Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IMISCOE Research Series ((IMIS))

Abstract

This chapter explores the contribution that Foucauldian political sociology offers for our understanding of borders within the governance of migration. Foucauldian political sociology does not provide us with a theory of borders but rather an open-ended set of analytics of power and government. These analytics allow for a diagnosis of the changing forms of programmatic and political reason, techniques of power and subjectivity that are at play in our attempts to understand and control migration. In arguing that Deleuze’s idea of ‘control’ offers an important contribution to this aspect of political sociology – one that is especially pertinent to debates about neoliberalism – this chapter gives new meaning to the concept of ‘border control’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, ‘in FY 2000, 52 % of immigrants were already in the [U.S.] when their visas became available. This means that being admitted as an immigrant does not equate with traveling to the United States to begin a new life, as was true in the nineteenth century’ (Martin 2004: 53, 55). On the decoupling of ‘immigration control’ and ‘border control ’, see Crowley (2003: 33–34) and Bigo (2000).

References

  • Adey, P. (2004). Secured and sorted mobilities: Examples from the airport. Surveillance & Society, 1(4), 500–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. (1999). Mapping political power beyond state boundaries: Territory, identity, and movement in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 28(3), 499–521. doi:10.1177/03058298990280030701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreas, P. (2003). Redrawing the line: Borders and security in the twenty-first century. International Security, 28(2), 78–111. doi:10.1162/016228803322761973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreas, P., & Biersteker, T. J. (Eds.). (2003). The rebordering of North America. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreas, P., & Snyder, T. (Eds.). (2000). The wall around the west: State borders and immigration controls in North America and Europe. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, É. (2002). Politics and the other scene. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. (1996). The European network. New Formations, 29, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996a). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. S. (1996b). Introduction. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. S. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 1–18). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, W. S. (1998). Immigration: History of U.S. policy. In D. Jacobson (Ed.), The immigration reader: America in a multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 48–71). Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2000). When two become one: Internal and external securitisations in Europe. In M. Kelstrup & M. C. Williams (Eds.), International relations theory and the politics of European integration (pp. 171–204). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(1), 63–92. doi:10.1177/03043754020270S105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, J. (2003). Locating Europe. In K. Groenendijk, E. Guild, & P. Minderhoud (Eds.), Search of Europe’s borders (pp. 27–44). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2002). Liberal government and authoritarianism. Economy and Society, 31(1), 37–61. doi:10.1080/03085140120109240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Postscript on control societies. In G. Deleuze (Ed.), Negotiations 1972–1990 (pp. 177–182). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diken, B., & Lautsen, C. B. (2002). Zones of indistinction: Security, terror, and bare life. Space and Culture, 5(3), 290–307. doi:10.1177/1206331202005003009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donzelot, J. (1988). The promotion of the social. Economy and Society, 17(3), 395–427. doi:10.1080/03085148800000016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECRE. (1999). Carriers’ liability: Country up-date on the application of carriers’ liability in European states. Brussels: European Council on Refugees and Exiles. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3c02740b4.html

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: A. Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). Space, knowledge, and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 239–256). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: Volume one. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 73–86). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboy, J. A. (1997). Implications of “third-party” involvement in enforcement: The INS, illegal travelers, and international airlines. Law & Society Review, 31(3), 505–530. doi:10.2307/3054044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, V. (2003). Before the EU border: Remote control of the “huddled masses”. In K. Groenendijk, E. Guild, & P. Minderhoud (Eds.), Search of Europe’s borders (pp. 191–214). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, J. M. C. (2004). Ports of entry as nodes in the world system. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 11(3), 303–327. doi:10.1080/10702890490493518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (2001). The liberal government of unfreedom. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(2), 93–111. doi:10.1177/030437540102600201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (1995). Migrants as a security problem: Dangers of ‘securitizing’ societal issues. In R. Miles & D. Thränhardt (Eds.), Migration and European integration: Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 53–72). London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRU. (2001). Round table on carriers’ liability related to illegal immigration: Brussels, 30 November 2001. Geneva: International Road Transport Union. http://www.iru.org/cms-filesystem-action?file=en_events_2001/Illegal2001.pdf

  • Isin, E. E. (2002). Being political: Genealogies of citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahav, G., & Guiraudon, V. (2000). Comparative perspectives on border control: Away from the border and outside the state. In P. Andreas & T. Snyder (Eds.), The wall around the west: State borders and immigration controls in North America and Europe (pp. 55–77). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. L. (2004). The United States: The continuing immigration debate. In W. A. Cornelius, T. Takeyuki, P. Martin, & J. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective (pp. 51–85). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (2003). Imagining the state. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (1996). Risk and responsibility. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 189–208). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajchman, J. (1999). Diagram and diagnosis. In E. Grosz (Ed.), Becomings: Explorations in time, memory, and futures (pp. 42–54). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. B. (2003). Rights of passage: The passport in international relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. B. (2004). Passports, mobility, and security: How smart can the border be? International Studies Perspectives, 5(1), 71–91. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00158.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1999). Guests and aliens. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1997). Governing through crime. In L. Friedman & G. Fisher (Eds.), The crime conundrum: Essays on criminal justice (pp. 171–184). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparke, M. (2004). Belonging in the PACE lane: Fast border crossing and citizenship in the age of neoliberalism. In J. S. Migdal (Ed.), Boundaries and belonging: States and societies in the struggle to shape identities and local practices (pp. 251–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UK Home Office (2004) Civil Penalty: Prevention of Clandestine Entrants. Vehicles. London: The Stationery Office. http://www.ebnlimited.co.uk/pdf/codeofpractice.pdf

  • Van der Ploeg, I. (1999). The illegal body: ‘Eurodac’ and the politics of biometric identification. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(4), 295–302. doi:10.1023/A:1010064613240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, G. (2001). Technological frontiers and the politics of mobilities. New Formations, 43, 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veyne, P. (1997). Foucault revolutionizes history. In A. I. Davidson (Ed.), Foucault and his interlocutors (pp. 146–182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, A. R. (1999). Matters of state: Theorizing immigration policy. In C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (Eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience (pp. 71–93). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This chapter originally appeared in the European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 187–203, 2006. I am grateful to the publishers for permission to reproduce it here. This is a somewhat shortened version. Apart from that, and some minor editing, I have changed only the Introduction and the Conclusion. In the 10 years since I first wrote ‘Border/Control’ an entire field of critical border studies has matured, greatly advancing our knowledge of a number of the themes addressed here. However, I have resisted the temptation to update my sources. Instead I hope this chapter can have as one of its functions to show where a certain version of Foucauldian political sociology was at when critical border studies was in its infancy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Walters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walters, W. (2016). Border/Control. In: Amelina, A., Horvath, K., Meeus, B. (eds) An Anthology of Migration and Social Transformation. IMISCOE Research Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23666-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23666-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23665-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23666-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics