Abstract
Common gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including those of colon/rectum, stomach, pancreas, liver and esophagus account for more than half of the worldwide cancer related deaths. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common GI malignancy diagnosed in both men and women. Although, a significant advancement has occurred towards understanding the multistep process of colorectal carcinogenesis, most of studies and existing therapeutic approaches are primarily based on genetic alterations of the disease. Growing evidences in recent years have now realized the involvement of epigenetic abnormalities along with genetic alterations to be crucial for growth and development of CRC. This chapter is focused on providing basics of human CRC and enumerating epigenetic changes associated with its growth and development, hence provides a better understanding of colorectal carcinogenesis.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
5.1 Introduction
Common gastrointestinal (GI) cancers including those of colon/rectum, stomach, pancreas, liver and esophagus account for more than half of the worldwide cancer related deaths. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common GI malignancy and third most commonly diagnosed cancer in both men and women. It is a major cause of cancer death worldwide with an estimated 50,000 deaths per year in the United States only [1]. Even with the development of successful screening programs in last decade, no significant decline in CRC incidence and deaths is reported or expected in coming years. Although, a significant advancement has occurred towards understanding the multistep process of colorectal carcinogenesis, most of studies and existing therapeutic approaches are primarily based on genetic alterations of the disease. Growing evidences in recent years have now realized the involvement of epigenetic abnormalities along with genetic alterations to be crucial for growth and development of CRC, and failures of current cancer therapy are in part due to lack of understanding epigenetic changes in CRC cells. Epigenetic changes in CRC cells include alterations in DNA methylation , histone modification , nucleosome positioning and non-coding RNAs expression, which provide a base for multistep process of colorectal carcinogenesis. This chapter is focused on providing basics of human CRC and enumerating epigenetic changes associated with its growth and development, hence may provide a better understanding for improving therapeutic approach of CRC treatments.
5.2 Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a term used for cancer that starts either in the colon or the rectum. These cancers can also be referred separately as colon cancer or rectal cancer, depending on where they start. Though both colon cancer and rectal cancer can be referred to as CRC, the difference lies in where the cancer actually began. If the cancer began in the colon, which is the upper part of the large intestine, it may be referred to as colon cancer. If the cancer began in the rectum, which is the later part of the large intestine leading to the anus, it is called rectal cancer. Both colon cancer and rectal cancer share many common features, and develop slowly over several years. Before a cancer develops, a growth of tissue or tumor usually begins as a non-cancerous polyp on the inner lining of the colon or rectum. These polyps are benign, non-cancerous tumors. Some polyps may change into cancer but not all. The chance of changing into a cancerous (malignant) polyp depends on its kind. The two main types of polyps are:
-
Neoplastic polyps (adenomatous polyps and adenomas) are polyps that can change into cancer, and because of this, these adenomas represent a pre-cancerous condition.
-
Nonneoplastic polyps (hyperplastic, juvenile, hamartomatous, inflammatory, and lymphoid polyps) in general, are not pre-cancerous. But some hyperplastic polyps can become pre-cancerous or might be a sign of having a greater risk of developing adenomas and cancer, particularly when these polyps grow in the ascending colon.
Another kind of pre-cancerous condition is called dysplasia. Dysplasia is an area in the lining of the colon or rectum where the cells look abnormal (but not like true cancer cells) when viewed under a microscope. These cells can change into cancer over time. Dysplasia is usually seen in people who have had diseases such as ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease for many years, which cause chronic inflammation of the colon.
If cancer forms in a polyp, it can eventually begin to grow into the wall of the colon or rectum. When cancer cells are in the wall, they can then grow into blood vessels or lymph vessels. Lymph vessels are thin, tiny channels that carry away waste and fluid. They first drain into nearby lymph nodes, which are bean-shaped structures containing immune cells that help fight against infections. Once cancer cells spread into blood or lymph vessels, they can travel to nearby lymph nodes or to distant parts of the body, such as the liver, and acquire the form of metastatic cancer.
Several types of cancer can start in the colon or rectum. Most common among them is adenocarcinoma.
Adenocarcinomas: These cancers start in intestinal gland cells that make mucus to lubricate the inside of the colon and rectum. Adenocarcinomas are the most common type of colorectal cancer, which represent more than 95 % of colon and rectal cancers. “Adeno” is the prefix for gland, and adenocarcinomas typically start within the intestinal gland cells that line the inside of the colon and/or rectum. They tend to start in the inner layer and then spread deeper to other layers. There are two main subtypes of adenocarcinoma:
-
Mucinous adenocarcinoma is made up of approximately 60 % mucus. The mucus can cause cancer cells to spread faster and become more aggressive than typical adenocarcinomas. Mucinous adenocarcinomas account for 10–15 % of all colon and rectal adenocarcinomas.
-
Signet ring cell adenocarcinoma accounts for less than 1 % of adenocarcinomas. Named for its appearance under a microscope, signet ring cell adenocarcinoma is typically aggressive and may be more difficult to treat.
There are many other types of rare CRCs, and combined these types account for just 5 % of all cases. Below are examples of other colorectal types:
-
Gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors: This slow-growing cancer forms in the neuroendocrine cell (a nerve cell that also creates hormones) in the lining of the gastrointestinal tract. These tumors account for just 1 % of all colorectal cancers, but half of all of the cancers found in the small intestine.
-
Primary colorectal lymphomas: It is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). These lymphomas are cancers that develop in the lymphatic system from cells called lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell that helps the body fight infections. NHL can develop in many parts of the body, including the lymph nodes, bone marrow, spleen, thymus and the digestive tract. Primary colorectal lymphomas account for just 0.5 % of all colorectal cancers, and about 5 % of all lymphomas. The disease usually occurs later in life, and is more common in men than women.
-
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): It is a rare type of CRC that starts in a special cell found in the lining of the gastrointestinal tract called interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs). More than 50 % of GISTs start in the stomach. While most of the others start in the small intestine, the rectum is the third most common location. GISTs are classified as sarcomas, a type of cancers that begin in the connective tissues, which include fat, muscle, blood vessels, deep skin tissues, nerves, bones and cartilage.
-
Leiomyosarcomas: Another form of sarcoma, leiomyosarcomas essentially means “cancer of smooth muscle.” The colon and rectum have three layers of muscle that can be affected, which all work together to guide waste through the digestive tract. This rare type of colorectal cancer accounts for about 0.1 % of all colorectal cases.
-
Melanomas: Though most commonly associated with the skin, melanomas can occur anywhere, including the colon or rectum.
-
Squamous cell carcinomas: Some parts of the gastrointestinal tract, like the upper part of the esophagus and the end of the anus, are lined with flat cells called squamous cells. These are the same type of cells that are found on the surface of the skin. Cancers starting in these cells are called squamous cell carcinoma.
About 75 % of CRC patients have sporadic disease with no apparent evidence of inheriting the disorder. The remaining 25 % of patients have a family history of CRC, and commonly referred familial colorectal cancer. A single gene, a combination of genes, or a combination of genetic and environmental factors can cause familial colorectal cancer. Typically these families have one or two members with a history of colorectal cancer or precancerous polyps. This type of CRC is also called as hereditary colorectal cancer as the exact gene that causes the disease is known. Inherited colorectal cancers are associated with a genetic mutation in a cancer susceptibility gene. Everyone inherits one susceptibility gene from each of their parents, making a total of two working copies of each gene. If a mutation in one copy of a cancer susceptibility gene is passed from the parent to their child, the child is predisposed (or has the potential) to develop cancer. The genetic causes of two hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) have been identified. Familial adenomatous polyposis is a disorder that leads to hundreds, even thousands, of polyps in the colon and rectum at a young age, usually as a teenager or young adult. Other names for this condition are hereditary polyposis of the colorectum, familial polyposis, and Gardner’s syndrome. This condition is inherited and primarily affects the gastrointestinal tract, commonly the colon and less often the stomach and small intestine. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is also known as Lynch syndrome or cancer family syndrome. It is a condition in which the tendency to develop colorectal cancer is inherited. People with HNPCC have a 50 % chance of passing the HNPCC gene to each of their children. A mutation in the genes (hMLH1 and hMSH2), that when functioning normally would protect against colon cancer, is the cause of HNPCC. People affected with this type of colorectal cancer do not develop large numbers of polyps (only a small number may be present or none at all). In families with HNPCC, cancer usually occurs on the right side of the colon. It often occurs at a younger age than colon cancer that is not inherited.
In addition to the genetic regulations of the human CRC, growing evidences in recent years have now realized the involvement of epigenetic abnormalities to be crucial for growth and development of CRC. The next part of this chapter is primarily focused on enumerating epigenetic changes in CRC cells including alterations in DNA methylation , histone modification , nucleosome positioning and non-coding RNAs expression, and their association with growth and development of human CRC.
5.3 Epigenetics of Colorectal Cancer
Epigenetic dysregulation is a common feature across all cancer types including CRC. Epigenetic changes differ from genetic changes mainly in that they occur at a higher frequency than do genetic changes, are reversible upon treatment with pharmacological agents and occur at defined regions in a gene. Epigenetic mechanisms, from DNA methylation to histone modifications , allow for a vast number of cellular phenotypes to be created from the same genetic material. Just as certain genetic changes play a key role in tumor initiation and progression, epigenetic changes may also set the course of tumor development and be required for malignant transformation. In recent years it has become clear that there is a synergy between genetic and epigenetic changes and that Knudson’s two-hit hypothesis needs to be revised: instead of only two possibilities (loss of heterozygosity or homozygous deletion), there is also a third possibility of transcriptional silencing by DNA methylation of promoters, which constitute the most common mechanism of epigenetic alteration associated with a large number of cancer phenotypes including human CRC.
5.3.1 Methylation of DNA
Most of CRC cases demonstrate chromosomal instability characterized by alterations in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, including APC, P53, and K-RAS [2, 3]. However, in addition to these genetic alterations, epigenetic mechanisms including abnormal DNA methylation is frequently observed in cancers, and now is growing as a potential tumor marker. Cytosine (C) methylation occurs after DNA synthesis by enzymatic transfer of a methyl group from the methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine to the carbon-5 position of cytosine (m5C). Cytosines are methylated in the human genome mostly when located 5′ to a guanosine. Hypermethylation of DNA sequences of promoters of tumor suppressor genes and homeobox genes has been reported to be one of the most constant features of the cancer genome [4–9]. The most frequently studied epigenetic changes investigated so far are global genomic DNA hypomethylation along with specific hypermethylation, predominantly at promoter CpG islands (CGI) of tumor suppressor genes. CpG islands are defined as a 500-base pair window with a G:C content of at least 55 % and an observed overexpected frequency of at least 0.65. Computational analysis of the human genome sequence predicts 29,000 CpG islands. It has been increasingly recognized over the past years that the CpG islands of a large number of genes, which are mostly unmethylated in normal tissue, are methylated to varying degrees in human cancers. Methylation of some CpG islands in non-malignant tissue also increases with age, whereas the total genomic content of m5C declines. The same is true during carcinogenesis of several tumors (e.g. adenoma-carcinoma sequence), where methylation takes place at specific promoter regions, followed by general hypomethylation of the whole genome, and this is thought to induce a higher rate of chromosomal instability (CIN). Post-synthetic covalent addition of a methyl group to cytosine is mediated by the three known active DNA cytosine methyltransferases (DNMT1, 3a, and 3b). When DNA containing a symmetrically methylated CpG dinucleotide is replicated, the result is two double-stranded DNA molecules, each containing a methylated CpG dinucleotide on the parental strand, but also containing an unmethylated CpG dinucleotide on the newly synthesized strand. The methylated state of the site in the parent molecule is maintained in the daughter molecules when a maintenance methyltransferase recognizes the hemimethylated site and methylates the unmethylated cytosine, restoring the symmetrically methylated CpG dinucleotide pair. DNMT1 is mainly responsible for maintenance of DNA methylation, whereas DNMT3a and DNMT3b have been shown to methylate hemimethylated and unmethylated DNA with equal efficiency. Overexpression of both DNMT1 and DNMT3 mRNAs has been reported in human tumors. The reciprocal relationship between the density of methylated cytosine residues and the transcriptional activity of a gene has been widely documented. However, this inverse correlation has been demonstrated conclusively only for methylation in the promoter regions and not in the transcribed parts of a gene. Several tumor-suppressor genes contain CpG islands in their promoters, and many of them show evidence of methylation silencing (reviewed in references [10–12]). Advances in the technology of DNA methylation analysis have spurred the discovery of numerous cases of hypermethylation of tumor-suppressor gene promoters in human tumors including human CRC.
5.3.1.1 Hypermethylation of CpG Island
Promoter hypermethylation is frequently observed in colorectal carcinomas, but is rare in adenomas [13]. Hypermethylation of CGI constitutes one of the most common epigenetic alterations involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. The presence of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in CRCs has been supported by the fact that one group of CRCs has few methylated promoter CGIs and another group harbors simultaneous aberrant methylation of multiple promoter CGIs [14, 15]. CIMP is initially defined using cancer-specific CIMP markers (CDKN2A, MINT1, MINT2, MINT31and MLH1) in CRCs [15], but in 2006, Weisenberger et al. [16] challenged the application of these classic CIMP markers and insisted upon the efficacy of novel marker panels to endorse the CIMP as a distinctive molecular feature of CRCs. Although based on a systematic analysis of a large number of CRCs with aberrant methylation of numerous promoter CGIs, later studies failed to emulate the original results using the same markers selected by Weisenberger et al. [17, 18]. No matter how the markers are selected, CIMP is certain to be involved in CRC development as the third molecular pathway, following CIN and microsatellite instability (MSI). Hypermethylation of promoter CGIs can prevent transcription of tumor suppressor or mismatch repair genes, such as MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), and occurs at an early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. Methylation of promoter CGIs followed by transcriptional silencing of MLH1 is present in ~70 % of sporadic MSI CRCs [19–21]. However, MLH1 is usually included in CIMP marker sets of promoter CGIs, and up to 60 % of CIMP-positive CRCs have aberrant methylation of MLH1 [22]. This may be one of the reasons for the clinical and pathological resemblance between CIMP-positive and MSI CRCs. The high frequency of serrated polyps with MLH1 gene promoter methylation in individuals with MSI CRC suggests the presence of a serrated pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis [23]. More recently, genetic and epigenetic profiles of a variety of colorectal polyps have demonstrated that sessile serrated adenomas/polyps may be precursor lesions for MSI CRCs and follow the CIMP pathway [24]. Little is known about the CRCs that are without methylation of any promoter CGIs. The absence of aberrant methylation of any promoter CGIs in these patients confers possible global hypomethylation , which has been often associated with CIN in CRC [25, 26]. Cancer-specific methylation of CGIs and subsequent loss of expression of associated genes in CRC cell lines that had hypermethylation of these promoter CGIs suggested possible involvement of promoter methylation of these genes in colorectal carcinogenesis. For example, SLC13A5, a member of the solute carrier (SLC) families and a Na+/sulfate/selenate/thiosulfate/carboxylate symporter [27] is one of the hallmarks of CIMP in renal cell carcinoma [28]. Certain SLC family members increase chemosensitivity against anticancer drugs by mediating the cellular uptake of hydrophilic drugs [29]. One of the sodium transporter families also has tumor suppressor activity, and aberrant methylation of promoter CGI is detected in aberrant crypt foci, which is considered to be the initial lesion of the serrated adenoma-carcinoma pathway [30]. Just as there are cancer-type specific differences in DNA hypermethylation patterns [6], some DNA sequences are more or less susceptible to DNA hypomethylation depending on the kind of cancer [31]. Another risk factor for CRC is ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease. Specific hypermethylation was seen to be a very early event in UC-associated carcinogenesis, thus indicating the possibility that hypermethylation might serve as a biomarker for early detection of cancer or dysplasia in UC. In addition, age is the principal function of CRC incidence, and age-related methylation changes are well documented for CRC [32].
5.3.1.2 Hypomethylation of DNA
DNA hypomethylation was the initial epigenetic abnormality recognized in human tumors. The first-described epigenetic changes in human cancer, reported in 1883, were losses in DNA methylation (m5C residues replaced by unmethylated C residues) [33] and later Feinberg and Vogelstein described hypomethylation of DNA in few cancer-irrelevant gene regions in colon adenocarcinomas versus normal colonic epithelium [34]. Many subsequent reports have later confirmed the frequent overall genomic hypomethylation in other types of cancers relative to their respective control tissues [35–37]. However, for several decades after its independent discovery, it was often ignored as an unwelcome complication, and almost all of the attention was given to the hypermethylation of promoters of genes that are silenced in cancers (e.g. tumor suppressor genes). Because it was subsequently shown that global hypomethylation of DNA in cancer was most closely associated with repeated DNA elements, cancer-linked DNA hypomethylation continued to receive little attention. However, along with modern technological development, recent high-resolution genome-wide studies confirmed that DNA hypomethylation is the almost constant companion to hypermethylation of the genome in cancer, usually but not always in different sequences.
DNA hypomethylation occurs in many tumors, particularly in advanced stages, and is generally assumed to be a genomewide event [35, 38]. Hypomethylation of highly repeated DNA sequences [36, 39–41], which comprise approximately half of the genome, is largely responsible for the global DNA hypomethylation that is observed quite frequently in cancers. Tandem centromeric satellite α, juxtacentromeric (centromere-adjacent) satellite 2, the interspersed Alu and long interspersed elements (LINE)-1 repeats are the most frequently studied DNA cancer-hypomethylated repeats [39–43]. In contrast with normal cells, hypomethylation in tumor cells typically occurs at the repetitive sequences residing in satellite or pericentromeric regions. The pattern of hypomethylation may make chromosomes more susceptible to breakage and, therefore, is thought to predispose to chromosomal instability (CIN) and aneuploidy [44]. Global DNA hypomethylation, which can lead to activation of previously silenced genes, is generally considered to be a genome-wide event [33, 35, 45]. In colorectal neoplasia, it is associated with an increased risk of colorectal carcinogenesis [46, 47] and has been observed in advanced, metastatic stages of colon cancer [48, 49]. Recently, hypomethylation of the CDH3 (P-cadherin) promoter was found in ACF and CRC with a potential “field effect” of CDH3 hypomethylation in the normal epithelium adjacent to cancer [50]. In another study, a significant correlation between the aberrant demethylation of the CDH3 gene and the tumor site and Dukes’ stage was observed [49]. The hypomethylation of the gene is associated with induction of CDH3 expression in CRC, and epigenetic demethylation of the CDH3 promoter causes its ectopic expression early in the colorectal adenoma–carcinoma sequence, which persists during invasive cancer [50]. In addition, a small population of undifferentiated CD133+ has been reported to create and propagate colorectal carcinoma [51], and the CD133 expression is directly regulated by epigenetic modifications [52]. In primary tissue, demethylation of the CD133 gene was observed at 40 % of CRC (19 out of 48 cases) and more frequently in advanced CRC with a trend toward preferentially developing lymph node metastasis [48]. These results demonstrate that CDH3 and CD133 genes are more frequently demethylated in advanced colorectal carcinomas [49]. LINE-1 is an emerging marker for global demethylation. Most carcinomas including breast, lung, head and neck, bladder, esophagus, liver, prostate, and stomach reveal a greater percentage of LINE-1 hypomethylation than their normal tissue counterparts, though normal tissues from different organs show tissue-specific levels of methylated LINE-1 [53]. Greater hypomethylation of LINE-1 is also observed in colon carcinoma than those of dysplastic polyp and histological normal colonic epithelium [53]. DNA derived from sera of patients with carcinoma display more LINE-1 hypomethylation than those of noncarcinoma individuals [53]. LINE-1 hypomethylation is partially reversed in cancers with MSI [54] and inversely correlated with methylation of CIMP-H genes in CRC [55]. LINE-1 hypomethylation is associated with an increase in colon cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality [56]. In normal colon mucosa, the LINE-1 methylation level is inversely correlated with methylation of CpG island loci (MLH1, CDKN2A/p16, TIMP3, APC, ESR1, and MYOD), though no associations in colon cancer were observed [57].
So far, three types of altered DNA methylation patterns have been known in human cancer: hypermethylation , hypomethylation and loss of imprinting (LOI) [58]. The LOI at the IGF2/H19 region as a result of hypomethylation is a clear example for this phenomenon. LOI is seen in about 40 % of CRC tissue [59]. In addition to DNA methylation changes, there is an abundance of other epigenetic alterations occurring within cancer cells including DNA methylation alterations outside of CpG islands , non-CpG methylation, changes in cytosine oxidative species (hydroxymethylcytosine, formylcytosine, carboxylcytosine) levels, and histone modifications.
5.3.2 Histone Modification
In addition to altered DNA methylation , post-translational histone modifications play an important role in gene regulation and carcinogenesis. The coiling of DNA around core histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4) forms nucleosomes that are the basic units of eukaryotic chromatin packaging. The core histones display highly dynamic N-terminal amino acid tails of 20–35 residues in length extending from the surface of nucleosome. Histone proteins can be chemically modified by the addition of residues on these tails, and can become post-translationally methylated (me), phosphorylated (P), acetylated (Ac), sumolyated (Sum), ubiquitinated (Ub) and ADP-ribosylated. Lysine residues (K) can either be mono-, di, or trimethylated, while arginine residues (R) can be monomethylated and symmetrically or asymmetrically dimethylated (Fig. 5.1). The addition or removal of post-translational modifications from histone tails is dynamic and achieved by a number of different histone-modifying enzymes. These include histone acetyltransferases (HATs), histone deacetylases (HDACs), histone methyltransferases (HMTs), histone demethylases (HDMs), histone ubiquitinating enzymes as well as deubiquitinating enzymes. They can be either specific (i.e. HMTs and HDMs) or general (i.e. HATs and HDACs) in their ability to recognize and alter the amino acid residues of histone tails [60, 61].
Post-translational modifications of histones can regulate the accessibility of chromatin to the transcriptional machinery. Generally, acetylation and phosphorylation are thought to change chromatin structure by altering the net positive charge of the histone proteins, thereby rendering DNA sequence information more accessible [62]. Acetylation of histone tails is typically associated with transcriptional activation of genes, while the functional consequences of methylation depend mainly on the number of methyl groups and their location within the histone tail [63]. Examples for modifications that are associated with open chromatin and active gene expression include histone 3 lysine 4 di- and trimethylation (H3K4me2 and H3K4me3, respectively) and histone 3 lysine 9 monomethylation (H3K9me1). Histone 3 lysine 27 di- and trimethylation (H3K27me2 and H3K27me3, respectively) and histone 3 lysine 9 di- and trimethylation (H3K9me2 and H3K9me3, respectively) are associated with inactive chromatin and repression of gene expression [64]. The high combinatorial potential of different modifications has been described as the ‘histone code’ [63] and a multitude of different post-translational modifications play an important role in eukaryotic gene regulation and in fine-folding of nucleosomes into higher-order chromatin [65]. Distinct modifications at specific histone tail residues serve as domains for interaction with specific proteins, and such interactions compartmentalize chromatin into heterochromatin and euchromatin as illustrated by recent genome-wide chromatin modification mapping studies [66]. Distinct histone modifications correlate with distinct genomic regions; for example, H3K4me3 with promoters; H3K39me1 with enhancers; H3K9 and H3K27 acetylation (H3K9ac, H3K27ac) with active regulatory regions; H3K36me3, H3K79me2 and H4K20me1 with transcribed regions and intron/exon usage; H3K27me3 with polycomb-repressed regions; and H3K9me3 with pericentromeric heterochromatin [66, 67]. As histone modifications play fundamental roles in gene regulation and expression, it is not surprising that aberrant patterns of histone marks are found in cancer. Dysregulation of histone-modifying enzymes, such as HDACs, HATs, HMTs and HDMs, is often responsible for these aberrant histone modifications. Genetic, cytogenetic and molecular approaches have identified many chromosomal translocations, deletions, and amplification events that link histone-modifying enzymes to cancer [68]. HDACs, for example, are often overexpressed in multiple types of cancer [69]. Dysregulation of HMTs and HDMs in cancer cells also contributes to aberrant histone modification patterns [70]. Advances in high throughput techniques enable genome-wide mapping of chromatin changes that occur during carcinogenesis [71]. Several studies linked global changes of PTMs to prognosis of patients with different types of cancer (reviewed in reference [72]).
Knowledge regarding the patterns of histone modification alterations in CRC is accumulating. Fraga et al. published the first report on a global change of histone modification in CRC in 2005 [73]. By immunodetection, high performance capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, they found global loss of H4K16ac and H4K20me3 in cancer cells and primary tumors, including colonic tumors. Subsequent studies investigated the global pattern of individual histone marks, mainly by immunohistochemistry. Two different studies reported that global levels of H4K12ac and H3K18ac increased in adenocarcinomas in respect to normal tissue or adenoma [74, 75]. A recent report from Stypula-Cyrus et al. found upregulation of HDACs (HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC5, and HDAC7) in human CRC [76]. Lysine methylation is one of the most prominent post-translational histone modifications that regulate chromatin structure. Changes in histone lysine methylation status have been observed during cancer formation, which is thought to be a consequence of dysregulation of histone lysine methyltransferases or the opposing demethylases [70]. KDM4/JMJD2 proteins, which are demethylases targeting histone H3K9 and H3K36 and histone H1.4K26 were found to be overexpressed in CRC [77, 78]. Moreover, the presence of H3K9me3 positively correlated with lymph node metastasis in patients with CRC. Methylation of histone H3K9 is associated with gene repression [79]. Nakazawa et al. observed a gradual increase in global level of histone 3 (H3K9me2) in neoplastic cells, in the adenomas, in the nuclei of adenocarcinomas and suggested its association with cancer progression from adenoma to adenocarcinoma [75]. In view of gene repressive effect of methylated histone 3 (H3K9), it is suggested that the increased H3K9me2 level repress transcriptional activity of certain genes that function as tumor suppressors and/or carcinostasis promoters in colorectal tumors. Dimethylation of H3K4 (H3K4me2) and acetylation of H3K9 (H3K9ac) correlated with the tumor histological type. In addition, lower levels of H3K4me2 correlated with a poor survival rate. The multivariate survival analysis showed that H3K4me2 status is an independent prognostic factor for patients with CRC [80]. In addition, it has been found that the methylation level of H3K27me2 detected with immunohistochemistry is an independent prognostic factor for metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal carcinomas [81]. The global level of H3K9me2 was distinctly higher in neoplastic cells (adenoma and adenocarcinoma) than in normal glandular cells; in addition, it was significantly higher in adenocarcinoma than in adenoma. Aberration of the global H3K9me2 level is an important epigenetic event in colorectal tumorigenesis and carcinogenesis involving gene regulation in neoplastic cells through chromatin remodeling [75]. Furthermore, a group of researchers also reported an increase in global levels of H3K18ac and H4K12ac in adenocarcinomas in comparison with those in normal tissue and adenomas, and demonstrated that HDAC2 and H4K12ac expressions in adenocarcinoma were higher than in adenoma, implying that these epigenetic changes also have a role in the progression from adenoma to adenocarcinoma [74].
5.3.3 Nucleosome Positioning
In addition to altered DNA methylation and histone modifications , gene expression can also be regulated by the positioning and occupancy of nucleosomes at promoter regions [82]. Altered promoter nucleosome positioning is an early event in gene silencing [83]. The term positioning describes the precise location of a given nucleosome, whereas occupancy describes the proportion of molecules bearing a nucleosome at a specific location, at any given instant [84]. The positioning of nucleosomes at promoters regulates gene expression by demarcating the promoter region and transcription start site (TSS) [85]. At gene promoter regions, nucleosomes can be held at specific positions by DNA-binding proteins such as transcription factor complexes [86]. While activation of gene expression correlates with nucleosome depletion at promoters, nucleosomes have been shown to rapidly reform when transcription ceases [87, 88]. In cancer, many genes critical to tumor development are known to undergo epigenetic silencing. Typically, this silencing occurs in association with hypermethylation and dense nucleosome occupancy across the CpG island (CGI) promoter region [89]. However, the majority of genes that are hypermethylated in cancer are also silenced in normal precursor cells despite no evidence of promoter methylation [90, 91]. These studies support the view that hypermethylation serves to consolidate a transcriptionally silent state rather than initiate it [92].
Nucleosomes are released by apoptotic and necrotic cells into the blood circulation. Although macrophages efficiently clear dead cells by phagocytosis [93], nucleosomes can enter the circulation in certain diseases, reflecting either increased production or impaired clearance. In addition to apoptotic and necrotic processes, the active release of DNA from all living normal and diseased cells into the bloodstream has also been described [94]. In patient with cancer, the release of nucleosomes and DNA is elevated due to the increasing cell turnover [95]. Many studies have investigated circulating nucleosomes for their potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers or their usefulness in therapy monitoring (reviewed in reference [96]). The prognostic value of the pre-therapeutic nucleosome concentration has been demonstrated in different types of cancer [97]. As nucleosomes are stable structures in the circulation [98], they could be a valuable source of novel biomarkers. Two histone methylation marks, H3K9me3 and H4K20me3, the hallmarks of pericentric heterochromatin [99], were investigated in circulating nucleosomes. H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 have been found to be lower at the pericentromeric satellite II repeat in patients with CRC when compared with healthy controls or patients with multiple myeloma. Recently, through next-generation sequencing of immunoprecipitated plasma DNA, reduced levels of H3K9me3 and H4K20me3-related repetitive sequences in circulation of patients with CRC was confirmed [100]. These data suggested the biomarker potential of H3K9me3 and H4K20me3-related nucleosomes in CRC. Since histone modification alterations can be detected in nucleosomes circulating in the blood of patients with cancer, it offers the possibility of using them as biomarkers in CRC and other types of cancer.
5.3.4 Non-coding RNAs
High throughput genome-scale studies have demonstrated that more than 93 % of the DNA sequences in the human genome are actively transcribed [101]. However, only approximately 5–10 % of the sequences are stably transcribed into mRNA or non-coding RNA (ncRNA). Genome tiling arrays have revealed that the amount of non-coding sequence is at least four times larger than the amount of coding sequence, which indicates that only 1 % of the human genome is composed of protein-coding genes and the remaining 4–9 % is transcribed into ncRNAs [102]. Therefore, ncRNAs constitute a very large proportion of the total RNA molecules. According to their transcript size, ncRNAs are grouped into two major classes: (a) small ncRNAs with transcripts <200 nucleotides (e.g. siRNAs and miRNAs , Piwi-interacting RNAs, and some retrotransposon-derived RNAs) and (b) long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) ranging in length from 200 nucleotides to ∼100 kilobases (kb) that lack significant protein-coding abilities [102, 103]. This class includes five broad categories: sense, antisense, bidirectional, intronic, and intergenic, based on the proximity between neighboring transcripts [104]. The function and clinical significance of short regulatory ncRNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), were elucidated first [105], and the regulatory roles of miRNAs have been broadly recognized in almost all physiological and pathological processes in the body, including carcinogenesis [106]. For example, MIR95 promotes cell proliferation and targets sorting Nexin 1 in human colorectal carcinoma [107]; moreover, in CRC patients, the plasma levels of MIR29a and MIR92a are significantly upregulated and the plasma levels of MIR601 and MIR760 are significantly downregulated; thus the levels of these miRNAs have good diagnostic value for CRC screening [108, 109].
5.3.4.1 Long Non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) in Human CRC
Emerging studies have revealed that particular LncRNAs are involved in diverse physiological and pathological processes, such as cell growth, apoptosis , stem cell pluripotency, and development, by acting as transcriptional, post-transcriptional, or epigenetic regulators . Notably, observations of a few known LncRNAs have suggested that their dysregulation is linked to tumor pathogenesis , and these molecules perform essential regulatory functions by acting on cellular proliferation, apoptosis, or metastasis by participating in a variety of key signaling pathways [110–113]. Recently, the roles of dysregulated functional LncRNAs in human cancers have received considerable attention [102, 111, 113–115]. Increasing evidence suggests that these LncRNAs are frequently aberrantly expressed in cancers, and some of them have been implicated in diagnosis and prognostication [116]. As LncRNAs do not encode proteins, their functions are closely associated with their transcript abundance [117]. It has been reported that LncRNAs demonstrated higher specificity than protein-coding mRNAs [111, 118], and had the advantages of being detectable in the blood [119] and urine [118, 120] of cancer patients by conventional PCR methods. The significance of LncRNAs in human CRC was realized in 2001 when Tanaka et al. [121] determined that a loss of imprinting of long QT intronic transcript 1 (LIT1/KCNQ1OT1) was frequently observed in CRC patients, suggesting a link between LncRNAs and CRC. Following this research, several studies focused on the aberrant expression of lncRNAs during colorectal carcinogenesis, and an accumulating number of studies indicated that specific LncRNAs had potential biological and clinical relevance in CRC. Table 5.1 below shows a list of LncRNAs that are linked to human CRC.
Accordingly, understanding the pathophysiological roles of LncRNAs in CRC undoubtedly represents an important aspect of current and future research, as these molecules may be the hallmark features of CRC. Furthermore, the detection and identification of potentially functional LncRNAs in CRC is an emerging avenue of LncRNA research, which will be necessary before the application of LncRNAs in cancer diagnosis and therapy.
5.3.4.2 MicroRNAs (miRNAs) in Human CRC
MicroRNAs are small, 18–24 nucleotide RNAs that regulate the translation and stability of specific target mRNAs. During the last decade, it has become clear that aberrant miRNA expression has a functional role in the initiation and progression of CRC. Specific miRNAs can act as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes depending on the cellular environment in which they are expressed. The expression of miRNAs is reproducibly altered in CRC, and their expression patterns are associated with diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic outcome in CRC. Extensive research is now aimed at determining if miRNAs can be used as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for cancer.
To date, numerous studies have examined miRNA expression patterns in CRC and confirmed that miRNAs are consistently and reproducibly altered in this disease [149]. A recent review of 23 microRNA expression studies found that of the 164 microRNAs that are significantly altered in CRC, approximately 2/3 of them were elevated and 1/3 that were reduced in tumors [149], indicating that microRNAs may have more oncogenic than tumor suppressive functions in CRC. Regardless of these findings, it is clear from functional studies that certain miRNAs have important oncogenic functions while others have important tumor suppressor functions.
Michael et al. were the first to show that miRNA expression patterns were altered in CRC [150]. They reported reduced expression of miR-143 and miR-145 in CRC and suggested that these miRNAs were tumor suppressors . Multiple studies have since validated these findings and demonstrated that miR-143 and miR-145 indeed have tumor suppressive functions in CRC [151]. Another highly relevant miRNA in CRC is the oncogenic miRNA, miR-21. At least seven studies reported that miR-21 is elevated in CRC [149]. Furthermore, miR-21 has been found to be elevated in many other solid tumor types [152] and this miRNA has important roles in cancer initiation, progression and metastasis. Other miRNAs which have been found to be altered in CRC in multiple reports include the miR-17-92 cluster, miR-106a, miR-31, miR-181b, miR-183, miR-135a/b, the miR-200a/b/c family, miR-203 and miR-224 [149]. The causes of the altered expression of miRNAs in CRC are diverse and complex. Aberrant transcription of miRNAs in CRC can be the result of transcription factors that are activated through various oncogenic signaling cascades, the result of genomic amplification/loss, genotoxic stress or inflammatory stimuli. Epigenetic mechanisms also affect miRNA expression levels. Several miRNAs, including let-7 [153], miR-34 [154], miR-342 [155], miR-345 [155], miR-9 [156], miR-129 [156], and miR-137 [156] are frequently hypermethylated in colon tumors and this is thought to lead to their reduced expression. MicroRNAs can also contribute to global epigenetic regulation in CRC. For example, miR-143 is a tumor suppressor miRNA that directly targets DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) and loss of miR-143 expression leads to increased DNMT3A expression in CRC tissues [157]. Similarly, loss of miR-342 leads to increased DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and this contributes to the hypermethylation of several tumor suppressor genes in CRC [158]. Several other miRNAs have also been implicated in CRC. MiR-30a-5p is a tumor suppressor miRNA that targets denticleless homolog (DTL) to suppress tumor growth in CRC [159]. MiR-192 and miR-215 are both effectors and regulators of p53 function to suppress colon carcinogenesis [160]. Another p53 related miRNA, miR-34a, has been shown to inhibit cell invasion in colon cancer cell lines by targeting FRA1 [161]. Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) can be negatively regulated by miR-101 [162] and this may contribute to the initiation and progression of colon tumors. MiR-451 overexpression in colon cancer cells leads to reduced cell proliferation through targeting of the oncogene macrophage migration factor (MIF) [163]. Over expression of miR-499-5p in CRC cell lines targets FOXO4 and PDCD4 to promote cell migration and invasion [164]. MiR-675 can target the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor gene to increase tumor growth [134]. MiR-365 acts as a tumor suppressor to inhibit cell cycle progression and promotes apoptosis of colon cancer cells by targeting Cyclin D1 (CCND1) and Bcl-2 [165]. Loss of miR-29 leads to increased expression of MMP2 to promote metastases in mouse models of colon cancer [166]. The oncogenic miR-95 promotes tumorigenicity by targeting sorting nexin 1 (SNX1) [107]. Furthermore, circulating microRNAs can be detected in blood serum, plasma or stool. Therefore, measuring microRNAs in blood serum, plasma or stool offers non-invasive approach to detect CRC. Because altered microRNA expression can influence the initiation and progression of colon cancer, it suggests that microRNAs have potential as therapeutic targets for CRC.
5.4 Summary
Cancer refers to a group of diseases that share a common overall phenotype: uncontrollable cell growth and proliferation. During multistep process of carcinogenesis, cells acquire a series of genetic changes that eventually lead to unrestrained cell growth and division, inhibition of cell differentiation, and evasion of cell death. However, these genetic changes alone cannot explain the overall phenotype of cancer cells. Concepts of ‘epigenetics’ offer a partial but crucial explanation of carcinogenesis. The initiation and progression of cancer, traditionally seen as a genetic disease, is now realized to involve epigenetic abnormalities along with genetic alterations. Recent advancements in the rapidly evolving field of cancer epigenetics have shown extensive reprogramming of every component of the epigenetic machinery in cancer including DNA methylation , histone modifications , nucleosome positioning and non-coding RNAs expression. The reversible nature of epigenetic aberrations has led to the emergence of the promising field of epigenetic therapy. As we continue improve our understanding of the biology and both genetic and epigenetic changes in CRC, we may be able to develop additional biomarkers and therapies to help treat and even prevent this disease.
Abbreviations
- CCND1:
-
Cyclin D1
- CGI:
-
CpG Island
- CIN:
-
Chromosomal Instability
- CIMP:
-
CpG Island Methylator Phenotype
- COX-2:
-
Cyclooxygenase 2
- CRC:
-
Colorectal Cancer
- DNMT:
-
DNA methyltransferase
- DTL:
-
Denticleless Homolog
- FAP:
-
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
- GI:
-
Gastrointestinal
- GIST:
-
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor
- HAT:
-
Histone Acetyltransferase
- HDAC:
-
Histone Deacetylase
- HDM:
-
Histone Demethylase
- HMT:
-
Histone Methyltransferase
- HNPCC:
-
Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
- ICC:
-
Interstitial cells of Cajal
- LINE:
-
Long Interspersed Elements
- LncRNA:
-
Long Non-Coding RNA
- LOI:
-
Loss of Imprinting
- MIF:
-
Macrophage Migration Factor
- miRNA:
-
Micro-RNA
- MSI:
-
Microsatellite Instability
- ncRNA:
-
Non-Coding RNA
- NHL:
-
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
- RB:
-
Retinoblastoma
- siRNA:
-
Small Interfering RNA
- SNX1:
-
Sorting Nexin 1
- TSS:
-
Transcription Start Site
- UC:
-
Ulcerative Colitis
References
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29.
Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61:759–67.
Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:525–32.
Graff JR, Herman JG, Lapidus RG, et al. E-cadherin expression is silenced by DNA hypermethylation in human breast and prostate carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1995;55:5195–9.
Melki JR, Vincent PC, Clark SJ. Concurrent DNA hypermethylation of multiple genes in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3730–40.
Costello JF, Fruhwald MC, Smiraglia DJ, et al. Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns. Nat Genet. 2000;24:132–8.
Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:988–93.
Pfeifer GP, Rauch TA. DNA methylation patterns in lung carcinomas. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19:181–7.
Nguyen C, Liang G, Nguyen TT, et al. Susceptibility of nonpromoter CpG islands to de novo methylation in normal and neoplastic cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1465–72.
Widschwendter M, Jones PA. DNA methylation and breast carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2002;21:5462–82.
Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:415–28.
Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16:6–21.
Burnett-Hartman AN, Newcomb PA, Potter JD, et al. Genomic aberrations occurring in subsets of serrated colorectal lesions but not conventional adenomas. Cancer Res. 2013;73:2863–72.
Shen L, Issa JP. Epigenetics in colorectal cancer. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2002;18:68–73.
Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:8681–6.
Weisenberger DJ, Siegmund KD, Campan M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2006;38:787–93.
Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer. Gut. 2009;58:90–6.
Shen L, Toyota M, Kondo Y, et al. Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis identifies three different subclasses of colon cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:18654–9.
van Rijnsoever M, Grieu F, Elsaleh H, et al. Characterisation of colorectal cancers showing hypermethylation at multiple CpG islands. Gut. 2002;51:797–802.
Arnold CN, Goel A, Compton C, et al. Evaluation of microsatellite instability, hMLH1 expression and hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in defining the MSI phenotype of colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004;3:73–8.
Samowitz WS, Albertsen H, Herrick J, et al. Evaluation of a large, population-based sample supports a CpG island methylator phenotype in colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:837–45.
Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, et al. Evaluation of markers for CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer by a large population-based sample. J Mol Diagn. 2007;9:305–14.
Hawkins NJ, Ward RL. Sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability and their possible origin in hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1307–13.
Gaiser T, Meinhardt S, Hirsch D, et al. Molecular patterns in the evolution of serrated lesion of the colorectum. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:1800–10.
Matsuzaki K, Deng G, Tanaka H, et al. The relationship between global methylation level, loss of heterozygosity, and microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:8564–9.
Rodriguez J, Frigola J, Vendrell E, et al. Chromosomal instability correlates with genome-wide DNA demethylation in human primary colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8462–9468.
He L, Vasiliou K, Nebert DW. Analysis and update of the human solute carrier (SLC) gene superfamily. Hum Genomics. 2009;3:195–206.
Arai E, Chiku S, Mori T, et al. Single-CpG-resolution methylome analysis identifies clinicopathologically aggressive CpG island methylator phenotype clear cell renal cell carcinomas. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1487–93.
Huang Y, Sadee W. Membrane transporters and channels in chemoresistance and -sensitivity of tumor cells. Cancer Lett. 2006;239:168–82.
Li H, Myeroff L, Smiraglia D, et al. SLC5A8, a sodium transporter, is a tumor suppressor gene silenced by methylation in human colon aberrant crypt foci and cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8412–7.
Nishiyama R, Qi L, Tsumagari K, et al. A DNA repeat, NBL2, is hypermethylated in some cancers but hypomethylated in others. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4:440–8.
Jubb AM, Bell SM, Quirke P. Methylation and colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2001;195:111–34.
Gama-Sosa MA, Slagel VA, Trewyn RW, et al. The 5-methylcytosine content of DNA from human tumors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983;11:6883–94.
Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B. Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts. Nature. 1983;301:89–92.
Bedford MT, van Helden PD. Hypomethylation of DNA in pathological conditions of the human prostate. Cancer Res. 1987;47:5274–6.
Ehrlich M. DNA methylation in cancer: too much, but also too little. Oncogene. 2002;21:5400–13.
Seifert HH, Schmiemann V, Mueller M, et al. In situ detection of global DNA hypomethylation in exfoliative urine cytology of patients with suspected bladder cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2007;82:292–7.
Rainier S, Johnson LA, Dobry CJ, et al. Relaxation of imprinted genes in human cancer. Nature. 1993;362:747–9.
Ehrlich M, Woods CB, Yu MC, et al. Quantitative analysis of associations between DNA hypermethylation, hypomethylation, and DNMT RNA levels in ovarian tumors. Oncogene. 2006;25:2636–45.
Hoffmann MJ, Schulz WA. Causes and consequences of DNA hypomethylation in human cancer. Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;83:296–321.
Weisenberger DJ, Campan M, Long TI, et al. Analysis of repetitive element DNA methylation by MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6823–36.
Narayan A, Ji W, Zhang XY, et al. Hypomethylation of pericentromeric DNA in breast adenocarcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1998;77:833–8.
Qu G, Dubeau L, Narayan A, et al. Satellite DNA hypomethylation vs. overall genomic hypomethylation in ovarian epithelial tumors of different malignant potential. Mutat Res. 1999;423:91–101.
Ji W, Hernandez R, Zhang XY, et al. DNA demethylation and pericentromeric rearrangements of chromosome 1. Mutat Res. 1997;379:33–41.
Suzuki K, Suzuki I, Leodolter A, et al. Global DNA demethylation in gastrointestinal cancer is age dependent and precedes genomic damage. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:199–207.
Goelz SE, Vogelstein B, Hamilton SR, et al. Hypomethylation of DNA from benign and malignant human colon neoplasms. Science. 1985;228:187–90.
Bariol C, Suter C, Cheong K, et al. The relationship between hypomethylation and CpG island methylation in colorectal neoplasia. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:1361–71.
Hibi K, Sakata M, Kitamura YH, et al. Demethylation of the CD133 gene is frequently detected in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:2235–7.
Hibi K, Goto T, Mizukami H, et al. Demethylation of the CDH3 gene is frequently detected in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:2215–7.
Milicic A, Harrison LA, Goodlad RA, et al. Ectopic expression of P-cadherin correlates with promoter hypomethylation early in colorectal carcinogenesis and enhanced intestinal crypt fission in vivo. Cancer Res. 2008;68:7760–8.
Ricci-Vitiani L, Lombardi DG, Pilozzi E, et al. Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells. Nature. 2007;445:111–5.
Baba T, Convery PA, Matsumura N, et al. Epigenetic regulation of CD133 and tumorigenicity of CD133+ ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene. 2009;28:209–18.
Chalitchagorn K, Shuangshoti S, Hourpai N, et al. Distinctive pattern of LINE-1 methylation level in normal tissues and the association with carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2004;23:8841–6.
Estecio MR, Gharibyan V, Shen L, et al. LINE-1 hypomethylation in cancer is highly variable and inversely correlated with microsatellite instability. PLoS One. 2007;2, e399.
Nosho K, Irahara N, Shima K, et al. Comprehensive biostatistical analysis of CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer using a large population-based sample. PLoS One. 2008;3, e3698.
Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, et al. A cohort study of tumoral LINE-1 hypomethylation and prognosis in colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1734–8.
Iacopetta B, Grieu F, Phillips M, et al. Methylation levels of LINE-1 repeats and CpG island loci are inversely related in normal colonic mucosa. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1454–60.
Schulz WA. DNA methylation in urological malignancies (review). Int J Oncol. 1998;13:151–67.
Cui H, Horon IL, Ohlsson R, et al. Loss of imprinting in normal tissue of colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability. Nat Med. 1998;4:1276–80.
Pedersen MT, Helin K. Histone demethylases in development and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:662–71.
Kouzarides T. SnapShot: histone-modifying enzymes. Cell. 2007;128:802.
Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21:381–95.
Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature. 2000;403:41–5.
Schneider R, Grosschedl R. Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression. Genes Dev. 2007;21:3027–43.
Munshi A, Shafi G, Aliya N, et al. Histone modifications dictate specific biological readouts. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36:75–88.
Zhou VW, Goren A, Bernstein BE. Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:7–18.
Ernst J, Kheradpour P, Mikkelsen TS, et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature. 2011;473:43–9.
Butler JS, Koutelou E, Schibler AC, et al. Histone-modifying enzymes: regulators of developmental decisions and drivers of human disease. Epigenomics. 2012;4:163–77.
Spiegel S, Milstien S, Grant S. Endogenous modulators and pharmacological inhibitors of histone deacetylases in cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2012;31:537–51.
Berry WL, Janknecht R. KDM4/JMJD2 histone demethylases: epigenetic regulators in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2013;73:2936–42.
Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:27–36.
Chervona Y, Costa M. Histone modifications and cancer: biomarkers of prognosis? Am J Cancer Res. 2012;2:589–97.
Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Villar-Garea A, et al. Loss of acetylation at Lys16 and trimethylation at Lys20 of histone H4 is a common hallmark of human cancer. Nat Genet. 2005;37:391–400.
Ashktorab H, Belgrave K, Hosseinkhah F, et al. Global histone H4 acetylation and HDAC2 expression in colon adenoma and carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2109–17.
Nakazawa T, Kondo T, Ma D, et al. Global histone modification of histone H3 in colorectal cancer and its precursor lesions. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:834–42.
Stypula-Cyrus Y, Damania D, Kunte DP, et al. HDAC up-regulation in early colon field carcinogenesis is involved in cell tumorigenicity through regulation of chromatin structure. PLoS One. 2013;8, e64600.
Fu L, Chen L, Yang J, et al. HIF-1alpha-induced histone demethylase JMJD2B contributes to the malignant phenotype of colorectal cancer cells via an epigenetic mechanism. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1664–73.
Yokoyama Y, Hieda M, Nishioka Y, et al. Cancer-associated upregulation of histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation promotes cell motility in vitro and drives tumor formation in vivo. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:889–95.
Rea S, Eisenhaber F, O’Carroll D, et al. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature. 2000;406:593–9.
Tamagawa H, Oshima T, Shiozawa M, et al. The global histone modification pattern correlates with overall survival in metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 2012;27:637–42.
Tamagawa H, Oshima T, Numata M, et al. Global histone modification of H3K27 correlates with the outcomes in patients with metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:655–61.
Zarzour P, Hesson LB, Ward RL. Establishing the clinical utility of epigenetic markers in cancer: many challenges ahead. Epigenomics. 2013;5:513–23.
Hesson LB, Sloane MA, Wong JW, et al. Altered promoter nucleosome positioning is an early event in gene silencing. Epigenetics. 2014;9:1422–30.
Berrozpe G, Bryant GO, Warpinski K, et al. Regulation of a mammalian gene bearing a CpG island promoter and a distal enhancer. Cell Rep. 2013;4:445–53.
Jiang C, Pugh BF. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:161–72.
Wang X, Bai L, Bryant GO, et al. Nucleosomes and the accessibility problem. Trends Genet. 2011;27:487–92.
Lee CK, Shibata Y, Rao B, et al. Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide. Nat Genet. 2004;36:900–5.
Schwabish MA, Struhl K. Evidence for eviction and rapid deposition of histones upon transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:10111–7.
Lin JC, Jeong S, Liang G, et al. Role of nucleosomal occupancy in the epigenetic silencing of the MLH1 CpG island. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:432–44.
Keshet I, Schlesinger Y, Farkash S, et al. Evidence for an instructive mechanism of de novo methylation in cancer cells. Nat Genet. 2006;38:149–53.
Sproul D, Nestor C, Culley J, et al. Transcriptionally repressed genes become aberrantly methylated and distinguish tumors of different lineages in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:4364–9.
Bestor TH. Unanswered questions about the role of promoter methylation in carcinogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;983:22–7.
Jiang N, Reich 3rd CF, Pisetsky DS. Role of macrophages in the generation of circulating blood nucleosomes from dead and dying cells. Blood. 2003;102:2243–50.
Stroun M, Maurice P, Vasioukhin V, et al. The origin and mechanism of circulating DNA. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;906:161–8.
Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:426–37.
Holdenrieder S, Stieber P. Clinical use of circulating nucleosomes. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2009;46:1–24.
Stoetzer OJ, Wittwer C, Lehner J, et al. Circulating nucleosomes and biomarkers of immunogenic cell death as predictive and prognostic markers in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012;12 Suppl 1:S217–24.
Holdenrieder S, Von Pawel J, Nagel D, et al. Long-term stability of circulating nucleosomes in serum. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:1613–5.
Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007;129:823–37.
Gezer U, Ustek D, Yoruker EE, et al. Characterization of H3K9me3- and H4K20me3-associated circulating nucleosomal DNA by high-throughput sequencing in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:329–36.
Birney E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Dutta A, et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1 % of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799–816.
Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:155–9.
Lipovich L, Johnson R, Lin CY. MacroRNA underdogs in a microRNA world: evolutionary, regulatory, and biomedical significance of mammalian long non-protein-coding RNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1799;2010:597–615.
Frith MC, Pheasant M, Mattick JS. The amazing complexity of the human transcriptome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:894–7.
Takizawa T, Gemma A, Ui-Tei K, et al. Basic and clinical studies on functional RNA molecules for advanced medical technologies. J Nippon Med Sch. 2010;77:71–9.
Shah AA, Leidinger P, Blin N, et al. miRNA: small molecules as potential novel biomarkers in cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:4427–32.
Huang Z, Huang S, Wang Q, et al. MicroRNA-95 promotes cell proliferation and targets sorting Nexin 1 in human colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2011;71:2582–9.
Wang Q, Huang Z, Ni S, et al. Plasma miR-601 and miR-760 are novel biomarkers for the early detection of colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7, e44398.
Huang Z, Huang D, Ni S, et al. Plasma microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:118–26.
Spizzo R, Almeida MI, Colombatti A, et al. Long non-coding RNAs and cancer: a new frontier of translational research? Oncogene. 2012;31:4577–87.
Prensner JR, Chinnaiyan AM. The emergence of lncRNAs in cancer biology. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:391–407.
Huarte M, Rinn JL. Large non-coding RNAs: missing links in cancer? Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:R152–61.
Gibb EA, Brown CJ, Lam WL. The functional role of long non-coding RNA in human carcinomas. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:38.
Mitra SA, Mitra AP, Triche TJ. A central role for long non-coding RNA in cancer. Front Genet. 2012;3:17.
Villegas VE, Rahman MF, Fernandez-Barrena MG, et al. Identification of novel non-coding RNA-based negative feedback regulating the expression of the oncogenic transcription factor GLI1. Mol Oncol. 2014;8:912–26.
Qi P, Du X. The long non-coding RNAs, a new cancer diagnostic and therapeutic gold mine. Mod Pathol. 2013;26:155–65.
Du Z, Fei T, Verhaak RG, et al. Integrative genomic analyses reveal clinically relevant long noncoding RNAs in human cancer. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20:908–13.
Hessels D, Klein Gunnewiek JM, van Oort I, et al. DD3(PCA3)-based molecular urine analysis for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2003;44:8–15, discussion 15–6.
Lin R, Maeda S, Liu C, et al. A large noncoding RNA is a marker for murine hepatocellular carcinomas and a spectrum of human carcinomas. Oncogene. 2007;26:851–8.
Tinzl M, Marberger M, Horvath S, et al. DD3PCA3 RNA analysis in urine—a new perspective for detecting prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2004;46:182–6, discussion 187.
Tanaka K, Shiota G, Meguro M, et al. Loss of imprinting of long QT intronic transcript 1 in colorectal cancer. Oncology. 2001;60:268–73.
Nissan A, Stojadinovic A, Mitrani-Rosenbaum S, et al. Colon cancer associated transcript-1: a novel RNA expressed in malignant and pre-malignant human tissues. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:1598–606.
Alaiyan B, Ilyayev N, Stojadinovic A, et al. Differential expression of colon cancer associated transcript1 (CCAT1) along the colonic adenoma-carcinoma sequence. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:196.
Kam Y, Rubinstein A, Naik S, et al. Detection of a long non-coding RNA (CCAT1) in living cells and human adenocarcinoma of colon tissues using FIT-PNA molecular beacons. Cancer Lett. 2014;352:90–6.
Ling H, Spizzo R, Atlasi Y, et al. CCAT2, a novel noncoding RNA mapping to 8q24, underlies metastatic progression and chromosomal instability in colon cancer. Genome Res. 2013;23:1446–61.
Graham LD, Pedersen SK, Brown GS, et al. Colorectal neoplasia differentially expressed (CRNDE), a novel gene with elevated expression in colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:829–40.
Ellis BC, Molloy PL, Graham LD. CRNDE: a long non-coding RNA involved in CanceR, Neurobiology, and DEvelopment. Front Genet. 2012;3:270.
Yochum GS, Cleland R, McWeeney S, et al. An antisense transcript induced by Wnt/beta-catenin signaling decreases E2F4. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:871–8.
Kogo R, Shimamura T, Mimori K, et al. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR regulates polycomb-dependent chromatin modification and is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6320–6.
Matouk IJ, Abbasi I, Hochberg A, et al. Highly upregulated in liver cancer noncoding RNA is overexpressed in hepatic colorectal metastasis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:688–92.
Ge X, Chen Y, Liao X, et al. Overexpression of long noncoding RNA PCAT-1 is a novel biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Med Oncol. 2013;30:588.
Xu C, Yang M, Tian J, et al. MALAT-1: a long non-coding RNA and its important 3′ end functional motif in colorectal cancer metastasis. Int J Oncol. 2011;39:169–75.
Yoshimizu T, Miroglio A, Ripoche MA, et al. The H19 locus acts in vivo as a tumor suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:12417–22.
Tsang WP, Ng EK, Ng SS, et al. Oncofetal H19-derived miR-675 regulates tumor suppressor RB in human colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:350–8.
Tian F, Tang Z, Song G, et al. Loss of imprinting of IGF2 correlates with hypomethylation of the H19 differentially methylated region in the tumor tissue of colorectal cancer patients. Mol Med Rep. 2012;5:1536–40.
Matouk IJ, DeGroot N, Mezan S, et al. The H19 non-coding RNA is essential for human tumor growth. PLoS One. 2007;2, e845.
Calin GA, Liu CG, Ferracin M, et al. Ultraconserved regions encoding ncRNAs are altered in human leukemias and carcinomas. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:215–29.
Sana J, Hankeova S, Svoboda M, et al. Expression levels of transcribed ultraconserved regions uc.73 and uc.388 are altered in colorectal cancer. Oncology. 2012;82:114–8.
Tsang WP, Wong TW, Cheung AH, et al. Induction of drug resistance and transformation in human cancer cells by the noncoding RNA CUDR. RNA. 2007;13:890–8.
Wang Y, Chen W, Yang C, et al. Long non-coding RNA UCA1a(CUDR) promotes proliferation and tumorigenesis of bladder cancer. Int J Oncol. 2012;41:276–84.
Lassmann S, Weis R, Makowiec F, et al. Array CGH identifies distinct DNA copy number profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in chromosomal- and microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal carcinomas. J Mol Med (Berl). 2007;85:293–304.
Davison EJ, Tarpey PS, Fiegler H, et al. Deletion at chromosome band 20p12.1 in colorectal cancer revealed by high resolution array comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;44:384–91.
Yang F, Huo XS, Yuan SX, et al. Repression of the long noncoding RNA-LET by histone deacetylase 3 contributes to hypoxia-mediated metastasis. Mol Cell. 2013;49:1083–96.
Liu Q, Huang J, Zhou N, et al. LncRNA loc285194 is a p53-regulated tumor suppressor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4976–87.
Zhang X, Zhou Y, Mehta KR, et al. A pituitary-derived MEG3 isoform functions as a growth suppressor in tumor cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5119–26.
Zhou Y, Zhong Y, Wang Y, et al. Activation of p53 by MEG3 non-coding RNA. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:24731–42.
Poliseno L, Salmena L, Zhang J, et al. A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology. Nature. 2010;465:1033–8.
Nakano S, Murakami K, Meguro M, et al. Expression profile of LIT1/KCNQ1OT1 and epigenetic status at the KvDMR1 in colorectal cancers. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:1147–54.
Luo X, Burwinkel B, Tao S, et al. MicroRNA signatures: novel biomarker for colorectal cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1272–86.
Michael MZ, O’Connor SM, van Holst Pellekaan NG, et al. Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1:882–91.
Akao Y, Nakagawa Y, Hirata I, et al. Role of anti-oncomirs miR-143 and -145 in human colorectal tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 2010;17:398–408.
Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2257–61.
Brueckner B, Stresemann C, Kuner R, et al. The human let-7a-3 locus contains an epigenetically regulated microRNA gene with oncogenic function. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1419–23.
Toyota M, Suzuki H, Sasaki Y, et al. Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-34b/c and B-cell translocation gene 4 is associated with CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4123–32.
Grady WM, Parkin RK, Mitchell PS, et al. Epigenetic silencing of the intronic microRNA hsa-miR-342 and its host gene EVL in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27:3880–8.
Agirre X, Vilas-Zornoza A, Jimenez-Velasco A, et al. Epigenetic silencing of the tumor suppressor microRNA Hsa-miR-124a regulates CDK6 expression and confers a poor prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4443–53.
Ng EK, Tsang WP, Ng SS, et al. MicroRNA-143 targets DNA methyltransferases 3A in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:699–706.
Wang H, Wu J, Meng X, et al. MicroRNA-342 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and invasion by directly targeting DNA methyltransferase 1. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:1033–42.
Baraniskin A, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Maghnouj A, et al. MiR-30a-5p suppresses tumor growth in colon carcinoma by targeting DTL. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:732–9.
Braun CJ, Zhang X, Savelyeva I, et al. p53-Responsive micrornas 192 and 215 are capable of inducing cell cycle arrest. Cancer Res. 2008;68:10094–104.
Wu J, Wu G, Lv L, et al. MicroRNA-34a inhibits migration and invasion of colon cancer cells via targeting to Fra-1. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:519–28.
Strillacci A, Griffoni C, Sansone P, et al. MiR-101 downregulation is involved in cyclooxygenase-2 overexpression in human colon cancer cells. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:1439–47.
Bandres E, Bitarte N, Arias F, et al. microRNA-451 regulates macrophage migration inhibitory factor production and proliferation of gastrointestinal cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2281–90.
Liu X, Zhang Z, Sun L, et al. MicroRNA-499-5p promotes cellular invasion and tumor metastasis in colorectal cancer by targeting FOXO4 and PDCD4. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:1798–805.
Nie J, Liu L, Zheng W, et al. microRNA-365, down-regulated in colon cancer, inhibits cell cycle progression and promotes apoptosis of colon cancer cells by probably targeting Cyclin D1 and Bcl-2. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:220–5.
Ding Q, Chang CJ, Xie X, et al. APOBEC3G promotes liver metastasis in an orthotopic mouse model of colorectal cancer and predicts human hepatic metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4526–36.
Acknowledgements
M.K.M. has been supported by National Institutes of Health grant P20CA192976, US Department of Defense grant W911NF-12-1-0073 and W911NF-14-1-0064, and National Science Foundation grant 1154214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bishnupuri, K.S., Mishra, M.K. (2016). Epigenetics of Colorectal Cancer. In: Mishra, M., Bishnupuri, K. (eds) Epigenetic Advancements in Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24951-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24951-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24949-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24951-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)