Abstract
This chapter draws attention to bodily boundaries between species of bacteria and the bodies of ticks, pets and humans, examining how ‘spot-on’ treatments for protection against ticks and fleas are used to protect human and companion animal bodies, relationships, and spaces from the threats of parasites. Such threats, it is argued, are controlled on the bodies of pets through the creation of ‘toxic skin’ that comes to serve as a protective boundary between human bodies and spaces and the threats of parasites. Suggesting that the parasitic relation can be used as an analytical tool for engaging with the politics of multispecies codependencies, the chapter addresses how parasitic relations challenge notions of human exceptionalism and the integrity of bodily boundaries. It demonstrates how spot-on treatments respond to such challenges by drawing lines through and around relations between human and non-human-animal bodies premised on the priority of particular bodily perspectives and ways of relating. The chapter concludes with the consideration that ticks, in spite of being an unwelcome parasite conceptualised and experienced as a threat, may be seen as the companion species par excellence as they bind together and are bound with a multitude of other species.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
www.Frontline.com/ (USA) http://uk.Frontline.com/Pages/default.aspx (UK) http://Frontline.se.merial.com/html/play/index.asp (SWEDEN). The adverts described have or will probably be replaced. Unfortunately, due to copyright restrictions, the images cannot be reproduced here; however, screen grabs are available for illustrative purposes from the author.
- 2.
http://www.who.int/immunization/topics/tick_encephalitis/en/, accessed 3/5/11.
- 3.
Although I recognise that the term pet is a problematic term, it is used here to avoid confusion between companion animal and companion species, which is dealt with towards the end of the chapter.
- 4.
Mutualism refers to two or more organisms in close association where both organisms benefit directly – a prime example is the union between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and root nodules in leguminous plants. Commensalism is used to refer to organisms in close association where one organism benefits with no direct cost to the other. The mutualism, commensalism, parasitism distinction becomes less significant when considered in relation to longer time frames, and given the more dynamic understandings of parasitism described in this chapter, this distinction becomes less significant.
- 5.
http://Frontline.us.merial.com/prd.asp, accessed 11-11-11.
- 6.
http://uk.Frontline.com/products/spot-on/Pages/How-FRONTLINE-Spot-On-Works.aspx, accessed 11-11-11.
- 7.
9.9 % of reported cases in cats and 3.3 % in dogs with a total reported cases = 316.
- 8.
4.5–9 kg.
- 9.
This is not to attend to the transgressive and usually illegal acts of beastiality, but acknowledge the social-, economic-, personal- and care-filled intimacies of choosing to live with other species (see Rudy 2011 for a discussion of this point).
References
Armstrong, P. M., Brunet, L. R., Spielman, A., & Telford, S. R. (2001). Risk of Lyme disease: Perceptions of residents of a lone star tick-infested community. Bulletin of the world Health Organisation, 79, 916–925.
Balogh, Z., Egyedb, L., Ferenczia, E., Bána, E., Szomora, K. N., Takácsa, M., & Berencsia, G. (2012). Experimental infection of goats with tick-borne encephalitis virus and the possibilities to prevent virus transmission by raw goat milk. Intervirology, 55, 194–200.
Barret, N. P., Schober-Bendixen, S., & Ehrlich, H. J. (2003). History of TBE vaccines. Vaccine, 21, 41–49.
Beck, U. (1989). The risk society. London: Sage.
Belk, R. W. (1996). Metaphoric relationships with pets. Society and Animals, 4(2), 121–145.
Caini, S., Szomor, K., Ferenczi, E., Székelyné Gáspár, Á., Csohán, Á., Krisztalovics, K., Molnár, Z., & Horváth, J. K. (2012). Tick-borne encephalitis transmitted by unpasteurised cow milk in western Hungary, September to October 2011. Euro Surveillance, 17, 1–5.
Cox, C. (2005). Insecticide factsheet: Fipronil. Journal of Pesticide Reform, 25, 10–15.
Drisdelle, R. (2010). Parasites: Tales of humanity’s most unwelcome guests. Berkley: University of California Press.
Fritz, R., Orlingera, K. K., Hofmeistera, Y., Janeckia, K., Trawegera, A., Perez-Burgosa, L., Barretta, P. N., & Kreila, T. R. (2012). Quantitative comparison of the cross-protection induced by tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccines based on European and Far Eastern virus subtypes. Vaccine, 30, 1165–1169.
Garret, L. (1994). The coming plague: Newly emerging diseases in a world out of balance. New York: Penguin.
Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.
Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. J. (2012). Awash in urine: DES and Premarin® in multispecies response-ability. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40, 301–316.
Hatley, J. (2011). Blood intimacies and biodicy: Keeping faith with ticks. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 63–76.
Hernstein Smith, B. (2004). Animal relatives, difficult relations. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13, 1–15.
Hinchliffe, S., Allen, J., Lavau, S., Bingham, N., & Carter, S. (2012). Biosecurity and the topologies of infected life: From borderlines to borderlands. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00538.x.
Holzman, H., Aberle, S. W., Stiasny, K., Werner, P., Mischak, A., Zainer, B., Netzer, M., Koppi, S., Bechter, E., & Heinz, F. X. (2009). Tick-borne encephalitis from eating goat cheese in a mountain region of Austria. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 15, 10.
Kaufman, W. R. (2008). Factors that determine sperm precedence in ticks, spiders and insects: A comparative study. In A. S. Bowman & P. Nuttall (Eds.), Ticks: Biology, disease and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kunz, C., & Heinz, F. X. (2003). Editorial tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccine, 21, S1–S2.
Margulis, L. (1981) 1993. Symbiosis in cell evolution: Microbial communities in the archean and proterozoic eons. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
McHugh, S. (2011). Animal stories: Narrating across species lines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Miller, H., Conrad, A., Barker, S., & Daugherty, C. (2007). Distribution and phylogenetic analyses of an endangered tick, Amblyomma spenodonti. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 34, 97–105.
Pfeffer, M., & Dobler, G. (2011). Tick-borne encephalitis virus in dogs – Is this an issue? Parasites & Vectors, 4, 59.
Rizzoli, A., Hauffe, H. C., Carpi, G., Vourc’h, G. I., Neteler, M., & Rosa, R. (2011). Lyme Borreliosis in Europe. Euro Surveillance, 16(27), 19906.
Roberts, L. S., & Janovy, J. (2009). Gerald D. Schmidt and Larry S. Roberts’ foundations of parasitology (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Rudy, K. (2011). Loving animals: Towards a new animal advocacy. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Sapp, J. (1994). Evolution by association: A history of symbiosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Serres, M. (2007). The parasite (trans: Scher, L. R.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Shapiro, E. D., & Gerber, M. A. (2000). Lyme disease. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 31, 533–42.
Steere, A. C. (1994). Lyme disease: A growing threat in urban populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 91, 2378–2383.
Theodossopoulos, D. (2005). Care, order and usefulness: The context of the human-animal relationship in a Greek island community. In J. Knight (Ed.), Animals in Person: Cultural perspectives on human-animal intimacies. Oxford: Berg.
Tingle, C. D., Rother, J. A., Dewhurst, C. F., Lauer, S., & King, W. J. (2000). Health and environmental effects of fipronil. London: Pesticide Action Network UK.
USEPA. (1998). Memorandium: Fipronil – review of incident reports for three products; DP Barcodes: 241621, D241622, D241623 and D245344. USEPA.
USEPA. (2000). Memorandum: Fipronil – review of incident reports for three products: DP Barcodes: D261920, D261922 and D261923. USEPA.
USEPA. (2010a). Data evaluation record for enhanced spot-on reporting dog product reg no. 65331–3. USEPA.
USEPA. (2010b). Data evaluation record for enhanced spot-on reporting dog product reg no. 65331–5. USEPA.
USEPA. (2010c). Memorandium: Review of enhanced reporting of 2008 spot-on incidents. USEPA.
van Loon, J. (2000). Parasite-politics: On the significance of symbiosis and assemblage in theorising community formations. In C. Pierson & S. Tormey (Eds.), Politics at the edge. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage.
Zimmer, C. (2000). Parasite Rex: Inside the bizarre world of nature’s most dangerous creatures. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bull, J. (2016). Toxic Skin and Animal Mops: Ticks and Humanimal Vulnerabilities. In: Käll, L. (eds) Bodies, Boundaries and Vulnerabilities. Crossroads of Knowledge. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22494-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22494-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22493-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22494-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)