Abstract
Men seek and ask for help in many different ways compared to women when it comes to their health. It has been well documented that men are less likely to have a usual source of healthcare and are less likely to utilize healthcare services, even when they have access to these services. For minority men (African American, Hispanic, and Latino), these healthcare-seeking behaviors are worse and are often structured by socioeconomic factors, which increases their risk for morbidity and mortality from preventable diseases. Men who are missing from healthcare settings may avoid these settings because they do not acknowledge their risk for chronic diseases, may experience challenges with navigating through healthcare settings (e.g., making appointments, transportation issues), or have difficulties with establishing trusting relationships with their providers. For minority men, their engagement with healthcare settings may be further diminished as a result of experiences of discrimination within these settings. Men who are engaged, have trusting relationships, and feel confident about managing their health are more likely to be adherent to treatment plans and exhibit positive health behaviors and health outcomes. To improve men’s healthcare-seeking behaviors, researchers, practitioners, and clinicians will need to consider individual, economic, and social determinants of men’s healthcare-seeking behaviors and relevant barriers toward improvement.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Men’s health
- Primary care
- Preventive healthcare
- Minority men
- Gender socialization
- Male healthcare disparities
- Socioeconomic position
Introduction
Men seek and ask for help in many different ways compared to women when it comes to their health. It has been well documented that men are less likely to have a usual source of healthcare and are less likely to utilize healthcare services, even when they have access to these services. For minority men (African American, Hispanic, and Latino), these healthcare-seeking behaviors are worse and are often structured by socioeconomic factors, which increases their risk for morbidity and mortality from preventable diseases. Men who are missing from healthcare settings may avoid these settings because they do not acknowledge their risk for chronic diseases, may experience challenges with navigating through healthcare settings (e.g., making appointments, transportation issues), or have difficulties with establishing trusting relationships with their providers. For minority men, their engagement with healthcare settings may be further diminished as a result of experiences of discrimination within these settings. Men who are engaged, have trusting relationships, and feel confident about managing their health are more likely to be adherent to treatment plans and exhibit positive health behaviors and health outcomes. To improve men’s healthcare-seeking behaviors, researchers, practitioners, and clinicians will need to consider individual, economic, and social determinants of men’s healthcare-seeking behaviors and relevant barriers toward improvement.
Men’s health remains a relatively recent area of study compared to women’s health in the United States (USA) and internationally [1–3]. Men’s health has gathered momentum around the world since the late 1980s and early 1990s due to gaps in health status and health-seeking behavior between men and women. Men are more disconnected from healthcare compared to women. The W.K. Kellogg Foundation noted in the early 1990s “a growing concern, and now with alarm, the absence of men of all ages in the waiting rooms of clinics and other healthcare providers” [4]. From 1997 to 1998, doctor visits for annual examinations and preventive services were 100 % higher for women than for men [5]. This problem with men accessing healthcare has persisted decades later as men are 24 % less likely than women to have visited a doctor within the past year, but are 32 % more likely to be hospitalized [6]. However, minority men are least likely to access healthcare and their health outcomes are even more dire than their Caucasian counterparts [7]. African American (AA) men’s health is considerably worse than other race-gender groups, with AA men disproportionately suffering from preventable diseases, being disproportionately disabled by them, and suffering disproportionately higher mortality, relative to European American (EA) men [1].
Research suggests that male gender socialization teaches men that they are invulnerable to illness or that asking for help, such as for medical problems, is a sign of weakness and continues to persist, particularly in AA men [8–10]. Avoidance of healthcare providers by men has been offered as a partial explanation for the increased mortality rates from several chronic diseases and the persistent disparities that have been observed in hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, and lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers when compared to Caucasian men [10–13]. Disparities in healthcare and health outcomes have been identified across race/ethnicity with minority men faring the worst on many health outcomes [14–16]. Overall, minorities are less likely to participate during the medical encounter and AA and Hispanic men are less likely to self-advocate during the medical encounter [17, 18]. Furthermore, AA and Hispanic men are less likely than Caucasian men to effectively manage their chronic condition [19–21]. AA men also have a shorter life span than any other group in the USA [11]. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) lays the foundation for a partnership with patients as health outcomes are linked to physician payment [22]. In particular, the ACA encourages shared decision which is associated with better health outcomes [23–26]. The literature shows that overall the health of AA, Hispanic, and Latino men lags behind that of Caucasian men and AA men’s health is at a crisis point due to the disparate burden of the diseases.
Root Causes of Disparities in Healthcare
The collective experiences of AA men appear to be distinctive from Caucasian men and AA women—this is partly attributable to race- and gender-based differences in economic and social life, health burden, and experiences of inequity in the healthcare system—which could impact AA men’s healthcare utilization and perceptions of healthcare [27–30]. In addition, studies have shown various barriers to improving men’s health behaviors [31]. Men often express fear of diagnosis, stress and role strain, lack of awareness and access to good information (from self and peers), medical mistrust, and relationships with healthcare providers [32]. One factor that promotes use of preventative health services is having a usual source of care, which can improve routine screening and care. As a result of many men in the USA lacking insurance, they are less likely than women to have a usual provider and usual source of care.
An Institute of Medicine (IOM) report described how the social hierarchy that exists in the USA plays an important role in explaining differences in the quality of care provided to minorities [33]. These differences occur in the context of historical and contemporary social inequities; are impacted by a variety of sources, including conscious or unconscious stereotyping; and are not explained by racial and ethnic differences in treatment refusal rates [33]. How people of different racial, ethnic, cultural, and gender groups are perceived remains part of a growing body of literature focusing on racism and bias within public health and healthcare [34–36]. That is, healthcare organizations are beholden to societal institutions and forces through funding streams, government mandates, and the practices of individual staff members [37–39]. For example, public health departments are constrained by government bodies that confer legal authorization to function and that provide their funding. Funders of health can structure the values and operating principles by which staff are evaluated and promoted which may influence the quality of care delivered and the resulting health outcomes of patients in those facilities. At the same time, as the conduits to resources and providers of critical services, health departments can have the capacity to control AA communities’ power, agency, and ability to access resources and services [39–41]. Hence, an essential starting point for appreciating the complexity of institutional racism in today’s healthcare system is to recognize the existence of inequities in the delivery and quality of healthcare [42].
Navigating Healthcare Systems
Racial disparities in quality of healthcare may involve one or more of several factors. Possible explanations include organizational factors within facilities and health plans or systems, including complex appointment or referral systems or long waiting times, simple lack of providers within any reasonable traveling distance or time, and poor understanding of how best to mobilize local community organizations that principally serve African American residents. Other matters, such as the racial and ethnic concordance (or lack thereof) between patients and clinicians, may have effects on patient care-seeking behaviors or satisfaction with care (101–104). Moreover, cognitive and decision-making processes may differ by culture and ethnic group, meaning that choices and preferences may not be mutually understood or acted upon [43]. Research has also demonstrated that poor health literacy may be a key intermediate variable, since poor health literacy is differentially distributed among racial and ethnic groups and is associated with difficulty obtaining appropriate care [33, 44].
Health-Seeking Behaviors and Barriers
When men do not seek help, or healthcare, they can burden the healthcare system [45]. There are many factors that contribute to men’s health-seeking behaviors that are shaped by male socialization and the lack of socializing males to and within the healthcare system. Many men exhibit treatment fears and help-seeking stigma that are fueled by psychological factors such as restricted emotional expression and not expressing negative emotions [45–47]. There are four central areas related to men and healthcare-seeking behaviors: access, awareness of their health needs, inability to express their emotions, and lack of social networks [45]. Our focus is largely on health behaviors here. Health behavior is a function of health status [48]; hence, it is important to understand the health beliefs and behaviors of men across race and ethnicity in order to improve their health outcomes.
For example, abuse of alcohol and illegal drugs is more common among men than women, and research has demonstrated that alcohol use among various populations is associated with the presence of masculine attitudes [13, 49]. Substance abuse may occur as a response to stress, physiological addiction, difficult life circumstances, and other environmental factors [50]. These life challenges may be further magnified by the fact that men are socialized to value economic independence. Low-income men may be at increased risk for substance abuse because of the daily stresses they face and the socially sanctioned nature of substance use as a coping strategy for men. Men with limited educational and employment opportunities may turn to alcohol and other drugs as an escape from their inability to live up to one of the major tenets of male gender socialization in our society [51].
AA men in their middle-adult years often evaluate their sense of manhood against their ability to fulfill their roles as provider, husband, father, employee, and community member [46, 52, 53], and often to maintain this sense of manhood, many men engage in unhealthy behaviors. Avoidance of healthcare providers by men has been offered as a partial explanation for the increased mortality rates from heart disease among men [10, 12, 13]. However, what further complicates this story is socioeconomic position . Men in lower socioeconomic positions also may conform more to traditional male role norms, which allows them to diminish their vulnerabilities [54]. As noteworthy, trust appears to benefit men’s health-seeking behavior and adherence to their treatment plans [55].
