Abstract
Conflicts and complex emergencies provide the most pervasive context for contemporary humanitarian action as they drive more than 80% of current humanitarian need. Conflicts are a universal feature of society, although every conflict is unique in terms of its actors, causes, consequences and dynamics. For humanitarian organisations
the word ‘conflict’ is usually used with reference to countries where there is politically motivated violence, internally or internationally, and where several parties (e.g. states, communities, political parties or groups) are involved in acting out their disagreement using violence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Global Peace Index (2016), http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GPI-2016-Report_2.pdf; UN WHS Secretariat (2015).
- 2.
- 3.
Zicherman et al. (2011), p. 6. This study surveyed five members of the Conflict Sensitivity Consortium, ActionAid International, CAFOD, CARE International, Plan International and World Vision International.
- 4.
Id., p. 9.
- 5.
Anderson (1999).
- 6.
Loane (2011).
- 7.
Médecins Sans Frontières (2016, May 5), http://www.msf.org.uk/article/msf-to-pull-out-of-world-humanitarian-summit; UN Secretary-General (2016).
- 8.
In 2015, 75 hospitals managed or supported by Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) were bombed.
- 9.
- 10.
UN Secretary General, ibid.
- 11.
World Humanitarian Summit (2016).
- 12.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 13.
The Cold War demonstrated how allies such as the US, UK and USSR who fought a major war together can get locked into a dangerous conflagration within a matter of few years. At the same time, the coming together of two former enemies, Germany and France, under the same bloc showed a potential for reversing the conflict dynamics (Wallensteen 2007).
- 14.
- 15.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 16.
Galtung (1967), http://www.transcend.org/files/Galtung_Book_unpub_Theories_of_Peace_-_A_Synthetic_Approach_to_Peace_Thinking_1967.pdf; Galtung (1969), pp. 167–191.
- 17.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 18.
Conflict Sensitivity Consortium (Undated), http://www.conflictsensitivity.org/do-no-harm-local-capacities-for-peace-project; Zicherman et al. (2011).
- 19.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 20.
Zicherman et al. (2011).
- 21.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 22.
Zicherman et al. (2011).
- 23.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
For example, sometimes States tend to play down the intensity of a situation of violence and claim to undertake actions in the name of maintaining public order, see Vite, ibid.
- 28.
Kalpakian (2004), p. 193.
- 29.
Zeitoun and Mirumachi (2008), pp. 297–316.
- 30.
Inter Press Service News Agency, Wars, No, Conflicts, Yes, 2007, http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/198/40379.html.
- 31.
UCDP, Definitions, http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/definitions/.
- 32.
Ibid.
- 33.
- 34.
Sarkees and Schafer (2000), pp. 123–144.
- 35.
Human Security Report Project (2013).
- 36.
UCDP, Definitions, http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/definitions/, extrasystemic conflicts refer to colonial wars or wars of independence, which occur between governments and non-state groups located outside a State’s own territory. Interstate armed conflicts involve two or more States. Internal armed conflicts are those that take place between the government and non-state groups located within the State or between two non-state actors within one State. It does not involve outside actors. Internationalised internal conflict however, is an internal conflict with intervention from external actors on one or both sides.
- 37.
- 38.
Ibid.
- 39.
Jeong (2008).
- 40.
- 41.
- 42.
Ibid, citing Wehr, P., Conflict Emergence, http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/problem/cemerge.htm.
- 43.
Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda (1996), p. 3, http://www.oecd.org/derec/sweden/50189495.pdf.
- 44.
Deutsch and Coleman (2000), pp. 428–450.
- 45.
Deutsch (1983).
- 46.
Id., p. 4.
- 47.
Human Security Report Project (2013).
- 48.
ICRC (2014), p. 277.
- 49.
- 50.
- 51.
HIIK (2015).
- 52.
United Nations WHS Secretariat (2015).
- 53.
Global Humanitarian Assistance (GHA) Report (2016).
- 54.
Global Peace Index (2016), http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GPI-2016-Report_2.pdf.
- 55.
Ibid.
- 56.
Ibid.
- 57.
Ibid.
- 58.
Ibid.
- 59.
GHA Report (2016).
- 60.
Global Peace Index (2016), http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GPI-2016-Report_2.pdf.
- 61.
PRIO (2015), http://www.prio.org/Projects/Extensions/ConflictTrends/Graphs/, accessed on 06 December, 2016.
- 62.
- 63.
Ibid.
- 64.
Global Peace Index (2016), http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GPI-2016-Report_2.pdf.
- 65.
United Nations WHS Secretariat (2015).
- 66.
Ibid.
- 67.
GHA Report (2016).
- 68.
Ramsbotham et al. (2011).
- 69.
See www.transcend.org for a comprehensive bibliography of Galtung’s publications on peace and conflict research.
- 70.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 71.
Ibid.
- 72.
Ibid.
- 73.
Galtung (1971), pp. 173–206.
- 74.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 75.
Ibid.; Galtung (1971).
- 76.
Ramsbotham et al. (2011).
- 77.
Wallensteen (2007).
- 78.
Ibid.; Ramsbotham et al. (2011).
- 79.
Ramsbotham et al. (2011).
- 80.
- 81.
Trocaire (2011).
- 82.
OECD (2012).
- 83.
Ramsbotham et al. (2011).
- 84.
Ibid.
- 85.
Ibid.
- 86.
Zeitoun and Mirumachi (2008).
- 87.
- 88.
OECD (2012).
- 89.
Zicherman et al. (2011).
- 90.
Id., p. 3.
- 91.
References
Anderson MB (1999) Do no harm: how aid can support peace-or war. Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc., London
Brahm E (2003) Latent conflict stage. Retrieved from Beyond Intractability: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/latent-conflict
Conflict Sensitivity Consortium (Undated) Do no harm. Retrieved from Conflict Sensitivity Consortium: http://www.conflictsensitivity.org/do-no-harm-local-capacities-for-peace-project/
Conflict Sensitivity Consortium (Undated) Introduction. Retrieved from Conflict Sensitive Consortium: http://www.conflictsensitivity.org/an-introduction-to-conflict-sensitivity-3/
Deutsch M (1983) The prevention of World War III: a psychological perspective. Polit Psychol 4(1):3–31, p 6, 24 and others
Deutsch M, Coleman P (2000) The handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, pp 428–450
DG ECHO (2015, February 2) Assessing needs vulnerability and risk. Retrieved from European Commission Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/what/humanitarian-aid/needs-assessments_en
Galtung J (1967) Theories of peace: a synthetic approach to peace thinking. Unpublished, Oslo. Retrieved from http://www.transcend.org/files/Galtung_Book_unpub_Theories_of_Peace_-_A_Synthetic_Approach_to_Peace_Thinking_1967.pdf
Galtung J (1969) Violence, peace, and peace research. J Peace Res (3):167–191
Galtung J (1971) The Middle East and the theory of conflict. J Peace Res 8(3/4):173–206
GHA Report (2016) Global humanitarian assistance report. Global Humanitarian Assistance, New York
Global Peace Index (2016) Global Peace Index 2016. Institute for Economics and Peace, Brussels
HIIK (2015) Conflict Barometer 2015. The Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research, Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://www.hiik.de/en/konfliktbarometer/pdf/ConflictBarometer_2015.pdf
Human Security Report Project (2013) Human Security Report 2013. Human Security Research Group, Vancouver
ICRC (2008) How is the term “Armed Conflict” defined in International Humanitarian Law? - Opinion paper. ICRC, Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/opinion-paper-armed-conflict.pdf
ICRC (2014) The International Committee of the Red Cross’s (ICRC’s) role in situations of violence below the threshold of armed conflict- Policy Document. Int Rev Red Cross 275–304
Jeong H-W (2008) Understanding conflict and conflict analysis. Sage Publications Limited, London
Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda (1996) The international response to conflict and genocide: lessons from the Rwanda experience: synthesis report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/derec/sweden/50189495.pdf
Kalpakian J (2004) Identity, conflict and cooperation in international river systems. Ashgate, Morocco
Lawand K (2012, December 10) Internal conflicts or other situations of violence – what is the difference for victims? Retrieved from International Committee of the Red Cross: http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/interview/2012/12-10-niac-non-international-armed-conflict.htm
Loane G (2011) Applying Conflict Sensitivity in Emergency Response (Questions and Discussion). Applying conflict sensitivity in emergency response: current practice and ways forward (Conference Paper, p. 70). Overseas Development Institute, London
Médecins Sans Frontières (2016, May 5) MSF to pull out of World Humanitarian Summit. Retrieved from MSF UK: http://www.msf.org.uk/article/msf-to-pull-out-of-world-humanitarian-summit
OECD (2012) Conflict analysis and its use in evaluation. In: OECD (ed) Evaluating peacebuilding activities in settings of conflict and fragility: improving learnings for results. OECD
Orbinski J (1999) Nobel Lecture. Retrieved July 2016, from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1999/msf-lecture.html
PRIO (2015) Graphs. PRIO Conflict Trends Project. Retrieved from http://www.prio.org/Projects/Extensions/ConflictTrends/Graphs/
Ramsbotham O, Woodhouse T, Miall H (2011) Contemporary conflict resolution. Polity Press, Cambridge
Sarkees RM (2011) The COW typology of war: defining and categorizing wars (version 4 of the data). The Correlates of War Project. Retrieved from http://cow.la.psu.edu/COW2%20Data/WarData_NEW/COW%20Website%20-%20Typology%20of%20war.pdf
Sarkees MR, Schafer P (2000) The correlates of war data on war: an update to 1997. Conflict Manag Peace Sci 18:123–144
SDC (2005) Conflict analysis tools -tip sheet. Retrieved from http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/Conflict-Analysis-Tools.pdf
The Global Peace Index (2016) Global cost of conflict reaches $14.3tn, says report. Institute for Economics and Peace, Brussels
Trocaire (2011) Conflict sensitivity toolkit. Trocaire, Dublin. http://www.trocaire.org/resources/policyandadvocacy/conflict-sensitivity-toolkit
UCDP (2016a) Definitions. Retrieved from Uppsala Conflict Data Program: http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/definitions/#dyad
UCDP (2016b) Fatalities view. Retrieved from Uppsala Conflict Data Program: http://ucdp.uu.se/#/exploratory
UCDP (2016c) Uppsala conflict data program. Uppsala University, Uppsala. Retrieved from http://ucdp.uu.se/#/encyclopedia
UN Secretary-General (2016) World Humanitarian Summit- chair’s summary. The United Nations, Istanbul
Vite S (2009) Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: legal concepts and actual situations. Int Rev Red Cross 873:70–94
Wallensteen P (2007) Understanding conflict resolution: war peace and the global system. Sage Publications, Sweden
WHS (2016) One humanity shared responsibility. The United Nations, New York
WHS Secretariat (2015) Restoring humanity: systhesis of the consultation process for the World Humanitarian Summit. United Nations, New York
Zeitoun M, Mirumachi N (2008) Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation. Int Environ Agreements 297–316
Zicherman N, Khan A, Street A, Heyer H, Chevreau O (2011) Applying conflict sensitivity in emergency response: current practice and ways forward. Humanitarian Practice Network, London
Further Reading
Ramsbotham O, Woodhouse T, Miall H (2011) Contemporary conflict resolution. Polity Press, Cambridge
Trocaire (2011) Conflict sensitivity toolkit. Trocaire, Dublin. http://www.trocaire.org/resources/policyandadvocacy/conflict-sensitivity-toolkit
Wallensteen P (2007) Understanding conflict resolution: war peace and the global system. Sage Publications, Sweden
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maitra, S. (2018). The Changing Nature of Conflict: The Need for a Conflict-Sensitive Approach. In: Heintze, HJ., Thielbörger, P. (eds) International Humanitarian Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14454-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14454-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14453-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14454-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)