Skip to main content

Order Effects, Moral Cognition, and Intelligence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 376))

  • 5192 Accesses

Abstract

Order effects have to do with how the order in which information is presented to an agent can affect how the information is processed. This paper examines the issue of order effects in the classification of moral situations. Some order effects mark a localized failure of intelligence. The hypothesis examined herein is that the processes or mechanisms that make some undesirable order effects possible may also have highly desirable effects. This will be done by comparing two artificial neural networks (ANNs) that classify moral situations, one subject to order effects and another that is not subject to them. The ANN subject to order effects has advantages in learning and noise tolerance over the other ANN – features hard to ignore in modeling intelligence. After presenting modeling results, there will be discussions of the implications of order effects for (a) cognitive modeling and artificial intelligence as well as (b) debates between moral particularists and generalists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chandran, P. S., & Matsuoka, K. (1994). A comment on noise injection into inputs in backpropagation [and author’s reply]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 24(1), 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarini, M. (2010). Particularism, analogy, and moral cognition. Minds and Machines, 20(3), 385–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarini, M. (2011). Computational neural modeling and the philosophy of ethics. In M. Anderson & S. Anderson (Eds.), Machine ethics (pp. 316–334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guarini, M. (2013a). Case classification, similarities, spaces of reasons, and coherences. In M. Araszkiewicz & J. Šavelka (Eds.), Coherence: insights from philosophy, jurisprudence and artificial intelligence, part of the law and philosophy series (Vol. 107, pp. 187–201). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarini, M. (2013b). Moral case classification and the nonlocality of reasons. Topoi, 32(2), 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, A., & Cottrell, G. (2006). Churchland on connectionism. In B. L. Keeley (Ed.), Paul Churchland. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombrozo, T. (2009). The role of moral commitments in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 33(2), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, K. (1992). Noise injection into inputs in back-propagation learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22(3), 436–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, R., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, a Bradford Book.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petrinovich, L., & O’Neill, P. (1996). Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(3), 145–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind and Language, 27(2), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seghouane, A.-K., Moudden, Y., & Fleury, G. (2002). On learning feedforward neural networks with noise injection into inputs. In Proceedings of the 2002 12th IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing, pp. 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamzow, J., & Nichols, S. (2009). Variations in ethical intuitions. Philosophical Issues, 19(1), 368–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at (a) the International Association for Computing and Philosophy conference at the University of Maryland, USA, July 2013; (b) the Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence conference at Oxford University, UK, September 2013; and (c) the Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric at the University of Windsor, Canada, November 2013. Thanks to the many participants at these events for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Guarini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guarini, M., Benko, J. (2016). Order Effects, Moral Cognition, and Intelligence. In: Müller, V.C. (eds) Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. Synthese Library, vol 376. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics