Skip to main content

Introduction: The Rhetoric of Parliamentary Debate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Rhetoric in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, 1830–1870

Part of the book series: Studies in Modern History ((SMH))

  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

Haapala introduces a rhetorical approach to studying parliamentary debate. Focusing on the debating practices of the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, the chapter suggests that an extraordinary relationship was formed between debate and parliamentary procedure in the Unions and the mid nineteenth-century House of Commons. As well as drawing attention to the relevance of procedure and rules of debate in the history of the British Parliament, Haapala discusses approaches previously used to make sense of parliamentary discourse and debate. The chapter also illustrates the adoption of parliamentary procedure in the Unions and highlights them as an important historical source for understanding political activity in British parliamentary culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Literature

  • Atkins, Judi, Alan Finlayson, James Martin and Nick Turnbull (eds) 2014. Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. (Rhetoric, Politics and Society). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevis, Matthew 2010 (2007). The Art of Eloquence: Byron, Dickens, Tennyson, Joyce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Michael 1973. The Great Reform Act. London: Hutchinson University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, Lars 2012. Eloquent Students: Rhetorical Practices at the Uppsala Student Nations 1663–2010. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, John W. 1988. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought. The Carlyle lectures 1985. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, Gilbert [Lord] 1958 (1929). An Introduction to the Procedure of the House of Commons. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charteris–Black, Jonathan 2014. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, Stefan, Donald Winch and John Burrow 1987 (1983). That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret. The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cradock, Percy 1953. Recollections of the Cambridge Union, 1815–1939. Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mille, James 1882 (1878). Elements of Rhetoric. New York: Harpers. http://archive.org/details/elementsrhetori00millgoog

  • Feuchter, Jörg and Johannes Helmrath (eds) 2013. Parlamentarische Kulturen vom Mittelalter bis in die Moderne. Reden, Räume, Bilder. Düsseldorf: Droste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielde, Adele M. 1914 (1899). Parliamentary Procedure. A Compendium of Its Rules Compiled from the Latest and Highest Authorities, for the Use of Students, and for the Guidance of Officers and Members of Clubs, Societies, Boards, Committees, and All Deliberative Bodies. Seattle: Helen N. Stevens. https://archive.org/details/parliamentarypro00fielrich

  • Finlayson, Alan 2014. Proving, Pleasing and Persuading? Rhetoric in Contemporary British Politics. The Political Quarterly 85 (4), 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Walter Morley 1935. The University Pitt Club, 1835–1935. Completed by Charles Montague Fletcher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foord, Archibald S. 1964. His Majesty’s Opposition, 1714–1830. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Galembert, Claire, Olivier Rozenberg and Cécile Vigour (eds) 2013. Faire parler le Parlement. Méthodes et enjeux de l’analyse des débats parlementaires pour les sciences sociales. Paris: LGDJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gash, Norman 1953. Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830–1850. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Fiona 2005. Playing at Politics: An Ethnography of the Oxford Union. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J. H. 1969. Character and Style in English Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, G. G. 1896. A Hand-Book of Procedure of the House of Commons, With Suggestions and Precedents for the Use of Parliamentary Debating Societies. London: Horace Cox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronbeck, Bruce 1982. Symbolic Dimensions of Parliamentary Procedure in the Late 18th-Century English Commons. Parliamentary Journal 23 (2), 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapala, Taru 2012. ‘That in the Opinion of this House’: The Parliamentary Culture of Debate in the Nineteenth-Century Cambridge and Oxford Union Societies. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, PhD diss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen 1989 (1962). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakewill, William 1659. Modus Tenendi Parliamentum, or, The Old Manner of Holding Parliaments in England Extracted Out of Our Ancient Records: With Certain Municipal Rights and Customes of this Commonwealth of England. Together with, the Priviledges of Parliament: And the Manner How Lawes are There Enacted by Passing of Bills. Collected Many Years Past Out of the Journal of the House of Commons. London: John Benson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Angus 1987. Parliament, Party, and the Art of Politics in Britain, 1855–59. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, Christopher 1965. The Oxford Union. London: Evans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, Patrick 1956. Questions in the House: The History of a Unique British Institution. London: The Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Derek 1939. A Poet in Parliament: The Life of Winthrop Mackworth Praed, 1802–1839. London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, Pasi and Kari Palonen 2009. Parliamentary Sources in the Comparative Study of Conceptual History: Methodological Aspects and Illustrations of a Research Proposal. Parliaments, Estates & Representation 29, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilbert, Courtenay P. [Sir] 1901. Legislative Methods and Forms. Oxford: Clarendon. https://archive.org/details/legislativemetho00ilbeiala

  • Ilie, Cornelia 2010. Introduction. In: Cornelia Ilie (ed.) European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, H. Donaldson 1931. The Reports of Parliamentary Debates, 1803–1908. Economica 34, 437–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, Alexandra 2009. Parliamentary Reform at Westminster. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, Peter 2002. Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice (Ideas in Context, vol. 63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Ged 2000. The Cambridge Union and Ireland, 1815–1914. Edinburgh: Ann Barry. http://www.gedmartic-mainmenu-11/146-the-cambridge-union-and-ireland-1815–1914

  • Martin, James 2014. Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, Joseph S. 2001. Public Speech and the Culture of Public Life in the Age of Gladstone. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, Joseph S. 2011. Knowledge and Power: The Parliamentary Representation of Universities in Britain and the Empire. (Parliamentary History: Texts & Studies 4). Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Philip [Lord] 2001. Playing by the Rules: The Constraining Hand of Parliamentary Procedure. The Journal of Legislative Studies 7 (3), 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palgrave, Reginald F. D. 1878 (1869). The Chairman’s Handbook. Suggestions and Rules for the Conduct of Chairmen of Public and Other Meetings, Drawn from the Procedure and Practice of Parliament, 3rd and revised edition. London: Knight. https://archive.org/details/chairmanshandbo01palggoog

  • Palonen, Kari 2008. Speaking Pro et Contra: The Rhetorical Intelligibility of Parliamentary Politics and the Political Intelligibility of Parliamentary Rhetoric. In: Suvi Soininen and Tapani Turkka (eds) The Parliamentary Style of Politics. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association, 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, Kari 2014. The Politics of Parliamentary Procedure. The Formation of the Westminster Procedure as a Parliamentary Ideal Type. Opladen: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, Kari, José María Rosales and Tapani Turkka (eds) 2014. The Politics of Dissensus. Parliament in Debate. Santander: Cantabria University Press and McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, Stephen 2009. Arena of Ambition: A History of the Cambridge Union. London: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen, Markku 2013. Rhetoric, Politics and Popularity in Pre-Revolutionary England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Chaïm and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca 1971 (1969). The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Published originally in French in 1958. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proksch, Sven-Oliver and Jonathan B. Slapin 2015. The Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Rebels and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, Josef 1908. The Procedure of the House of Commons: A Study of its History and Present Form, Vols. 1–2. Translated from German by A. Ernest Steinthal, with an introduction by Sir Courtenay Ilbert, Clerk of the House of Commons. London: A. Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Christopher 2000. Whose Parliament? Political Oratory and Print Culture in the Later 18th Century. Language and Literature 9 (2), 122–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Christopher 2012. Imprison’d Wranglers. The Rhetorical Culture of the House of Commons, 1760–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Christopher 2013. Whig Declamation and Rhetorical Freedom at Trinity College, Cambridge, 1770–1805. Review of English Studies 64 (266), 630–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Wemyss [Sir] (ed.) 1899. The Life of William Ewart Gladstone. London: Cassell. http://openlibrary.org/books/OL7137445M/The_life_of_William_Ewart_Gladstone

  • van Rijn, Jaap 2010. De eeuw van het debat. De ontwikkeling van het publieke debat in Nederland en Engeland, 1800–1920. Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, Henry M. 1915 (1876). Robert’s Rules of Order for Deliberative Assemblies. Part I: Rules of Order: A Compendium of Parliamentary Law, Based upon the Rules and Practice of Congress, Part II: Organization and Conduct of Business: A Simple Explanation of the Method of Organizing and Conducting the Business of Societies, Conventions, and Other Deliberative Assemblies. Chicago: Scott. https://archive.org/details/robertsrulesofor00robe

  • Rozenberg, Olivier and Éric Thiers (eds) 2013. L’opposition parlementaire. Paris: La Documentation française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, Andreas and Andreas Wirsching (eds) 2012. Parlamentarischen Kulturen in Europa. Das Parlament als Kommunikationsraum. Düsseldorf: Droste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Thomas 2008. Parliamentary Procedure: Principal forms and Political Effects. Public Choice 136, 353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobell, Henry 1670 (1656). Memorials of the Method and Manner of Proceedings in Parliament in Passing Bills. Together with Several Rules & Customs, Which by Long and Constant Practice Have Obtained the Name of Orders of the House. Gathered by observation, and out of the Journal Books from the time of Edward 6. London. http://tinyurl.com/jsakhmy

  • Setälä, Maija 2009. Rhetoric and Deliberative Democracy. Redescriptions 13 (1), 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin 2005. Hobbes on Representation. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2), 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin 2008. Political Rhetoric and the Role of Ridicule. In: Kari Palonen, Tuija Pulkkinen and José María Rosales (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to the Politics of Democratization in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Thomas [Sir] 1612. Common-Wealth of England and the Manner of Gouvernement Thereof: With New Additions of the Chiefe Courts in England, and the Offices Thereof by the Said Author. London: Will Stansby. http://tinyurl.com/j9rw63l

  • Steinmetz, Willibald 1993. Das Sagbare und das Machbare: Zum Wandel politischer Handlungsspielräume England 1780–1867. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, Willibald 2013. Normen parlamentarischen Redens in England (1600–1900). In: Jörg Feuchter and Johannes Helmrath (eds) Parlamentarische Kulturen vom Mittelalter bis in die Moderne. Reden, Räume, Bilder. Düsseldorf: Droste, 51–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. D. G. 1971. The House of Commons in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toye, Richard 2014. The Rhetorical Culture of the House of Commons after 1918. History 99, 270–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahrman, Dror 1992. Virtual Representation: Parliamentary Reporting and Languages of Class in the 1790s. Past & Present 136, 83–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, David 1984. The Oxford Union: Playground of Power. London: Macdonald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wordsworth, Charles 1891. Annals of My Early Life, 1806–1846; with occasional compositions in Latin and English verse. London: Longmans. http://openlibrary.org/books/OL7085937M/Annals_of_my_early_life_1806–1846

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haapala, T. (2016). Introduction: The Rhetoric of Parliamentary Debate. In: Political Rhetoric in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, 1830–1870. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35128-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35128-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-35127-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-35128-5

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics