Abstract
In this chapter, social issues are recast from charity-based and needs-based approaches that have dominated our thinking to understanding social issues based on human rights instruments. Rights-based framing reveals the roots of social issues and problems as interdependent and exposes the inequities within societies. Understanding social issues from this perspective calls for the synergistic efforts of diverse stakeholders including governments to resolve these issues. The use of basic international, regional, and national human rights instruments is reviewed as well as the international customary law, general comments, and mechanisms to monitor the implementation of human rights by the United Nations and the self-monitoring of countries. Using child marriage as an example, the chapter then illustrates how to apply the basic rights-based principles of participation, accountability, nondiscrimination, and transparency toward the understanding of social issues. A discussion of the challenges that arise follows as well as the types of analyses that may be used. The chapter ends with a suggested exercise of reframing homelessness in the United States from a human rights approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For more information, see National Law Center on Homelessness& Poverty and Los Angeles Community Action Network (2014). Racial Discrimination in Housing and Homelessness in the United States: A Report to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Retrieved from http://www.nlchp.org/documents/CERD_Housing_Report_2014.
References
CEDAW Committee. (1989). General recommendation No. 12—eighth session, 1989 violence against women.
CEDAW Committee. (1992). General recommendation No. 19—eleventh session, 1992 violence against women.
Family Watch International. (2009). Family policy brief: ICESCR Committee General Comment 20. www.familywatchinternational.org.
Fee, E., & Parry, M. (2008). Jonathan Mann, HIV/AIDS, and human rights. Journal of Public Health Policy, 29(1), 54–71.
Hertel, S., & Libal, K. (2011). Human rights in the United States: Beyond exceptionalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, J. M., Gruskin, S., Grodin, M. A., & Annas, G. J. (Eds.). (1999). Health and human rights: A reader. New York: Routledge.
Patterson, A. S. (2009). AIDS/HIV. In D. P. Forsythe (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Petersen, C. (2011). Bridging the gap?: The role of regional and national human rights institutions in the Asia Pacific. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 13(1), 174–209.
Sepúlveda, M., & Nyst, C. (2012). The human rights approach to social protection. Finland: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Shaw, M. N. (2003). International Law (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Stainton, T. (2005). Empowerment and the architecture of rights based social policy. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 287–296.
UNAIDS. (2013). Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2009). The state of the world’s children 2009: Maternal and newborn health. UNICEF.
United Nations Population Fund. (2012). Marrying too young: End child marriage. UNFPA. http://www.unfpa.org/public/home/publications/pid/12166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gabel, S.G. (2016). Understanding Human Rights and Social Policy. In: A Rights-Based Approach to Social Policy Analysis. SpringerBriefs in Rights-Based Approaches to Social Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24412-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24412-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24410-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24412-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)