pathway does not seem to display any selectivity, but is involved, among others, in the uptake of drug nanocarriers.
2.2.4 Other Endocytic Pathways
Various clathrin- and caveolae-independent endocytosis have also been described. In particular, pathways similar to CvME involving cholesterol-rich microdomains called ‘rafts’, having a 40–50 nm diameter, have received increasing attention (Conner and Schmid 2003). A classification for the clathrin- and caveolae-independent pathways has been proposed (van Oss 1978). However, the understanding of their implications in the interactions with drug delivery nanosytems is still in a nascent stage.
3 Investigation of Nanoparticle Uptake and Internalization
3.1 Phagocytosis
3.1.1 Experimental Techniques
Nanoparticles are mainly characterized by (1) their size, measured directly by various microscopy techniques or indirectly by dynamic light scattering; (2) their surface properties such as charge, indirectly evaluated from their zeta potential in a reference electrolyte, hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity and chemical composition (chromatography and surface spectroscopy); (3) their morphology, assessed by microscopy. The visualization of their interaction with cells can be achieved through incorporation of a fluorescent tracer which can be either covalently bound to the nanocarriers or to the encapsulated drug or simply incorporated into the nanoparticles (simulating the encapsulated drug). Confocal microscopy has shown invaluable usefulness to monitor the intracellular trafficking , for example when performed on unfixed living macrophages (Swanson and Watts 1995). The quantification of phagocytosis can be precisely performed using radiolabeled polymers (in case of nanoparticles) or lipids (in case of liposomes) as well as radiolabeled drugs, and in some cases through an extraction and chromatography process. The characterization of phagocytosis as an active internalization pathway is often achieved through inhibition by lowering temperature or using metabolic inhibitors (e.g, sodium azide) or inhibitors of actin polymerization (e.g, cytochalasin D). The modern tools of proteomics and live imaging are also used to characterize the molecular mechanisms of phagocytosis (Groves et al. 2008). Finally, the complement activation induced by the nanocarrier’s surface can be investigated by measuring the residual hemolytic capacity of the serum after incubation with the particles (Racoosin and Swanson 1992).
3.1.2 Nanocarrier Characteristics Influencing Phagocytosis
3.1.2.1 Size
Although a minimum size of 0.5 µm for a particle to undergo phagocytosis is often put forward (Aderem and Underhill 1999; Groves et al. 2008), this statement is not always (Martina et al. 2007) justified and generally used to highlight the wide size tolerance for phagocytosis [‘macrophages can eat bigger than their head’ (Labarre et al. 1993)] compared to other endocytosis modes. Model polystyrene particles in a range of around 250 nm to 3 µm have actually been shown to have an optimal in vitro phagocytosis rate (particle weight per cell), merely increasing with the particle size (the number of particles by cell decreases by three orders of magnitude at the same time), whereas nanoparticles smaller than 250 nm were less efficiently internalized (wt/cell) (Desjardins and Griffiths 2003; Aderem 2002). Similarly, particles based on other polymers [human serum albumin (Korn and Weisman 1967), modified cellulose (Roberts and Quastel 1963; Schäfer et al. 1992), poly(methylmethacrylate) (Korn and Weisman 1967; Tabata and Ikada 1988) and poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) (PACA) (Korn and Weisman 1967)] exhibited a higher uptake when their size increased from around 200 nm to several microns. However, in the case of drug carriers intended for an intravenous administration (requiring small particle size to avoid embolization), a size of 200 nm can be considered as optimal (Korn and Weisman 1967). Liposomes generally display the same pattern: larger (>100 nm) and multilamelar ones are less numerous but deliver a higher payload to macrophages, compared to the smaller (and unilamelar) ones (Tabata and Ikada 1990; Müller et al. 1992; Rahman et al. 1982; Schwendener et al. 1984; Harashima et al. 1995). Some studies reported a more balanced (Moghimi and Szebeni 2003) or even opposite (Rudt and Muller 1993) impact of the liposome size, suggesting that other factors like surface properties may get the upper hand.
In the presence of serum, the size of the nanocarriers was observed to have a strong influence on the opsonin adsorption, and therefore on the phagocytosis. Indeed, the in vitro consumption of complement proteins was demonstrated to increase with the size of lipid nanocapsules (the total surface exhibited by the particles being constant) (Heath et al. 1985). This was explained by the fact that on the most curved surface of the smallest particles, the proper geometric configuration for efficient complement activation could be achieved less easily than on larger ones (Vonarbourg et al. 2006). Noteworthy, in vitro and in vivo studies on 200–800 nm liposomes suggested two kinds of uptake by phagocytes: a size-dependant one involving opsonization, increasing with the size of liposomes, and a size-independent one, corresponding to unopsonized particles (Allen et al. 1991).
Finally, it is worth mentioning that some macrophages have shown a decrease in the phagocytosis of small particles (200 nm) and a shift to other endocytosis pathways like clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Vonarbourg et al. 2006). But in general, a low uptake by macrophages is observed for nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm, whatever the mechanism involved (Vonarbourg et al. 2006).
3.1.2.2 Surface Properties
Early studies performed on nanocarriers shown that liposomes (Harashima et al. 1994; Koval et al. 1998) as well as polymer nanoparticles (Gregoriadis 1978; Torchilin et al. 1980; Grislain et al. 1983) are rapidly cleared from the bloodstream by macrophages of the RES, virtually irrespective of the particle composition. Indeed the presence or not of a proper surface coating able to repel opsonins proved to be the bottom line in entering the phagocytosis pathway or not. The physicochemical characteristics of the particle surface are thus critical and determine the interaction with opsonins prior to cell surface.
The most important driving forces for protein adsorption are often regarded to be ionic and hydrophobic interactions (combined with entropic gain caused by conformational changes of the protein during adsorption) (Lenaerts et al. 1984; Kreuter et al. 1979). In the case of nanocarriers, highly charged particles have proven to fix complement proteins, especially liposomes (Claesson et al. 1995; Verrecchia et al. 1993), either negatively or positively charged, whatever the complement activation pathway (Devine et al. 1994; Gabizon and Papahadjopoulos 1992). The observation that the former often activate even more complement than the latter may originate in differences in the amount of adsorbed proteins and the opsonins/dysopsonins ratios (Juliano and Stamp 1975; Chonn et al. 1991) (dysopsonins decrease recognition by phagocytes). More specifically, apolipoproteins have been proposed to contribute specifically to the uptake by hepatocyte (Juliano and Lin 1980). In the case of polymer nanoparticles, although negative charges can be related to a higher uptake (Vonarbourg et al. 2006; Moghimi et al. 1993; Scherphof and Kamps 1998), the surface hydrophobicity appears to be the key factor for opsonization . Nanoparticles prepared from hydrophobic polymers poly(styrene) (Mosqueira et al. 1999), poly(lactide) (PLA) (Roser et al. 1998; Norman et al. 1992), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) (Leroux et al. 1994) and poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) (PACA) (Leroux et al. 1995) undergo important adsorption of Ig, complement proteins and other plasma proteins like albumin, either in vitro or in vivo. To account for these observations, a higher level of protein adsorption on hydrophobic surfaces than on hydrophilic ones has been proposed (Esmaeili et al. 2008; Bertholon et al. 2006), as well as high affinity of IgG and albumin for hydrophobic regions (Gabizon and Papahadjopoulos 1992; Jeon et al. 1991).
However, as a general rule, it is considered that the in vivo fate of exogenous nanoparticles is opsonization and phagocytosis by RES’s protagonists, be they liposomes or polymer nanoparticles, with little discrimination regarding their composition, unless the particles possess a very small size (lower than 50–100 nm) or, more importantly, a specific hydrophilic coating able to repel opsonins. Poly(ethylene glycol) [PEG, also known as poly(oxyethylene)] has been extensively described for this purpose (Vonarbourg et al. 2006; Owens and Peppas 2006). In general, PEGylated nanocarriers dramatically decreased the in vitro opsonin adsorption and macrophage uptake, as compared to their non-PEGylated counterparts. After intravenous administration, PEGylation results in a decreased RES uptake and a prolonged circulation half-life, from typically few minutes to several hours. Besides PEG, polysaccharides have also been proposed as alternative hydrophilic polymers (Ilium et al. 1986).
When opsonized nanocarriers encounter macrophage surface, it is noteworthy that polymer nanoparticles and liposomes, whose structure and chemical composition strongly differ, still show similar interactions with macrophages, based on their surface electric charge. Liposomes displaying a negatively charged surface, generally containing the negatively charged phospholipids phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylglycerol, have a much higher binding to and phagocytosis by macrophages as compared to neutral vesicles (Moghimi and Szebeni 2003; Cullis et al. 1998; Labarre 2012; Lee et al. 1992a, b, 1993); the same is true for positively charged liposomes (Tabata and Ikada 1990; Müller et al. 1992). A similar pattern was found for negatively and positively charged polymer nanoparticles compared to neutral ones (Roberts and Quastel 1963; Schäfer et al. 1992; Moghimi et al. 1993; Scherphof and Kamps 1998). Additionally, hydrophobic nanoparticles are more readily captured than hydrophilic nonionic ones (Roberts and Quastel 1963). Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for the preferential uptake of charged particles: existence of high charge density areas at the cell surface able to mediate endocytosis of positively charged particles (Cullis et al. 1998; Hsu and Juliano 1982) and involvement of nonspecific interactions with nonspecific receptors by electrostatic interactions for negative particles (Müller et al. 1992), especially with type B scavenger receptor (Raz et al. 1981). Taking advantage of macrophage receptors to enhance phagocytosis has been further achieved by coupling specific ligands to nanocarriers. For example, grafting rabbit Ig (Vĕtvicka and Fornůsek 1987) as well as mouse monoclonal antibody (Rigotti et al. 1995) to liposomes greatly enhanced their uptake by rat and human macrophages, respectively, most probably through increased FcR binding. Mannose receptors have also been exploited by the introduction of mannose residue and neoglycoprotein on liposome surface, enhancing uptake by murine Kupffer cells and peritoneal macrophages (Derksen et al. 1988; Betageri et al. 1993; Barratt et al. 1986). Other ways have also being explored, as attested by a study on the plasma membrane glycoprotein CD44 and the possible involvement of scavenger receptors (Muller and Schuber 1989). However, if the aforementioned studies provide decisive insight in the nanoparticle surface—macrophage interaction, it should be kept in mind that, as soon as in vivo is concerned (or even in vitro studies in presence of serum), the opsonization process is likely to take precedence.
3.1.2.3 Shape
The vast majority of nanoparticles developed for drug delivery have a spherical shape . However, the control of particle shape is receiving increasing attention in order to control phagocytosis. First, maintaining or not the particle’s spherical shape, i.e, rigidity, can be a significant factor. As far as interaction with the cell membrane is concerned, macrophages tend to show a strong preference for rigid particles. One study showed that soft polyacrylamide particles were unable to stimulate the assembly of actin filaments required for the formation and closure of phagosomes, as opposed to rigid particles (having the same total polymer mass and surface properties) (Kole et al. 1994). On the other hand, particle rigidity can have an opposite effect on opsonization . Rigid liposome membranes, composed of cholesterol and saturated phospholipids with a high melting point, are indeed known to decrease complement activation and thus phagocytosis (Rudt and Muller 1993; Jeon et al. 1991). Similarly, core-shell nanoparticles having a rigid polystyrene core were significantly less prone to uptake by RES than nanoparticles made of a more flexible core, based on fluid-like poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) (Yu et al. 1997): a flexible particle is thought to provide a greater number of surface interactions with the biological environment (Alexis et al. 2008). Thus, no clear relationship emerges between nanocarrier rigidity and phagocytosis.
Besides particle rigidity, other works have focused on the control of the shape itself. The rationale behind this approach can be found in the well-known exposure of macrophages to exogenous particles of a high geometrical variety, like rod-shaped bacteria, Escherichia coli and Bacillus anthracis, disk-shaped senescent erythrocytes or multiple culpate and solpate airborne pollen grains. Advances in the synthesis techniques now allow a more precise control of particle geometry (Beningo and Wang 2002; Sun et al. 2005). Lipid disks have been developed as alternatives to liposomes, having a diameter of 120 nm (Champion et al. 2007) to 250 nm (Champion et al. 2007), and a thickness of only a few nanometers, showing efficient uptake by RES macrophages. Other lipid assemblies, either bilayer disks (Guo 2001) or cube-shaped so-called cubosomes (Larabi et al. 2003) have been proposed as new drug nanocarriers. However, the impact of the shape of such systems on phagocytosis as compared to liposomes remains to be fully elucidated. As demonstrated for polystyrene particles of various shapes (ellipsoids, disks, UFO-like), the local particle shape at the point of contact dictates whether macrophages initiate phagocytosis or simply spread on particles (Carmona-Ribeiro 2006). For example, a macrophage attached to an ellipse at the pointed end will internalize it in a few minutes, while a macrophage attach to a flat region of the same ellipse will not internalize it for over 12 h. This effect, originating in the complexity of actin structure required to initiate uptake, was even prevailing on particle size (Carmona-Ribeiro 2006).
3.1.3 Theoretical Models of Nanocarrier Phagocytosis
Several theoretical models have been proposed in order to understand and ultimately predict phagocytosis, depending on the nanoparticles characteristics. Based on the idea that nanoparticle phagocytosis is primarily an interaction between two surfaces, a first model has been anticipated using the so-called wettability hypothesis. According to this model, the probability of phagocytosis is related to the wettability (measured by the contact angle) of the cell membrane in comparison to that of the particle surface (Drummond and Fong 1999). In other words, this model is limited to the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity characteristics of the nanoparticles. A more recent theory is based on the hypothesis that the film tension existing between the particle and the cell during the early and intermediate stages of phagocytosis plays a critical role in the mediation of the particle engulfment. This more comprehensive model allows to take additional forces into account, such the as electrostatic, van der Waals, receptor-ligand (FcR-Fc) and cytoskeletal (actin polymerization) forces, allowing refined predictions based on nanoparticle size and surface properties (Champion and Mitragotri 2006).
3.2 Other Endocytic Pathways
3.2.1 Experimental Techniques
In addition to the above-described methodologies to study the phagocytosis—most of which are also applicable to investigate various endocytosis pathways, specific markers (Table 1) can be tracked using various inhibitors to characterize CME [e.g, chlorpromazine, known to disrupt the assembly of clathrin-coated pits (Wang et al. 1993)], CvME [e.g, nystatin and filipin (Schnitzer et al. 1994)] and macropinocytosis [amilorid (Swanson 1989; Hoffmann et al. 2001)]. The specific inhibition of CME and CvME has also been recently achieved through infection with adenoviruses encoding mutant specific endocytic peptides, prior to incubation with nanoparticles (Harush-Frenkel et al. 2007). The characterization of RME is often performed using competition studies, while techniques like surface plasmon resonance allow to quantify the interaction between receptors and ligand-decorated nanoparticles (Stella et al. 2000). Atomic force microscopy was also recently used to quantify the interaction between a cell and nanoparticles deposited on the probe tip (Vasir and Labhasetwar 2008).
Finally, the uptake studies performed on cocultures of different cell lines require the identification of each cell type simultaneously to the detection of the nanocarriers, which can be achieved using internalized fluorescent dyes in confocal fluorescence microscopy, or using specific antibodies in flow cytometry (Grabowski et al. 2016) (Fig. 2).
3.2.2 Nanocarrier Characteristics Influencing Non-phagocytic Endocytosis
Contrary to phagocytosis, it is difficult to describe a thorough and consistent profile of nanoparticle matching each of the above-mentioned endocytic pathway. Indeed, unlike phagocytosis occurring primarily in professional phagocytes, other endocytic mechanisms may take place in virtually all types of cells and vary accordingly; differences may also occur between the apical and basolateral membranes of a polarized cell (von Bonsdorff et al. 1985). Moreover, several endocytic mechanisms often take place simultaneously.
3.2.2.1 Size
Nanoparticle size is a relevant parameter regarding the endocytic pathway, although its impact may vary upon the type of cells. For example, the same polystyrene nanoparticles (varying from around 20–1000 nm) were not preferably endocyted according to their size by the HUVEC endothelial, the ECV 304 bladder carcinoma and the HNX 14C squamous carinoma cell lines, whereas the 20–100 nm particles were preferentially internalized by the Hepa 1-6 hepatoma and the HepG2 human hepatocyte cell lines and the 20–600 nm particles by the KLN 205 squamous carcinoma cell line (Zauner et al. 2001). Some trends can however be drawn.
Cells from the gastrointestinal epithelium [Caco-2 cell line (Desai et al. 1997) as well as rat gastrointestinal tissue (Desai et al. 1996)] display a greater uptake for 100 nm PLGA particles compared to 0.5–10 µm ones, both in terms of number and total mass. The same size-dependency was observed on conjunctival epithelial cells in vivo for PLGA particles (Qaddoumi et al. 2004), as well as for poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) particles (Calvo et al. 1996). In the 1–100 nm range, explored more recently, the highest uptake (in number) was found with 50 nm gold beads (Devika Chithrani et al. 2006; Jiang et al. 2008) for Hela cells, occurring via receptor-mediated endocytosis .
The size may also directly affect the mode of endocytosis. Although the typical endosome sizes reported (i.e., 100 nm for CME, 50–80 nm for CvME) (Bareford and Swaan 2007; Conner and Schmid 2003; van Oss 1978; Chen et al. 1997) do not perfectly match the sizes of drug nanocarriers (most of the time higher than 100 nm) (Desai et al. 1996, 1997; Calvo et al. 1996), some size-dependant endocytosis pathways have been reported in the non-phagocytic murine melanoma B16 cells, using 50–1000 nm polystyrene beads devoid of ligands (Rejman et al. 2004). Internalization of nanoparticles having a diameter below 200 nm was found to involve CME. As the size of the particle increased, a shift to the CvME internalization pathway became apparent and turned to be the predominant pathway for particles as big as 500 nm. Thus, CME occurred for nanoparticles with a size limit of around 200 nm and kinetic parameters seemed to determine internalization of these particles along CME rather than CvME (Rejman et al. 2004). More studies are required to understand the CvME uptake of the biggest particles. On the other hand, looking at the lower end of nanocarrier size, alternative pathways to CME and CvME have recently been proposed. In particular, studies on polystyrene nanoparticles internalization by HeLa cells showed that, while beads of 40 nm in diameter entered cell through well-known CME, particles smaller than 25 nm were internalized via a novel non-clathrin and non-caveolae-mediated pathway, being also cholesterol-independent (Lai et al. 2007), which may open the door to the design of new drug delivery nanocarriers.
Finally, macropinocytosis corresponds to a poor size-selective endocytosis pathway, generally occurring in complement of CME or CvME (Harush-Frenkel et al. 2008; de Rieux et al. 2007). In some cases, size may however have little influence on uptake (Prabha et al. 2002), compared to surface properties (e.g. charge and presence of ligands).
3.2.2.2 Surface Charge
Due to the negatively charged character of the cell plasma membrane, positively charged drug nanocarriers generally display better association and internalization rates. Such nanoparticles are generally based on (or coated with) cationic polymers, the most widely used being the polysaccharide chitosan. Several studies report an efficient uptake by Caco-2 cells of cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles [e.g., particles having a zeta potential ζ ≈ +15 to +30 mV (Ma and Lim 2003; Mao et al. 2005)] through adsorptive endocytosis , and possibly involving CME. Similar patterns were observed on A-549 epithelial cells (Huang et al. 2002, 2004). Other cationic nanocarriers similarly impact endocytosis, such as PLA-PEG – based nanoparticles coated with the cationic lipid stearylamine (ζ ≈ +35 mV) which showed increased and faster uptake by HeLa cells compared to the negatively charged parent PLA-PEG nanoparticles (ζ ≈ –35 mV). The former was processed through the CME pathway, contrarily to the latter (Harush-Frenkel et al. 2007). Some authors, using quaternary ammoniums to modulate the surface charge of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (ζ ≈ –5 to +20 mV), suggested a threshold of positive surface charges on endocytosis, depending also on the cell line used (Chung et al. 2007). Interestingly, a positive charge resulting from drug adsorption may also impact on the nanocarrier’s endocytosis, as shown with PCL nanoparticles loaded with tamoxifen on MCF-7 breast cancer cells (Chawla and Amiji 2002); however, the drug leakage should be taken into account.
3.2.2.3 Nonionic Surface Coating
Coating nanoparticle by nonionic polymers like PEG can also influence endocytosis, as suggested by several studies focused on the interaction between various PEGylated nanoparticles and brain endothelial cells. It was shown that nanospheres prepared from a poly(methoxyethyleneglycol cyanoacrylate-co-n-hexadecyl cyanoacrylate) (PEG-PHDCA) copolymer were able to accumulate in both healthy rat brain and brain glioma (Calvo et al. 2001a, b, 2002; Brigger et al. 2002) not only owing to a prolonged blood circulation time, but also to a specific affinity of the surface of these nanoparticles for the endothelial cells of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) (Brigger et al. 2002). Using an original in vitro model of rat BBB (Garcia-Garcia et al. 2005), the authors shown that PEG-PHDCA were internalized through the CME pathway after specific recognition by LDL receptors, and accumulated in endosomal/lysosomal compartments (Kim et al. 2007). While the total amount of adsorbed proteins was lower onto the PEG-PHDCA nanoparticles than on their PHDCA counterparts, a preferential adsorption of apolipoprotein E (apo E) onto PEG-PHDCA nanoparticles was correlated with their increased cell uptake, thus suggesting the critical role of this protein in the endocytosis of these particles by the rat brain endothelial cells (Kim et al. 2007a, b). Similar conclusions were drawn from parallel studies performed on PACA nanoparticles PEGylated by the single adsorption of polysorbate 80. Such nanoparticles have indeed shown efficient endocytosis by brain endothelial cells using various labels (Kreuter 2001). Here also, a preferential adsorption of apo E (and/or apo B) on these particles suggested that the particles may undergo endocytosis after specific binding to LDL receptors (Kreuter 2001, 2002). Adsorption of polysorbate 80 onto solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and PLA nanoparticles has also been investigated along the same line (Göppert and Müller 2003, 2005; Sun et al. 2004). Although some controversy arose about possible interactions between the desorbed surfactant molecules and the cell tight junctions (Olivier et al. 1999; Kreuter et al. 2003), this was not the case with nanoparticles prepared from the PEG-PHDCA copolymer where the PEG chains are chemically linked, thus firmly bound at the surface of the particles.
3.2.2.4 Decoration by Targeting Ligands
The decoration of nanoparticles by targeting ligands , i.e, molecules able to recognize a specific biological target, has been investigated in order to promote delivery to a specific cell population and/or to control the intracellular trafficking of the nanocarriers. This strategy relies on the idea that ligand-bearing nanocarriers will be internalized through the same pathway as the ligand alone. Moreover, the concentration of ligands on the nanoparticles surface offers potential for stronger cell interactions as compared to ligand alones. Indeed, the entropic gain in the formation of multivalent complexes may increase the binding constants by a factor of 1000 for bivalent interactions and even by 108 for tri- and pentavalent ones (Haag and Kratz 2006).
The folic acid (FA) vitamin has been widely studied as a targeting ligand for nanocarriers, especially for anticancer strategies (Chavanpatil et al. 2006). Indeed, FA binds with a low affinity to the reduced folate carrier present in virtually all cells, but with a high affinity (in the nanomolar range) to the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked folate receptor (FR), which exhibits highly limited distribution (Haag and Kratz 2006). In particular, FR is often overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells but highly restricted in normal tissues (Hilgenbrink and Low 2005). Moreover, FR has the ability to transport both FA and the FA-linked cargo by RME with subsequent endosomal escape into the cytosol (Haag and Kratz 2006; Weitman et al. 1992), thus avoiding lysosomal degradation. Although CvME appears to be involved in the uptake of FA in some cases (Rothberg et al. 1990; Pelkmans and Helenius 2002), the complete mechanism is complex and remains debated (Haag and Kratz 2006; Dauty et al. 2002). In the case of polymer nanocarriers, plasmon surface resonance revealed that FA covalently bound to PEG-PHDCA nanoparticles had a tenfold higher apparent affinity for FR compared to free FA (Stella et al. 2000). Liposomes were also decorated with FA by incorporating a phospholipid-anchored FA (Sabharanjak and Mayor 2004) or a FA-PEG-phospholipid conjugate (Lee and Low 1995) into the liposome bilayer. Such liposomes have shown a preferential uptake by FR-expressing cells. Similar cell uptake data were obtained with PLGA nanoparticles coated with the poly(L-lysine)-PEG-FA conjugate (Gabizon et al. 2004), with albumin nanoparticles coated with activated FA (Chavanpatil et al. 2006), as well as with polymer micelles prepared from a mixture of poly(L-histidine)-PEG-FA and PLA-PEG-FA (Kim et al. 2005).
Transferrin (Tf) has also been studied as targeting ligand to specific cell populations in order to increase cellular uptake of nanocarriers. Indeed Tf receptors (TfR) are overexpressed in several malignant tissues compared to healthy ones (Lee et al. 2005) [typically twofold to tenfold more (Qian et al. 2002)]. PLGA nanoparticles conjugated with Tf exhibited a twofold greater in vitro uptake by MCF-7 cells as well as a reduced exocytosis, compared to unconjugated PLGA particles; competition experiments with free Tf confirmed the involvement of TfR in the uptake process (Vasir and Labhasetwar 2007). In vivo studies performed in S-180 solid tumor-bearing mice showed a promising accumulation in the tumor of paclitaxel after intravenous administration of Tf-conjugated to PEG-PACA nanoparticles loaded with this drug (Sahoo and Labhasetwar 2005). TfR are also known to be highly expressed in some healthy tissues like brain capillaries where they are known to mediate transcytosis (Jones and Shusta 2007). Interestingly, Tf-conjugated to PEG-coated albumin nanoparticles significantly increased the delivery of AZT to rat brain, the proportion of the drug located in this tissue being doubled as compared to the same nanoparticles devoid of ligand (Xu et al. 2005).
The use of ligands like Tf for nanocarrier functionalization may however be hindered by a competition with the corresponding endogenous pool of ligands (Jones and Shusta 2007). This is the reason why monoclonal antibodies (MAb) have been employed, as for instance the mouse OX26 directed against the rat TfR. This MAb binds to a TfR epitope dinstinct from the Tf binding site, thus preventing competition with endogenous Tf (Mishra et al. 2006). In this context, OX26 has been conjugated to PEGylated liposomes to increase the brain delivery of the encapsulated drug daunomycin to rats (Lee et al. 2000; Huwyler et al. 1997). The transcytosis mechanism of such OX26 immunoliposomes was demonstrated using an in vitro model of BBB consisting in a monolayer of rat brain endothelial cells RBE4 (Maruyama et al. 1995). Similar studies were carried out on mice, but using another MAb, the rat 8D3 MAb to the mouse TfR (Mishra et al. 2006). It was also observed that PEGylated immunoliposomes decorated with the Fab’ fragments of antibodies reduced the RES uptake that is observed when using the whole antibodies (Cerletti et al. 2000) whose Fc fragment may be recognized by macrophages (Maruyama et al. 1997). Using the avidin (SA)-biotin (BIO) technology, chitosan nanospheres were also conjugated with PEG bearing the OX26 MAb. These functionalized chitosan-PEG-BIO-SA/OX26 nanoparticles were able to translocate into the brain tissue after intravenous administration (Harding et al. 1997). A high density of antibodies at the nanocarrier surface may, however, increase hydrophobicity, thus limiting the ability to escape the recognition by the RES. To combine efficient targeting and minimal RES uptake, an optimal coating of 10–30 antibody molecules per particle has been suggested in the case of liposomes (Aktaş et al. 2005; Andresen et al. 2005). For example, a density of around 30 OX26 antibody molecules per (100 nm) liposome was found optimal for brain delivery to rats in two independent studies (Huwyler et al. 1997; Maruyama et al. 1999).
Lectins have also attracted interest because of their inherent ability to provide specific binding to carbohydrates located at the surface of epithelial cells (Huwyler et al. 1996). Tomato lectins (TL) have been intensively utilized for the delivery to the intestinal mucosa after oral administration, as TL-coated particles were shown to avidly adhere to enterocytes both in vitro (Ponchel and Irache 1998) and in vivo (Lehr et al. 1992). Other lectins like wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) have the ability to bind cancer cells preferentially to normal cells (Florence et al. 1995). Interestingly, PLGA nanoparticles coated with WGA exhibited a preferential uptake by A549 and H1299 cancer cells (Aub et al. 1963; Mo and Lim 2005).
Ligands of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) have been more recently investigated for the targeting of various endothelial cells. In particular, RGD peptides have been used to target tumor cells with increased expression of specific CAM integrins (Mo and Lim 2005). For example, PEGylated liposomes conjugated with the RGD peptide were found to form clusters on endothelial microvessels of tumors in mice, contrary to control liposomes conjugated with a RAD peptide (Dunehoo et al. 2006). ‘Intracellular’ CAM-1 (ICAM-1) is another particularly interesting target for perturbed endothelial cells (Schiffelers et al. 2003). Polystyrene nanoparticles bearing MAb to human and mouse ICAM-1 were developed for this purpose (Ding et al. 2006). Interestingly, endothelial cells did not internalize ICAM-1 MAb but well MAb-coated nanoparticles or multivalent MAb conjugates. Indeed, the uptake was found to require ICAM-1 clustering. The endocytosis pathway was independent from CME, CvME, macropinocytosis and phagocytosis (Muro et al. 2003, 2006). The nanoparticles finally trafficked to lysosomes (Muro et al. 2003). In vivo studies showed that nanoparticles conjugated with ICAM-1 MAb enabled also vascular delivery to pulmonary and vascular endothelium (Muro et al. 2006).
3.2.2.5 Shape
The influence of particle shape on endocytosis is being increasingly investigated. In some cases, it was found that spherical nanoparticles had a higher and faster rate of endocytosis compared to rods or disks, as demonstrated using gold nanoparticles (Devika Chithrani et al. 2006) as well as ICAM-1- and TAT-coated nanoparticles (Christofidou-Solomidou et al. 2000; Muro et al. 2008). On the contrary, other studies suggested preferential uptake of rod-shaped (Zhang et al. 2008) or cylindrical (Gratton et al. 2008) particles.
3.2.3 Theoretical Models
Several models have been proposed to describe the non-phagocytic endocytosis of viruses and nanoparticles. A first model of RME based on the hypothesis of a cell membrane containing diffusive mobile receptors, wrapping around a particle coated with corresponding ligands, leads to a threshold particle radius of around 30 nm, above which endocytosis is likely to occur (Gratton et al. 2008). Then, a more general mechanism has been proposed, which includes also nonspecific attractive/repulsive forces. This contribution, which was found to be as important as specific interactions, leads to more general predictions (Gao et al. 2005). The importance of elastic deformation of the cytoskeleton for the engulfment has also been shown to be of significant contribution (Decuzzi and Ferrari 2007). However, the variety of the mechanisms of non-phagocytic internalization pathways seems to complicate the elaboration of a general model, able to fit the multiple experimental data.
4 Investigation of Nanoparticle Intracellular Trafficking
In addition to above-mentioned techniques, the intracellular trafficking can be monitored using fluorescent markers specific for vesicles (e.g, Lysotracker® for the endo/lysosomes). Cell fractionation techniques are also used, such as a selective permeation of membranes, in which sequential treatments with proteases and surfactants allow the recovery and the quantification of (fluorescence or radiolabeled) material associated to the plasmic membrane, cytosol, endo/lysosomal vesicles and other organelles (Sun and Wirtz 2006) (Fig. 3).
With respect to nanocarrier characteristics, the particle electric charge plays a crucial role in its intracellular fate. This is of particular importance in its interaction with endocytic vesicles, in response to the pH decrease during endosome maturation and fusion with lysosomes . Most strategies developed in this field aim at promoting endosomal escape in order to limit drug degradation due to low pH and presence of enzymes, and to ensure the cytosolic delivery of the drug when needed.
pH-sensitive liposomes have been tailored for this purpose. Most of them are based on dioleyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE), which undergoes a transition from lamellar to inverted micelles structures at low pH, allowing the fusion between the liposomal and the endosomal membranes, and the destabilization of the endosomes (Garcia-Garcia et al. 2005; Fattal et al. 2004). DOPE is often used in combination with the mildly acidic amphiphils oleic acid (OA) and cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHEMS). At neutral pH, OA and CHEMS (ionized) act as stabilizers and allow DOPE to maintain a bilayer structure; at lower pH, OA and CHEMS get protonation and cause the destabilization of the liposomal bilayer with the subsequent release of the liposome content (Zuhorn et al. 2007). Typically, DOPE:OA liposomes become leaky at pH 6.5 and DOPE:CHEMS at pH 5.5 (Ellens et al. 1984). The transfer of the DOPE molecules to the endosomal membrane is thought to promote endosome leakage (Garcia-Garcia et al. 2005; Drummond et al. 2000), although the precise mechanism remains to be elucidated (Qian et al. 2002). Such pH-sensitive liposomes have shown efficient in vitro cytosolic delivery of model fluorescent probes (Bergstrand et al. 2003) and oligonucleotides (ODN) (Straubinger et al. 1985; Ropert et al. 1992). However, the in vivo efficacy is more questionable, mainly due to stability concerns in the presence of serum (Düzgünes et al. 2001).
Unlike these pH-sensitive anionic liposomes, lipoplexes, resulting from the complexation of nucleic acids with cationic lipids, exhibit a total net positive charge (Qian et al. 2002; Fattal et al. 2004). They are often designed using the cationic DOTMA (Connor et al. 1986) and DOTAP (Felgner et al. 1994). Although they display some in vitro transfection activity, their efficacy runs short from a therapeutic point of view. This was attributed to an inefficient destabilization of the endosomal membranes (Fattal et al. 2004).
On the contrary, if cationic polymers do not possess fusogenic activity per se, some of them, like the popular poly(ethylene imine) (PEI), have however the ability to disrupt endosomal membrane, as a consequence of their important buffering capacity (Simberg et al. 2004). Indeed, polyplexes resulting from the complexation of DNA plasmids with PEI show remarkable transfection efficiency on various cell lines, which lead the authors to propose the so-called ‘proton-sponge’ effect (Demeneix et al. 2004). According to this hypothesis, the endosomal pH decrease entails a high protonation of PEI, which results in an osmotic swelling due to water entry and subsequent vacuole disruption, thus allowing the cytoplasmic release of the PEI/DNA particles (Demeneix et al. 2004). This was supported by the fact that PEI transfection efficiency was decreased by 100-fold by bafilomycin-A, a specific vacuolar H+-ATPase inhibitor (Boussif et al. 1995). Noteworthy, live cell microscopy also allowed to visualize a burst release of polyplexes from the acidic vesicles (Kichler et al. 2001). Other mechanisms have also been suggested, such as a possible swelling of the polymer network resulting from the increasing repulsion of the protonated groups (Merdan et al. 2002). Based on electron microscopy observations, direct interactions with the lysosomal membrane leading to the formation of holes have been proposed too (Behr 1997). The precise mechanism of the endo/lysosomal escape as well as the transport to the nucleus is not yet clearly understood. However, PEI remains today one of the major transfection agents useful for the design of nanocarriers able to escape the endosomes . Recent studies aim at clarifying the impact of the physicochemical characteristics of PEI (structure, molecular weight) and its polyplexes on the transfection efficiency (Bieber et al. 2002).
Combining such features promoting endosomal escape with stealth properties in the same nanocarriers is often challenging. Some developments of nanocarriers based on modified PEG have paved the way for new pH-responsive systems, the key feature being the incorporation of acid-labile groups. For instance, polymer micelles loaded with the anticancer drug doxorubicin were prepared from PEG-dendrimer hybrids on which hydrophobic groups were attached through an acid sensitive acetal linkage (Neu et al. 2005). The micelles were stable at pH 7.4, but upon acidification of endosomes, the loss of hydrophobic groups by hydrolysis caused the destabilization of the micelles, which enabled drug release (Gillies et al. 2004). Another recent example involves the self-assembling of the amphiphilic block copolymers PEG-poly(aspartate), to which the anticancer drug adriamycin was conjugated through hydrazone linkers that were stable at pH 7, but cleavable at pH 6 and below. The micelles formed by this copolymer were taken up in vitro by the cells of a multicellular tumor spheroid and the released drug was observed to accumulate in the cell nuclei, suggesting that escape from endo/lysosomes has taken place (Gillies and Fréchet 2005).
The decoration of nanocarrier surface with ligands also determines its intracellular fate. Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs), also known as protein transduction domains, have also raised increasing attention due to their ability to translocate across membranes (Bae et al. 2005; Patel et al. 2007). The most commonly studied CPP for nanoparticle functionalization is the HIV-1 trans-activating transcriptional activator peptide (TAT). Remarkably, ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO) coated with TAT were shown to efficiently tag progenitor cells (Torchilin 2008). An increasing number of examples of conjugation of TAT to liposomes (Lewin et al. 2000), polymer micelles and polyplexes (Yagi et al. 2007) have been described. However, the internalization mechanism of CPPs remains to be fully elucidated: it may involve macropinocytosis (Bae et al. 2005), but also CME and CvME (Patel et al. 2007), as well as direct penetration, although the latter remains debated. Endosomal escape of CPPs and nuclear targeting also need further investigations.
Other ligands have been recently investigated to address nanocarriers to intracellular organelles, like mitochondria and nucleus. The few examples of mitochondrial targeting of nanoparticles include the binding of the peptide sequence Mito-8 to quantum dots (QDs), which showed strong in vitro mitochondrial localization (Kleemann et al. 2005). Nucleus targeting of nanoparticles is actively investigated for gene delivery. Promising experiments have been carried out using nuclear localization signals (NLS) peptides (Hoshino et al. 2004) or TAT peptides (Tkachenko et al. 2003) coated onto gold nanoparticles.
Finally, the influence of particle shape on the intracellular trafficking also deserves more insight. A recent study has compared layered double hydroxides (LDHs) nanoparticles made of Mg and Al oxides, having hexagonal or rod shapes (de la Fuente and Berry 2005). Both were internalized by various mammalian cell lines through CME and were found to escape from endosomes (probably through their buffering capacity), but hexagonal LDHs remained in the cytoplasm whereas rod-like LDHs were directed to the nucleus, probably through a microtubule-mediated active transport mechanism (de la Fuente and Berry 2005). This opens exciting perspectives, especially for the control of the intracellular gene delivery.
5 Concluding Remarks
While significant progress in the understanding of the nanoparticle internalization by a variety of mammalian cells has already been achieved, many advances in nanomedicine still rely on phagocytosis, while tailoring nanocarriers targeting the other endocytic pathways is complicated by the variety of the cells and internalization mechanisms encountered. Modeling such complex biological barriers with reliable in vitro systems remains a difficulty, together with the disparities in the experimental conditions used to study the nanoparticle-cell interactions. Despite these hurdles, the expending knowledge of biological markers offers increasing possibilities to target nanocarriers to and inside the desired cell populations.
References
Aderem A (2002) How to eat something bigger than your head. Cell 110:5–8
Aderem A, Underhill D (1999) Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages. Annu Rev Immunol 17:593–623
Aktaş Y, Yemisci M, Andrieux K, Gürsoy RN, Alonso MJ, Fernandez-Megia E, Novoa-Carballal R, Quiñoá E, Riguera R, Sargon MF, Celik HH, Demir AS, Hincal AA, Dalkara T, Capan Y, Couvreur P (2005) Development and brain delivery of chitosan-PEG nanoparticles functionalized with the monoclonal antibody OX26. Bioconjug Chem 16:1503–1511
Al-Awqati Q (1986) Proton-translocating ATPases. Annu Rev Cell Biol 2:179–199
Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (2002) Intracellular vesicular traffic. In: Alberts B (ed) Molecular biology of the cell, 4th edn. Garland Science, New York
Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK, Farokhzad OC (2008) Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 5:505–515
Allen TM, Austin GA, Chonn A, Lin L, Lee KC (1991) Uptake of liposomes by cultured mouse bone marrow macrophages: influence of liposome composition and size. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembranes 1061:56–64
Andresen TL, Jensen SS, Jørgensen K (2005) Advanced strategies in liposomal cancer therapy: problems and prospects of active and tumor specific drug release. Prog Lipid Res 44:68–97
Aub JC, Tieslaut C, Lankester A (1963) Reactions of normal and tumor cell surfaces to enzymes. I. Wheat-germ lipase and associated mucopolysaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 50:613–619
Bae Y, Nishiyama N, Fukushima S, Koyama H, Yasuhiro M, Kataoka K (2005) Preparation and biological characterization of polymeric micelle drug carriers with intracellular pH-triggered drug release property: tumor permeability, controlled subcellular drug distribution, and enhanced in vivo antitumor efficacy. Bioconjug Chem 16:122–130
Bareford LM, Swaan PW (2007) Endocytic mechanisms for targeted drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:748–758
Barratt G, Tenu JP, Yapo A, Petit JF (1986) Preparation and characterisation of liposomes containing mannosylated phospholipids capable of targetting drugs to macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta 862:153–164
Behr JP (1997) The proton sponge: a trick to enter cells the viruses did not exploit. Chimia 51:34–36
Beningo KA, Wang Y (2002) Fc-receptor-mediated phagocytosis is regulated by mechanical properties of the target. J Cell Sci 115:849–856
Bergstrand N, Arfvidsson MC, Kim J, Thompson DH, Edwards K (2003) Interactions between pH-sensitive liposomes and model membranes. Biophys Chem 104:361–379
Bertholon I, Vauthier C, Labarre D (2006) Complement activation by core-shell poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate)–polysaccharide nanoparticles: influences of surface morphology, length, and type of polysaccharide. Pharm Res 23:1313–1323
Betageri GV, Black CD, Szebeni J, Wahl LM, Weinstein JN (1993) Fc-receptor-mediated targeting of antibody-bearing liposomes containing dideoxycytidine triphosphate to human monocyte/macrophages. J Pharm Pharmacol 45:48–53
Bieber T, Meissner W, Kostin S, Niemann A, Elsasser H (2002) Intracellular route and transcriptional competence of polyethylenimine-DNA complexes. J Control Release 82:441–454
Black C, Gregoriadis G (1974) Intracellular fate and effect of liposome-entrapped actinomycin-d injected into rats. Biochem Soc Trans 2:869–871
Boussif O, Lezoualc’h F, Zanta MA, Mergny MD, Scherman D, Demeneix B, Behr JP (1995) A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7297–7301
Brigger I, Morizet J, Aubert G, Chacun H, Terrier-Lacombe M, Couvreur P, Vassal G (2002) Poly(ethylene glycol)-coated hexadecylcyanoacrylate nanospheres display a combined effect for brain tumor targeting. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 303:928–936
Calvo P, Alonso MJ, Vila-Jato JL, Robinson JR (1996) Improved ocular bioavailability of indomethacin by novel ocular drug carriers. J Pharm Pharmacol 48:1147–1152
Calvo P, Gouritin B, Brigger I, Lasmezas C, Deslys J, Williams A, Andreux JP, Dormont D, Couvreur P (2001a) PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles as vector for drug delivery in prion diseases. J Neurosci Methods 111:151–155
Calvo P, Gouritin B, Chacun H, Desmaële D, D’Angelo J, Noel JP, Georgin D, Fattal E, Andreux JP, Couvreur P (2001b) Long-circulating PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles as new drug carrier for brain delivery. Pharm Res 18:1157–1166
Calvo P, Gouritin B, Villarroya H, Eclancher F, Giannavola C, Klein C, Andreux JP, Couvreur P (2002) Quantification and localization of PEGylated polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles in brain and spinal cord during experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 15:1317–1326
Carmona-Ribeiro AM (2006) Lipid bilayer fragments and disks in drug delivery. Curr Med Chem 13:1359–1370
Caron E, Hall A (1998) Identification of two distinct mechanisms of phagocytosis controlled by different Rho GTPases. Science 282:1717–1721
Cerletti A, Drewe J, Fricker G, Eberle AN, Huwyler J (2000) Endocytosis and transcytosis of an immunoliposome-based brain drug delivery system. J Drug Target 8:435–446
Champion JA, Mitragotri S (2006) Role of target geometry in phagocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:4930–4934
Champion JA, Katare YK, Mitragotri S (2007a) Making polymeric micro- and nanoparticles of complex shapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:11901–11904
Champion JA, Katare YK, Mitragotri S (2007b) Particle shape: a new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers. J Control Release 121:3–9
Chang WJ, Rothberg KG, Kamen BA, Anderson RG (1992) Lowering the cholesterol content of MA104 cells inhibits receptor-mediated transport of folate. J Cell Biol 118:63–69
Chavanpatil MD, Khdair A, Panyam J (2006) Nanoparticles for cellular drug delivery: mechanisms and factors influencing delivery. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 6:2651–2663
Chawla JS, Amiji MM (2002) Biodegradable poly([var epsilon]-caprolactone) nanoparticles for tumor-targeted delivery of tamoxifen. Int J Pharm 249:127–138
Chen H, Langer R, Edwards DA (1997) A film tension theory of phagocytosis. J Colloid Interface Sci 190:118–133
Cheng Z, Singh RD, Marks DL, Pagano RE (2006) Membrane microdomains, caveolae, and caveolar endocytosis of sphingolipids. Mol Membr Biol 23:101–110
Chonn A, Cullis PR, Devine DV (1991) The role of surface charge in the activation of the classical and alternative pathways of complement by liposomes. J Immunol 146:4234–4241
Christofidou-Solomidou M, Pietra GG, Solomides CC, Arguiris E, Harshaw D, Fitzgerald GA, Albelda SM, Muzykantov VR (2000) Immunotargeting of glucose oxidase to endothelium in vivo causes oxidative vascular injury in the lungs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 278:L794–L805
Chung T, Wu S, Yao M, Lu C, Lin Y, Hung Y, Mou C, Chen Y, Huang D (2007) The effect of surface charge on the uptake and biological function of mesoporous silica nanoparticles in 3T3-L1 cells and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 28:2959–2966
Claesson PM, Blomberg E, Fröberg JC, Nylander T, Arnebrant T (1995) Protein interactions at solid surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 57:161–227
Claus V, Jahraus A, Tjelle T, Berg T, Kirschke H, Faulstich H, Griffiths G (1998) Lysosomal enzyme trafficking between phagosomes, endosomes, and lysosomes in J774 macrophages. Enrichment of cathepsin H in early endosomes. J Biol Chem 273:9842–9851
Conner SD, Schmid SL (2003) Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature 422:37–44
Connor J, Norley N, Huang L (1986) Biodistribution of pH-sensitive immunoliposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 884:474–481
Couvreur P, Tulkenst P, Roland M, Trouet A, Speiser P (1977) Nanocapsules: a new type of lysosomotropic carrier. FEBS Lett 84:323–326
Cullis PR, Chonn A, Semple SC (1998) Interactions of liposomes and lipid-based carrier systems with blood proteins: relation to clearance behaviour in vivo. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 32:3–17
Dauty E, Remy J, Zuber G, Behr J (2002) Intracellular delivery of nanometric DNA particles via the folate receptor. Bioconjug Chem 13:831–839
de la Fuente JM, Berry CC (2005) Tat peptide as an efficient molecule to translocate gold nanoparticles into the cell nucleus. Bioconjug Chem 16:1176–1180
de Rieux A, Fievez V, Théate I, Mast J, Préat V, Schneider Y (2007) An improved in vitro model of human intestinal follicle-associated epithelium to study nanoparticle transport by M cells. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 30:380–391
Decuzzi P, Ferrari M (2007) The role of specific and non-specific interactions in receptor-mediated endocytosis of nanoparticles. Biomaterials 28:2915–2922
Demeneix B, Hassani Z, Behr J (2004) Towards multifunctional synthetic vectors. Curr Gene Ther 4:445–455
Derksen JT, Morselt HW, Scherphof GL (1988) Uptake and processing of immunoglobulin-coated liposomes by subpopulations of rat liver macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta 971:127–136
Desai MP, Labhasetwar V, Amidon GL, Levy RJ (1996) Gastrointestinal uptake of biodegradable microparticles: effect of particle size. Pharm Res 13:1838–1845
Desai MP, Labhasetwar V, Walter E, Levy RJ, Amidon GL (1997) The mechanism of uptake of biodegradable microparticles in Caco-2 cells is size dependent. Pharm Res 14:1568–1573
Desjardins M, Griffiths G (2003) Phagocytosis: latex leads the way. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15:498–503
Devika Chithrani B, Ghazani A, Chan W (2006) Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett 6:662–668
Devine DV, Wong K, Serrano K, Chonn A, Cullis PR (1994) Liposome-complement interactions in rat serum: implications for liposome survival studies. Biochim Biophys Acta 1191:43–51
Di Fiore PP, De Camilli P (2001) Endocytosis and signaling. an inseparable partnership. Cell 106:1–4
Ding B, Dziubla T, Shuvaev VV, Muro S, Muzykantov VR (2006) Advanced drug delivery systems that target the vascular endothelium. Mol Interv 6:98–112
Drummond CJ, Fong C (1999) Surfactant self-assembly objects as novel drug delivery vehicles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 4:449–456
Drummond DC, Zignani M, Leroux J (2000) Current status of pH-sensitive liposomes in drug delivery. Prog Lipid Res 39:409–460
Dunehoo AL, Anderson M, Majumdar S, Kobayashi N, Berkland C, Siahaan TJ (2006) Cell adhesion molecules for targeted drug delivery. J Pharm Sci 95:1856–1872
Düzgünes N, Simões S, Slepushkin V, Pretzer E, Rossi JJ, De Clercq E, Antao VP, Collins ML, de Lima MC (2001) Enhanced inhibition of HIV-1 replication in macrophages by antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes and acyclic nucleoside phosphonate analogs delivered in pH-sensitive liposomes. Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 20:515–523
Eboue D, Auger R, Angiari C, Le Doan T, Tenu JP (2003) Use of a simple fractionation method to evaluate binding, internalization and intracellular distribution of oligonucleotides in vascular smooth muscle cells. Arch Physiol Biochem 111:265–272
Ellens H, Bentz J, Szoka FC (1984) pH-induced destabilization of phosphatidylethanolamine-containing liposomes: role of bilayer contact. Biochemistry 23:1532–1538
Esmaeili F, Ghahremani MH, Esmaeili B, Khoshayand MR, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R (2008) PLGA nanoparticles of different surface properties: preparation and evaluation of their body distribution. Int J Pharm 349:249–255
Fattal E, Couvreur P, Dubernet C (2004) “Smart” delivery of antisense oligonucleotides by anionic pH-sensitive liposomes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:931–946
Felgner JH, Kumar R, Sridhar CN, Wheeler CJ, Tsai YJ, Border R, Ramsey P, Martin M, Felgner PL (1994) Enhanced gene delivery and mechanism studies with a novel series of cationic lipid formulations. J Biol Chem 269:2550–2561
Florence AT, Hillery AM, Hussain N, Jani PU (1995) Nanoparticles as carriers for oral peptide absorption: studies on particle uptake and fate. J Control Release 36:39–46
Frank M, Fries L (1991) The role of complement in inflammation and phagocytosis. Immunol Today 12:322–326
Gabizon A, Papahadjopoulos D (1992) The role of surface charge and hydrophilic groups on liposome clearance in vivo. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembranes 1103:94–100
Gabizon A, Shmeeda H, Horowitz AT, Zalipsky S (2004) Tumor cell targeting of liposome-entrapped drugs with phospholipid-anchored folic acid-PEG conjugates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:1177–1192
Gao H, Shi W, Freund LB (2005) Mechanics of receptor-mediated endocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9469–9474
Garcia-Garcia E, Gil S, Andrieux K, Desmaële D, Nicolas V, Taran F, Georgin D, Andreux JP, Roux F, Couvreur P (2005a) A relevant in vitro rat model for the evaluation of blood-brain barrier translocation of nanoparticles. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:1400–1408
Garcia-Garcia E, Andrieux K, Gil S, Kim HR, Le Doan T, Desmaële D, d’Angelo J, Taran F, Georgin D, Couvreur P (2005b) A methodology to study intracellular distribution of nanoparticles in brain endothelial cells. Int J Pharm 298(2):310–314
Gillies ER, Fréchet JMJ (2005) pH-responsive copolymer assemblies for controlled release of doxorubicin. Bioconjug Chem 16:361–368
Gillies ER, Goodwin AP, Fréchet JMJ (2004) Acetals as pH-sensitive linkages for drug delivery. Bioconjug Chem 15:1254–1263
Göppert TM, Müller RH (2003) Plasma protein adsorption of Tween 80- and poloxamer 188-stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles. J Drug Target 11:225–231
Göppert TM, Müller RH (2005) Polysorbate-stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles as colloidal carriers for intravenous targeting of drugs to the brain: comparison of plasma protein adsorption patterns. J Drug Target 13:179–187
Grabowski N, Hillaireau H, Vergnaud-Gauduchon J, Nicolas V, Tsapis N, Kerdine-Romer S, Fattal E (2016) Surface-modified biodegradable nanoparticles’ impact on cytotoxicity and inflammation response on a co-culture of lung epithelial cells and human-like macrophages. J Biomed Nanotechnol 12(1):135–146
Gratton SEA, Ropp PA, Pohlhaus PD, Luft JC, Madden VJ, Napier ME, DeSimone JM (2008a) The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11613–11618
Gratton SEA, Napier ME, Ropp PA, Tian S, Desimone JM (2008b) Microfabricated particles for engineered drug therapies: elucidation into the mechanisms of cellular internalization of PRINT particles. Pharm Res 25:2845–2852
Gregoriadis G (1978) Liposomes in the therapy of lysosomal storage diseases. Nature 275:695–696
Grislain L, Couvreur P, Lenaerts V, Roland M, Deprezdecampeneere D, Speiser P (1983) Pharmacokinetics and distribution of a biodegradable drug-carrier. Int J Pharm 15:335–345
Groves E, Dart A, Covarelli V, Caron E (2008) Molecular mechanisms of phagocytic uptake in mammalian cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:1957–1976
Guo LSS (2001) Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion: an improved antifungal therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 47:149–163
Haag R, Kratz F (2006) Polymer therapeutics: concepts and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 45:1198–1215
Harashima H, Sakata K, Funato K, Kiwada H (1994) Enhanced hepatic uptake of liposomes through complement activation depending on the size of liposomes. Pharm Res 11:402–406
Harashima H, Hiraiwa T, Ochi Y, Kiwada H (1995) Size dependent liposome degradation in blood: in vivo/in vitro correlation by kinetic modeling. J Drug Target 3:253–261
Harding JA, Engbers CM, Newman MS, Goldstein NI, Zalipsky S (1997) Immunogenicity and pharmacokinetic attributes of poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted immunoliposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1327:181–192
Harush-Frenkel O, Debotton N, Benita S, Altschuler Y (2007) Targeting of nanoparticles to the clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 353:26–32
Harush-Frenkel O, Rozentur E, Benita S, Altschuler Y (2008) Surface charge of nanoparticles determines their endocytic and transcytotic pathway in polarized MDCK cells. Biomacromolecules 9:435–443
Heath TD, Lopez NG, Papahadjopoulos D (1985) The effects of liposome size and surface charge on liposome-mediated delivery of methotrexate-gamma-aspartate to cells in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta 820:74–84
Hilgenbrink AR, Low PS (2005) Folate receptor-mediated drug targeting: from therapeutics to diagnostics. J Pharm Sci 94:2135–2146
Hoffmann PR, deCathelineau AM, Ogden CA, Leverrier Y, Bratton DL, Daleke DL, Ridley AJ, Fadok VA, Henson PM (2001) Phosphatidylserine (PS) induces PS receptor-mediated macropinocytosis and promotes clearance of apoptotic cells. J Cell Biol 155:649–660
Hoshino A, Fujioka K, Oku T, Nakamura S, Suga M, Yamaguchi Y, Suzuki K, Yasuhara M, Yamamoto K (2004) Quantum dots targeted to the assigned organelle in living cells. Microbiol Immunol 48:985–994
Hsu MJ, Juliano RL (1982) Interactions of liposomes with the reticuloendothelial system. II: nonspecific and receptor-mediated uptake of liposomes by mouse peritoneal macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta 720:411–419
Huang M, Ma Z, Khor E, Lim L (2002) Uptake of FITC-chitosan nanoparticles by A549 cells. Pharm Res 19:1488–1494
Huang M, Khor E, Lim L (2004) Uptake and cytotoxicity of chitosan molecules and nanoparticles: effects of molecular weight and degree of deacetylation. Pharm Res 21:344–353
Huwyler J, Wu D, Pardridge WM (1996) Brain drug delivery of small molecules using immunoliposomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:14164–14169
Huwyler J, Yang J, Pardridge WM (1997) Receptor mediated delivery of daunomycin using immunoliposomes: pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282:1541–1546
Ilium L, Hunneyball I, Davis S (1986) The effect of hydrophilic coatings on the uptake of colloidal particles by the liver and by peritoneal macrophages. Int J Pharm 29:53–65
Jeon S, Lee J, Andrade J, De Gennes P (1991) Protein–surface interactions in the presence of polyethylene oxide: I. Simplified theory. J Colloid Interface Sci 142:149–158
Jiang W, Kim BYS, Rutka JT, Chan WCW (2008) Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nat Nanotechnol 3:145–150
Jones A, Shusta E (2007) Blood–brain barrier transport of therapeutics via receptor-mediation. Pharm Res 24:1759–1771
Juliano RL, Lin G (1980) The binding of human plasma proteins to cholesterol containing liposomes. In: Baldwin H (ed) Liposomes and immunobiology. Elsevier, New York, pp 49–66
Juliano RL, Stamp D (1975) The effect of particle size and charge on the clearance rates of liposomes and liposome encapsulated drugs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 63:651–658
Kanaseki T, Kadota K (1969) The “vesicle in a basket”. A morphological study of the coated vesicle isolated from the nerve endings of the guinea pig brain, with special reference to the mechanism of membrane movements. J Cell Biol 42:202–220
Kichler A, Leborgne C, Coeytaux E, Danos O (2001) Polyethylenimine-mediated gene delivery: a mechanistic study. J Gene Med 3:135–144
Kim SH, Jeong JH, Chun KW, Park TG (2005) Target-specific cellular uptake of PLGA nanoparticles coated with poly(L-lysine)-poly(ethylene glycol)-folate conjugate. Langmuir 21:8852–8857
Kim HR, Gil S, Andrieux K, Nicolas V, Appel M, Chacun H, Desmaële D, Taran F, Georgin D, Couvreur P (2007a) Low-density lipoprotein receptor-mediated endocytosis of PEGylated nanoparticles in rat brain endothelial cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 64:356–364
Kim HR, Andrieux K, Gil S, Taverna M, Chacun H, Desmaële D, Taran F, Georgin D, Couvreur P (2007b) Translocation of poly(ethylene glycol-co-hexadecyl)cyanoacrylate nanoparticles into rat brain endothelial cells: role of apolipoproteins in receptor-mediated endocytosis. Biomacromolecules 8:793–799
Kim HR, Andrieux K, Delomenie C, Chacun H, Appel M, Desmaële D, Taran F, Georgin D, Couvreur P, Taverna M (2007c) Analysis of plasma protein adsorption onto PEGylated nanoparticles by complementary methods: 2-DE, CE and protein lab-on-chip system. Electrophoresis 28:2252–2261
Kleemann E, Neu M, Jekel N, Fink L, Schmehl T, Gessler T, Seeger W, Kissel T (2005) Nano-carriers for DNA delivery to the lung based upon a TAT-derived peptide covalently coupled to PEG-PEI. J Control Release 109:299–316
Kole L, Sarkar K, Mahato SB, Das PK (1994) Neoglycoprotein conjugated liposomes as macrophage specific drug carrier in the therapy of leishmaniasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 200:351–358
Korn ED, Weisman RA (1967) Phagocytosis of latex beads by Acanthamoeba. II. Electron microscopic study of the initial events. J Cell Biol 34:219–227
Koval M, Preiter K, Adles C, Stahl PD, Steinberg TH (1998) Size of IgG-opsonized particles determines macrophage response during internalization. Exp Cell Res 242:265–273
Kreuter J (2001) Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 47:65–81
Kreuter J (2002) Transport of drugs accross the blood-brain barrier by nanoparticles. Curr Med Chem: Cent Nerv Syst Agents 2:241–249
Kreuter J, Täuber U, Illi V (1979) Distribution and elimination of poly(methyl-2-14C-methacrylate) nanoparticle radioactivity after injection in rats and mice. J Pharm Sci 68:1443–1447
Kreuter J, Ramge P, Petrov V, Hamm S, Gelperina SE, Engelhardt B, Alyautdin R, von Briesen H, Begley DJ (2003) Direct evidence that polysorbate-80-coated poly(butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles deliver drugs to the CNS via specific mechanisms requiring prior binding of drug to the nanoparticles. Pharm Res 20:409–416
Labarre D (2012) The interactions between blood and polymeric nanoparticles depend on the nature and structure of the hydrogel covering the surface. Polymers 4:986–996
Labarre D, Montdargent B, Carreno M, Maillet F (1993) Strategy for in vitro evaluation of the interactions between biomaterials and complement system. J Appl Biomater 4:231–240
Lai SK, Hida K, Man ST, Chen C, Machamer C, Schroer TA, Hanes J (2007) Privileged delivery of polymer nanoparticles to the perinuclear region of live cells via a non-clathrin, non-degradative pathway. Biomaterials 28:2876–2884
Larabi M, Yardley V, Loiseau PM, Appel M, Legrand P, Gulik A, Bories C, Croft SL, Barratt G (2003) Toxicity and antileishmanial activity of a new stable lipid suspension of amphotericin B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3774–3779
Lee RJ, Low PS (1995) Folate-mediated tumor cell targeting of liposome-entrapped doxorubicin in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta 1233:134–144
Lee K, Hong K, Papahadjopoulos D (1992a) Recognition of liposomes by cells: In vitro binding and endocytosis mediated by specific lipid headgroups and surface charge density. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembranes 1103:185–197
Lee K, Pitas RE, Papahadjopoulos D (1992b) Evidence that the scavenger receptor is not involved in the uptake of negatively charged liposomes by cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembranes 1111:1–6
Lee KD, Nir S, Papahadjopoulos D (1993) Quantitative analysis of liposome-cell interactions in vitro: rate constants of binding and endocytosis with suspension and adherent J774 cells and human monocytes. Biochemistry 32:889–899
Lee HJ, Engelhardt B, Lesley J, Bickel U, Pardridge WM (2000) Targeting rat anti-mouse transferrin receptor monoclonal antibodies through blood-brain barrier in mouse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292:1048–1052
Lee ES, Na K, Bae YH (2005) Doxorubicin loaded pH-sensitive polymeric micelles for reversal of resistant MCF-7 tumor. J Control Release 103:405–418
Lehr CM, Bouwstra J, Schacht E, Junginger H (1992) In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers. Int J Pharm 78:43–48
Lenaerts V, Nagelkerke JF, Van Berkel TJ, Couvreur P, Grislain L, Roland M, Speiser P (1984) In vivo uptake of polyisobutyl cyanoacrylate nanoparticles by rat liver Kupffer, endothelial, and parenchymal cells. J Pharm Sci 73:980–982
Leroux JC, Gravel P, Balant L, Volet B, Anner BM, Allémann E, Doelker E, Gurny R (1994) Internalization of poly(D, L-lactic acid) nanoparticles by isolated human leukocytes and analysis of plasma proteins adsorbed onto the particles. J Biomed Mater Res 28:471–481
Leroux J, De Jaeghere F, Anner B, Doelker E, Gurny R (1995) An investigation on the role of plasma and serum opsonins on the evternalization of biodegradable poly(D, L-lactic acid) nanoparticles by human monocytes. Life Sci 57:695–703
Lewin M, Carlesso N, Tung CH, Tang XW, Cory D, Scadden DT, Weissleder R (2000) Tat peptide-derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cells. Nat Biotechnol 18:410–414
Ma Z, Lim L (2003) Uptake of chitosan and associated insulin in Caco-2 cell monolayers: a comparison between chitosan molecules and chitosan nanoparticles. Pharm Res 20:1812–1819
Mao S, Germershaus O, Fischer D, Linn T, Schnepf R, Kissel T (2005) Uptake and transport of PEG-graft-trimethyl-chitosan copolymer-insulin nanocomplexes by epithelial cells. Pharm Res 22:2058–2068
Marsh M, Helenius A (2006) Virus entry: open sesame. Cell 124:729–740
Martina M, Nicolas V, Wilhelm C, Ménager C, Barratt G, Lesieur S (2007) The in vitro kinetics of the interactions between PEG-ylated magnetic-fluid-loaded liposomes and macrophages. Biomaterials 28:4143–4153
Maruyama K, Takizawa T, Yuda T, Kennel SJ, Huang L, Iwatsuru M (1995) Targetability of novel immunoliposomes modified with amphipathic poly(ethylene glycol)s conjugated at their distal terminals to monoclonal antibodies. Biochim Biophys Acta 1234:74–80
Maruyama K, Takahashi N, Tagawa T, Nagaike K, Iwatsuru M (1997) Immunoliposomes bearing polyethyleneglycol-coupled Fab’ fragment show prolonged circulation time and high extravasation into targeted solid tumors in vivo. FEBS Lett 413:177–180
Maruyama K, Ishida O, Takizawa T, Moribe K (1999) Possibility of active targeting to tumor tissues with liposomes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 40:89–102
Matter K, Mellman I (1994) Mechanisms of cell polarity: sorting and transport in epithelial cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 6:545–554
Mayor S, Pagano RE (2007) Pathways of clathrin-independent endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:603–612
Merdan T, Kunath K, Fischer D, Kopecek J, Kissel T (2002) Intracellular processing of poly(ethylene imine)/ribozyme complexes can be observed in living cells by using confocal laser scanning microscopy and inhibitor experiments. Pharm Res 19:140–146
Mishra V, Mahor S, Rawat A, Gupta PN, Dubey P, Khatri K, Vyas SP (2006) Targeted brain delivery of AZT via transferrin anchored pegylated albumin nanoparticles. J Drug Target 14:45–53
Mo Y, Lim L (2005a) Preparation and in vitro anticancer activity of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles loaded with paclitaxel and isopropyl myristate. J Control Release 107:30–42
Mo Y, Lim L (2005b) Paclitaxel-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: potentiation of anticancer activity by surface conjugation with wheat germ agglutinin. J Control Release 108:244–262
Moghimi SM, Szebeni J (2003) Stealth liposomes and long circulating nanoparticles: critical issues in pharmacokinetics, opsonization and protein-binding properties. Prog Lipid Res 42:463–478
Moghimi SM, Muir IS, Illum L, Davis SS, Kolb-Bachofen V (1993) Coating particles with a block co-polymer (poloxamine-908) suppresses opsonization but permits the activity of dysopsonins in the serum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1179:157–165
Mosqueira VC, Legrand P, Gref R, Heurtault B, Appel M, Barratt G (1999) Interactions between a macrophage cell line (J774A1) and surface-modified poly (D, L-lactide) nanocapsules bearing poly(ethylene glycol). J Drug Target 7:65–78
Mukherjee S, Ghosh RN, Maxfield FR (1997) Endocytosis. Physiol Rev 77:759–803
Muller CD, Schuber F (1989) Neo-mannosylated liposomes: synthesis and interaction with mouse Kupffer cells and resident peritoneal macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta 986:97–105
Müller RH, Wallis KH, Tröster SD, Kreuter J (1992) In vitro characterization of poly(methyl-methaerylate) nanoparticles and correlation to their in vivo fate. J Control Release 20:237–246
Muro S, Wiewrodt R, Thomas A, Koniaris L, Albelda SM, Muzykantov VR, Koval M (2003) A novel endocytic pathway induced by clustering endothelial ICAM-1 or PECAM-1. J Cell Sci 116:1599–1609
Muro S, Dziubla T, Qiu W, Leferovich J, Cui X, Berk E, Muzykantov VR (2006a) Endothelial targeting of high-affinity multivalent polymer nanocarriers directed to intercellular adhesion molecule 1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 317:1161–1169
Muro S, Schuchman EH, Muzykantov VR (2006b) Lysosomal enzyme delivery by ICAM-1-targeted nanocarriers bypassing glycosylation- and clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Mol Ther 13:135–141
Muro S, Garnacho C, Champion JA, Leferovich J, Gajewski C, Schuchman EH, Mitragotri S, Muzykantov VR (2008) Control of endothelial targeting and intracellular delivery of therapeutic enzymes by modulating the size and shape of ICAM-1-targeted carriers. Mol Ther 16:1450–1458
Neu M, Fischer D, Kissel T (2005) Recent advances in rational gene transfer vector design based on poly(ethylene imine) and its derivatives. J Gene Med 7:992–1009
Norman ME, Williams P, Illum L (1992) Human serum albumin as a probe for surface conditioning (opsonization) of block copolymer-coated microspheres. Biomaterials 13:841–849
Oh P, McIntosh DP, Schnitzer JE (1998) Dynamin at the neck of caveolae mediates their budding to form transport vesicles by GTP-driven fission from the plasma membrane of endothelium. J Cell Biol 141:101–114
Olivier J, Fenart L, Chauvet R, Pariat C, Cecchelli R, Couet W (1999) Indirect evidence that drug brain targeting using polysorbate 80-coated polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles is related to toxicity. Pharm Res 16:1836–1842
Owens D, Peppas N (2006) Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 307:93–102
Parton RG, Simons K (2007) The multiple faces of caveolae. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:185–194
Patel LN, Zaro JL, Shen W (2007) Cell penetrating peptides: intracellular pathways and pharmaceutical perspectives. Pharm Res 24:1977–1992
Pelkmans L, Helenius A (2002) Endocytosis via caveolae. Traffic 3:311–320
Ponchel G, Irache JM (1998) Specific and non-specific bioadhesive particulate systems for oral delivery to the gastrointestinal tract. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 34:191–219
Prabha S, Zhou W, Panyam J, Labhasetwar V (2002) Size-dependency of nanoparticle-mediated gene transfection: studies with fractionated nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 244:105–115
Qaddoumi M, Ueda H, Yang J, Davda J, Labhasetwar V, Lee V (2004) The characteristics and mechanisms of uptake of PLGA nanoparticles in rabbit conjunctival epithelial cell layers. Pharm Res 21:641–648
Qian ZM, Li H, Sun H, Ho K (2002) Targeted drug delivery via the transferrin receptor-mediated endocytosis pathway. Pharmacol Rev 54:561–587
Racoosin EL, Swanson JA (1992) M-CSF-induced macropinocytosis increases solute endocytosis but not receptor-mediated endocytosis in mouse macrophages. J Cell Sci 102(Pt 4):867–880
Rahman YE, Cerny EA, Patel KR, Lau EH, Wright BJ (1982) Differential uptake of liposomes varying in size and lipid composition by parenchymal and kupffer cells of mouse liver. Life Sci 31:2061–2071
Raz A, Bucana C, Fogler WE, Poste G, Fidler IJ (1981) Biochemical, morphological, and ultrastructural studies on the uptake of liposomes by murine macrophages. Cancer Res 41:487–494
Rejman J, Oberle V, Zuhorn IS, Hoekstra D (2004) Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem J 377:159–169
Rejman J, Bragonzi A, Conese M (2005) Role of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis in gene transfer mediated by lipo- and polyplexes. Mol Ther 12:468–474
Rigotti A, Acton SL, Krieger M (1995) The class B scavenger receptors SR-BI and CD36 are receptors for anionic phospholipids. J Biol Chem 270:16221–16224
Roberts J, Quastel JH (1963) Particle uptake by polymorphonuclear leucocytes and ehrlich ascites-carcinoma cells. Biochem J 89:150–156
Ropert C, Lavignon M, Dubernet C, Couvreur P, Malvy C (1992) Oligonucleotides encapsulated in pH sensitive liposomes are efficient toward Friend retrovirus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 183:879–885
Roser M, Fischer D, Kissel T (1998) Surface-modified biodegradable albumin nano- and microspheres. II: effect of surface charges on in vitro phagocytosis and biodistribution in rats. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 46:255–263
Rothberg K, Ying Y, Kolhouse J, Kamen B, Anderson R (1990) The glycophospholipid-linked folate receptor internalizes folate without entering the clathrin-coated pit endocytic pathway. J Cell Biol 110:637–649
Rudt S, Muller R (1993) In-vitro phagocytosis assay of nanoparticles and microparticles by chemiluminescence.3. Uptake of differently sized surface-modified particles, and its correlation to particle properties and in-vivo distribution. Eur J Pharm Sci 1:31–39
Sabharanjak S, Mayor S (2004) Folate receptor endocytosis and trafficking. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:1099–1109
Sahoo SK, Labhasetwar V (2005) Enhanced antiproliferative activity of transferrin-conjugated paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles is mediated via sustained intracellular drug retention. Mol Pharm 2:373–383
Schäfer V, von Briesen H, Andreesen R, Steffan A, Royer C, Tröster S, Kreuter J, Rübsamen-Waigmann H (1992) Phagocytosis of nanoparticles by human immunodeficiency virus (HlV)-infected macrophages: a possibility for antiviral drug targeting. Pharm Res 9:541–546
Scherphof G, Kamps J (1998) Receptor versus non-receptor mediated clearance of liposomes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 32:81–97
Schiffelers RM, Koning GA, ten Hagen TLM, Fens MHAM, Schraa AJ, Janssen APCA, Kok RJ, Molema G, Storm G (2003) Anti-tumor efficacy of tumor vasculature-targeted liposomal doxorubicin. J Control Release 91:115–122
Schmid SL (1997) Clathrin-coated vesicle formation and protein sorting: an integrated process. Annu Rev Biochem 66:511–548
Schnitzer JE (2001) Caveolae: from basic trafficking mechanisms to targeting transcytosis for tissue-specific drug and gene delivery in vivo. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 49:265–280
Schnitzer JE, Oh P, Pinney E, Allard J (1994) Filipin-sensitive caveolae-mediated transport in endothelium: reduced transcytosis, scavenger endocytosis, and capillary permeability of select macromolecules. J Cell Biol 127:1217–1232
Schwendener R, Lagocki P, Rahman Y (1984) The effects of charge and size on the interaction of unilamellar liposomes with macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembranes 772:93–101
Simberg D, Weisman S, Talmon Y, Barenholz Y (2004) DOTAP (and other cationic lipids): chemistry, biophysics, and transfection. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 21:257–317
Stella B, Arpicco S, Peracchia MT, Desmaële D, Hoebeke J, Renoir M, D’Angelo J, Cattel L, Couvreur P (2000) Design of folic acid-conjugated nanoparticles for drug targeting. J Pharm Sci 89:1452–1464
Straubinger RM, Düzgünes N, Papahadjopoulos D (1985) pH-sensitive liposomes mediate cytoplasmic delivery of encapsulated macromolecules. FEBS Lett 179:148–154
Strømhaug PE, Berg TO, Gjøen T, Seglen PO (1997) Differences between fluid-phase endocytosis (pinocytosis) and receptor-mediated endocytosis in isolated rat hepatocytes. Eur J Cell Biol 73:28–39
Sun SX, Wirtz D (2006) Mechanics of enveloped virus entry into host cells. Biophys J 90:L10–L12
Sun W, Xie C, Wang H, Hu Y (2004) Specific role of polysorbate 80 coating on the targeting of nanoparticles to the brain. Biomaterials 25:3065–3071
Sun X, Rossin R, Turner JL, Becker ML, Joralemon MJ, Welch MJ, Wooley KL (2005) An assessment of the effects of shell cross-linked nanoparticle size, core composition, and surface PEGylation on in vivo biodistribution. Biomacromolecules 6:2541–2554
Swanson J (1989) Phorbol esters stimulate macropinocytosis and solute flow through macrophages. J Cell Sci 94:135–142
Swanson JA, Baer SC (1995) Phagocytosis by zippers and triggers. Trends Cell Biol 5:89–93
Swanson JA, Watts C (1995) Macropinocytosis. Trends Cell Biol 5:424–428
Tabata Y, Ikada Y (1988) Effect of the size and surface-charge of polymer microspheres on their phagocytosis by macrophage. Biomaterials 9:356–362
Tabata Y, Ikada Y (1990) Phagocytosis of polymer microspheres by macrophages. In: Boutevin B (ed) New polymer materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–141
Tkachenko AG, Xie H, Coleman D, Glomm W, Ryan J, Anderson MF, Franzen S, Feldheim DL (2003) Multifunctional gold nanoparticle-peptide complexes for nuclear targeting. J Am Chem Soc 125:4700–4701
Torchilin VP (2008) Tat peptide-mediated intracellular delivery of pharmaceutical nanocarriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:548–558
Torchilin VP, Berdichevsky VR, Barsukov AA, Smirnov VN (1980) Coating liposomes with protein decreases their capture by macrophages. FEBS Lett 111:184–188
van Oss CJ (1978) Phagocytosis as a surface phenomenon. Annu Rev Microbiol 32:19–39
Vasir JK, Labhasetwar V (2007) Biodegradable nanoparticles for cytosolic delivery of therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:718–728
Vasir JK, Labhasetwar V (2008) Quantification of the force of nanoparticle-cell membrane interactions and its influence on intracellular trafficking of nanoparticles. Biomaterials 29:4244–4252
Verrecchia T, Huve P, Bazile D, Veillard M, Spenlehauer G, Couvreur P (1993) Adsorption/desorption of human serum albumin at the surface of poly(lactic acid) nanoparticles prepared by a solvent evaporation process. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1019–1028
Vĕtvicka V, Fornůsek L (1987) Polymer microbeads in immunology. Biomaterials 8:341–345
von Bonsdorff CH, Fuller SD, Simons K (1985) Apical and basolateral endocytosis in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells grown on nitrocellulose filters. EMBO J 4:2781–2792
Vonarbourg A, Passirani C, Saulnier P, Benoit J (2006a) Parameters influencing the stealthiness of colloidal drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 27:4356–4373
Vonarbourg A, Passirani C, Saulnier P, Simard P, Leroux JC, Benoit JP (2006b) Evaluation of pegylated lipid nanocapsules versus complement system activation and macrophage uptake. J Biomed Mater Res A 78:620–628
Wang LH, Rothberg KG, Anderson RG (1993) Mis-assembly of clathrin lattices on endosomes reveals a regulatory switch for coated pit formation. J Cell Biol 123:1107–1117
Weitman SD, Lark RH, Coney LR, Fort DW, Frasca V, Zurawski VR, Kamen BA (1992) Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues. Cancer Res 52:3396–3401
Xu Z, Gu W, Huang J, Sui H, Zhou Z, Yang Y, Yan Z, Li Y (2005) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of actively targetable nanoparticles for paclitaxel delivery. Int J Pharm 288:361–368
Yagi N, Yano Y, Hatanaka K, Yokoyama Y, Okuno H (2007) Synthesis and evaluation of a novel lipid-peptide conjugate for functionalized liposome. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 17:2590–2593
Yu B, Hailman E, Wright SD (1997) Lipopolysaccharide binding protein and soluble CD14 catalyze exchange of phospholipids. J Clin Investig 99:315–324
Zauner W, Farrow NA, Haines AMR (2001) In vitro uptake of polystyrene microspheres: effect of particle size, cell line and cell density. J Control Release 71:39–51
Zhang K, Fang H, Chen Z, Taylor JA, Wooley KL (2008) Shape effects of nanoparticles conjugated with cell-penetrating peptides (HIV Tat PTD) on CHO cell uptake. Bioconjug Chem 19:1880–1887
Zuhorn IS, Engberts JBFN, Hoekstra D (2007) Gene delivery by cationic lipid vectors: overcoming cellular barriers. Eur Biophys J 36:349–362
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hillaireau, H. (2016). Investigating Interactions Between Nanoparticles and Cells: Internalization and Intracellular Trafficking. In: Vauthier, C., Ponchel, G. (eds) Polymer Nanoparticles for Nanomedicines. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41421-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41421-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41419-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41421-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)