Skip to main content

Self-defense on Five Fronts: A Reply to My Commentators

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philip Pettit: Five Themes from his Work

Part of the book series: Münster Lectures in Philosophy ((MUELP,volume 1))

  • 392 Accesses

Abstract

It is very challenging to be presented with such a wide array of commentaries on my work, many of which raise very fundamental questions. In this necessarily brief set of responses, I propose to divide the commentaries into five areas; to present my overall background view in each area; and then, against that background, to consider the main points made in the relevant commentaries. The five areas are: Epistemology and Semantics; Philosophy of Mind; Consequentialism; Group Agency; and Republicanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an account of the views relevant to this section see CM as well as (Pettit 1990a, b, 1991c, 1998a, c, 1999b; 2002b; Jackson and Pettit 2002).

  2. 2.

    For our joint papers on the topic see (Jackson et al. 2004). And for work of my own on the topic see (CM; JD).

  3. 3.

    Notice that when Kim (1998, 74) considers whether the program model ought to relieve that worry, he mistakenly suggests that that was the model he had proposed in putting forward his views on supervenient causation in his 1984 paper.

  4. 4.

    Relevant papers include (CM; 2003c, 2004, 2007a; JD; 2008c).

  5. 5.

    See (Pettit and Smith 1990, 1996; TF; JD).

  6. 6.

    On the idea of property-desires, see (Pettit 1991b).

  7. 7.

    Relevant texts include (Pettit and Brennan 1986; Pettit 1984, 1987, 1988, 1989; NJD; Pettit 1991a, 2001b; Pettit and Braithwaite 1993, 1994; CP; R; 1997, 2000b, 2012; Pettit and Scanlon 2000; Pettit and Smith 2000, 2004).

  8. 8.

    The most important publications on, or in the background to, the topic of group agency are: (CM; TF; Pettit 2001a; List and Pettit 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006; Pettit 2003a, 2003b, 2005b, 2006b, 2007d, 2009a, b; Pettit and Schweikard 2006; GA).

  9. 9.

    Relevant works are: (Pettit 1996; R; 1998b, 1999a, 2000a; TF; 2002a, 2003a, 2005a, 2006a, 2007b, c, 2008a, b, d, 2010, 2011, 2013; Lovett and Pettit 2009; Marti and Pettit 2010; GA; OPT).

References

  • Jackson, F., and P. Pettit. 2002. Response-dependence without Tears. Philosophical Issues (supp. to Nous) 12: 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F., P. Pettit, and M. Smith. 2004. Mind, morality, and explanation: Selected collaborations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaegwon, K. 1984. Ephiphenomenal and supervenient causation. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9: 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a physical world: An essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1986. Philosophical papers Vol 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, C., and P. Pettit. 2002. Aggregating sets of judgments: An impossibility result. Economics and Philosophy 18: 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, C., and P. Pettit. 2004. Aggregating sets of judgments: Two impossibility results compared. Synthese 140: 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, C., and P. Pettit. 2005. On the many as one. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, C., and P. Pettit. 2006. Group agency and supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44(Spindel Suppl): 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, F., and P. Pettit. 2009. Neo-republicanism: A normative and institutional research program. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, J.L., and P. Pettit. 2010. A political philosophy in public life: Civic republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1984. Satisficing consequentialism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58: 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1987. Universalizability without utilitarianism. Mind 96: 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1988. The consequentialist can recognise rights. Philosophical Quarterly 35: 537–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1989. Consequentialism and respect for persons. Ethics 99: 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1990a. The reality of rule-following. Mind 99: 1–21; reprinted in P. Pettit 2002 Rules, Reasons, and Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1990b. Affirming the reality of rule-following. Mind 99: 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1991a. Consequentialism. In A companion to ethics, ed. P. Singer. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1991b. Decision theory and folk psychology. In Essays in the foundations of decision theory, ed. M. Bacharach and S. Hurley. Oxford: Blackwell; reprinted in P. Pettit 2002 Rules, Reasons, and Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1991c. Realism and response-dependence. Mind 100: 587–626; reprinted in P. Pettit 2002 Rules, Reasons, and Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1996. Freedom and antipower. Ethics 106: 576–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1997. Republican theory and criminal punishment. Utilitas 9: 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1998a. Noumenalism and response-dependence. Monist 81: 112–32; reprinted in P. Pettit 2002 Rules, Reasons, and Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1998b. Reworking sandel’s republicanism. Journal of Philosophy 95: 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1998c. Terms, things and response-dependence. European Review of Philosophy 3: 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1999a. Republican liberty, contestatory democracy. In Democracy’s value, ed. C. Hacker-Cordon and I. Shapiro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1999b. A theory of normal and ideal conditions. Philosophical Studies 96: 21–44; reprinted in P. Pettit 2002 Rules, Reasons, and Norms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2000a. Democracy, electoral and contestatory. Nomos 42: 105–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2000b. Non-consequentialism and universalizability. Philosophical Quarterly 50: 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2001a. Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma. Philosophical Issues (supp to Nous) 11: 268–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2001b. In Non-consequentialism and political philosophy, ed. R. Nozick and D. Schidmtz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2002a. Keeping republican freedom simple: On a difference with Quentin Skinner. Political Theory 30: 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2002b. Rules, reasons, and norms: Selected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2003a. Deliberative democracy, the discursive dilemma, and republican theory. In Philosophy, politics and society Vol 7: Debating deliberative democracy, ed. J. Fishkin and P. Laslett, 138–162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2003b. Groups with minds of their own. In Socializing metaphysics, ed. F. Schmitt. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2003c. Looks as powers. Philosophical Issues (supp. to Nous) 13: 221–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2004. Motion blindness and the knowledge argument. In The knowledge argument, ed. P. Ludlow, Y. Nagasawa, and D. Stoljar. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2005a. The domination complaint. Nomos 86: 87–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2005b. Rawls’s political ontology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4: 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2006a. The determinacy of republican policy: A reply to McMahon. Philosophy and Public Affairs 34: 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2006b. When to defer to a majority—And when not. Analysis 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2007a. Consciousness and the frustrations of physicalism. In Minds, worlds and conditionals: Themes from the philosophy of Frank Jackson, ed. I. Ravenscroft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2007b. Free persons and free choices. History of Political Thought 28: 709–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2007c. A republican right to basic income? Basic Income Studies 2(2): Art 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2007d. Responsibility incorporated. Ethics 117: 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2008a. The basic liberties. In Essays on H.L.A.Hart, ed. M. Kramer, 201–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2008b. Freedom and probability: A comment on Goodin and Jackson. Philosophy and Public Affairs 36: 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2008c. Physicalism without Pop-out. In Naturalistic analysis, ed. D. Braddon-Mitchell and R. Nola. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2008d. Republican liberty: Three axioms, four theorems. In Republicanism and political theory, ed. C. Laborde and J. Manor. Oxford: Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2009a. Corporate responsibility revisited. Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie 38(Special issue: Philip Pettit and the incorporation of responsibility): 159–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2009b. The reality of group agents. In Philosophy of the social sciences: Philosophical theory and scientific practice, ed. C. Mantzavinos, 67–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2010. A republican law of peoples. European Journal of Political Theory, Special Issue on ‘Republicanism and International Relations’ 9: 70–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2011. The instability of freedom as non-interference: The case of Isaiah Berlin. Ethics 121: 693–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2012. The inescapability of consequentialism. In Luck, value and commitment: Themes from the ethics of Bernard Williams, ed. U. Heuer and G. Lang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2013. Two republican traditions. In Republican democracy: Liberty, law and politics, ed. A. Niederbeger and P. Schink. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and J. Braithwaite. 1993. Not just deserts, even in sentencing. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 4: 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and J. Braithwaite. 1994. The three Rs of republican sentencing. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 5: 318–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and G. Brennan. 1986. Restrictive consequentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64: 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and M. Smith. 1990. Backgrounding desire. Philosophical Review 99: 565–92; reprinted in F. Jackson, P. Pettit and M. Smith, 2004, Mind, Morality and Explanation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and M. Smith. 1996. Freedom in belief and desire. Journal of Philosophy 93: 429–49; reprinted in F. Jackson, P. Pettit and M. Smith, 2004, Mind, Morality and Explanation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and T.M. Scanlon. 2000. Consequentialism and contractualism. Theoria 66: 228–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and D. Schweikard. 2006. Joint action and group agency. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 18–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and M. Smith. 2000. Global consequentialism. In Morality, rules and consequences, ed. B. Hooker, E. Mason, and D.E. Miller. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., and M. Smith. 2004. The truth in deontology. In Reason and value: Themes from the moral philosophy of Joseph Raz, ed. R.J. Wallace, Pettit Philip, S. Scheffler, and M. Smith, 153–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Pettit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pettit, P. (2016). Self-defense on Five Fronts: A Reply to My Commentators. In: Derpmann, S., Schweikard, D. (eds) Philip Pettit: Five Themes from his Work. Münster Lectures in Philosophy, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26103-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics