Abstract
Know how to position and prepare the patient.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
FormalPara Objectives-
Know how to position and prepare the patient.
-
Know how to get open access to the peritoneal cavity/first trocar.
-
Know how to explore the abdominal cavity.
-
Know how to expose solid organs and hollow viscus.
-
Know how to control bleeding and contamination.
-
Know the principles of laparoscopic bowel resection and anastomosis.
-
Know the principles of laparoscopic lavage and abdominal drainage.
Since its initial description in 1985, laparoscopy has acquired an increasing place in the diagnostic and therapeutic emergency setting and now has well-defined indications in the armamentarium of surgery for acute diseases. Laparoscopy is not only a technical variant or an additional therapeutic option; it has become a genuine component of the array of surgical treatment.
1 Ergonomics
-
Are important issues and directly affect outcomes
-
Entail patient position and preparation, the surgeon and table position, the operating room (OR) setup, the trocar setup, and the instruments and technology needed
1.1 Patient Position and Preparation
-
The patient is positioned supine, legs spread apart allowing the (assisting) surgeon to stand between the legs enabling access to any point of the abdominal cavity including the diaphragm.
-
Precautions must be taken so that the patient does not slide when the table is inclined or tilted.
-
Pressure points should be protected.
-
Arms in adduction especially in emergencies of the lower abdomen or pelvis.
-
Routine bladder catheter inserted (not only when lower abdominal procedures are indicated but also because the duration of the procedure is often unknown).
-
Patient should be prepped and draped in order to correctly deal with any unexpected findings and intraoperative accident or to convert without delay.
1.2 Surgeon and Table Position
-
The patient, table, and monitor should be positioned so that full access can be obtained to all four quadrants of the abdomen as required (Fig. 7.1).
-
The surgeon should be able to move to either side or between the legs as necessary or preferred.
-
The table should allow inclination or tilting as necessary.
1.3 Monitor and Screen Position
-
Optimal ergonomics call for:
-
A flat screen placed at 15° below eye level (or at the gaze-down level, i.e., at the level of the surgeon’s elbows).
-
The monitor placed so that the surgeon’s vision, hands, target, and screen are aligned.
-
Either several monitors or the video monitors should be mobile and moved according to the site of the pathology to maintain the [ideal] alignment necessary for optimal ergonomic conditions.
-
1.4 Trocar Setup, Creation of Pneumoperitoneum, and Instrumentation
-
Trocar setup:
-
Initial trocar layout depends on clinical findings and diagnostic probabilities:
-
Triangulation is recommended to allow resection and adequate suturing as necessary.
-
Lateralization of trocar insertion is recommended in case of intestinal distension (intestinal obstruction or ileus secondary to peritonitis or abscess).
-
Avoid insertion through previous scars (incisions or drainage sites) for the first trocar.
-
Add additional trocars as needed.
-
-
Should allow full and unrestricted exploration of the entire abdominal cavity as necessary
-
First trocar insertion:
-
Routine open approach is strongly recommended (without use of the Veress needle), especially when there is considerable intestinal distension.
-
The periumbilical approach is recommended in case of diagnostic doubt, unless prior surgery indicates otherwise.
-
-
Further trocars can be inserted once a preliminary survey of the entire abdominal cavity has shown that there is no need to abort or to convert to a laparotomy.
-
Two trocars are placed on the right and left and lateral to the rectus muscle sheath at the level of the umbilicus (Fig. 7.2).
-
-
-
Pneumoperitoneum
-
Should be established progressively, under close monitoring:
-
Insufflation should be stopped immediately in case of any drop in blood pressure, unexplained tachycardia, or rise in respiratory pressure.
-
If the patient stabilizes, laparoscopy can be resumed but with extreme caution (reduced abdominal pressure and close monitoring).
-
-
-
Instruments
-
30° scopes are recommended:
-
The 10 mm scope offers better lighting and view.
-
The 5 and 3 mm laparoscopes offer less trauma but reduced lighting and view.
-
-
-
Essential instrumentation includes:
-
3, 5, 10, and 12 mm ports
-
Atraumatic grasping forceps and clamps
-
Right-angle forceps
-
Titanium and absorbable clips
-
At least two needle holders
-
Energy-driven devices for hemostasis and cutting according to availability and surgeon preference
-
Scissors
-
Adequate suction-irrigation device
-
Suture material and endoloops
-
Umbilical or vascular tapes
-
Rubber drains, tourniquets, clamps and bulldog clamps, and bowel and vascular clamps
-
Plastic bags for the extraction of the operative specimen as required
-
2 Exploration of the Abdominal Cavity
-
Hemostasis
-
Active bleeding in unstable patients requires open surgery.
-
Otherwise, in stable patients:
-
Small vessels can be closed with clips or with 3/0 monofilament sutures or with modern coagulation devices (ultrasonic devices or Ligasure™).
-
Large wound surfaces and lacerations of solid organs can be sealed quickly and effectively with autologous fibrin adhesive (Tisseal®, Baxter) and tamponed in combination with a fleece (Hemopatch®, Baxter).
-
More active bleeding can temporarily be stopped by applying pressure followed by FloSeal® for permanent hemostasis.
-
-
3 Indications
The wide range of disease that may be diagnosed and treated by emergency laparoscopy includes acute cholecystitis, perforated duodenal ulcer, appendicitis and other causes of acute right lower quadrant pain including adnexal disease, complicated diverticular disease, intestinal obstruction including intussusception, incarcerated or strangulated inguinal or incisional hernia, peritonitis of all origins, iatrogenic perforations, suspicion of mesenteric ischemia, as well as certain postoperative complications.
If the diagnosis is not recognized beforehand, the surgeon should note the area of maximal inflammation, concentration of pus, or blood, as in the case of ruptured ectopic pregnancy.
3.1 Acute Cholecystitis
-
Acute cholecystitis requires cholecystectomy.
-
Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis can be challenging because of:
-
Inflammation (difficult dissection) of the gallbladder
-
Increased bleeding
-
Fragility (perforation is possible)
-
Adhesion to adjacent organs
-
Altered anatomy
-
-
-
Timing of operation
-
Although still debated, most authors agree that early (within 7 days of onset of signs) cholecystectomy appears to be safe and shortens the total hospital stay. In fact, as long as the patient is in good general health and there is no major anesthesia problem, early cholecystectomy can be performed within 48 h from onset.
-
Delaying cholecystectomy results in significantly higher conversion rates, surgical postoperative complications reoperation rates, and significantly longer postoperative hospital stay, without any advantages.
-
-
Of note, the main biliary ducts are at increased risk in acute cholecystitis, and this warrants particular attention.
-
As the critical view of safety (Fig. 7.3) is more difficult and the demarcation of Rouvière’s sulcus is present in only 70 % of patients, anterograde dissection, intraoperative cholangiograms (Fig. 7.4), and/or the use of indocyanine green is strongly recommended to landmark and delineate the biliary tree. Indocyanine green cholangiography has the advantage of delineation before any dissection takes place.
-
-
Ideal treatment is based on the acute cholecystitis Tokyo consensus guidelines:
-
Grade I (mild acute cholecystitis, with no organ dysfunction and limited disease
-
Grade II (moderate acute cholecystitis: extensive inflammation but no organ dysfunction)
-
Grade III (severe acute cholecystitis including gangrenous cholecystitis or empyema with organ dysfunction).
-
-
Both grades I and II (mild and moderate) cholecystitis can ideally be treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In case of intraoperative difficulties subtotal cholecystectomy can be performed (although there are no proven advantages).
-
Both grades II and III (moderate and severe) in high-risk patients can be treated by transhepatic drainage (cholecystostomy).
3.2 Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcer
-
Laparoscopic repair is feasible and should result in less postoperative pain and surgical site morbidity.
-
The treatment of choice is simple closure of the perforation (Fig. 7.5) and adequate medical treatment of Helicobacter pylori.
-
Sutures, glue, and/or omentum, sometimes associated.
-
A hybrid procedure consists of drawing the omentum through the perforation by means of an endolumenal endoscope.
-
Open repair might be better when:
-
Patients are hemodynamically unstable.
-
Patients are at risk for pneumoperitoneum.
-
Patients have already undergone previous upper GI surgery needing extensive adhesiolysis.
-
More extensive time-consuming operations are necessary.
-
Patients are at high risk (two or more Boey risk factors).
-
Chronic ulcer with a diameter of more than 20 mm is present.
-
-
3.3 Acute Appendicitis and Acute Pelvic Problems in the Female
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy (vs. open):
-
Can be advantageous in the obese and the elderly.
-
Can be performed in the pregnant women, but care is warranted to adjust trocar insertion to uterine height.
-
Stump closure is no longer a matter of debate: recent studies have reversed the purported advantages of staplers used routinely, and these should be reserved for patients when loop closure seems difficult or inappropriate (stump necrosis) or there is need for rapid closure. Higher costs for the staplers, however, must be considered, and loop-closure is often chosen instead
-
-
Adnexal torsion and ruptured ectopic pregnancy:
-
Ideal settings for emergency laparoscopic surgery.
-
Patient must be hemodynamically stable.
-
Requires specific equipment (vacuum, special suction probe) for tubal preservation.
-
3.4 Complicated Diverticular Disease
-
Hinchey stages I and IIa can be treated medically, sometimes combined with percutaneous drainage.
-
Patients with persistent septic signs after drainage and in those with Hinchey IIb, Hinchey III and IV require surgical treatment.
-
Laparoscopic treatment has been shown to be safe and as effective as open treatment for Hinchey IIb and III.
-
Source control consisting of resection of the perforated colon segment, with or without immediate anastomosis, is still the standard treatment and can be performed laparoscopically.
-
However, some surgeons advocate simple laparoscopic lavage, associated or not with suture and/or drainage, the goal being to avoid a major bowel resection and potentially a stoma:
-
Quantity: four liters of saline followed by drainage plus antibiotic therapy.
-
Decreases mortality and morbidity (particularly surgical site complications).
-
Suture or fibrin glue closure of the perforation (if obvious) can be attempted, sometimes reinforced with an omental patch.
-
Usually no further surgery is required.
-
-
3.5 Intestinal Obstruction
-
Laparoscopy can be indicated for obstruction related to adhesions or bands.
-
It is of prime important to avoid all abdominal scars for the creation of pneumoperitoneum and/or initial trocar insertion.
-
The first trocar insertion should be performed “open.” at a location at a distance from the expected site of obstruction, if possible avoiding any scars.
-
Intraoperatively, caution is warranted when running the distended intestinal loops.
-
The fragile serosa renders grasping and retraction dangerous. Tilting the table is of great help to move the distended and heavy bowel loops. The bowel should only be grasped at the mesenteric attachments (Fig. 7.6). It is recommendable first to find the collapsed loops and run them orally (Fig. 7.7).
-
Special atraumatic dissectors (Maryland) and retractors are a wise precaution.
-
Angled scopes may be useful for optimal viewing behind and lateral to adhesions, especially when mobilization of bowel is difficult.
-
Extreme caution is warranted in case of vascular compromise and/or necrotic bowel, as it is preferable to convert rather than to provoke a rupture with inundation of the peritoneal cavity with septic contents.
-
If necessary, intestinal resection with anastomosis may be performed via laparoscopy, but by using bulldog bowel clamps, spillage of septic intestinal contents has to be avoided at all costs (Fig. 7.8).
-
-
3.6 Incarcerated/Strangulated Hernias
-
Only cohort and case series studies have been published on laparoscopic repair of incarcerated groin hernias.
-
Either TEP or TAPP can be performed. but many surgeons would not recommend inserting prosthetic material in case of incarcerated hernia with intestinal necrosis or if resection is necessary.
-
Laparoscopy has been used to repair complicated and/or nonreducible retro-xiphoid, Morgagni or diaphragmatic hernias, paraesophageal hernias, rare acute abdominal wall hernias, such as supra-vesical and Spigelian, or obturator hernias, internal hernias.
3.7 Mesenteric Ischemia
-
As intestinal ischemia occurs most often in the elderly, frequently with comorbidity, diagnostic laparoscopy may be better tolerated (than laparotomy).
-
Of note, however, creation of pneumoperitoneum may have a potentially adverse effect on mesenteric blood flow: low intra-abdominal pressure is recommended.
-
After bowel resection with primary anastomosis trocars may be left in place to accomplish a second-look procedure, if indicated.
3.8 Peritonitis
-
Performed more and more often in peritonitis by skilled laparoscopic surgeons, laparoscopy can be an excellent choice to perform source control (perforation closure, resection), reduction of bacterial contamination (lavage), and prevention of persistent or recurrent infection.
-
Under low-pressure pneumoperitoneum not exceeding 12 mmHg, laparoscopic aspiration of gross purulent exudates, fecal debris, food particles, and intraperitoneal lavage is possible. Timing is important, as laparoscopy is best adapted to recent onset and localized peritonitis.
-
All lavage fluid should be completely aspirated before the abdominal cavity is closed.
-
The advantages of laparoscopic treatment of peritonitis include:
-
Complete exploration of the abdominal cavity with minimal parietal insult.
-
Most causes of peritonitis (perforated duodenal ulcer, perforated appendicitis, perforation in diverticular disease, postoperative leakage after index laparoscopic operations) can, if done quickly after onset, be treated adequately via laparoscopy.
-
Whenever needed, stoma may be fashioned laparoscopically.
-
3.9 Iatrogenic Perforations
-
Laparoscopy is an ideal method to treat iatrogenic perforations, the most common being perforations during colonoscopy.
-
Laparoscopic resection or suture repair of iatrogenic perforations is safe and is associated with reduced surgical and psychological stress for the patient because of its low morbidity and mortality.
-
Laparoscopic suture, peritoneal rinsing, and drainage can be accomplished under optimal conditions, often without the need for protective stoma if performed early (<24 h after perforation (the colon is usually prepared for the colonoscopy, limiting the spillage of fecal matter)).
-
Simple drainage performed laparoscopically also seems feasible for retroperitoneal ERCP perforations, but strict and close follow-up is necessary.
3.10 Immediate Laparoscopy for Postoperative Complications After Initial Laparotomy/Laparoscopy Operations
-
Several postoperative complications including bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess, small bowel obstruction, bile leak, ischemic bowel disease, retrieval of retained foreign bodies, and anastomotic leakage, if revision is necessary, may be treated laparoscopically
-
Indications for same-hospital stay include laparoscopic exploration and treatment of postoperative obstruction after laparoscopic bariatric surgery, reiterative adhesions, anastomotic leakage after colectomy, and gastrectomy. Of importance is the timing (as early as possible), the atraumatic handling of the gastrointestinal tract, and surgeon’s level of experience in advanced laparoscopy.
Selected Reading
Laparoscopic Treatment of the Acute Abdomen (Excluding Trauma)
Agresta F, Ciardo LF, Mazzarolo G, Michelet I, Orsi G, Trentin G, Bedin N. Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:9. doi:10.1186/1749-7922-1-9.
Agresta F, Ansolini L, Baiocchi GL, Bergamini C, Campanile FC, Carlucci M, Cocorullo G, Corradi A, Franzato B, Lupo M, Mandala V, Mirabella A, Pernazza G, Piccoli M, Staudacher C, Vettoretto N, Zago M, Lettieri E, Levati A, Peitrini D, Scaglione M, De Masi S, De Placido G, Francucci M, Rasi M, Fingerhut A, Uranüs S, Garantini S. Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d’Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell’Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2134–64.
Alamili M, Mcgenur RJ. Acute complicated diverticulitis managed by laparoscopic lavage. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1345–9.
Arnell TD. Minimally invasive reoperation following laparotomy. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2006;19:223–7.
Banz V, Gsponer T, Candinas D, Güller U. Population-based analysis of 4113 patients with acute cholecystitis. Defining the optimal time-point for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254:964–70.
Bertleff MJOE, Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment. Dig Dis. 2010;27:161–9.
Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcer: a prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987;205:22–6.
Brandt D, Gervaz P, Durmishi Y, Platon A, Morel P, Poletti PA. Percutaneous CT scan-guided drainage vs. antibiotherapy alone for Hinchey II diverticulitis: a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1533–8.
Campanelli G, Catena F, Ansaloni L. Prosthetic abdominal wall hernia repair in emergency surgery: from polypropylene to biological meshes. World J Emerg Surg. 2008;3:33. doi:10.1186/1749-7922-3-33.
Chu T, Chandhoke RA, Smith PC, Schwaitzberg SD. The impact of surgeon choice on the cost of performing laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1187–91. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1342-1.
Coimbra C, Bouffioux L, Kohnen L, Deroover A, Dresse D, Denoel A, Honoré P, Detry O. Laparoscopic repair of colonoscopic perforation: a new standard. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1514–7.
De Bakker JK, Dijksmann LM, Donkervoort SD. Safety and outcome of general surgical open and laparoscopic procedures during pregnancy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1574–8.
Deeba S, Purkayastha S, Paraskevas P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Zacharakis E. Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernias. JSLS. 2009;13:327–31.
Enochsson L, Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Fenyö G, Gudbjartson T, Kullman E, Ringqvist I, Sörensen S, Wenner J. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in overweight patients. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:387–92. doi:10.1007/s004640000334.
Eypasch E, Troidl H, Mennigen R, Spangenberger W, Barlow A. Laparoscopy via an indwelling cannula: an alternative to planned relaparotomy. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1395.
Favuzza J, Friel JC, Kelly JJ, Perugini R, Counihan TC. Benefits of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis. Int J Color Dis. 2009;24:797–801.
Fingerhut A, Chouillard E. Ergonomic and technical aspects of laparoscopy for trauma and non trauma emergencies. Eur Surg. 2005;37:8–14.
Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borie F. Prevention of complications in laparoscopic surgery. In: Eubanks S, Swanstrom L, Soper N, editors. Mastery of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery. Philadephia: Lippincott; 2004.
Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA. 2003;289:1639–44.
Gervaz P, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P, Huber O, Inan I. Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3373–8.
Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010;97:141–50.
Hamdan K, Somers S, Chand M. Management of late postoperative complications of bariatric surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1345–55.
Hemmila MR, Birkmeyer NJ, Arbabi S, Osborne NH, Wahl WL, Dimick JB. Introduction to propensity scores a case study on the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Arch Surg. 2010;145:939–45.
Hirota M, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Miura F, Hirata K, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Strasberg S, Pitt H, Gadacz TR, de Santibanes E, Gouma DJ, Solomkin JS, Belghiti J, Neuhaus H, Büchler MW, Fan ST, Ker CG, Padbury RT, Liau KH, Hilvano SC, Belli G, Windsor JA, Dervenis C. Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:78–82.
Jani K, Saxena AK, Vaghasia R. Omental plugging for large-sized duodenal peptic perforations: a prospective randomized study of 100 patients. South Med J. 2006;99:467–71.
Kazemier G, In’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1473–6.
Klarenbeek BR, Veenhof AA, Bergamaschi R, van der Peet DL, van den Broek WT, de Lange ES, Bemelman WA, Heres P, Lacy AM, Engel AF, Cuesta MA. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial short-term results of the sigma trial. Ann Surg. 2009;249:39–44.
Kumar RR, Kim JT, Haukoos JS, Macias LH, Dixon MR, Stamos MJ, Konyalian VR. Factors affecting the successful management of intra-abdominal abscesses with antibiotics and the need for percutaneous drainage. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:183–9.
Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1013–21.
Lee CW, Sarosi GA. Emergency ulcer surgery. Surg Clin N Am. 2011;91:1001–13.
Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S, Molkhou JM, Hay JM, Laborde Y, Gillet M, Fingerhut A. Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:641–6.
Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A. Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90:668–79.
Michalowski K, Bornman PC, Krige JEJ, Gallagher PJ, Terblanche J. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with complicated acute cholecystitis or fibrosis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:904–6.
Navez B, Tassetti V, Scohy JJ, Mutter D, Guiot P, Evrard S, Marescaux J. Laparoscopic management of acute peritonitis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:32–6.
Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W. The European association for endoscopic surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1121–43.
Rosin D, Zmora O, Khaikin M, Bar Zakai B, Ayalon A, Shabtai M. Laparoscopic management of surgical complications after a recent laparotomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:994–6.
Sackier JM. Emergency laparoscopy. In: Scott-Conner CEH, editor. The SAGES manual: fundamentals in laparoscopy and GI endoscopy. Berlin: Springer; 1999.
Sajid MS, Rimple J, Cheek E, Baig MK. Use of Endo-GIA versus endo-loop for securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review surgical laparoscopy. Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2009;19:11–5.
Sanna A, Adani GL, Anania G, Donini A. The role of laparoscopy in patients with suspected peritonitis: experience of a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003;13:17–9.
Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD001546.
Sgourakis G, Radtke A, Sotiropoulos GC, Dedemadi G, Karaliotas C, Fouzas I, Karaliotas C. Assessment of strangulated content of the spontaneously reduced inguinal hernia via hernia sac laparoscopy: preliminary results of a prospective randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2009;19:133–7.
Shukla PJ, Maharaj R, Fingerhut A. Ergonomics and technical aspects of minimal access surgery in acute surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36:3–9.
Tisherman SA, Ivy ME, Frangos SG, Kirton OC. Acute care surgery survey opinions of surgeons about a new training paradigm. Arch Surg. 2011;146:101–6.
Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandström P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11:183–93.
Zamir G, Reissman P. Diagnostic laparoscopy in mesenteric ischemia. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:390–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uranues, S., Fingerhut, A. (2016). Laparoscopy for Non-trauma Emergencies. In: Fingerhut, A., Leppäniemi, A., Coimbra, R., Peitzman, A., Scalea, T., Voiglio, E. (eds) Emergency Surgery Course (ESC®) Manual. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21338-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21338-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21337-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21338-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)