Mistrust of the healthcare system remains an important issue with men, particularly AA men in the southern US states, due to the history of unethical mistreatment and racial discrimination which at times were highly prevalent (e.g., Tuskegee syphilis experiment) [56]. Racial and ethnic minorities are more prone than Caucasians to distrust the healthcare establishment, and historically minority men have had less access to culturally competent providers [57–59]. Southern US AAs are more likely than Caucasians to report perceived racial barriers to care [60] and AA men are more likely than AA women to report perceived discrimination [61–65]. Perceived discrimination and mistreatment are associated with poorer medical adherence and delays in seeking healthcare [66–69]. In addition, higher levels of trust in the healthcare system are associated with better adherence to recommended care, greater patient satisfaction, and better outcomes [70–73].
Self-Management and Self-Advocacy
Self-management positively influences health outcomes by increasing persons’ involvement in the control of their health conditions [74]. Negative emotional states, social factors, and chronic life stressors have been found to hinder men’s ability to manage their health [75]. Additionally, there are significant racial/ethnic differences in perceived difficulty with self-care behaviors [76–78], which, for men, is significantly influenced by self-confidence [79]. Self-confidence refers to the belief that one is capable of performing those behaviors required to attain a certain outcome and could be applied specifically to beliefs about self-care behaviors [80]. Research has also found that men with high levels of self-confidence were able to engage in more health-promoting and health-monitoring behaviors. Confidence in self-management is influenced by patient empowerment [81]. Higher levels of self-confidence in men as measured by self-efficacy were associated with being more likely to report better medication adherence and hypertension control. Higher self-efficacy has been closely linked to active participation in cardiovascular disease risk-reduction strategies in minority populations [82], positive behavior change [83], patient empowerment [84], and chronic disease management. Men as patients can become empowered as they gain new knowledge about their health. This knowledge may come as a result of better relationships and communication with their providers and their own search for information. As men gain new knowledge, they may also acquire new skills and capacities to manage their chronic conditions which will make them co-participants in the healthcare encounter. As providers improve communication, build rapport, engage patients, and develop accountability systems to monitor patient outcomes, patients and providers will improve their relationships.
Another important factor to better manage and increase men’s confidence to manage their health is involvement. The positive benefits of patient involvement extend beyond the medical encounter [23, 24, 26, 85–88]. Patients who are well informed are more capable of monitoring their health, coping with their illness, and adhering to treatment [89]. Self-advocacy extends beyond patient involvement; it encompasses gathering and using information to advance health [90]. Health information seeking has increased in the USA, and it is associated with patient empowerment, positive health management, patient follow-up, and patient treatment decision making [91, 92]. Rooks and colleagues found health information seeking was associated with changing approach to managing health and better understanding of how to treat illness [93]. However, studies have found racial and ethnic minority men are less likely to use the health information sought during the medical encounter [18, 94].
Health information is an important factor contributing to the poor health status of the most vulnerable men; however, access to culturally appropriate information is important as well (NCI 2006). Possible explanations for poor access to culturally appropriate health information include organizational factors within facilities and health plans or systems, including complex appointment or referral systems or long waiting times, simple lack of providers within any reasonable traveling distance or time, and poor understanding of how best to mobilize local community organizations that principally serve African Americans. Other matters, such as the racial and ethnic concordance (or lack thereof) between patients and clinicians, may have effects on patient care-seeking behaviors or satisfaction with care [95–98].
Literacy levels of men remain a significant predictor in determining how appropriate health information is for AA men and other high-risk men to improve patient awareness of diseases and treatments [99]. AA men obtain health information using the Internet, television, and print media such as magazines, pamphlets, and books [100] and prefer to receive health messages from effective speakers who embody characteristics they can model such as clergies, community leaders, active community members, and health professionals [101]. As a result, studies have found that identifying and developing culturally appropriate health promotion messages for AA men would be beneficial toward improving the health outcomes of African American men [99–102].
Next Steps to Improve Health-Seeking Behavior
Improving the health-seeking behavior of the most vulnerable men will require a comprehensive approach. Traditionally, patients with multiple comorbidities are identified as complex patients [103–114]; however, this definition might be too restrictive [115]. Safford and colleagues [115] contend that complexity extends beyond having multiple comorbidities, proposing that it includes socioeconomic, behavioral, cultural, and environmental factors [115]. Safford and colleagues propose that patient complexity is a function of “the interactions between biological, cultural, environmental, socioeconomic, and behavioral forces” (Vector Model of Complexity). The health-seeking behavior of men is complex, and if healthcare providers address only one facet, as we have seen, the result is likely to be less than optimal for men [116]. Thus, to improve health-seeking behavior of men and the most vulnerable men (minority), one must address all the vectors that impact health-seeking behavior in men and how men interface with the healthcare system. The aforementioned remains somewhat difficult because men’s health remains understudied and systematically underfunded. However, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a step in the right direction in addressing men’s health. The ACA emphasizes preventive care and population health partnered with primary health. This type of partnership is absolutely necessary to improve health-seeking behavior in men as it addresses matters outside of the medical encounter that challenge health-seeking behavior for men. Lastly, one of the critical inclusions in the ACA is the role of accountability for physicians. With increased accountability and monitoring of patient outcomes, we will expect that we will see an increase in men’s use of preventive healthcare services, as well as their engagement in the healthcare system in meaningful ways that will reduce their burden of disease and minimize costs to the healthcare system.
References
Rich J, Ro M. A poor man’s plight: uncovering the disparity in men’s health. Battle Creek, MI: Kellogg Foundation; 2002.
Sabo D. Understanding men’s health: a relational and gender sensitive approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Center for Populations and Development Studies; 1999.
Yamey G. Health minister announces initiatives on men’s health. BMJ. 2000;320(7240):961.
W.K. Kellogg Foundation. What about men? Exploring the inequities in minority men’s health. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation; 2002.
National Center for Health Statistics. Utilization of Ambulatory Medical Care by Women: United States, 1997–98. Hyattsville, MD; 2001.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Policy. Health Men. www.ahrq.gov/patients-consumers/patientinvolvement/health-men/index.html. Accessed November 1, 2015.
National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2013: With Special Feature on Prescription Drugs. Hyattsville, MD; 2014.
Griffith DM, Gunter K, Allen JO. Male gender role strain as a barrier to African American men’s physical activity. Health Educ Behav. 2011. doi:10.1177/1090198110383660.
Ornelas IJ, Amell J, Tran AN, Royster M, Armstrong-Brown J, Eng E. Understanding African American men’s perceptions of racism, male gender socialization, and social capital through photovoice. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(4):552–65. doi:10.1177/1049732309332104.
Nicholas DR. Men, masculinity, and cancer: risk-factor behaviors, early detection, and psychosocial adaptation. J Am Coll Health. 2000;49(1):27–33.
Harvey IS, Alston RJ. Understanding preventive behaviors among mid-Western African-American men: a pilot qualitative study of prostate screening. J Men’s Health. 2011;8(2):140–51.
Staples R. Health among African American males. In: Sabo D, Gordon F, editors. Men’s health and illness: gender, power and the body. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995. p. 121–38.
Helgeson VS. Masculinity, men’s roles, and coronary heart disease. In: Sabo D, Gordon F, editors. Men’s health and illness: gender, power and the body. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995. p. 68–104.
Adler NE, Rehkopf DH. US disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:235–52.
Satcher D. Our commitment to eliminate racial and ethnic health disparities. Yale J Health Poliy Law Ethics. 2001;1:1.
Williams DR. Adult health status: patterns, paradoxes, and prospects. America becoming: racial trends and their consequences, vol. 2; 2001. p. 371.
Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, Vu HT, Powe NR, Nelson C, Ford DE. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282(6):583–9. doi:10.1001/jama.282.6.583.
Elder KT, Wiltshire JC, McRoy L, Campbell D, Gary LC, Safford M. Men and differences by racial/ethnic group in self advocacy during the medical encounter. J Mens Health. 2010;7(2):135–44.
Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Jacquez A. Outcomes of border health Spanish/English chronic disease self-management programs. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):401–9.
Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006;44(11):964–71. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000233678.80203.c1.
Utz SW, Steeves RH, Wenzel J, Ivora Hinton P, Jones RA, Andrews D, Muphy A, Oliver MN. “Working hard with it”: self-management of type 2 diabetes by rural African Americans. Fam Community Health. 2006;29(3):195–205.
Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor, Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, Department of Health. Coverage of certain preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. Final rules. Fed Regist 2013; 78(127): 39869–99.
Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995;33(12):1176–87.
Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware Jr JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):S110–127.
Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):6–8. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1209500.
Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, Ordway L, DiMatteo MR, Kravitz RL. Antecedents of adherence to medical recommendations: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. J Behav Med. 1992;15(5):447–68.
Carpenter WR, Godley PA, Clark JA, Talcott JA, Finnegan T, Mishel M, Bensen J, Rayford W, Su LJ, Fontham ETH. Racial differences in trust and regular source of patient care and the implications for prostate cancer screening use. Cancer. 2009;115(21):5048–59.
Musa D, Schulz R, Harris R, Silverman M, Thomas SB. Trust in the health care system and the use of preventive health services by older black and white adults. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(7):1293–9.
Williams DR. The health of men: structured inequalities and opportunities. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(5):724–31.
Williams DR, Mohammed SA. Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research. J Behav Med. 2009;32(1):20–47.
Cheatham C, Barksdale D, Rogers S. Barriers to health care and health seeking behaviors faced by Black men. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(11):555–63.
Griffith DM, Mason M, Yonas M, Eng E, Jeffries V, Plihcik S, Parks B. Dismantling institutional racism: theory and action. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39(3):381–92.
Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
Ford CL, Airhihenbuwa CO. The public health critical race methodology: Praxis for antiracism research. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1390–8. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.030.
Jones CP. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a Gardener’s Tale. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1212–5. doi:10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1212.
Jones CP, Truman BI, Elam-evans LD, Jones CA, Jones CY, Jiles R, Rumisha SF, Perry GS. Using “socially assigned race” to probe white advantages in health status. Ethn Dis. 2008;18:496–504.
Trubek LG, Das M. Achieving equality: healthcare governance in transition. Am J Law Med. 2003;29:395–421.
Byrd WM, Clayton LA. Race, medicine, and health care in the United States: a historical survey. J Natl Med Assoc. 2001;93(3 Suppl):11S–34S.
Dreachslin JL, Weech-Maldonado R, Dansky KH. Racial and ethnic diversity and organizational behavior: a focused research agenda for health services management. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(5):961–71.
Morgan G. Images of organization. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1997.
Boyd NM, Angelique H. Rekindling the discourse: organizational studies in community psychology. J Community Psychol. 2002;30:325–48.
Sullivan LW. Missing persons: minorities in the health professions, a report of the Sullivan Commission on Diversity in the Healthcare Workforce. 2004.
Hiatt RA, Rimer BK. A new strategy for cancer control research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:957–64.
Pignone M, DeWalt DA, Sheridan S, et al. Interventions to improve health outcomes for patients with low literacy. A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(2):185–92.
White A, Banks I. Men and help seeking. In: Kirby RS, Carson CCI, White A, Kirby M, editors. Men’s health. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group; 2009. p. 505–14.
Hammond WP, Mattis JS. Being a man about it: manhood meaning among African American men. Psychol Men Masculinity. 2005;6(2):114–26. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.2.114.
White A. Men’s health in the 21st century. Int J Men’s Health. 2006. doi:10.3149/jmh.0501.1.
Brown LJ, Bond MJ. An examination of the influences on health-protective behaviours among Australian men. Int J Men’s Health. 2008;7(3):274–87.
Lemle R, Mishkin ME. Alcohol and masculinity. J Subst Abuse Drugs. 1989;6(4):213–22.
Chaffin M, Kelleher K, Hollenberg J. Onset of physical abuse and neglect: psychiatric substance abuse and social risk factors from prospective community data. Child Abuse Neglect. 1996;20:191–203.
Batholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Intervention mapping: designing theory and evidence based health promotion programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing; 2001.
Ray R. The professional allowance: how socioeconomic characteristics allow some men to fulfill family role expectations better than other men. Int J Sociol Fam (Spl Iss Intersectionality). 2008;34(2):327–51.
Bowman PJ. Research perspectives on Black men: role strain and adaptation across the Black adult male life cycle. In: Jones R, editor. Black adult development and aging. Verkeley, CA: Cobb and Henry; 1989. p. 117–50.
Powell-Hammond W, Siddiqi AA. Social determinants of medical mistrust among African American men. In: Treadwell HM, Xantos C, Holden KB, editors. Social determinants of health among African American men. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2013. p. 135–60.
Elder K, Ramamonjiarivelo Z. Wiltshire J et al. Trust, medication adherence, and hypertension control in Southern African American men. 2012;102(12):2242–5.
Gamble VN. Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and Health Care. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1773–8.
Boulware LE, Cooper LA, Ratner LE, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Rep. 2003;118(4):358–65.
Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DM. Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(21):2458–63.
McGary H. Distrust, social justice, and health care. Mt Sinai J Med. 1999;66(4):236–40.
Fowler-Brown A, Ashkin E, Corbie-Smith G, Thaker S, Pathman DE. Perception of racial barriers to health care in the rural South. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006;17(1):86–100.
Banks KH, Kohn-Wood LP, Spencer M. An examination of the African American experience of everyday discrimination and symptoms of psychological distress. Community Ment Health J. 2006;42(6):555–70.
Dion KL. The social psychology of perceived prejudice and discrimination. Can Psychol. 2001;43:1–10.
Harrell JP, Merritt M, Kalu J. Racism and mental health. In: Jones RL, editor. Hampton, VA: Cobb and Henry; 1998. p. 247–80.
Krieger N. Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29(2):295–352.
Williams DR, Williams-Morris R. Racism and mental health: the African American experience. Ethn Health. 2000;5(3–4):243–68.
Casagrande SS, Gary TL, LaVeist TA, Gaskin DJ, Cooper LA. Perceived discrimination and adherence to medical care in a racially integrated community. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(3):389–95.
Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(9):537–46.
LaVeist TA, Nickerson KJ, Bowie JV. Attitudes about racism, medical mistrust, and satisfaction with care among African American and white cardiac patients. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57 Suppl 1:146–61.
Nickerson KJ, Helms JE, Terrell F. Cultural mistrust, opinions about mental illness, and black students’ attitudes toward seeking psychological help from white counselors. J Couns Psychol. 1994;41(3):378–85.
Mechanic D. Managed care, rationing, and trust in medical care. J Urban Health. 1998;75(1):118–22.
Mechanic D, Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients’ trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA. 1996;275(21):1693–7.
Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(3):213–20.
Thom DH, Ribisl KM, Stewart AL, Luke DA. Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians. Med Care. 1999;37(5):510–7.
Chen Y, Zhang X, Hu X, Deng Y, Chen J, Li S, Zhang C, Wang J, Liu Z, Hao Y. The potential role of a self-management intervention for benign prostate hyperplasia. Urology. 2012.
Brown CT, Emberton M. Self-management for men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Curr Prostate Rep. 2009;7(3):111–6.
Aguilar R. Men’s health: managing type 2 diabetes in men. J Fam Pract. 2012;61(6):S16.
Liburd LC, Namageyo-Funa A, Jack Jr L. Understanding “masculinity” and the challenges of managing type-2 diabetes among African-American men. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(5):550.
Misra R, Lager J. Ethnic and gender differences in psychosocial factors, glycemic control, and quality of life among adult type 2 diabetic patients. J Diabetes Complications. 2009;23(1):54–64.
Loeb SJ, Steffensmeier D, Kassab C. Predictors of self‐efficacy and self‐rated health for older male inmates. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(4):811–20.
Joekes K, Van Elderen T, Schreurs K. Self-efficacy and overprotection are related to quality of life, psychological well-being and self-management in cardiac patients. J Health Psychol. 2007;12(1):4–16.
Williams K, Bond M. The roles of self-efficacy, outcome expectancies and social support in the self-care behaviours of diabetics. Psychol Health Med. 2002;7(2):127–41.
Olivarius NF, Beck-Nielsen H, Andreasen AH, Horder M, Pedersen PA. Randomised controlled trial of structured personal care of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Br Med J. 2001;323(7319):970–5.
Cohen H, Britten N. Who decides about prostate cancer treatment? A qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2003;20(6):724–9.
Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Butler PM, Arnold MS, Fitzgerald JT, Feste CC. Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(7):943–9.
Barsky AJ, Kazis LE, Freiden RB, Goroll AH, Hatem CJ, Lawrence RS. Evaluating the interview in primary care medicine. Soc Sci Med Med Psychol Med Sociol. 1980;14A(6):653–8.
Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware Jr JE. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102(4):520–8.
Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware Jr JE, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3(5):448–57.
Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152(9):1423–33.
Sanders Thompson VL, Talley M, Caito N, Kreuter M. African American men’s perceptions of factors influencing health-information seeking. Am J Mens Health. 2009;3(1):6–15.
Vessey JA, Miola ES. Teaching adolescents self-advocacy skills. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23(1):53–6.
Bartlett YK, Coulson NS. An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects health professional/patient communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;83(1):113–9.
Tu HT, Cohen GR. Striking jump in consumers seeking health care information. Track Rep. 2008;20:1–8.
Rooks RN, Wiltshire JC, Elder K, BeLue R, Gary LC. Health information seeking and use outside of the medical encounter: is it associated with race and ethnicity? Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(2):176–84.
Wiltshire J, Cronin K, Sarto GE, Brown R. Self-advocacy during the medical encounter: use of health information and racial/ethnic differences. Med Care. 2006;44(2):100–9.
Mueller KJ, Ortega ST, Parker K, Askenazi PK. Health status and access to care among rural minorities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1999;10:230–49.
Eng E, Smith J. Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995;35:23–9.
Earp JA, Eng E, O’Malley MS, Altpeter M, Rauscher G, Mayne L, Matthews HF, Lynch KS, Qaqish B. Increasing the use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(4):646–54.
Lopez E, Eng E, Robinson N, Wang C. Photovoice as a community based participatory research method. In: Israel B, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker D, editors. Methods in community based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Wiley; 2005. p. 326–48.
Bennett CL, Ferreira MR, Davis TC, Kaplan J, Weinberger M, Kuzel T, Seday MA, Sartor O. Relation between literacy, race, and state of presentation among low-income patients with prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1998;16(9):3101–4.
Thompson Sanders V, Cavazos-Rehg P, Tate K, Gaier A. Health Education Research. Cancer information seeking among African Americans. J Cancer Educ. 2008;23:92–101.
Friedman DB, Thomas TL, Owens OL, Hebert JR. It takes two to talk about prostate cancer: a qualitative assessment of African American men’s and women’s cancer communication practices and recommendations. Am J Men’s Health. 2012;6(6):472–84.
Griffith DM, Pichon LC, Campbell B, Allen JO. YOUR blessed health: a faith based CBPR approach to addressing HIV/AIDS among African Americans. AIDS Educ Prevent. 2010;22(3):203–17.
de Jonge P, Huyse FJ, Stiefel FC. Case and care complexity in the medically ill. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90(4):679–92.
Durso SC. Using clinical guidelines designed for older adults with diabetes mellitus and complex health status. JAMA. 2006;295(16):1935–40.
Elliott RA, Ross-Degnan D, Adams AS, Safran DG, Soumerai SB. Strategies for coping in a complex world: adherence behavior among older adults with chronic illness. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(6):805–10.
Francis CK. Hypertension, cardiac disease, and compliance in minority patients. Am J Med. 1991;91(1A):29S–36S.
Huyse FJ, Stiefel FC, de Jonge P. Identifiers, or “red flags,” of complexity and need for integrated care. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90(4):703–12.
Kerr EA, Heisler M, Krein SL, Kabeto M, Langa KM, Weir D, Piette JD. Beyond comorbidity counts: how do comorbidity type and severity influence diabetes patients’ treatment priorities and self-management? J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(12):1635–40.
Lyketsos CG, Dunn G, Kaminsky MJ, Breakey WR. Medical comorbidity in psychiatric inpatients: relation to clinical outcomes and hospital length of stay. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(1):24–30.
Ofili E, Igho-Pemu P, Bransford T. The prevention of cardiovascular disease in blacks. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1999;14(2):169–75.
Shea S, Misra D, Ehrlich MH, Field L, Francis CK. Predisposing factors for severe, uncontrolled hypertension in an inner-city minority population. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(11):776–81.
Textor SC. Managing renal arterial disease and hypertension. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2003;18(4):260–7.
Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(20):2269–76.
Yates JW. Comorbidity considerations in geriatric oncology research. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51(6):329–36.
Safford MM, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI. Patient complexity: more than comorbidity. The vector model of complexity. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22 Suppl 3:382–90.
Miller NH, Hill M, Kottke T, Ockene IS. The multilevel compliance challenge: recommendations for a call to action. A statement for healthcare professionals. Circulation. 1997;95(4):1085–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilbert, K.L., Elder, K., Thorpe, R.J. (2016). Health-Seeking Behavior and Meeting the Needs of the Most Vulnerable Men. In: Heidelbaugh, J. (eds) Men's Health in Primary Care. Current Clinical Practice. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26091-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26091-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26089-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26091-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)