Skip to main content

Human Rights Education and Religious Education: A Protestant Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights and Religion in Educational Contexts

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights ((CHREN,volume 1))

  • 461 Accesses

Abstract

“Is there a differentia specifica justified for the educational topic of human rights?” and “What can be considered as the profile of human rights education at school from a Protestant perspective?”

This paper generally assumes that one can actually justify a specific Protestant justification and potential in view of the human rights education issue. In more concrete terms: theological and ethical modes justification from a Protestant perspective can make a significant contribution to contemporary human rights education—and this is true not only for the national context of Germany or the other German-speaking countries with their denominational background of religious education, but also in the international context and its secular forms of learning about religion in school.

For this, a general provision is made at the start: human rights education in the school context is based on the central idea of “human dignity and worthiness of protection” as a general educational goal, which at the same time is associated with an openness to diverse forms of justification and thus to different educational subjects such as religious education (RE). Closer determinations and distinctions are fundamentally important for processing the questions mentioned above, which are geared not towards differentiation, but towards a productive conviviality of different forms of justification and education.

In this paper, this initial determination is developed in more detail in four sections:

1. What are the fundamental challenges that arise with a specific denominational profile of RE from the perspective of human rights education? 2. How is this requirement for interpretation currently reflected in teaching and educational plans as well as teaching materials in Protestant RE? 3. Which specific theological and ethical thought patterns are relevant for a theoretical reflection from a Protestant perspective? 4. What didactic consequences can be drawn from this for future human rights education—including with an interreligious orientation—in the context of RE? A final 5th part summarizes these reflections.

Originally published as Menschenrechtsbildung im evangelischen Religionsunterricht, in: M. L. Pirner, J. Lähnemann, H. Bielefeldt (Hrsg.) Menschenrechte und inter-religiöse Bildung, EB-Verlag Dr. Brandt e.K., Berlin 2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is conceivable that human rights education could take place without the dimension of religious value education. The UN “World Programme for Human Rights” running from 2005 to 2015 appears in no way ignorant on questions of religion. However religion is primarily discussed as a possible subject matter, but rarely from the perspective of an institutionalised religious human rights education. In short: the initiative will serve for the better and peaceful co-existence of religions, but they are not talking here about an educational contribution by religious institutions themselves or even about a specific religious justification potential of human rights. Maybe behind it is a specific secular belief that one is well advised, especially in these times, to keep the religious factor out of these debates as this could just act to exacerbate the conflict.

  2. 2.

    The Toledo Guiding Principles on Teaching about Religions and Beliefs in Public Schools published by the OSCE in 2007 must be mentioned here (see http://www.osce.org/publications/odihr/2007/11/28314_993_en.pdf; as of June 10, 2010).

  3. 3.

    Standardised testing requirements in the Abitur (school leaving certificate) examination on Protestant theology (Resolution of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of 01.12.1989 as amended on 16.11.2006), 32 (Online).

  4. 4.

    See, for example the question of: Human dignity or: When does the right to life begin? http://www.1000fragen.de/hintergruende/dossiers/dossier.php?sid=d5f30fdc13afb2401d930b28c03bbace&did=14&simple=n&pn=1.

  5. 5.

    “The concept of openness to justification proves to be a middle ground, seeking to avoid the extremes of radical universalism and radical relativism” (Vögele, 2000, p. 490).

References

  • Baumert, J. (2002). Deutschland im internationalen Bildungsvergleich. In N. Killius, J. Kluge, & L. Reisch (Hrsg.), Die Zukunft der Bildung (pp. 100–150). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • der Rat, E. K. D. (Hrsg.). (1975). Die Menschenrechte im ökumenischen Gespräch. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • der Rat, E. K. D. (Hrsg.). (2003). Maße des Menschlichen. Evangelische Perspektiven zur Bildung in der Wissens- und Lerngesellschaft. Eine Denkschrift des Rates der Evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • der Sekretariat, K. M. K. (Hrsg.). (2008). Menschenrechtsbildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Länderumfrage des Sekretariats zur Erstellung des nationalen Berichts im Rahmen des Aktionsplans der Vereinten Nationen für das Weltprogramm für Menschenrechtsbildung. Stuttgart: Klett Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich, V.-J. (2010). Oberstufe religion. Gerechtigkeit. Teachers book. Stuttgart: Calwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, T., & Wagensommer, G. (2010). Menschenrechte: Grundsätzliches. In W. Schwendemann (Hrsg.), Menschenrechte, Solidarität, Zivilcourage. Bausteine für die Sekundarstufe I (pp. 16–27). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, B. (2002). Religionsunterricht als Werteerziehung? – Eine Problemanzeige. ZEE, 46, 256–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D., & Elsenbast, V. (Red.). (2006). Grundlegende Kompetenzen religiöser Bildung. Zur Entwicklung des evangelischen Religionsunterrichts durch Bildungsstandards für den Abschluss der Sekundarstufe I. Münster: Comenius Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. (1992). “Soll ich meines Bruders Hüter sein?”. Zugänge zum Verständnis der Menschenrechte im Religionsunterricht. Eine Untersuchung zur Frage der didaktischen Rezeption des Themas “Menschenrechte” in unterrichtsrelevanten Materialien und Schulbüchern sowie in den Lehrplänen und Rahmenrichtlinien für den evangelischen und katholischen Religionsunterricht. Frankfurt/M.: P. Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körtner, U. H. J. (2000). “Was ist der Mensch, daß du seiner gedenkst?”. Fragen und Antworten theologischer Anthropologie im Gespräch mit der Medizin. In W. Vögele & A. Dörries (Hrsg.), Menschenbild in Medizin und Theologie. Fachsymposium zum interdisziplinären Dialog (pp. 47–74). Rehburg-Loccum: Evangelische Akademie Loccum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihr, A. (2005). Die UN-Dekade für Menschenrechtsbildung – Eine Bilanz. Der Bürger im Staat, 55(1/2), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obst, G. (2008). Kompetenzorientiertes Lehren und Lernen im Religionsunterricht. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). (2009). Human rights education in the school systems of Europe. Central Asia and North America: A compendium of good practice. Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlag, T. (2010). Horizonte demokratischer Bildung. Evangelische Religionspädagogik in politischer Perspektive. Freiburg/Basel/Vienna: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendemann, W. (2008). Kompetenzen und Inhalte des neuen Bildungsplanes (2004) für das Fach Evangelische Religion – Gymnasium – Bezüge zur Menschenrechtsbildung. In Ders. & G. Wagensommer (Hrsg.), “… bis ins dritte und vierte Glied.” Religionspädagogische Rezeptionsforschung zu Nationalsozialismus und Holocaust. Aus der Geschichte lernen (3) (pp. 149–159). Münster u. a.: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendemann, W. (Hrsg.). (2010). Menschenrechte, Solidarität, Zivilcourage. Bausteine für die Sekundarstufe I. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vögele, W. (2000). Menschenwürde zwischen Recht und Theologie. Begründungen von Menschenrechten in der Perspektive öffentlicher Theologie. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Schlag .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schlag, T. (2016). Human Rights Education and Religious Education: A Protestant Perspective. In: Pirner, M., Lähnemann, J., Bielefeldt, H. (eds) Human Rights and Religion in Educational Contexts. Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39351-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39351-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39350-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39351-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics