Abstract
About 50 % of the increase in agricultural produce during the twentieth century was achieved by application of inorganic fertilizers to crop plants. Fertilizer application is still an important farm input that is required to achieve challenging yield targets of the twenty-first century. However, fertilizer application is known to deteriorate the environment around us. Therefore, better fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) is suggested for economical yields and a safer environment. This chapter first introduces the concept of FUE for a safer environment and then, subsequent topics detail factors affecting FUE and known management practices to enhance FUE at agricultural farms. Future research challenges relating to FUE and the environment are identified. The chapter, as a whole, summarizes important literature for farmers, policy makers, and scientists.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In spite of decreased growth rate of the world’s average population from 1.26 to 1.10 % since 2006, absolute annual increase is continuing to be large. According to a recent estimate by the Population Division of the United Nations, about 80 million people will be added annually to the world population until the mid-2030s. The major share of this increase is expected to take place in the developing countries. More food, feed, and cloth are required for these additional people (Evans 2009). It has been estimated that the world will need twice as much food within 30 years (Glenn et al. 2008).
Over the previous few decades, dietary patterns around the globe have changed due to income growth, urbanization, awareness, and consumer preferences. Diets have shifted away from staples such as cereals, roots, and tubers and pulses towards more livestock products, vegetable oils, and fruits and vegetables (FAO 2008). Total meat production in developing countries has increased from 27 million tonnes to 147 million tonnes between 1970 and 2005, and global meat demand is expected to increase by more than 50 % by 2030 (FAO 2011). This will further increase the pressure on agricultural land, especially in Asia, which has the world’s highest population density per hectare of arable land. Nonetheless, biofuel production would also require more land replacing the food crops. As per estimates, if biofuel use grows by 50 % over the next 10 years then 21 million hectares of food crops would be displaced by bioenergy crops. This would imply greater intensification of agriculture to meet food demand.
Cultivated soils do not usually contain sufficient amounts of plant nutrients for high and sustained crop yields. Therefore, agricultural yield depends upon availability of nutrients applied through fertilization and yield of most crops has been reported to increase linearly with the amount of absorbing nutrients (Kaur et al. 2007). Plant nutrition is one of the major factors that control soil productivity and quality (Jaga and Patel 2012). Fertilizers maintain soil fertility and productivity through supplying essential plant nutrients and therefore make a vital contribution to economic crop production.
Intensive agriculture can have negative effects on the environment: it can upset the balance of the food chain, pollute ecosystems, and cause harm to flora and fauna. To keep food production at the same level as population growth, without using up or destroying the resources and environment, is a major task. The main challenges include increasing the area of productive land, increasing the yield per unit area of land, maintaining soil productivity and reversing the nutrient mining of soil, and breeding new crop varieties with higher yield potential and improved tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. One of the sources of pollution from intensive agriculture is the excessive use of fertilizers (Ju et al. 2014). Typically a crop plant uses less than half of the applied fertilizers (Connor et al. 2011). Remaining nutrients attach to soil particles, leach into ground or surface water, or cause air pollution such as oxides of N (Ongley 1996; Hietz et al. 2011).
Recovery of applied inorganic fertilizer by plants is low in many soils of the world and increased fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) or nutrient use efficiency (NUE) is the only option for sustainable agriculture (Fixen 2009). Plants use only about 50 % of applied N; the remaining 15–25 % reacts with organic compounds in soil, 2–20 % is lost through volatilization, and 2–10 % is reported to interfere with surface and groundwaters (Raun and Johnson 1999; Sonmez et al. 2007; Chien et al. 2009). Average FUE is reported up to 65 % for corn, 57 % for wheat, and 46 % for rice (Ladha et al. 2005; Chien et al. 2009). The recovery of applied P is even lower and on an average only 25 % or less of the applied P is taken up by crop plants in a growing season. Moreover, precipitation of applied P with Ca and Mg in calcareous soils (Rahmatullah et al. 1994) and with Fe and Al oxides in acidic soils further reduces P use efficiency (Vance et al. 2003).
Overreliance and imbalanced use of mineral fertilizers is reported to pose serious public and environmental hazards (Savci 2012). The impact of fertilizer on the environment must be scrutinized as public influence over production is increasing. Overuse of N fertilizers contributes several harmful effects on the environment. In soil, by the process of microbial nitrification, ammonium ion is converted into nitrate and thus a negative charge on nitrate favours its downward movement into groundwater. However, the time taken by nitrates to move from the root zone to groundwater varies significantly depending upon soil texture and climate. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), concentration of NO3-N should not exceed 10 mg L−1 in drinking water. The main alleged health hazard due to nitrate ingestion in food and water is a blue baby disease of young babies. Nitrogen loss as gaseous substances generally occurs through volatilization and denitrification, and this leads to environmental pollution. Another negative aspect of increased fertilization is eutrophication of water bodies. Increased concentration of P promotes luxurious growth of higher aquatic plants and algae that degrade water quality (Conley et al. 2009). Eutrophication leads towards depletion in oxygen and proliferation of unwanted species. As a consequence, it reduces the number of living species such as fish in the aquatic environment (Ansari et al. 2011).
Decreased fertilizer recovery not only has heavy costs but also has serious environmental concerns. Thus, judicious application of fertilizers to soils and their use by plants is needed for sustainable and safer agriculture. Nutrient use efficiency accounts for the acquisition of nutrients from the soil, biomass generation from nutrients, and remobilization of nutrients to organs of agronomic interest (Baligar et al. 2001; Aziz et al. 2011a, b). Nutrient use efficiency can be described by four agronomic indices: partial factor productivity (PFP), that is, crop yield in kg per nutrient applied in kg; agronomic efficiency (AE), that is, a kg crop yield increase per kg nutrient applied; apparent recovery efficiency (RE), that is, nutrient taken up in kg per nutrient applied in kg; and physiological efficiency (PE), that refers to kg yield increase per kg nutrient taken up (Mosier et al. 2004). Fertilizer use efficiency can be enhanced by adopting best management practices that refer to application of nutrient at the right time, from the right source, at the right rate, and at the right place (Roberts 2008; Epstein 1972; Fageria 1992).
2 Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Environment
Agriculture in the world is dependent on manufactured fertilizers and demand of fertilizers for crop production is increasing in most of the countries due to cultivation of modern varieties and intensive cropping systems. Consumption of N, P, and K fertilizers for crop production increased from 31 million tons in 1961 to 183 million tons in 2011 (FAO 2014). The greatest increase of consumption during the period was in N fertilizers (Fig. 1). The sharp increase in fertilizer consumption during the 1960s and 1970s can be attributed to the introduction of fertilizer-responsive cultivars of cereals, the Green Revolution cultivars. Even in the twenty-first century, the focus of plant breeders seems to be development of hybrids and varieties for greater yields. The new cultivars introduced have higher demands for nutrients as compared to old cultivars.
Energy and raw material, utilized for fertilizer manufacturing, often come from limited resources. A substantial amount of energy is consumed in the manufacture of fertilizers at industries and in transport of manufactured fertilizers to agricultural fields. From mining to manufacturing, various hazardous chemicals are introduced in the soil, water, and atmosphere. A detailed description of environmental hazards of the fertilizer industry is given in a technical report of United Nations Environment Programmme (UNEP 2000). Fertilizer manufacturing plants emit ammonia, fluorine (as SiF4 and HF), oxides of N (NOx and N2O), oxides of S (SOx), fertilizer dust, acid mists, and radiation in the atmosphere. Effluents of the industry also have these pollutants in toxic concentrations. Moreover, most of the solid wastes and by-products of the industry are pollutants. Therefore, manufactured fertilizers are a major cause of environmental pollution (Li et al. 2013; Ju et al. 2014).
Based on composition and purity of the raw material, fertilizers may be a source of pollutants in soils. As compared with N and K fertilizers, heavy metal contaminations were greater in rock phosphate and P fertilizers (Raven and Loeppert 1997). Toxic soil Cd concentrations in potato and sugar beet fields were related to long-term overuse of P fertilizers (Cheraghi et al. 2012).
Not all of the applied quantity of mineral nutrients is taken up by crop plants. More than 90 % of applied fertilizers may be lost in the environment leading to increased pollution of soil, water, and atmosphere. The situation gets worse when the applied nutrients, such as N and P, end up in water bodies causing eutrophication. Apart from runoff, N can also leach to groundwater and volatilize to atmosphere. About 50 % applied N can be lost through ammonia volatilization and 25 % as nitrate leaching beyond the root zone (Zhao et al. 2011). Leaching of nitrate and contamination of drinking water resources increases health risks for humans and animals and volatilized ammonia is itself toxic and it also acts as a greenhouse gas and results in acid rains.
Due to pollution hazards of fertilizers during mining, manufacturing, and application, manufactured fertilizers are not safe for our environment (Table 1). Organic farming is suggested by some scientists as a sustainable and safer agricultural technology (Gabriel et al. 2010; Koohafkan et al. 2012; Strandberg et al. 2013). As desired yield levels are not achieved in organic farming, scientists have focused on integrated nutrient management strategies to improve fertilizer use efficiency (Bruulsema et al. 2008). Such strategies are not only good for better farm income, but also help us partially to decrease our dependence on manufactured fertilizers. Less fertilizer consumption at agricultural farms means less mining and manufacturing while there are still additional profits from crop production. By this, several issues of environmental pollution can be minimized. Therefore, increased FUE is a milestone towards a safer environment and greater agricultural profit.
3 Factors Affecting Fertilizer Use Efficiency
A fertilizer is considered efficient when maximum economical yield is obtained with the minimum amount of fertilizer application. Various soil, plant, fertilizer, and environmental factors that affect FUE are described below.
3.1 Leaching Losses
Nitrate (NO3) fertilizers are susceptible to leaching losses (Almasri and Kaluarachchi 2004a, b). The extent of leaching is more in sandy soil compared to clayey soils. The situation is further aggravated when soil is bare than cropped soil. The main problems related to NO3 − leaching are eutrophication of surface waters, increased production of nitrous oxide from receiving water bodies, and a higher concentration of NO3 − in drinking water (WHO recommends <50 mg NO3 − L−1 of drinking water).
According to Lehmann and Schroth (2003), nitrate leaching is lower in subsoil due to the increase in net positive charge, and the nitrate held in subsoil can be taken up by deep-rooted crops. Therefore, it is important to distinguish between nitrate movement within the soil profile (i.e., topsoil to subsoil), and leaching beyond the root zone, into the groundwater. Losses from ammonical fertilizers are higher during the summer season because of rapid oxidization by nitrifying organisms. The activity of the nitrifying organism can be reduced to minimize leaching losses. Various chemical compounds inhibit microbial nitrification of N fertilizers and reduce the leaching loss.
Phosphorus losses by subsurface leaching are negligible compared to losses by erosion and surface runoff. Subsurface leaching increases when P is in soluble organic form, as manure; the soil’s capacity to bind inorganic P is saturated; preferential flow of water through channels and cracks in the soil prevents soluble P from getting in contact with the soil’s adsorption sites. Furthermore, drained soils have a higher rate of subsurface leaching compared to undrained soils. Compared to inorganic P, dissolved organic P is more mobile in soil (Havlin et al. 1999; For detailed reading see Tunney et al. 1997).
Potassium can be lost in drainage water in sandy and acid soils and in high rainfall areas (Malavolta 1985; Havlin et al. 1999). Losses can be minimized by modifying the time of application with crop growth stage to maximum plant uptake period and also applying the fertilizer in split doses. However, in clayey soils, there are no leaching losses. Moreover, recently developed slow-release K fertilizers are not subject to leaching losses, for example, potash frits, potassium metaphosphate, and fused potassium phosphate.
Sulfate, added to soil as a secondary nutrient along with N and K fertilizers, is susceptible to leaching from the topsoil and accumulating in the subsoil. In the subsoil SO4 2− is only available later in the season to deep-rooted crops. Leaching can also result in SO4 2− losses to groundwater. Sulphate is also readily leached from surface soils; maximum losses are in soils dominated by monovalent cations such as K and Na and minimal in soils with high amounts of Al (Havlin et al. 1999).
3.2 Gaseous Losses
Gaseous losses of N from soils may be through (1) ammonia volatilization under high pH conditions in alkaline soils and (2) loss as N2, N2O, and NO due to denitrification. These losses are influenced by soil pH, fresh organic matter, moisture, temperature, and soil microbial diversity. Ammonia volatilization at high pH can be minimized by proper placement of urea. Cantarella et al. (2005) reported volatilization losses ranging 37–64 % of urea applied to maize crop at various locations. It is recommended to apply ammonical fertilizers at least 4–6 inches below the soil surface. Alternatively, urea should be used instead of nitrate fertilizer wherever there are high chances of losses of N by denitrification processes.
3.3 Immobilization
Immobilization is a major cause of reduced FUE as nutrients released from fertilizer become unavailable for growing crops over a certain period of time via chemical, physicochemical, and microbiological immobilization (Keeney and Sahrawat 1986; FAO 1972; Zhang et al. 2013). Ammonium and K ions are immobilized by strong adsorption by 2:1 type clay minerals such as vermiculite (Allison et al. 1953; Barshad and Kishk 1970). High soil pH further enhances this type of fixation. Practical soil fixation can be reduced by timely and proper placement of fertilizer. Fertilizer should be carefully selected so that it will have minimum interaction with the soil. Furthermore, the time and mode of application should be selected to ensure minimum immobilization of nutrients, such as preferable use of nitrate fertilizer may improve availability.
At low pH, the efficiency of water soluble P is very low. In acidic soils, P is known to react with Fe/Al oxides to form insoluble complexes (Vance et al. 2003). However, rock phosphate has shown increased solubility and availability under acidic conditions. In calcareous soils, applied P is invariably converted into tri-calcium phosphate, an insoluble P compound (Rahmatullah et al. 1994). Under such conditions water soluble P are relatively more efficient than water insoluble P such as rock phosphate.
Microbiological fixation of fertilizer N may be of concern when undecomposed organic matter of wider C/N ratio is present in the soil. However, this is a temporary type of immobilization. Application of a starter dose of N fertilizer to organic matter or by allowing enough time for complete decomposition of undecomposed organic matter may improve the N availability for the crop. Sulfate can bind to clays, and it is less mobile than nitrate but has higher mobility than phosphate.
3.4 Soil Compaction and Fertilizer Use Efficiency
Soil compaction is a common observation under mechanized farming and is one of the major problems facing modern agriculture. Soil compaction increases soil strength and decreases soil physical fertility through decreasing storage and supply of water and nutrients, which leads to additional fertilizer requirement and increasing production cost (Hamza and Anderson 2005). Numerous physical changes in soils due to compaction result in a poor response for N and P fertilizers. Soil compaction results in the soil particles coming closer resultantly decreasing soil bulk density and soil porosity. Because the points of contact between soil particles are increased, compaction also results in an increase of soil strength. In fine-textured soil, compaction reduces the available water capacity of soil, resulting in decreasing nutrient availability.
3.5 Soil Temperature
Soil temperature is one of the important environmental factors affecting plant growth and fertilizer response of crops (Mackay and Barber 1984; Pregitzer and King 2005). Temperature affects most physical processes occurring in the soil and the rate of chemical reactions increases with rise in temperature that controls nutrient availability. Soil temperature affects fertilizer efficiency by changing solubility of fertilizers, cation exchange, and ability of the plants to absorb and use nutrients (Pregitzer and King 2005; Hussain et al. 2010; Hussain and Maqsood 2011). Volatilization losses of N are related to high soil and atmospheric temperature. Soils in warm regions generally fix higher amounts of P compared to temperate regions. Soil temperature can be managed to an extent by common management practices including tillage, mulching, and irrigation. Moreover, root growth is severely affected by either too cold or hot soil temperature ultimately affecting nutrient uptake (Marschner 1995).
3.6 Soil Moisture
Soil moisture regulates nutrient movement within soil and their uptake by plants. Drought conditions can limit nutrient uptake because of decreased nutrient movement as well as decreased root growth (Marschner 1995). Excessive moisture leads to leaching loss of added fertilizers whereas lack of moisture results in poor availability of the added fertilizer and high osmotic pressure of the soil solution due to concentration effect fertilizers (Taylor et al. 1983). Thus, efficient water management is complementary to efficient fertilizer management. Maximum efficiency of fertilizers can be obtained only in the presence of adequate soil moisture and vice versa. Mengel and Haeder (1973) demonstrated that increasing soil moisture from 10 to 28 % increased K transport by up to 175 %.
3.7 Soil pH
Soil pH is one of the major edaphic factors that regulate nutrient availability (Marschner 1995). Most plant nutrients are available at soil pH 6 to 7.5. If soil pH is lower or higher than the range, nutrient availability reduces sharply and even 1 unit pH increase or decrease can decrease/increase 100 times nutrient availability. At low pH, most micronutrients except molybdenum are available and even can be present in toxic concentrations because of their increased solubility (Tan 2011). In contrast, their availability reduces at alkaline pH particularly of Zn, Fe, Cu, and Mn.
Plant nutrient availability depends on the prevalent soil pH. In highly acidic or alkali soils, efficiency of P fertilizers is low. In such situations, efficiency of fertilizers can be increased by correcting the soil condition, using suitable amendments. Physiologically alkaline fertilizers such as calcium carbonate and the like should receive priority on acid soils and physiologically acid fertilizers, or alternatively use of acidic fertilizers such as ammonium sulphate on alkaline soils. At pH higher than 7, Ca and Mg ions, as well as the presence of carbonates of these metals result in precipitation of P fertilizers, decreasing their availability (Cole and Olsen 1959; Shen et al. 2011).
3.8 Soil Organic Matter
The organic matter in soil not only supplies different nutrient elements, but also improves physical conditions of soils, stimulates microbial activity, protects the soil from erosion, retards the fixation of nutrients, increases mobility of nutrients in soils, increases the buffering capacity, and helps in many other ways (Tan 2011; Osman 2013a, b). Potential benefits of organic matter in soil in turn increase the efficiency of applied inorganic fertilizers. However, a high amount of organic matter may not prevent P losses as a result of leaching. This may be due to the absence of Al and Fe compounds, which are mainly responsible for P retention under low pH conditions (Vance et al. 2003).
3.9 Plant Characteristics
Crop species vary in their ability to remove nutrients form soil. Furthermore, there is significant variation within cultivars of the same crop species (Aziz et al. 2006, 2011a, b, 2014; Gill et al. 2002). Numerous researchers have revealed varietal variations for K uptake in ryegrass, maize, soybean, and barley (Dunlop et al. 1979; Terman 1977; Glass and Perley 1980). Because the roots are the principal organs through which plants take up nutrients, the rooting pattern and habit have an important bearing on nutrient removal. Crops with shallow extensive fibrous roots are able to uptake a greater amount of fertilizer applied per unit area (Lynch 1995). The fertilizer needs of deep-rooted crops are generally lower than shallow-rooted crops. Munson (1985) identified five plant root factors that significantly influence nutrient uptake from soil. These include ion flux, root radius, rate of water uptake, root length, and rate of root growth.
3.10 Fertilizer Characteristics
Nutrient mobility, type of fertilizer, and the time and method of application significantly influence the FUE (Sadras and Lemaire 2014). Nitrogenous fertilizers are highly mobile and subjected to both downward and lateral mobility. In contrast, P is highly immobile (Smeck 1985). Potassium is also mobile but compared to N its mobility is lower (Nastri et al. 2000). To get maximum efficiency N and K fertilizer should be applied in frequent split doses and P as basal dressing or near the root zone (Munson 1985; Sowers et al. 1994; Awan et al. 2007). The type of fertilizer also determines the efficiency (Zaman et al. 2005). Ammonium and urea fertilizers are more efficient than nitrate fertilizers for paddy soils (Datta 1986). Water-soluble P materials are more efficient for short duration crops and in soils that are neutral to alkaline in reaction. There is also a certain amount of interaction noticed among crops and fertilizers. For example, paddy performs better when ammonium sulphate is applied as N carrier and for tobacco when potassium sulphate is applied as K carrier (Craswell et al. 1981; Vann et al. 2013).
4 Possible Ways to Improve Fertilizer Use Efficiency
Increase in FUE aims at obtaining more yield while adding a small amount of fertilizer materials. This will not only result in minimizing the production cost for a certain crop but it will also reduce the risk of environmental contamination. Hence, it improves the overall economy of a region/country. The FUE can be improved by managing soil and plant factors coupled with improvement in fertilizer materials.
4.1 Site-Specific Nutrient Management
Soil is an ultimate reservoir of plant nutrients and their availability depends upon a number of soil properties including physical, chemical, and biological (Havlin et al. 1999). As the soil system is dynamic, hence both temporal and special variability exist resulting in a huge variation in nutrient concentrations even in similar soil types. Fertilizer recommendations are general for any region or area. This may lead to over- or underapplication of applied fertilizer materials, resulting in a decreased FUE. Moreover, a plant’s nutrient requirement varies with growth stages. This demands site-specific fertilization depending upon soil physicochemical properties and crop species/varieties. Fertilization according to the need of the crop is one of the management options to improve FUE and reduce the risk of environmental contamination. Precision farming technology is a valuable tool to identify and correct site-specific crop nutrient deficiencies (Roberts 2008). In addition to crop monitoring, modern technologies such as leaf color charts, chlorophyll meters, and remote sensing are useful techniques to manage nutrient requirements by crops.
4.2 Crop-Specific Nutrient Management
Crop responses to applied fertilizers vary from specie to specie; variability even exists among different cultivars of the same species. For example, cereals demand more K compared to vegetables and other crops (Greenwood et al. 1980), whereas dicotyledons require more B than monocots (Neales 1960). Thus, application of these nutrients to such crops according to their requirement will result in more efficient utilization and reduced losses to the environment. A number of studies have been reported on genotypic variation among wheat, maize, cotton, brassica, and rice cultivars for different nutrients (Kanwal et al. 2009; Maqsood et al. 2009; Aziz et al. 2011a, b, 2014). Hence, application of fertilizers to crop cultivars that are not responsive and inefficient utilizers leads towards environmental pollution. Moreover, as a plant goes through different growth stages during its life cycle, certain stages are high-demanding compared to others. Hence, FUE can be improved by applying the nutrients at the right time and in the right amount, when there is actual need for that nutrient by the growing crop. Split application of N is also one of the management options to match the nutrient requirement with the crop demand. Ortiz-Monasterio et al. (1996) found about 50 % reduction in nitrous oxide emission from irrigated wheat crop while applying only 33 % of N fertilizer at planting and the remainder after 1 month.
Nature has bestowed an excellent mechanism in plants by which certain crop species/genotypes are more efficient utilizers of applied as well as indigenous soil nutrients. This may be attributed either to more efficient nutrient uptake or its rapid assimilation during metabolic processes. Roots play an important role in this regard. However, root growth is also restricted under high nutrient concentration (Shen et al. 2012). As FUE aims at obtaining more yield with the application of less fertilizer material, therefore nutrient application should be at the optimal rate at which root growth is maximum. However, under high input systems, FUE can also be improved by maximizing root proliferation in subsurface soils either through breeding or agronomic nutrient management practices (Mi et al. 2010; Lynch 2007, 2011). More root proliferation leads to more exploration of soil nutrient reserves, hence more nutrient uptake. Farmers can achieve better FUE by growing those cultivars that are efficient utilizers of applied as well as indigenous plant nutrients.
4.3 Fertilizer Materials
Fertilizer use efficiency can also be improved by changing the morphology of the fertilizer material either by coating or by increasing the size of the granule. Fertilizers vary in nutrient solubility, availability, and recovery. Fertilizers applied to one crop may have residual effects for subsequent crops. Only less than half of the applied P may be recovered by the first crop (Sattari et al. 2012), whereas most of N fertilizers are readily available to plants and mobile in the soil system. This leads to higher losses of applied N. Coated N fertilizers with controlled release of N can ensure a continuous supply of N to plants for longer periods (Mulder et al. 2011; Ni et al. 2011a, b; Xie et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2011).
Controlled/slow-release fertilizers for improving NUE from urea have also been practiced in many parts of the world. In addition, urease inhibitors were also introduced to minimize N losses from urea. A number of inorganic and organic urease inhibitors were tried in the past (readers are referred to the review by Chien et al. 2009). However, N-(n-butyl)thiophosphorictriamide (NBTPT) was found to be most effective compared to others such as phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPDA) (Byrnes 1988; Lu et al. 1989). NBTPT addition to soil resulted in 60 % reduction in ammonia volatilization losses compared to control where no urease inhibitor was applied (Cantarella et al. 2005). In addition, some other laboratory and field studies (Chien et al. 1988; Christianson et al. 1990; Freney et al. 1995) revealed that cyclohexylphosphorictriamide (CHPT) was even more effective than NBTPT. Combined nitrate and urease inhibitors were also tried to see their impact on improving FUE (Nastri et al. 2000; Radel et al. 1992; Zaman et al. 2005). However, until now urease inhibitors can delay NH3 losses for only 1–2 weeks in the case of surface application of urea (Chien et al. 2009). Moreover, it also depends upon soil physicochemical properties coupled with moisture and temperature. Nevertheless, coating of urea with natural biodegradable polymers and micronutrients can also reduce N losses from 30 to 67 % (Junejo et al. 2011). In addition, the concept of urea supergranules has also been reported with some advantages over the routine application of normal granules. This will act as a slow-release fertilizer.
