Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence and Responsible Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 376))

Abstract

Researchers in AI often highlight the importance of socially responsible research, but the current literature on the social impacts of AI tends to focus on particular application domains and provides little guidance to researchers working in other areas. Additionally, such social impact analysis tends to be done in a one-off fashion, proposing or problematizing a particular aspect of AI at a time, rather than being deeply integrated into innovation processes across the field. This paper argues that work on the societal dimensions of AI can be enriched by engagement with the literature on “responsible innovation,” which has up until now focused on technical domains like nanotechnology, synthetic biology, and geoengineering. Drawing on this literature, the paper describes and justifies three interrelated aspects of what a more deeply integrated, ongoing practice of responsibility in AI would look like: consideration of the social contexts and consequences of decisions in the AI design space; reflectiveness about one’s emphasis on theoretical vs. applied work and choice of application domains; and engagement with the public about what they desire from AI and what they need to know about it. Mapping out these three issues, it is argued, can both describe and theorize existing work in a more systematic light and identify future opportunities for research and practice on the societal dimensions of AI. Finally, the paper describes how philosophical and theoretical aspects of AI connect to issues of responsibility and technological governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2011). Machine ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R. (2009). Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2007). Can technologies represent their publics? Technology in Society, 29, 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B., & Smith, R. (2013). Meeting the responsibility to explain AI. Slides presented at the twenty-seventh AAAI conference. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. http://aitopics.org/sites/default/files/articles-columns/Meeting%20the%20Responsibility%20to%20Explain%20AI%20-%20AAAI%20-%2020130718.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

  • Chen, T., et al. (2013). Robots for humanity: A case study in assistive mobile manipulation. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Special issue on Assistive Robotics, 20(1), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • DARPA. (2014). About the challenge. Informational website. http://www.theroboticschallenge.org/about. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

  • Docherty, B. (2012). Losing humanity: The case against killer robots. Human Rights Watch report. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/arms1112_ForUpload.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

  • Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Public attitudes towards robots (report). Special Eurobarometer 382. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

  • Fasola, J., & Matarić, M. (2013). A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 2(2), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E., et al. (2006). Midstream modulation of technology: Governance from within. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(6), 485–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E., et al. (2010). Research thrives on integration of natural and social sciences. Nature, 463(1018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, C. (2009). Computational sustainability: Computational methods for a sustainable environment, economy, and society. The Bridge. Winter 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, et al. (Eds.). (2012). Collected essays on human-centered computing, 2001–2011. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, E., & Selman, B. (2009). Interim report from the AAAI presidential panel on long- term AI futures. Online document. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. http://www.aaai.org/Organization/presidential-panel.php. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

  • Lin, P., et al. (2011). Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., & Bennett, I. (2008). Thinking longer term about technology: Is there value in science fiction-inspired approaches to constructing futures? Science and Public Policy, 35(8), 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, A., et al. (2012). Open roboethics: Establishing an online community for accelerated policy and design change. Presented at We Robot 2012.http://robots.law.miami.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Moon_et_al_Open-Roboethics-2012.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2014.

  • Murphy, R., & Woods, D. (2009). Beyond Asimov: The three laws of responsible robotics. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(4), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. (2005). Human-level artificial intelligence? Be serious! AI Magazine, Winter 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norvig, P., & Russell, S. (2009). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nourbakhsh, I. (2009). Ethics in robotics. Lecture at Carnegie Mellon University. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giKT8PkCCv4. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

  • Nourbakhsh, I. (2013). Robot futures. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, V., et al. (2011). Principles of robotics: Regulating robots in the real world. EPSRC document. http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/Pages/principlesofrobotics.aspx. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

  • Reddy, R. (2006). Robotics and intelligence systems in support of society. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(3), 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, N. (2011). Innovation starvation. World Policy Journal, 28, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, J. et al. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.

  • Takayama, L., et al. (2008). Beyond dirty, dangerous, and dull: What everyday people think robots should do. HRI ’08, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schomberg, R. (2011). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode. Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2010). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, A. (2013). Ethical robots: Some technical and ethical challenges. Description and slides of a presentation at EUCog meeting, Social and Ethical Aspects of Cognitive Systems. http://alanwinfield.blogspot.com.es/2013/10/ethical-robots-some-technical-and.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper from David Guston, Erik Fisher, Clark Miller, Illah Nourbakhsh, Stuart Russell, David Atkinson, participants in the Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology colloquia at Arizona State University, and two anonymous reviewers. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under award #1257246 through the Virtual Institute for Responsible Innovation (VIRI). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miles Brundage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brundage, M. (2016). Artificial Intelligence and Responsible Innovation. In: Müller, V.C. (eds) Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. Synthese Library, vol 376. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics