Abstract
Luxembourg is a small country, where daily life is marked by multiple exchanges with neighbouring countries while at the same time, being the seat of several European institutions and a major global financial center. This sees that Luxembourg is particularly concerned by the phenomenon of globalization and Europeanization: Due to the very international nature of life and economic activity in Luxembourg, many of its jurists have to deal with international law issues and with foreign law. This probably explains why, today, Luxembourg seems to be one of the European countries most interested in the transnationalization of legal education. Another reason of this interest is that Luxembourg has not an own old legal tradition; its law is a product of different influences of neighbouring countries. Thus, although most Luxembourg lawyers remain attached to French legal culture, they do not, as a rule, have the same negative reaction toward new legal solutions imported from abroad. The main aspect of this particular situation is the new transnationalised bachelor in law created in the University of Luxembourg, which is obligatory from the very outset for all law students. The concept of transnationalisation that led to the reform rests on the idea, of immersing the students, from the very first day of their legal education, in a comparative approach instead of centering the study of law, first, on learning national law and then, eventually, expanding that study to other systems at the end of the course. Nevertheless, teaching national law is not completely sacrificed in the reformed curriculum: along with each transnational course, the students will participate in small-group seminars in which they will work with the specific national law addressing the transnationalised subject matter, thereby learning the basic technical skills of a jurist (analysing legislation and court decisions, legal interpretation, resolving specific factual situations, etc.) as well as the national law.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
In Luxembourg, a jurist or legal expert who works as an employee of an enterprise can never be a “lawyer” (meaning a person admitted to the practice of law), because the practice of law is a liberal and, therefore, independent profession. A lawyer who wishes to accept a position as an employee must resign from the bar, although he or she may be readmitted to the bar if he or she is no longer an employee.
- 3.
From http://www.mj.public.lu/professions/avocat/stage_judiciaire (last visited 14 April 2015).
- 4.
For the particular challenges posed by the transposition of the European transsystemic experience, see Dedek and de Mestral (2009).
- 5.
This network covers means all the EU Member States plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Macedonia, Norway, Switzerland, and Turkey.
References
Ancel, Pascal. 2011. Dénationaliser l’enseignement du droit civil? Réflexions autour d’une expérience québécoise. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil 4: 701–724.
Ancel, Pascal. 2013. Quelle place pour l’enseignement du droit national en Europe? Revue de Droit de l’Université de Sherbrooke 43: 91–120.
Dedek, Helge, and Armand de Mestral. 2009. Born to be wild: The “Transsystemic” Program at McGill and the De-Nationalization of legal education. German Law Journal 10: 889–911.
Gény, François. 1914. Science et technique en droit privé positif. Paris: Recueil Sirey.
Husa, Jaakko. 2009. Turning the curriculum upside down: Comparative law as an educational tool for constructing the pluralistic legal mind. German Law Journal 10: 913–928.
Poillot, Elise. 2012. Le particularisme de l’enseignement du droit à Luxembourg. In Quelle pédagogie pour l’enseignant juriste? Expérimentations, modélisations, circulation, ed. Magalie Flores-Lonjou, Céline Laronde-Clérac, and Agnès de Luget. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Poillot, Elise (dir.). 2015. L’enseignement clinique du droit. Expérien ces croisées et perspective critique. Bruxelles: Larcier
Valcke, Catherine. 2004. Global law teaching. Journal of Legal Education 54(2): 160–182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ancel, P. (2016). Towards a New Model of Legal Education: The Special Case of Luxembourg. In: Jamin, C., van Caenegem, W. (eds) The Internationalisation of Legal Education. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29125-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29125-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29123-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29125-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)