These controlled released fertilizers only partially reduce nutrient losses and further research is required to check nutrient losses by applying the right type of fertilizer. Therefore, research efforts must be directed towards cheaper and environmentally friendly fertilizers that have minimal nutrient losses and greater FUE. A number of new fertilizer products are now available to improve fertilizer use efficiency including sulphur-coated urea, slow-release fertilizers, smart fertilizers, and nitrification inhibitors.
4.4 Integrated Nutrient Management
Integrated nutrient management (INM) (i.e., combined use of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients) is also an important key to achieve higher FUE (Yamoah et al. 2002). Organic amendments not only improve soil fertility status but also result in improvement of soil physicochemical properties such as structure and nutrient and moisture retention, as well as porosity/aeration. However, while adding organic amendments to soil, their C:N ratio and mineralization rate should also be kept in mind (Treadweell et al. 2007).
Incorporation of legumes in crop rotation is also an integral component of INM. Legumes not only improve soil nutrient reserves but also improve soil physical properties helpful in root proliferation, hence more efficient nutrient uptake. Rahman et al. (2009) observed a significant increase in N use efficiency while incorporating broadbean and hairy vetch legume crops in a rice-based cropping system. INM by using green manures, animal manures, and crop residues reduces the fertilizer application rate along with reduced emission of N2O (Aulakh 2010), hence more FUE. Long-term studies on INM in China were conducted in multilocation field trials for rice by Zhang et al. (2011). They observed 20–30 % reduction in fertilizer use coupled with 20–80 % increase in agronomic FUE. However, success of this INM system demands a comprehensive training of the farmers. Otherwise imbalanced use of nutrients will not only waste the resources but lead towards environmental contamination.
4.5 Method of Fertilizer Application
Nutrient losses can also be minimized by following proper application methods. Conventional fertilizer application methods such as broadcasting and side dressing are less efficient compared to fertigation and foliar fertilization techniques (Rehman et al. 2012). Nevertheless, it also depends upon specific mineral nutrient, crop species, and soil properties. For example, banded application of P to crops results in more P uptake compared to broadcast application. This improved P uptake might be attributed to reduced soil contact, hence less fixation of applied P fertilizers. Sitthaphanit et al. (2009) observed reduced leaching losses of N, P, and K by split application and delaying the basal application in a tropical sandy soil. N losses from urea and other fertilizers can also be minimized by its deep placement into the soil. Deep placement of urea supergranules is one of the best management options to improve FUE in flooded rice in Bangladesh and Vietnam (Roy and Hammond 2004). However, its application is laborious and costly, hence impracticable for developed countries of the world.
Unconventional methods of fertilizer application are also in practice in many parts of the world. Nutrients are applied directly to the leaves (foliar fertilization) or to the roots (drip fertigation) where they are actually required. It also involves reduced fertilizer and labor cost. Moreover, it will result in improved water use efficiency in arid and semiarid regions of the world. Liang et al. (2014) found that optimal daily fertigation is a better approach to improve cucumber yield and FUE under greenhouse conditions. Alam et al. (2005) conducted a study on wheat crop employing different N and P application methods and found 74 % increase in P fertilizer efficiency over top-dressed N and P. Fertigation results in improved N use efficiency as more NO3 are present in the upper soil surface and NO3 leaching losses to the groundwater decrease (Hebbar et al. 2004; Hou et al. 2007; Hassan et al. 2010). However, there are certain limitations that should be addressed before following these practices. In the case of fertigation, fertilizer material should not be corrosive and also not react with other chemicals in water. In addition, good quality water should also be used otherwise precipitation of salts will result in clogging the entire irrigation system. Therefore, generally fertigation is practiced for vegetable and fruit plants.
Foliar feeding of nutrients to plants is also a promising management strategy to improve FUE. With micronutrients that are generally required in small quantities, their uniform application to growing plants can also be carried out by foliar application. Dixon (2003) reported that foliar application of N and P is about 7 and 20 % more efficient compared to soil application of these nutrients. Foliar application of urea resulted in 80 % recovery of applied N in wheat crop (Smith et al. 1991). Foliar application along with the bed planting method resulted in improved agronomic efficiency, that is, about 93.82 % compared to conventional methods where it was only 43.67 % (Bhuyan et al. 2012). However, foliar fertilization of plants should be done at very low rates of fertilizer material otherwise leaf burning will result in crop damage. In addition, nutrient feeding through foliar application also demands a comprehensive knowledge of crop growth stage and nutrient demand.
4.6 Balanced Fertilization
Balanced nutrition is an important key to improve FUE. The major reason for low N use efficiency in many agricultural soils of the world is either high N input or low N input. In the case of high input agricultural systems, it leads towards the contamination of natural resources. Indeed N deficiency is ubiquitous throughout the world but in addition, certain other essential elements such as P, S, K, Zn, and B are also deficient. According to an estimate about half of the world’s cereal-growing soils are Zn deficient (Cakmak 2002). Boron deficiency has also been reported in more than 80 countries worldwide (Shorrocks 1997). However, in many parts of the world mostly farmers apply N coupled with a nominal quantity of P fertilizer while ignoring the use of K and other macro- and micronutrients. This imbalanced fertilization results in a wider N:P ratio of about 7:1 to 6:1 (Vitousek et al. 2009). Furthermore, a very wide N:K ratio (i.e., 1:0.23 to 1:0.36) exists throughout the world (Krauss 2004). This practice is more common in developing countries and is one the major constraints to improve nutrient utilization efficiency in the existing cropping systems. As plants need 17 essential elements for their growth and development, so overuse of only one nutrient creates a strong imbalance and results in reduced NUE by plants. A number of studies reveal that addition of S, K, P, and Zn along with N results in enhanced N recovery from the applied fertilizer source, hence more FUE (Aulakh and Malhi 2004; Gordon 2005; Salvagiotti et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2012a, b, c). Dobermann et al. (2002) observed 30–40 % increases in N recovery efficiency of rice from balanced fertilization. More efficient recovery of nutrients from applied fertilizers will lead towards reducing the burden of contaminants on the environment.
5 Moisture Conservation and Water Management
Moisture conservation in rainfed areas by mulching and deep ploughing will enhance fertilizer efficiency. Similarly management of irrigation water at critical crop stages is also important to improve fertilizer efficiency.
6 Future Challenges
6.1 Limiting Resources of Rock Phosphate
Limiting raw material for fertilizer manufacturing further increases the importance of FUE. Rock phosphate is the only raw material for most P fertilizers. According to Global Phosphorus Research Initiative, reservoirs of rock phosphate are estimated to deplete completely in the next 100 years (GPRI 2014). This demands wise use of available rock phosphate and higher FUE (Cordell et al. 2011). Moreover, the only option when rock phosphate will not be available will be managing the P cycle while adding the required P rates in the form of organic matter (Dawson and Hilton 2011). Then this organic matter must be mineralized at a rate of crop P demand. Related strategies are already known and often listed under organic farming. However, organic farming is uneconomical in most developing countries due to lower crop yields and greater expense. A great number of scientists are working to find a suitable alternative technology for the days when rock phosphate will no longer be available. Plant breeding for better P uptake and use efficiency for a P-deficient environment is being advocated and efforts are underway; however, newly developed cultivars of agronomic crops actually require greater inputs of P fertilizer as increase in yield is often related to greater fertilizer demand.
6.2 Depleting Soil Fertility
Exhausting cropping systems are depleting nutrients from the soils (Foster and Magdoff 1998) and heavy fertilizer applications can damage the environment due to losses of nutrients. Also, higher fertilizer rates decrease FUE and may result in uneconomical yield if applied more than the crop demands. Restoration, maintenance, and buildup of soil fertility status require knowledge about various soil aspects (Palm et al. 1997; Sanchez et al. 1997; Lahmar et al. 2012). Due to imbalanced application of fertilizers, soil is more depleted in micronutrients as compared to macronutrients (Fan et al. 2008). For many cropping systems, workable strategies are still not known to maintain soil fertility and produce greater yield by taking into consideration soil and environmental health.
