Abstract
To search for a GMI material for GMI sensor applications, two main requirements should be satisfied, namely a high GMI ratio (or a large GMI effect) and a high sensitivity to the applied field (or a high magnetic response).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
7.1 Criteria for Selecting GMI Materials
To search for a GMI material for GMI sensor applications, two main requirements should be satisfied, namely a high GMI ratio (or a large GMI effect) and a high sensitivity to the applied field (or a high magnetic response). In view of the theoretical analyses and experimental results, it is concluded that a large GMI effect should exist in magnetic materials with the following desirable properties:
-
low resistivity, ρ;
-
high magnetic permeability, μ;
-
high saturation magnetisation, M s; and
-
small ferromagnetic relaxation parameter (or low damping parameter), α.
In this context, crystalline ferromagnetic materials have the advantage of lower resistivity (ρ), but amorphous ones have better soft magnetic behaviour (e.g. higher magnetic permeability, μ, and saturation magnetisation, M s) because they lack magnetocrystalline anisotropy. In particular, non-magnetostrictive materials can be expected to show the best GMI performance because the magnetoelastic contribution to magnetic anisotropy substantially weakens the soft magnetic behaviour. Improvement in the magnetic softness of an actual amorphous material by appropriate thermal treatment and/or the application of external parameters (mechanical stress, magnetic field, etc.) can lead to a simultaneous improvement in the GMI effect and its field sensitivity. The damping parameter (α) is often considered in the high frequency range where ferromagnetic resonance takes place, while it can be neglected in the intermediate frequency range (i.e. f = 0.1–10 MHz), where most GMI-based sensing applications have been identified (see Chap. 8). In addition, for practical sensor applications, the mass manufacturability and cost of materials are also important factors.
7.2 Evaluation of GMI Wires
In ferromagnetic materials, the highest value of the GMI effect experimentally observed is much smaller than the theoretically predicted value. Research in the field has been focused on special thermal treatments and on the development of new materials with properties appropriate for practical GMI sensor applications. In this section, all existing GMI wires will be reviewed and evaluated.
7.2.1 Co-Based Wires
Both conventional and glass-covered Co-based amorphous wires exhibit a GMI effect, owing to their high circular permeability. This is mainly due to the presence of circumferential anisotropy and an outer shell circular domain structure that results from coupling between negative magnetostriction and quenching compressive stress [1–5]. Among the Co-based amorphous alloys investigated, an alloy system with the nominal composition of Co–Fe–Si–B exhibits nearly zero and negative magnetostriction of λ s = −0.4 × 10−7. This alloy is often obtained by alloying Fe–Si–B that has a positive λ s of 25 × 10−6 with Co–Si–B that has a negative λ s of −3 × 10−6 [5, 6]. As a result, a record value of GMI ratio (1200 % at 14.2 MHz) has been achieved in the conventional amorphous Co68Fe4.35Si12.5B15 wire [7]. This value is much larger than that reported earlier (600 %) with the same composition [2, 5]. This larger value of GMI ratio is a result of minimising contact resistance and cancelling parasitic impedance [7]. However, a high field sensitivity of GMI (~500 %/Oe) was reported by Vazquez [2], while no information was found in the work by Garcia et al. [7].
In an attempt to develop magnetic wires for high-frequency sensor applications, Nie et al. [8] reported that a Co–Mn–Si–B amorphous glass-covered wire with nearly zero magnetostriction exhibited a GMI effect at high frequencies. For the amorphous Co68.2Mn7Si10B15 microwire, the GMI ratio and magnetic response reached the values of 153 and 65 %/Oe, respectively, at a frequency of 30 MHz. Vinai et al. [9] recently revealed that these microwires also exhibited a GMI effect at frequencies up to GHz. In the frequency range of 100 MHz–6 GHz, the GMI ratio reached a maximum value of ~100 % at a frequency of 2 GHz. As shown earlier in Chap. 6, for Co-based amorphous wires, the GMI effect can be further improved by appropriate field annealing [10], Joule current annealing [11–15], or the application of a tensile stress [16, 17].
In summary, the Co-based amorphous wires with nearly zero and negative magnetostriction are good candidates for GMI sensor applications. It should be noted that while the Co-based conventional and glass-covered amorphous wires are suitable for sensor applications in the low and intermediate frequency range (up to several MHz), the glass-covered amorphous microwires can be used for electrotechnical devices operating at much higher frequencies (up to several GHz). Due to their relatively high resistivity, the microwires retain their large GMI value at higher frequencies, when compared to ribbons and wires. In practice, depending upon the specific requirements of a sensor device (e.g. the operating-frequency range), either wires or microwires should be chosen accordingly.
7.2.2 Fe-Based Wires
Fe-based amorphous wires have relatively small or even no MI effects, owing to their relatively small effective permeability, which is due to the presence of an outer shell radial domain configuration that results from the coupling between the highly positive magnetostriction and the quenching compressive stress [4, 10, 18, 19]. A primary alloy of Fe–Si–B having a positive λ s of 25 × 10−6 was found to show poor magnetic softness and hence a small MI effect (~3 %), while a larger MI effect (~36 %) was obtained in the annealed wires [10, 19, 20]. It was the precipitation of an FeSi nanocrystalline phase that significantly decreased the bulk positive magnetostriction and hence gave rise to the MI effect of the annealed Fe–Si–B wires [20]. The crystallisation of Fe–Si–B-based amorphous alloys containing Nb and Cu causes the formation of a nanoscale bcc structure, and the bcc alloys exhibit excellent ultrasoft magnetic properties (i.e. high effective permeability and small coercivity) [6, 10]. In these alloys, the roles that Cu and Nb play are to maximise the density of crystal nuclei and to retard grain growth, respectively, leading to an ultrafine grain structure. Among these alloys, the nanocrystalline alloys with a nominal composition of Fe73.5Si13.5B9Nb3Cu1 were found to show the best magnetic softness. These materials are therefore expected to show large MI effects. Indeed, Knobel et al. [10] reported that conventional Fe73.5Si13.5B9Nb3Cu1 nanocrystalline wires (e.g. the amorphous wire samples annealed at 550–600 °C) exhibited a GMI effect. The largest value of GMI ratio was about 200 % at a frequency of 500 kHz for the wire sample annealed at 600 °C for 1 h. In another study, Li et al. [21] partially substituted Fe by Cr in Fe73.5Si13.5B9Nb3Cu1 nanocrystalline wires with the expectation of further reducing the magnetostriction of the primary alloy. They found that, although the GMI ratio and magnetic response were slightly smaller in Cr-doped samples, the addition of Cr improved the GMI response and significantly reduced the undesirable hysteretic effect in GMI curves with increasing and decreasing applied magnetic fields [21]. In addition, the presence of Cr significantly improved the corrosion resistance properties, which is desirable for sensing applications in a corrosive environment. The GMI effect was also observed in Fe-based nanocrystalline glass-coated wires and microwires [4, 18]. Interestingly, the Fe89B1Si3C3Mn4 nanocrystalline glass-covered microwires were found to show the GMI effect in the GHz frequency range [9]. At a frequency of 4 GHz, the GMI ratio reached a value as high as 70 % for the sample annealed at 350 °C. For this typical microwire, conventional furnace annealing proved more effective in improving the GMI effect compared with current annealing. Furthermore, it should be recalled that for both Fe-based amorphous and nanocrystalline glass-covered wires, the removal of the glass layer can significantly improve the GMI effect and magnetic response. However, the GMI ratios of Fe-based nanocrystalline wires are often smaller than those of Co-based amorphous wires [5].
7.2.3 Electrodeposited Wires
Besides rapidly quenched wires, electrodeposited wires, which comprise a highly conductive non-magnetic metal core (e.g. Cu, CuBe, and Ag) and a thin layer of soft magnetic metal (e.g. NiFe, NiFeRu, NiFeMo, CoP, and CoNiFe), have been found to show excellent GMI behaviours [22–42]. For electrodeposited wires, the magnetic layer has either a circular or a radial domain configuration, depending strongly upon the alloy composition and the sample processing conditions [40]. Wires having a circular domain structure are often expected to show a larger MI effect [38, 42].
In a pioneering work, Usov et al. [38] predicted that the GMI effect could be further improved in a composite amorphous wire when the electrical conductivity of the inner core is much higher than that of the shell region. Since this work, experimental efforts have been devoted to investigating the GMI effect in electrodeposited wires, such as CoP/Cu [22–26, 39], NiFe/Cu [28–30, 41], CoNiFe/Cu [31, 32, 40], NiFeRu/Cu [33], and NiFeMo/Cu [34]. Sinnecker et al. [22] reported that an electrodeposited CoP/Cu wire exhibited radial magnetic anisotropy (i.e. the radial domain structure) and the size of the closure domains increased with the magnetic layer thickness (CoP). It is interesting to note that, although magnetic wires with a radial magnetic anisotropy are not expected to show any GMI effect, a significant increase in GMI ratio with the magnetic layer thickness of the CoP/Cu composite wire was attained [22]. This indicated that the observed GMI effect was associated with the current distribution along the sample radius, with two well-defined regions having different transport and magnetic properties [23–26]. Recently, Phan et al. [39] optimised the processing conditions in order to achieve the largest GMI effect in a typical CoP/Cu electrodeposited wire. The largest GMI ratio was achieved with a deposition time of 6 min and an electrolytic current density of 639 mA/cm2. At the measured frequency of 10.7 MHz, the GMI ratio and magnetic response reached the highest values of 534 and 21 %/Oe, respectively. It was proposed that the changes of deposition time and electrolytic current density caused variations in the domain structure of the CoP magnetic layer and hence the GMI behaviour [39]. More interestingly, Kurlyandskaya et al. [40] found that the GMI ratio reached a value as high as 1200 % at a frequency of 4 MHz for FeNiCo/CuBe electroplated wire. This is the highest value reported until now, among existing electrodeposited wires. However, no information on the magnetic response of GMI was given [40]. In a comprehensive study investigating the influences of processing parameters (e.g. electrodeposition current density, duty cycle, electrolyte solution, pH value, applied magnetic field, magnetic layers, and post-annealing) on the GMI of electrodeposited NiFe/Cu wires, Li et al. [41] reported that the GMI ratio and magnetic response reached maximum values of 1110 and 218 %/Oe, respectively, at a frequency of 4 MHz for a dc Joule-annealed wire sample.
Recently, it has been revealed that the GMI effect can be further improved in electrodeposited wires by the inclusion of an insulating interlayer between the core and the magnetic shell (e.g. CuBe/insulator/NiFeB wires) [36, 37]. For instance, the GMI ratio reached a value of 250 % at f = 500kH–1 MHz for an electrodeposited CuBe/insulator/NiFeB wire, which is much larger than that of ~23 % at f = 1 MHz for the electrodeposited CuBe/NiFeB wire without the insulator layer [36]. This can arise from the differences in current distribution under the external magnetic field and from the electromagnetic interaction between the conductive core and the ferromagnetic layer of the composite wires with and without an insulator layer [36, 37]. In this context, Buznikov et al. [42] have recently developed a model for predicting the GMI effect in these typical wires. The model reveals that the field dependence of magnetic shell permeability significantly affects the eddy current distribution and therefore leads to the observed GMI effect. The inclusion of a thin insulator layer can lead to a further improvement in the GMI effect at sufficiently high frequencies, because it actually increases both the diagonal and off-diagonal impedance [42].
In general, electrodeposited composite wires are good candidate materials for producing high-performance magnetic sensors and sensing devices operating at low and intermediate frequencies (up to several MHz). Within this operating regime, electrodeposited composite wires may be even more promising than rapidly quenched wires and ribbons.
7.2.4 Multilayer Wires
Multilayer wire is a new family of magnetic microwires with multilayer bimagnetic characteristics [43, 44]. A typical biphase magnetic microwire consists of a ferromagnetic nucleus, an intermediate glass layer, and a ferromagnetic outer shell, as exemplified in Fig. 7.1. They were prepared by several complementary techniques including quenching and drawing for precursor glass-coated magnetic/metallic core microwire, sputtering for Au metallic intermediate nanolayer, and electroplating for magnetic external microtube. This combination of techniques enables the manipulation of different soft/hard magnetic characteristics at different layers and hence permits one to tune the properties of the biphase microwires. The peculiarity of the multilayer wires lie in the coupling between various layers. The presence of an external magnetic shell around a glass-coated microwire induces a longitudinal anisotropy in the nucleus of the latter, drastically modifying its magnetoinductive behaviour, making it very sensitive to the presence of an applied external stress and temperature [45, 46].
The most notable magnetic characteristic is the step-like magnetisation process arising from the different magnetic phases and couplings [47]. These can be optimised by specific thermal treatment processing to grow a new structural phase with a hard magnetic character at the magnetic core via conventional thermal annealing, or by inducing suitable helical anisotropy at the magnetic shell via helical magnetic field annealing or torsion annealing. Different magnetic configurations have been explored thus far: soft (nucleus)/hard (outer shell), hard/soft, and soft/soft [48]. One can invariably make use of the magnetic interactions to manipulate the soft magnetic core behaviour. For instance, it can be modulated through the hard phase stray fields, or magnetic bistability can be modified through the magnetoelastic anisotropy induced by the external phase. In addition to the soft/hard magnetic nature of each magnetic phase, an effective tuning of average behaviour can be achieved by adapting the thickness of each layer.
These multilayer wires are of practical significance as sensing core elements in sensor devices. Subject to a delicate control in terms of the reversal magnetisation of the soft phase, this type of microwire has come to be an ideal candidate in a variety of sensor technologies from temperature/tensile stress and torsion/position sensors to coil-less orthogonal fluxgates. The versatility of their properties and the high degree of freedom for tailoring give these wires an outstanding edge in the competitive sensing technology field.
7.3 Nominated GMI Materials for Sensor Applications
A wide variety of GMI materials are currently available for practical GMI sensor applications. Table 7.1 summarises several materials that possess a high GMI ratio and magnetic response and are promising for making high-performance GMI sensors. Appropriate selection is dependent upon specific requirements, such as their field sensitivity, working frequency range, size, and thermal stability. The ultrahigh sensitivity of GMI to external dc magnetic field (down to 10−8 Oe) can be used for magnetic field sensors and other sensors based on the change of a local magnetic field. It should be emphasised that not only the GMI ratio (η) and the magnetic response (ξ), but also the particular shape of the η(H) curve are important for high-performance sensor applications. In this context, the longitudinal weak-field-annealed amorphous ribbons [64, 67–74] and amorphous wires subjected to dc bias current [75–84] are promising candidate materials for producing auto-biased linear field sensors.
References
Chiriac H, Ovari TA (1996) Amorphous glass-covered magnetic wires: preparation, properties, applications. Prog Mater Sci 40:333–407
Vazquez M (2001) Giant magnetoimpedance in soft magnetic “wires”. J Magn Magn Mater 226–230:693–699
Knobel M, Pirota KR (2002) Giant magnetoimpedance: concepts and recent progress. J Magn Magn Mater 242–245:33–40
Knobel M, Vazquez M, Kraus L (2003) Giant magnetoimpedance (Chap 5). In: Buschow KH (ed) Handbook of magnetic materials, vol 15. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, pp 1–69
Vazquez M, Knobel M, Sanchez ML, Valenzuela R, Zhukov AP (1997) Giant magneto-impedance effect in soft magnetic wires for sensor applications. Sen Act A 59:20–29
McHenry ME, Willard MA, Laughlin DE (1999) Amorphous and nanocrystalline materials for applications as soft magnets. Prog Mater Sci 44:291–433
Garcia D, Raposo V, Montero O, Iniguez JI (2006) Influence of magnetostriction constant on magnetoimpedance-frequency dependence. Sen Act A 129:227–230
Nie HB, Zhang XX, Pakhomov AB, Xie Z, Yan X, Zhukov A, Vazquez M (1999) Giant magnetoimpedance of glass-covered amorphous microwires of Co–Mn–Si–B and Co–Si–B. J Appl Phys 85:4445–4447
Vinai F, Coisson M, Tiberto P (2006) High-frequency magneto-impedance in metastable metallic materials: an overview. J Magn Magn Mater 300:e82–e87
Knobel M, Sanchez ML, Gomez-Polo C, Marin P, Vazquez M, Hernando A (1996) Giant magneto-impedance effect in nanostructured magnetic wires. J Appl Phys 79:1646–1648
Kraus L, Knobel M, Kane SN, Chiriac H (1999) Influence of Joule heating on magnetostriction and giant magnetoimpedance effect in a glass covered CoFeSiB microwire. J Appl Phys 85:5435–5437
Kraus L, Chiriac H, Ovari TA (2000) Magnetic properties of stress-Joule-heated amorphous FeCrBSi microwire. J Magn Magn Mater 215–216:343–345
Pirota KR, Kraus L, Chiriac H, Knobel M (2001) Magnetostriction and GMI in Joule-heated CoFeSiB glass-covered microwires. J Magn Magn Mater 226–230:730–732
Brunetti L, Tiberto P, Vinai F, Chiriac H (2001) High-frequency giant magnetoimpedance in joule-heated Co-based amorphous ribbons and wires. Mater Sci Eng, A 304–306:961–964
Li DR, Lu ZC, Zhou SX (2004) Magnetic anisotropy and stress-impedance effect in Joule heated Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9 ribbons. J Appl Phys 95:204–207
Kurlyandskaya GV, Vazquez M, Munoz JL, Garcia D, McCord J (1999) Effect of induced magnetic anisotropy and domain structure features on magneto-impedance in stress annealed Co-rich amorphous ribbons. J Magn Magn Mater 196–197:259–261
Tejedor M, Hernando B, Sanchez ML, Prida VM, Vazquez M (1999) Stress and magnetic field dependence of magneto-impedance in amorphous Co66.3Fe3.7Si12B18 ribbons. J Magn Magn Mater 196–197:330–332
Vazquez M, Hernando A (1996) A soft magnetic wire for sensor applications. J Phys D Appl Phys 29:939–949
Moron C, Garcia A (2005) Giant magneto-impedance in nanocrystalline glass-covered microwires. J Magn Magn Mater 290–291:1085–1088
Takemura Y, Tokuda H (1996) IEEE Trans Magn 32:4947–4949
Li YF, Vaquez M, Chen DX (2000) GMI effect of Fe73.5−xCrxCu1Nb3Si13.5B9 amorphous and nanocrystalline soft wires. J Magn Magn Mater 249:342–345
Sinnecker JP, Garcia JM, Asenjo A, Vazquez M, Garcia-Arribas A (2000) Giant magnetoimpedance in CoP electrodeposited microtubes. J Mater Res 15:751–755
Yu RH, Landry G, Li YF, Basu S, Xiao JQ (2000) Magneto-impedance effect in soft magnetic tubes. J Appl Phys 87:4807–4809
Sinnecker JP, Knobel M, Pirota KR, Garcia JM, Asenjo A, Vazquez M (2000) Frequency dependence of the magnetoimpedance in amorphous CoP electrodeposited layers. J Appl Phys 87:4825–4827
Garcia JM, Sinnecker JP, Asenjo A, Vazquez M (2001) Enhanced magnetoimpedance in CoP electrodeposited microtubes. J Magn Magn Mater 226–230:704–706
Garcia JM, Asenjo A, Vazquez M, Yakunin AM, Antonov AS, Sinnecker JP (2001) Determination of closure domain penetration in electrodeposited microtubes by combined magnetic force microscopy and giant magneto-impedance techniques. J Appl Phys 89:3888–3891
Jantaratana P, Sirisathitkul C (2006) Effects of thickness and heat treatments on giant magnetoimpedance of electrodeposited cobalt on silver wires. IEEE Trans Magn 42:358–362
Li XP, Zhao ZJ, Seet HL, Heng WM, Oh TB, Lee JY (2003) Effect of magnetic field on the magnetic properties of electroplated NiFe/Cu composite wires. J Appl Phys 94:6655–6658
Li XP, Zhao ZJ, Chua C, Seet HL, Lu L (2003) Enhancement of giant magnetoimpedance effect of electroplated NiFe/Cu composite wires by dc Joule annealing. J Appl Phys 94:7626–7630
Hu J, Qin H, Zhang L, Chen J (2004) Giant magnetoimpedance effect in Ag/NiFe plate wire. Mater Sci Eng, B 106:202–206
Atalay FE, Kaya H, Atalay S (2006) Unusual grain growth in electrodeposited CoNiFe/Cu wires and their magnetoimpedance properties. Mater Sci Eng, B 131:242–247
Atalay FE, Kaya H, Atalay S (2006) Giant magnetoimpedance effect in electrodeposited CoNiFe/Cu wires with varying Ni, Fe and Co content. J Alloys Compd 420:9–14
Atalay FE, Kaya H, Atalay S (2006) Magnetoimpedance effect in electroplated NiFeRu/Cu wire. J Phys D Appl Phys 39:431–436
Velleuer J, Munoz AG, Yakabchuk H, Schiefer C, Hackl A, Kisker E (2007) Giant magnetoimpedance in electroplated NiFeMo/Cu microwires. J Magn Magn Mater 2:651–657
Zhang Z, Wu Q, Zhong K, Yang S, Lin X, Huang Z (2006) The size and space arrangement roles on coercivity of electrodeposited Co1−xCux nanowires. J Magn Magn Mater 303:e304–e307
Wang XZ, Yuan WZ, Zhao Z, Li XD, Ruan JZ, Yang XL (2005) Giant magnetoimpedance effect in CuBe/NiFeB and CuBe/insulator/NiFeB electroless-deposited composite wires. IEEE Trans Magn 41:113–115
Wang XZ, Yuan WZ, Zhao Z, Li XD, Ruan JZ, Zhao ZJ, Yang JX, Yang XL, Sun Z (2007) Enhancement of giant magnetoimpedance in composite wire with insulator layer. J Magn Magn Mater 308:269–272
Usov N, Antonov A, Granovsky A (1997) Theory of giant magntoimpedance effect in composite amorphous wire. J Magn Magn Mater 171:64–68
Phan MH, Peng HX, Wisnom MR, Tung MT, Dung NV, Nghi NH (2007) Optimized GMI effect in electrodeposited CoP/Cu composite wires. J Magn Magn Mater 2:244–247
Kurlyandskays GV, Garcia-Arribas A, Barandiaran JM (2003) Advantages of nonlinear giant magnetoimpedance for sensor applications. Sens Actuators A 106:234–239
Li XP, Seet HL, Fran J, Yi JB (2006) Electrodeposition and characteristics of Ni80Fe20/Cu composite wires. J Magn Magn Mater 304:111–116
Buznikov NA, Antonov AS, Granovsky AB, Kim CG, Kim CO, Li XP, Yoon SS (2006) Giant magnetoimpedance in composite wires with insulator layer between non-magnetic core and soft magnetic shell. J Magn Magn Mater 300:e63–e66
Pirota K, Hernandez-Velez M, Navas D, Zhukov A, Vázquez M (2004) Multilayer microwires: tailoring magnetic behavior by sputtering and electroplating. Adv Funct Mat 14:266–268
Pirota K, Provencio M, García K, Hernandez-Velez M, Vázquez MJ (2005) Magn Magn Mat 290–291:68
Vázquez M, Pirota K, Torrejon J, Badini G, Torcunov AJ (2006) Magn Magn Mater 304:197–202
Torrejón J, Badini G, Pirota K, Vázquez M (2007) Acta Mater 55:4271–4276
Vazquez M (2007) Advanced magnetic microwires. In: Kronmüller H, Parkin S (ed) Handbook of magnetism and advanced magnetic materials. Wiley&Sons, NJ
Torrejón J, Infante G, Badini-Confalonieri G et al (2013) J Miner Met Mater Soc 65(7):890–900
Vazquez M, Garcia-Beneytez JM, Garcia JM, Sinnecker JP, Zhukov AP (2000) Giant magneto-impedance in heterogeneous microwires. J Appl Phys 88:6501–6505
Pirota KR, Kraus L, Chiriac H, Knobel M (2000) Magnetic properties and giant magnetoimpedance in a CoFeSiB glass-covered microwire. J Magn Magn Mater 221:L243–L247
Phan MH, Yu SC, Kim CG, Vazquez M (2003) Origin of asymmetrical magnetoimpedance in a Co-based amorphous microwire due to dc bias current. Appl Phys Lett 83:2871–2873
Phan MH, Peng HX, Yu SC, Chau N (2005) Valve behavior of giant magnetoimpedance in field-annealed Co70Fe5Si15Nb2.2Cu0.8B7 amorphous ribbon. J Appl Phys 97:10M108, 1–3
Phan MH, Peng HX, Yu SC, Vazquez M (2006) Optimized giant magnetoimpedance effect in amorphous and nanocrystalline materials. J Appl Phys 99:08C505, 1–3
Guo HQ, Kronmuller H, Dragon T, Cheng ZH, Shen BG (2001) Influence of nanocrystallization on the evolution of domain patterns and the magnetoimpedance effect in amorphous Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9 ribbons. J Appl Phys 89:514–516
Lee HB, Kim KJ, Kim TK, Kim CO, Yu SC (2000) Magnetoimpedance effect in the nanocrystalline Fe–Zr–Cu–B–Al alloy system. J Appl Phys 87:5269–5291
Viegas ADC, de Andrade AMH, Sommer RL, Jiang JS, Chien CL (2001) Magnetoimpedance in Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9 amorphous films at microwave frequencies. J Magn Magn Mater 226–230:707–708
de Cos D, Fry N, Orue I, Panina PV, Garcia-Arribas A, Barandiaran JM (2006) Very large magnetoimpedance (MI) in FeNi/Au multilayer film systems. Sens Actuators A 129:256–259
de Andrade AMH, da Silva RB, Correa MA, Viegas ADC, Severino AM, Sommer RL (2004) Magnetoimpedance of NiFe/Ag multilayers in the 100 kHz–1.8 GHz range. J Magn Magn Mater 272–276:1846–1847
Xiao SQ, Liu YH, Yan SS, Dai YY, Zhang L, Mei LM (2000) Giant magnetoimpedance and domain structure in FeCuNbSiB films and sandwiched films. Phys Rev B 61:5734–5739
Xiao SQ, Liu YH, Dai YY, Zhang L, Zhou SX, Liu GD (1999) Giant magnetoimpedance effect in sandwiched films. J Appl Phys 85:4127–4130
Morikawa T, Nishibe Y, Yamadera H (1997) Giant magnetoimpedance effect in layered thin films. IEEE Trans Magn 33:4367–4372
Morikawa T, Nishibe Y, Yamadera H, Nonomura Y, Takeuchi M, Sakata J, Taga Y (1996) Enhancement of giant magneto-impedance in layered film by insulator separation. IEEE Trans Magn 32:4965–4967
Li XD, Yuan WZ, Zhao ZJ, Ruan JZ, Yang XL (2005) The GMI effect in nanocrystalline FeCuNbSib multilayered films with a SiO2 outer layer. J Phys D Appl Phys 38:1351–1354
Nie HB, Pakhomov AB, Yan X, Zhang XX, Knobel M (1999) Giant magnetoimpedance in crystalline Mumetal. Sol Stat Commun 112:285–289
Amalou F, Gijs MAM (2004) Giant magnetoimpedance of amorphous ribbon/Cu/amorphous ribbon trilayer microstructures. J Appl Phys 95:1364–1371
