Abstract
An epistemically lucky agent manages to derive a true conclusion from an incomplete, or faulty, set of premises. The concept of epistemic luck is interesting because it appears that an agent acquires knowledge in these situations, when in fact, Western epistemologists tend to resist attributing knowledge to the agent. The Nyāya, on the other hand, would attribute a type of knowledge to the agent while denying that the agent has acquired a more robust type of knowledge. The Nyāya attribute knowledge to an agent despite the possibility of epistemic luck because they distinguish between two types of knowledge: knowledge simpliciter and a more robust sense of knowledge, which I call reflective knowledge, following Pritchard (2005).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Bhattacharya’s suggestion was given in private correspondence with Matilal.
References
Annaṁbhaṭṭa. 2003. Tarkasaṁgraha-dīpikā on Tarkasaṁgraha by Annaṁbhaṭṭa. Trans. G. Bhattacharya. Calcutta: Progressive Publishers.
Ganeri, Jonardon. 1999. Semantic powers: Meaning and the means of knowing in classical Indian philosophy, Oxford philosophical monographs. Oxford: Clarendon.
Gettier, Edmund. 2000. Is justified true belief knowledge? In Knowledge: Readings in contemporary epistemology, ed. Sven Bernecker and Fred Dretske, 13–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, Alvin. 2000. Discrimination and perceptual knowledge. In Knowledge: Readings in contemporary epistemology, ed. Sven Bernecker and Fred Dretske, 86–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matilal, B.K. 1986. Perception: An essay on classical Indian theories of knowledge. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Matilal, B.K. 2001. The word and the world: India’s contribution to the study of language, 3rd ed. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Mohanty, Jitendra Nath. 2002. Reason and tradition in Indian thought: An essay on the nature of Indian philosophical thinking, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.
Pritchard, Duncan. 2005. Epistemic luck. Oxford: Clarendon.
Shaw, J.L. 1996a. Cognition of cognition Part I: By Pandit Visvabandhu Tarkatīrtha translated from Bengali with explanatory notes. Journal of Indian Philosophy 24(2): 165–207.
Shaw, J.L. 1996b. Cognition of cognition Part II: By Pandit Visvabandhu Tarkatīrtha translated from Bengali with explanatory notes. Journal of Indian Philosophy 24(3): 231–264.
Shaw, J.L. 2004. Knowledge, belief and doubt: Some contemporary problems and their solutions from the Nyāya perspective. Paper presented at a meeting of the Society for Global Philosophy, 25 August: URL http://philosophyandculture.org/seminar0408shaw.html.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank Professor J.L. Shaw, who has spent a considerable amount of time and energy explaining the Nyāya theory of knowledge and translating numerous works into English so that the content of these works may be discussed and examined by modern philosophers. His contributions to the field of philosophy have made Indian philosophy, and particularly the Nyāya School, more accessible to everyone. He has been kind enough to allow me access to a draft of his paper, Knowledge, Belief and Doubt: Some Contemporary Problems and their Solutions from the Nyāya Perspective (2004) so that I could use it as a basis for this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doctor, P. (2016). Nyāya, J.L. Shaw and Epistemic Luck. In: Bilimoria, P., Hemmingsen, M. (eds) Comparative Philosophy and J.L. Shaw. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17873-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17873-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17872-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17873-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)