6.3 Soil-Specific Recommendations
It is recommended that fertilizers should be applied according to crop requirement and soil characteristics (Pierce and Sadler 1997). Soil- and crop-specific fertilizer recommendations take into account soil, crop, and environmental factors for greater nutrient recovery and yields (Swinton and Lowenberg-DeBoer 1998). The right type of fertilizer applied in the right amount, with the right method, and at the right time are important considerations of FUE (Bruulsema et al. 2008). However, there is a need for developing kits for determining site-specific crop nutrient deficiencies. This will be a great breakthrough in improving FUE and reducing the risk of environmental contamination of land, air, and water resources.
Soils differ greatly in physical, chemical, and biological characteristics. Therefore, plant-available pools of nutrients in soils also vary (Hussain et al. 2011). The native status of a particular nutrient in the soil is the most important factor controlling the required rate of fertilizer. Based on this approach, scientists have formulated critical concentrations of plant-available nutrients in soils. These critical limits are (in mg kg−1 soil): nitrate-N (extraction with AB-DTPA) >20, P (extraction with NaHCO3) >15, K (extraction with NH4OAc) >150, Zn (extraction with DTPA) >1.0, Cu (extraction with DTPA) >0.5, Fe (extraction with DTPA) >4.5, Mn (extraction with DTPA) >2.0, and B (extraction with hot water) >1.0 (Watanabe and Olsen 1965; Mahler et al. 1984; Soltanpour 1985; Quevauviller et al. 1996). Depletion of nutrients from soil solution by plant uptake is restored from various other nutrient pools in soils (Viets 1962; Barber 1995). However, soil buffering capacity is partially ignored when recommending fertilizers on the concentration of plant-available nutrients in the soil. Therefore, FUE would differ if soil buffering capacity is sufficient to supply nutrients over a longer period of time.
Only soil P and K are investigated in detail by different adsorption and release models for soils. Reports suggest recommending fertilizer rates based on adsorption isotherms: however, this is limited to P and K only (Zhengli et al. 1988; Mehadi et al. 1990; Dobermann et al. 1996). However, recommendations based on adsorption isotherms are often too complex to be understood by farmers. Moreover, there are site-to-site variations among the fields of a farm and even within a single field. There is a demand for a more farmer-friendly and dynamic system of fertilizer recommendations that consider all soil characteristics. Efforts are underway to estimate site-specific fertilizer requirements by use of advanced technology (Mueller et al. 2001; Franzen et al. 2002; Mallarino and Wittry 2004). However, the desired success is still awaited.
6.4 Biofortification, Environment, and FUE
Biofortification of edible plant parts through genetic and agronomic means is being advocated on a large scale (Bouis et al. 2011). Biofortification strategies currently focus on seven mineral elements (Fe, Zn, Cu, Ca, Mg, I, and Se) that are most commonly deficient in human diets (White and Broadley 2009). Agronomic biofortification strategies require higher rates of fertilizer application to increase food quality (Hussain et al. 2013). However, the greater the nutrient applied, the lesser will be FUE and there will more environmental hazard.
Computations for FUE include amount of fertilizer applied, amount of nutrients uptaken by plants, and yield of the crop (Jat and Gerard 2014). Environmental considerations, food quality parameters, and actual farm profits are not considered in FUE. Nevertheless, these factors play a key role in suitability and profitability of fertilization (Prasad 2008). In future, new computations of FUE are required to include these factors. Farm profit can easily be calculated. However, the most challenging task is to quantify environmental hazards of fertilization in a given soil-crop-environment and management combination. Probably, the amount of nutrient lost in the atmosphere or water bodies is more hazardous for the environment as compared to the amount of fertilizer temporarily retained in the soil.
References
Alam SM, Shah SA, Iqbal MM (2005) Evaluation of method and time of fertilizer application for yield and optimum P-efficiency in wheat. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 27:457–463
Allison FE, Doestch IH, Roller EM (1953) Availability of fixed ammonium in soils containing different clay minerals. Soil Sci 75:371–381
Almasri MN, Kaluarachchi JJ (2004a) Implications of on‐ground nitrogen loading and soil transformations on ground water quality management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:165–186
Almasri MN, Kaluarachchi JJ (2004b) Assessment and management of long-term nitrate pollution of ground water in agriculture-dominated watersheds. J Hydrol 295:225–245
Ansari AA, Gill SS, Khan FA (2011) Eutrophication: threat to aquatic ecosystems. In: Ansari AA et al (eds) Eutrophication: causes, consequences and control. Springer, Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9625-8
Aoun M, Samrani AGE, Lartiges BS, Kazpard V, Saad Z (2010) Releases of phosphate fertilizer industry in the surrounding environment: investigation on heavy metals and pollution in soil. J Environ Sci 22:1387–1397
Aulakh MS (2010) Integrated nutrient management for sustainable crop production, improving crop quality and soil health, and minimizing environmental pollution. In: 19th world congress of soil science, soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane, 1–6 Aug 2010, pp 79–82
Aulakh MS, Malhi SS (2004) Fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency as influenced by interactions with other nutrients. In: Mosier AR, Syers JK, Freney JR (eds) SCOPE 65. Agriculture and the nitrogen cycle: assessing the impacts of fertilizer use on food production and the environment. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 181–191
Awan TH, Manzoor Z, Safdar ME, Ahmad M (2007) Yield response of rice to dynamic use of potassium in traditional rice growing area of Punjab. Pak J Agric Sci 44:130–135
Aziz T, Rahmatullah MA, Maqsood MA, Tahir IA, Cheema MA (2006) Phosphorus utilization by six Brassica cultivars (Brassica juncea L.) from tri-calcium phosphate; a relatively insoluble P compound. Pak J Bot 38:1529–1538
Aziz T, Steffens D, Schubert S (2011a) Variation in phosphorus efficiency among brassica cultivars. II: Root morphology and carboxylates exudation. J Plant Nutr 34:2127–2138
Aziz T, Rahatullah, Maqsood MA, Sabir M, Kanwal S (2011b) Categorization of Brassica cultivars for phosphorus acquisition from phosphate rock on basis of growth and ionic parameters. J Plant Nutr 34:522–533
Aziz T, Finnigen PM, Lambers H, Jost R (2014) Organ specific phosphorus allocation patterns and transcript profiles linked to phosphorus efficiency in two contrasting wheat genotypes. Plant Cell Environ 37:943–960
Baligar VC, Fageria NK, He ZL (2001) Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:921–950
Barber SA (1995) Soil nutrient bioavailability: a mechanistic approach. Wiley, New York
Barshad I, Kishk FM (1970) Factors affecting potassium fixation and cation exchange capacities of soil vermiculite clays. Clays Clay Miner 18:127–137
Bhuyan MHM, Ferdousi MR, Iqbal MT (2012) Foliar spray of nitrogen fertilizer on raised bed increases yield of transplanted aman rice over conventional method. Int Sch Res Notes. doi:10.5402/2012/184953
Bouis HE, Hotz C, McClafferty B et al (2011) Biofortification: a new tool to reduce micronutrient malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull 32:S31–S40
Bruulsema TW, Witt C, García F, Li S, Rao TN, Chen F, Ivanova S (2008) A global framework for fertilizer BMPs. Better Crop 92:13–15
Byrnes, BH (1988) The degradation of urease inhibitor phenyl phosphorodiamidate in soil systems and preference of N (n butyl) thiophosphoric triamide in flooded rice culture. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Munich, Weibenstephan, Germany
Cakmak I (2002) Plant nutrition research: priorities to meet the human needs for food in sustainable ways. Plant Soil 247:3–24
Cantarella H, Quaggio JA, Gallo PB, Bolonhezi D, Rossetto R, Martins JLM, Paulino VJ, Alcântara PB (2005) Ammonia losses of NBPT-treated urea under Brazilian soil conditions. In: IFA international workshop on enhanced-efficiency fertilizers, Frankfurt, 28–30 June 2005 (CD-ROM)
Cheraghi M, Lorestani B, Merrikhpour H (2012) Investigation of the effects of phosphate fertilizer application on the heavy metal content in agricultural soils with different cultivation patterns. Biol Trace Elem Res 145:87–92
Chien MM, Savant NK, Engel NGH (1988) Evaluation of cyclohexyl phosphoric and thiophosphorictriamides as sustained-action urease inhibitors in submerged soil. Agron Abstr 213
Chien SH, Prochnow LI, Cantarella H (2009) Recent developments of fertilizer production and use to improve nutrient efficiency and minimize environmental impacts. Adv Agron 209:267–322
Christianson, CB, Byrnes BH, Carmona G (1990) A comparison of sulfur and oxygen analogs of phosphoric triamide urease inhibitor in reducing urea hydrolysis and ammonia volatilization. Fertilizer Research 26:21–27
Cole CV, Olsen SR (1959) Phosphorus solubility in calcareous soils: II. Effects of exchangeable phosphorus and soil texture on phosphorus solubility. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23:119–121
Conley DJ, Paerl HW, Howarth RW, Boesch DF, Seitzinger SP, Havens KE, Lancelot C, Likens GE (2009) Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science 323:1014–1015
Connor DJ, Loomis RS, Cassman KG (2011) Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cordell D, Rosemarin A, Schröder JJ, Smit AL (2011) Towards global phosphorus security: a systems framework for phosphorus recovery and reuse options. Chemosphere 84:747–758
Craswell ET, De Datta SK, Obcemea WN, Hartantyo M (1981) Time and mode of nitrogen fertilizer application to tropical wetland rice. Fertil Res 2(4):247–259
Datta SD (1986) Improving nitrogen fertilizer efficiency in lowland rice in tropical Asia. Fertil Res 9(1–2):171–186
Dawson CJ, Hilton J (2011) Fertiliser availability in a resource-limited world: production and recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus. Food Policy 36:S14–S22
Dixon RC (2003) Foliar fertilization improves nutrient use efficiency. Fluid J 2003:2
Dobermann A, Cassman KG, Cruz PCS et al (1996) Fertilizer inputs, nutrient balance, and soil nutrient-supplying power in intensive, irrigated rice systems. II: Effective soil K-supplying capacity. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 46:11–21
Dobermann A, Witt C, Dawe D (2002) Site-specific nutrient management for intensive rice cropping systems in Asia. Field Crops Res 74:37–66
Dunlop J, Glass ADM, Tomkins BD (1979) The regulation of K+ uptake by ryegrass and white clover roots in relation to their competition for potassium. New Phytol 83:365–370
Elsken M, Pussemier L, Dumortier P, Van Langenhove K, Scholl G, Goeyens L, Focant JF (2013) Dioxin levels in fertilizers from Belgium: Determination and evaluation of the potential impact on soil contamination. Sci Total Environ 454–455:366–372
Epstein E (1972) Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspective. Wiley, New York, NY
Evans A (2009) The feeding of the nine billion: global food security for the 21st century (a Chatham house report). Royal Institute of International Affairs, London
FAGERIA NK (1992) Maximizing crop yields. Dekker, New York, 274 pp
Fan M-S, Zhao F-J, Fairweather-Tait SJ et al (2008) Evidence of decreasing mineral density in wheat grain over the last 160 years. J Trace Elem Med Biol 22:315–324
FAO (1972) The state of food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, pp 30–45
FAO (2008) FAO statistical yearbook. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome
FAO (2011) Current world fertilizer trends and outlook to 2015. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
FAO (2014) Fertilizer consumption database. http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/R/*/E. Accessed 5 Aug 2014
Feng ZH, Liu HF, Wang X (2009) Toxic substances contents in fertilizers and its environmental risk assessment in China. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China 4: S14–S31 (in Chinese)
Fixen PE (2009) Nutrient use efficiency in the context of sustainable agriculture. In: IPNI symposium on nutrient use efficiency at the Latin American congress of soil science, San Jose, 16–20 Nov 2009
Foster JB, Magdoff F (1998) Liebig, Marx, and the depletion of soil fertility: relevance for today’s agriculture. Mon Rev York 50:32–45
Franzen DW, Hopkins DH, Sweeney MD et al (2002) Evaluation of soil survey scale for zone development of site-specific nitrogen management. Agron J 94:381–389
Freney JR, Keerthisinghe DG, Chaiwanakupt P, Phongpan S, Harrington K (1995) Effect of cyclohexylphosphorictriamide and N-(n-butyl) thiophosphorictriamide on ammonia loss and grain yield of flooded rice in Thailand following urea application. Fertil Res 40:225–233
Gabriel D, Sait SM, Hodgson JA et al (2010) Scale matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at different spatial scales. Ecol Lett 13:858–869
Gill MA, Mansoor S, Aziz T, Rahmatullah, Akhtar MS (2002) Differential growth response and phosphorus utilization efficiency of rice genotypes. Pak J Agric Sci 39(2):83–87
Glass ADM, Perley JE (1980) Varietal differences in potassium uptake by barley. Plant Physiol 65:160–164
Glenn JC, Gordon TJ, Florescu E (2008) The millennium project: state of the future. World Federation of UN Associations, Washington, DC
Gordon B (2005) Maximizing irrigated corn yields in the Great Plains. Better Crops 89(2):8–10
GPRI (2014) Phosphorus. http://phosphorusfutures.net/. Accessed 5 Aug 2014
Greenwood DJ, Cleaver TJ, Turner MK, Hunt J, Niendorf KB, Loquens SMH (1980) Comparison of the effects of potassium fertilizer on the yield, potassium content and quality of 22 different vegetable and agricultural crops. J Agric Sci 95(2):441–456
Hamza MA, Anderson WK (2005) Soil compaction in cropping systems: a review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil Tillage Res 82:121–145
Hartley TN, Macdonald AJ, McGrath SP, Zhao FJ (2013) Historical arsenic contamination of soil due to long-term phosphate fertiliser applications. Environ Pollut 180:259–264
Hassan SW, Oad FC, Tunio S, Candahi AW, Siddiqui MH, Oad SM, Jagirani AW (2010) Effect of N application and N splitting strategy on maize N uptake, biomass production and physio-agronomic characteristics. Sarhad J Agric 26(4):551–558
Havlin JL, Beaton JD, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL (1999) Soil fertility and fertilizers: an introduction to nutrient management, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Hebbar SS, Ramachandrappa BK, Nanjappa HV, Prabhakar M (2004) Studies on NPK drip fertigation in field grown tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Eur J Agron 21:117–127
Hietz P, Turner BL, Wanek W, Richter A, Nock CA, Wright SJ (2011) Long-term change in the nitrogen cycle of tropical forests. Science 334(6056):664. doi:10.1126/science.1211979
Hou Z, Li P, Gong J, Wang Y (2007) Effects of fertigation scheme on N uptake and N use efficiency in cotton. Plant Soil 290:115–126
Hussain S, Maqsood MA (2011) Root zone temperature influences nutrient accumulation and use in maize. Pak J Bot 43:1551–1556
Hussain S, Rahmatullah, Maqsood MA, Kanwal S (2010) Root-zone temperature influences zinc requirement of maize cultivars on a calcareous loam soil. J Plant Nutr 33:1960–1969
Hussain S, Maqsood M, Rahmatullah (2011) Zinc release characteristics from calcareous soils using diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid and other organic acids. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:1870–1881
Hussain S, Maqsood MA, Aziz T, Basra SMA (2013) Zinc bioavailability response curvature in wheat grains under incremental zinc applications. Arch Agron Soil Sci 59:1001–1016
Jaga PK, Patel Y (2012) An overview of fertilizers consumption in India: determinants and outlook for 2020 – a review. Int J Sci Eng Technol 1(6):285–291
Jat ML, Gerard B (2014) Nutrient management and use efficiency in wheat systems of South Asia, 1st edition. Adv Agron 125:171–259
Javied S, Mehmood T, Chaudhry M., Tufail M and Irafan N (2009) Heavy metal pollution from phosphate rock used for the production of fertilizer in Pakistan. Micro chemical Journal 91: 94–99
Javid A, Bajwa R, Manzoor T (2011) Biosorption of heavy metals by pretreated biomass of Aspergillus niger. Pak J Bot 43:419–425
Ju XT, Kou CL, Christie P, Dou ZX, Zhang FS (2014) Changes in the soil environment from excessive application of fertilizers and manures to two contrasting intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain. Environ Pollut 145:497–506
Junejo N, Khanif YM, Dharejo KA, Hanafi MM, Wan-Yunus WMZ (2011) Reduced NH3 losses by coating urea with biodegradable polymers and Cu in a sandy soil. Afr J Biotechnol 10:10618–10625
Kanwal S, Rahmatullah, Maqsood MA, GulBakhat HFS (2009) Zinc requirement of maize hybrids and indigenous varieties on Udic Haplustalf. J Plant Nutr 32(3):470–478
Kaur T, Brar BS, Dhillon NS (2007) Soil organic matter dynamics as affected by long-term use of organic and inorganic fertilizers under maize-wheat cropping system. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 10:110–121
Keeney DR, Sahrawat KL (1986) Nitrogen transmissions in flooded rice soils. ASA, Madison, WI
Kongshaug G, Bockman OC, Kaarstad O, Morka H (1992) Inputs of trace elements to soils and plants, Proc. Chemical Climatology and Geomedical Problems, Norsk Hydro: Oslo, Norway
Koohafkan P, Altieri MA, Gimenez EH (2012) Green agriculture: foundations for biodiverse, resilient and productive agricultural systems. Int J Agric Sustain 10:61–75
Krauss A (2004) Balanced fertilization, the key to improve fertilizer use efficiency. In: AFA 10th international annual conference Cairo, Egypt, 20–22 Jan 2004
Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik TJ (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Adv Agron 87:85–156
Lahmar R, Bationo BA, Dan Lamso N et al (2012) Tailoring conservation agriculture technologies to West Africa semi-arid zones: building on traditional local practices for soil restoration. Field Crop Res 132:158–167
Lehmann J, Schroth G (2003) Nutrient leaching. In: Schroth G, Sinclair F (eds) Trees, crops and soil fertility. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 151–166
Leung AOW, Luksemburg WJ, Wong AS, Wong MH (2007) Spatial distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in soil and combusted residue at Guiyu, an electronic waste recycling site in Southeast China. Environ Sci Technol 41:2730–2737
Li Y, Zhang W, Ma L et al (2013) An analysis of China’s fertilizer policies: impacts on the industry, food security, and the environment. J Environ Qual 42:972–981
Liang X, Gao Y, Zhang X, Tian Y, Zhang Z et al (2014) Effect of optimal daily fertigation on migration of water and salt in soil, root growth and fruit yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in solar-greenhouse. PLoS One 9(1):e86975. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086975
Liu C, Wang K, Zheng X (2012a) Responses of N2O and CH4 fluxes to fertilizer nitrogen addition rates in an irrigated wheat-maize cropping system in northern China. Biogeosciences 9:839–850
Liu G, Li Y, Alva AK, Porterfield DM, Dunlop J (2012b) Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency of potato and cereal crops by optimizing temperature, moisture, balanced nutrients and oxygen bioavailability. J Plant Nutr 35:428–441
Liu S, Zhang L, Jiang J, Chen N, Yang X, Xiong Z, Zou J (2012c) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice seedling nurseries under flooding and moist irrigation regimes in Southeast China. Sci Total Environ 426:166–171
Loganathan P, Hedley MJ (1997) Downward movement of cadmium and phosphorus from phosphatic fertilizers in pasture soil in New Zealand. Environ Pullut 95(3):319–324
Lu W., Lindau CW, Pardue JH, Patrick WH, WH Jr, Reddy KR, Khind CS (1989) Poyential of phenyl phosphorodiamidate and N- (n butyl) thiophosphoric tri amide for inhibiting urea hydrolysis in simulated oxidized and reduced soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Analysis 20:775–788
Lynch J (1995) Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol 109:7–13
Lynch JP (2007) Turner review no. 14. Roots of the second revolution. Aust J Bot 55:493–512
Lynch JP (2011) Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiol 156:1041–1049
Mackay AD, Barber SA (1984) Soil temperature effects on root growth and phosphorus uptake by corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:818–823
Mahler RL, Naylor DV, Fredrickson MK (1984) Hot water extraction of boron from soils using sealed plastic pouches. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:479–492
Malavolta E (1985) Potassium status of tropical and subtropical region soils. In: Munson R (ed) Potassium in agriculture. ASA CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 163–200
Mallarino AP, Wittry DJ (2004) Efficacy of grid and zone soil sampling approaches for site-specific assessment of phosphorus, potassium, pH, and organic matter. Precis Agric 5:131–144
Manivannan P, Jayachandran SS (2011) A study of air pollution around a fertilizer plant. IUP J Environ Sci V(4):21–25
Maqsood MA, Rahmatullah, Kanwal S, Aziz T, Ashraf M (2009) Evaluation of Zn distribution among grain and straw of twelve indigenous wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Pak J Bot 41(1):225–231
Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press International, San Diego, CA
Mehadi AA, Taylor RW, Shuford JW (1990) Prediction of fertilizer phosphate requirement using the Langmuir adsorption maximum. Plant Soil 122:267–270
Mengel K, Haeder HE (1973) Potassium availability and its effect on crop production. Potash Rev 11:1
Mi GH, Chen FJ, Wu QP, Lai NW, Yuan LX, Zhang FS (2010) Ideotype root architecture for efficient N acquisition by maize in intensive cropping systems. Sci China Life Sci 53:1369–1373
Mo, CH., Cai, Q Y., Li, YH., Zeng, QY (2008) Occurrence of priority organic pollutants in the fertilizers, China. J Hazardous Materials 152:1208–1213
Mosier AR, Syers JK, Freney JR (2004) Agriculture and the nitrogen cycle. Assessing the impacts of fertilizer use on food production and the environment. Scope-65. Island Press, London
Mueller TG, Pierce FJ, Schabenberger O, Warncke DD (2001) Map quality for site-specific fertility management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1547–1558
Mulder WJ, Gosselink RJA, Vingerhoeds MH et al (2011) Lignin based controlled release coatings. Ind Crops Prod 34:915–920
Munson RD (ed) (1985) Potassium in agriculture. American Society Agronomy, Madison, WI
Nastri A, Toderi G, Bernati E, Govi G (2000) Ammonia volatilization and yield response from urea applied to wheat with urease (NBPT) and nitrification (DCD) inhibitors. Agrochimica 44:231–239
Neales TF (1960) Some effects of boron on root growth. Aust J Biol Sci 13(3):232–248
Ni B, Liu M, Lü S et al (2011a) Environmentally friendly slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. J Agric Food Chem 59:10169–10175
Ni BL, Liu MZ, Lu SY, Xie LH, Wang YF (2011b) Environmentally friendly slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. J Agric Food Chem 59:10169–10175. doi:10.1021/jf202131z
Nunes JA, Batista BL, Rodrigues JL, Caldas NM, Neto JAG, Barbosa F Jr (2010) A simple method based on ICP-MS for estimation of background levels of arsenic, cadmium, cooper, manganese, nickel, lead and selenium in blood of the Brazilian population. J Toxicol Environ Health 73:878–887
Ongley ED (1996) Fertilizers as water pollutants. In: Control of water pollution from agriculture – FAO irrigation and drainage paper 55. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Ortiz-Monasterio JI, Matson PA, Panek J, Naylor RL (1996) Nitrogen fertilizer management: consequences for N2O and NO emissions in Mexican irrigated wheat. In: Transactions 9th nitrogen workshop. Technische Universitat Braunschweig, Braunschweig, pp 531–534
Osman KT (2013a) Soil organic matter. Springer, Dordrecht
Osman KT (2013b) Soils: principles, properties and management. Springer Science Business Media, Dodrecht, Netherland
Palm CA, Myers RJK, Nandwa SM (1997) Combined use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources for soil fertility maintenance and replenishment. In: Buresh RJ, Sanchez PA, Calhoun F (eds) Replenishing soil fertility in Africa. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 193–217
Pathak MD (1999) Groundwater development in Maharashtra State, India. In: 25th WEDC Integrated development for water supply and sanitation Conference Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Pierce FJ, Sadler EJ (1997) Adequacy of current fertilizer recommendations for site-specific management. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI
Prasad R (2008) Efficient fertilizer use: the key to food security and better environment. J Trop Agric 47:1–17
Pregitzer KS, King JS (2005) Effect of soil temperature on nutrient uptake. In: BassiriRad H (ed) Nutrient acquisition by plants, an ecological perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 277–310
Quevauviller P, Lachica M, Barahona E et al (1996) Interlaboratory comparison of EDTA and DTPA procedures prior to certification of extractable trace elements in calcareous soil. Sci Total Environ 178:127–132
Radel RJ, Randle AA, Gauntney J, Brock BR, Williams HM (1992) Thiophosphoryl triamide: a dual purpose urease/nitrification inhibitor. Fertil Res 31:275–280
Rahman MM, Amano T, Shiraiwa T (2009) Nitrogen use efficiency and recovery from N fertilizer under rice based cropping systems. Aust J Crop Sci 3:336–351
Rahmatullah, Gill MA, Shaikh BZ, Salim M (1994) Bioavailability and distribution of P among inorganic fractions in calcareous soils. Arid Soil Res Rehab 8:227–234
Raun WR, Johnson GV (1999) Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron J 91:357–363
Raven KP, Loeppert RH (1997) Trace element composition of fertilizers and soil amendments. J Environ Qual 26:551–557
Rehman H, Aziz T, Farooq M, Wakeel A, Rengel Z (2012) Zinc nutrition in rice production systems: a review. Plant Soil 361:203–226
Roberts TL (2008) Improving nutrient use efficiency. Turk J Agric For 32:177–182
Roy AH, Hammond LL (2004) Challenges and opportunities for the fertilizer industry. In: Mosier AR, Syers JK, Freney JR (eds) Agriculture and the nitrogen cycle: assessing the impacts of fertilizer use on food production and the environment. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 233–243
Sadras VO, Lemaire G (2014) Quantifying crop nitrogen status for comparisons of agronomic practices and genotypes. Field Crops Res 164:54–64
Salvagiotti F, Castellarin JM, Miralles DJ, Pedrol HM (2009) Sulfur fertilization improves nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by increasing nitrogen uptake. Field Crop Res 113:170–177
Sanchez PA, Shepherd KD, Soule MJ et al (1997) Soil fertility replenishment in Africa: an investment in natural resource capital. In: Buresh RJ, Sanchez PA, Calhoun FG (eds) Replenishing soil fertility in Africa. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1–46
Sattari SZ, Bouwman AF, Giller KE, van Ittersum MK (2012) Residual soil phosphorus as the missing piece in the global phosphorus crisis puzzle. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:6348–6353
Savci S (2012) An agricultural pollutant: chemical fertilizer. Int J Environ Sci Dev 3(1):77–80
Seniczak S, Dabrowski J, Klimek A, Kaczmarek S (1998) The mites associated with young Scots pine forests polluted by a copper smelting works in Glogow, Poland. In: Mitchell R, Horn D, Needham GR, Welbourn WC (eds) Acarology IX: Proceedings, vol 1. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH, pp 573–574
Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, Li H, Bai Z, Chen X, Zhang W, Zhang F (2011) Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol 156:997–1005
Shen J, Li C, Mi G, Li L, Yuan L, Jiang R, Zhang F (2012) Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China. J Exp Bot. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers342
Shorrocks V (1997) The occurrence and correction of boron deficiency. Plant Soil 193:121–148
Sitthaphanit S, Limpinuntana V, Toomsan B, Panchaban S, Bell RW (2009) Fertilizer strategies for improved nutrient use efficiency on sandy soils in high rainfall regimes. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. doi:10.1007/s10705-009-9253-z
Smeck NE (1985) Phosphorus dynamics in soils and landscapes. Geoderma 36:185–199
Smith CJ, Freney JR, Sherlock RR, Galbally IE (1991) The fate of urea nitrogen applied in a foliar spray to wheat at heading. Fertil Res 28:129–138. doi:10.1007/BF01049743
Soltanpour PN (1985) Use of ammonium bicarbonate DTPA soil test to evaluate elemental availability and toxicity 1. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 16:323–338
Sonmez S, Kaplan M, Somnez NK, Kaya H, Uz I (2007) Effect of both soil copper applications and foliar copper application frequencies on macronutrients contents of tomato plants. Asian J Chem 19:5372–5384
Sowers KE, Pan WL, Miller BC, Smith JL (1994) Nitrogen use efficiency of split nitrogen application in soft white winter wheat. Agron J 86:942–948
Strandberg B, Damgaard C, Dalgaard T (2013) Time matters: effect of time since transition to organic farming on hedgerow ground vegetation. Agric Ecosyst Environ. http://orgprints.org/23272
Swinton SM, Lowenberg-DeBoer J (1998) Evaluating the profitability of site-specific farming. J Prod Agric 11:439–446
Tan KH (2011) Principles of soil chemistry, 4th edn. CRC Press, Taylors and Francis Group, New York
Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds) (1983) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Society Agronomy, Madison, WI
Terman GL (1977) Yields and nutrient accumulation by determinate soybeans, as affected by applied nutrients. American Society Agronomy, Madison, WI
Treadweell DD, Hochmuth GJ, Hochmuth RC, Simmone EH, Davis LL, Laughlin WL, Li Y, Olczyk T, Sprenkel RK, Osborne LS (2007) Nutrient management in organic greenhouse herb production: where are we now? Hortic Technol 17:461–466
Tunney H, Breeuwsma A, Withers PJA, Ehlert PAI (1997) Phosphorus fertiliser strategies: present and future. In: Tunney H, Carton OT, Brooks PC, Johnston AE (eds) Phosphorus loss from soil to water. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 177–203
Uma KO (1993) Nitrates in shallow (regolith) aquifers around Sokoto Town. Niger Environ Geol 21:70–76
UNEP (2000) Mineral fertilizer production and the environment, Part 1. The fertilizer industry’s manufacturing processes and environmental issues. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Paris
Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for recurring a non-renewable resources. New Phytol 157:423–447
Vann MC, Fisher LR, Jordan DL, Smith WD, Hardy DH, Stewart AM (2013) Potassium rate and application effect on flue-cured tobacco. Agron J 105:304–310
Viets FG Jr (1962) Micronutrient availability, chemistry and availability of micronutrients in soils. J Agric Food Chem 10:174–178
Vitousek PM, Naylor R, Crews T, David MB, Drinkwater LE, Holland E, Johnes PJ, Katzenberger J, Martinelli LA, Matson PA, Nziguheba G, Ojima D, Palm CA, Robertson GP, Sanchez PA, Townsend AR, Zhang FS (2009) Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science 324:19
Watanabe FS, Olsen SR (1965) Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 29:677–678
White PJ, Broadley MR (2009) Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets—iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytol 182:49–84
Xie L, Liu M, Ni B et al (2011) Slow-release nitrogen and boron fertilizer from a functional superabsorbent formulation based on wheat straw and attapulgite. Chem Eng J 167:342–348
Yamoah CF, Bationo A, Shapiro R, Koala S (2002) Trend and stability analyses of millet yields treated with fertilizer and crop residues in the Sahel. Field Crops Res 75:53–62
Yang Y-C, Zhang M, Zheng L et al (2011) Controlled release urea improved nitrogen use efficiency, yield, and quality of wheat. Agron J 103:479–485
Zaman M, Nguyen ML, Blennerhassett JD, Quin BF (2005) Increasing the utilization of urea fertilizer by pasture. In: Currie LD, Hanly JA (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on developments in fertilizer application technologies and nutrient management. Occasional report no. 18, Fertilizer and Lime Research Center, Massey University, Palmerston North
Zhang FS, Cui ZL, Fan MS, Zhang W, Chen X, Jiang R (2011) Integrated soil-crop system management: reducing environmental risk while increasing crop productivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in China. J Environ Qual 40:1051–1057. doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0292
Zhang WF, Ma L, Huang GQ, Wu L, Chen X, Zhang F (2013) The development and contribution of nitrogenous fertilizer in china and challenges faced by the country. Sci Agric Sin 46:3161–3171
Zhao BQ, Li XY, Liu H et al (2011) Results from long-term fertilizer experiments in China: the risk of groundwater pollution by nitrate. NJAS Wageningen J Life Sci 58:177–183
Zhengli H, Zuxiang Z, Keneng Y, Changyong W (1988) Potential phosphate sorptivity value from Langmuir equation and its application for phosphate fertilizer recommendation. Acta Pedol Sin 4:10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aziz, T., Maqsood, M.A., Kanwal, S., Hussain, S., Ahmad, H.R., Sabir, M. (2015). Fertilizers and Environment: Issues and Challenges. In: Hakeem, K. (eds) Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23162-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23162-4_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23161-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23162-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)