Phan MH, Peng HX, Wisnom MR, Yu SC, Nghi NH Great enhancement of GMI effect in polymer composites containing Co-based ferromagnetic microwires. J Magn Magn Mater (in press)
Fu CM, Hsu CY, Chao YC, Kim DS, Matsushita N, Abe M (2004) Tunnel magnetoimpedance effect of the ZnNi-ferrite encapsulated NiFe micropsheres. J Magn Magn Mater 272–276:e1839–e1841
Hu J, Qin H, Qi G, Jiang M (2006) Giant magnetoimpedance in a MnZn ferrite. J Magn Magn Mater 302:375–377
Carara M, Sommer RL (1997) Giant magnetoimpedance in highly textured (110)[001] FeSi3 %. J Appl Phys 81:4107–4109
Gomez-Polo C, Perez-Landazabal JI, Recarte V, Ciurzynska W (2003) Effect of the ordering on the magnetic and magnetoimpedance properties of Fe-6.5 % Si alloy. J Magn Magn Mater 254–255:88–90
Jantaratana P, Sirisathitkul C (2004) Giant magnetoimpedance in silicon steels. J Magn Magn Mater 281:399–404
Hu J, Qin H (2002) Magnetoimpedance effect in Fe flakes. J Magn Magn Mater 246:375–378
Soares JM, de Araujo JH, Cabral FAO, Dumelow T, Machado FLA, de Araujo AEP (2002) Giant magnetoimpedance in FeAg granular alloys. Appl Phys Lett 80:2532–2534
Fraga GLF, Pureur P, Brandao DE (2002) Spontaneous magnetoimpedance in the Heusler compounds Pd2MnSn and Pd2MnSb near the Curie temperature. Sol Stat Comm 124:7–10
Fu CM, Hsu KS, Lin ML, Wen ZH (2000) Giant magnetoimpedance effects in sintered La1−xCaxMnO3 oxides. J Magn Magn Mater 209:151–153
Hu J, Qin HW (2003) Magnetoimpedance effect at various temperatures for manganite La0.7Ca0.3MnO3−σ. Mater Sci Eng B 100:304–306
Castro GMB, Rodrigues AR, Machado FLA, de Araujo AEP, Jardim RF, Nigam AK (2004) Magnetoimpedance measurements in bulk samples of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 and La0.6Y0.1Ca0.3MnO3. J All Comp 369:108–111
Hu J, Qin HW (2001) Magnetoimpedance effect in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3. J Magn Magn Mater 234:419–422
Hu J, Qin HW (2001) Giant magnetoimpedance effect in La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 under low dc magnetic fields. Mater Sci Eng B 79:186–189
Hu J, Qin HW (2002) Magnetoimpedance effect in semiconducting La0.4Sr0.6MnO3. Mater Sci Eng B 88:18–21
Patanjali PV, Theule P, Zhai Z, Hakim N, Sridhar S, Suryanarayanan R, Apostu M, Dhalenne G, Revcolevschi A (1999) High-frequency magnetoimpedance of double perovskite La1.2Sr1.8Mn2O7: secondary transitions at high temperatures. Phys Rev B 60:9268–9271
Hu J, Qin HW, Zhang Y (2000) Giant magnetoimpedance effect in La–Ba–Mn–O oxide. Mater Sci Eng B 77:280–281
Hu J, Qin HW (2000) Magnetoimpedance effect in La0.67Ba0.33MnO3 under low dc magnetic fields. Sol Stat Commun 116:159–162
Hu J, Qin HW, Niu HD, Zhu L, Chen J, Xiao W, Pei Y (2003) Magnetoimpedance effect in manganite La2/3Ba1/3MnO3 at various temperatures. J Magn Magn Mater 261:105–111
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peng, HX., Qin, F., Phan, MH. (2016). Selection of GMI Wires for Sensor Applications. In: Ferromagnetic Microwire Composites. Engineering Materials and Processes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29276-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29276-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29274-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29276-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)