Abstract
The authors maintain that there is a weakness in many of the methods employed in information systems development and particularly in the requirements determination phase since this is the most organizationally dependent (Flynn, 1992). The weakness is that although the methods may have an underpinning philosophical basis, they are not explicitly embedded within any social scientific perspective. Such a perspective would enable methods or methodologies to address the organizational contexts in which their use may be envisaged (Hughes, 1998a). This would require systems developers to engage with social actors in order to find out about their social situations. This engagement may be considered to be as much interpretive research as it is practical systems development. Indeed it may be possible to extend the spectrum proposed by Nandhakumar and Jones (1997) in Figure 18.1 to include practical systems development within ‘Consultancy’. In the figure they propose that it may be possible to consider the main methods of interpretive research as existing on a spectrum which spans from those which have most distance between researcher and subject to those in which the researcher is most engaged with the subject.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison-Wesley, Reading).
Baskerville, R. and Pries-Heje, J. (1998) Grounding action research. Journal of Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (forthcoming).
Baskerville, R. and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology. 11(3), 235–46.
Baskerville, R. and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1998) Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 90–107.
Blumer, H. (1962) Society as symbolic interaction, in Human Behaviour and Social Processes, Rose, A.M. (ed) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) pp. 179–92.
Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
Brown, A. (1992) Grounding soft systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(6), 387–95.
Button, G. and Sharrock, W. (1994) Occasioned practices in the work of software engineers, in Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues, Jirotka, M. and Goguen, J.A. (eds) (Academic Press, London), pp. 217–40.
Calloway, L.J. and Ariav, G. (1991) Developing and using a qualitative methodology to study relationships among designers and tools, in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Nissen, H.-E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (eds) (North Holland, Amsterdam) pp. 175–93.
Charmaz, K. (1983) The grounded theory method: an explication and interpretation, in Contemporary Field Research, Emerson, R.M. (ed) (Waveland Press Inc., Illinois, USA) pp. 109–26.
Charmaz, K. (1990) ‘Discovering’ chronic illness: using grounded theory. Social Science in Medicine, 30(11), 1161–72.
Checkland, P.B. (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester).
Checkland, P.B. and Scholes, S. (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action (John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester)
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
Denzin, N. (1970) The Research Act (Butterworths, London).
Denzin, N. (1971) Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology, in Understanding Everyday Life, Douglas, J. (ed) (Routledge, London) pp. 259–84.
Denzin, N. (1994) The art and politics of interpretation, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) (Sage, London) pp. 500–15.
Dey, I. (1993) Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists (Routledge, London).
Fitzgerald, B. (1996) Formalized systems development methodologies: a critical perspective. Information Systems Journal, 6(1), 3–23.
Flynn, D.J. (1992) Information Systems Requirements: Determination and Analysis (McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK).
Garfinkle, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
Glaser, B. (1992) Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory (Sociology Press, Mill Valley CA).
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, Chicago).
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A.L. (1970) Status Passage (Aldine, Chicago).
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Allen Lane, London).
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) (Sage, London) pp. 105–17.
Gummesson, E. (1991) Qualitative Methods in Management Research (Sage, London).
Hall, C. (1992) Homecoming: the self at home, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of California, Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences.
Hughes, J. (1998a) The development of the GIST (Grounding Information SysTems) methodology: determining situated requirements in information systems analysis, Unpublished PhD thesis, Information Systems Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Hughes, J. (1998b) Selection and evaluation of information system methodologies: the gap between theory and practice. IEE Proceedings: Software (Special issue–Information Systems, N. Jayaratna (ed.)), 145(4), 1–5.
Jayaratna, N. (1994) Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies (McGraw Hill, London).
Jönsson, S. (1991) Action research, in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Nissen, H.-E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (eds) (North Holland, Amsterdam) pp. 371–96.
Kelle, U. (ed.) (1995) Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice, (Sage, London).
Klein, H.K., Hirschheim, R. and Nissen, H-E. (1991) A pluralist perspective of the information systems research arena, in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Nissen, H.-E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (eds) (North Holland, Amsterdam) pp. 1–20.
Lincoln, Y.S. and Denzin, N.K. (1994) The fifth moment, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) (Sage, London) pp. 575–86.
Martin, P.Y. and Turner, B.A. (1986) Grounded theory and organizational research. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 22(2), 141–57.
Mathiassen, L., Borum, F. and Pederson, J.S. (1997) Developing managerial skills in IT organisations–a case study based on action learning, in Proceedings of the 20th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 20), Oslo, Norway, pp. 849–65.
Mead, G. (1934) Mind, Self and Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Merton, R.K. (1963) Society Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, Glencoe).
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, Second Edn (Sage, London).
Nandhakumar, J. and Jones, M. (1997) Distance and engagement in IS research. Information Systems Journal, 7(2), 109–31.
Oliphant, J. and Blockley, D.I. (1991) Knowledge-based system: advisory on the earth retaining structures. Computers and Structures, 40(1), 173–83.
Parsons, T. (1964) Evolutionary universals in society. American Sociological Review, 29(3), 339–57.
Parsons, T. (1966) Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).
Pidgeon N.F., Turner, B.A. and Blockley, D.I. (1991) The use of Grounded Theory for conceptual analysis in knowledge elicitation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35(2), 151–73.
Pries-Heje, J. (1991) Three barriers for continuing use of computer-based tools in information systems development: a grounded theory approach. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 3, 119–36.
Rapoport, R. (1970) Three dilemmas of action research. Human Relations, 23(6), 499–513.
Reason, P. (1994) Three approaches to participative inquiry, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) (Sage, London) pp. 324–39.
Richards, T. and Richards, L. (1991) The NUD·IST qualitative data analysis system. Qualitative Sociology, 14 (4/2 winter), pp. 307–24.
Robinson, W.S. (1951) The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review, 16(6), 812–18.
Schon, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. (Basic Books, New York, USA).
Sandberg, A. (1982) Fran aktionsforskning till praxisforskning. Sociologisk Forskning.
Schutz, A. (1964) Studies in Social Theory (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague).
Schutz, A. (1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).
Strauss, A.L. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994) Grounded theory methodology: an overview, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) (Sage, London) pp. 273–85.
Toraskar, K.V. (1991) How managerial users develop their decision support?: a grounded theory approach, in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Nissen, H.-E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (eds) (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, North-Holland) pp. 195–225.
Vidgen, R. and Braa, K. (1997) Balancing interpretation and intervention in information systems research: the ‘action case’ approach, in Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 International Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative research, Lee, A., Liebenau, J. and DeGross, J. (eds) pp. 524–41 (Philadelphia, USA).
Walsham, G. (1993) Ethical issues in information systems development–the analyst as moral agent, in Human, Organizational and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development, Avison, D., Kendall, J.E. and DeGross, J.I. (eds) (North Holland, Amsterdam) pp. 281–94.
Waters, M. (1994) Modern Sociological Theory (Sage, London, UK).
Znaniecki, F. (1934) The Method of Sociology (Farrer and Rinehart, New York).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Association for Information Technology Trust
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, J., Wood-Harper, T. (2016). Systems Development as a Research Act. In: Willcocks, L.P., Sauer, C., Lacity, M.C. (eds) Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 2. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29269-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29269-4_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29268-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29269-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)