Abstract
An experiment was conducted to determine if consumers purchased products with many more functions than they actually used, and if so why. It was found that, in the case of calculators, the higher the variety seeking drive of the consumer, the higher his level of anticipated usage of functions in the future, and hence higher the number of functions purchased. It was also found that the actual number of functions used by a consumer relative to the total number of functions available in a product increased rapidly for a short time following purchase, and then stabilized. Further, the disconfirmation with product usage was found to decrease over the life of the product. The implications for future research have also been discussed.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Belk, Russell W. (1984), “Manifesto for a Consumer Behavior," 1984 AMA Winter Educators Conference: Scientific Method in Marketing. Eds. Paul F. Anderson and Michael J. Ryan, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 163–68.
Hirschman, Elizabeth C. (1980), “Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Jpvrnal pf Consumer Research, 7, 283–95.
Hoyer, Wayne D. and Nancy M. Ridgway. (1984), “Variety Seeking as an Explanation for Exploratory Purchase Behavior: A Theoretical Model," Advances in Consumer Research 11, 114–9.
McAlister, Leigh. (1982), “A Dynamic Attribute Satisfaction Model of Variety Seeking Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research. 9, 141–150.
McAlister, Leigh and Edgar A. Pessemier. (1982), “Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisplinary Review," Journal of Cpnsmner Research, 9, 311–22.
Midgley, David F. and Grahame R. Dowling. (1978), “Innovativeness: The Concept and its Measurement," Jpurnal of cpnsumer Research, 4, 229–42.
Price, Linda L. and Nancy M. Ridgway. (1983), “Development of a Scale to Measure Use innovat ivenes s," Advances in Consumer Research. 10, 679–84.
Raju, P. S. (1980), “Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics and Exploratory Behavior," Jpumal pf Cpnsmaer Research, 7, 272–82.
Raju P. S. and M. Venkatesan. (1980), “Exploratory Behavior in the Consumer Context: A State of Art Review," Advances in Consumer Research. 7, 258–63.
Rogers, Everett M. (1962) Diffusion of Innovativeness New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, Everett M. and Floyd F. Shoemaker. (1971) Communication of Innovations New York: The Free Press.
Zaichkoweky, Judith Lynne (1985), “Familiarity: Product Use, Involvement or Expertise?" in Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 12, eds. Elizabeth C. Hirshman and Morris B. Holbrook, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 296–99.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ram, S., Jung, HS. (2015). How Does Variety Seeking Affect Product Usage?. In: Hawes, J.M., Glisan, G.B. (eds) Proceedings of the 1987 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17052-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17052-7_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17051-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17052-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)