Abstract
There are no compelling data to support a disease-free or overall survival benefit for any one of the various surgical techniques over another for esophageal carcinoma. Each technique has advantages. Transhiatal esophagectomy has been shown to be safe, with fewer pulmonary complications than the transthoracic approach and a more benign clinical course in the event of an anastomotic leak from a cervical esophagogastrostomy, thereby resulting in reduced perioperative mortality.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
There are no compelling data to support a disease-free or overall survival benefit for any one of the various surgical techniques over another for esophageal carcinoma. Each technique has advantages. Transhiatal esophagectomy has been shown to be safe, with fewer pulmonary complications than the transthoracic approach and a more benign clinical course in the event of an anastomotic leak from a cervical esophagogastrostomy, thereby resulting in reduced perioperative mortality.
15.1 Surgical Technique
15.1.1 Patient Positioning
The patient is positioned supine with the head extended and rotated to the right. The left arm is tucked, leaving the right arm for venous or arterial access. If a central venous catheter is required, it is placed in the right internal jugular vein. The patient’s skin is prepped from the left ear superiorly to the pubis inferiorly and laterally to both midaxillary lines.
15.1.2 Abdominal and Lower Mediastinal Phase
Access to the abdomen is obtained through an upper midline incision (xiphoid to umbilicus). Costal margins are retracted with a table-fixed retractor. Division of the ligamentum teres and the falciform and triangular ligaments enables retraction of the left lateral segment of the liver. First, the adequacy of the gastric conduit is assessed—always handling the stomach gently and avoiding unnecessary traction. Next, the gastrocolic omentum is divided a safe distance from right gastroepiploic vessels, to avoid injury to the main blood supply of the conduit. The left gastroepiploic and short gastric vessels are ligated, followed by division of the gastrohepatic omentum after ensuring that a replaced left hepatic artery is not present. The dissection is then carried inferiorly along the lesser curve, with the right gastric artery preserved if at all possible. For adequate mobilization of the pylorus to the esophageal hiatus, the hepatic flexure is taken down, and an extensive Kocher maneuver is performed to expose the border of the superior mesenteric vessels. A pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty is performed to help prevent delayed gastric emptying. The common hepatic, celiac, proximal splenic, and left gastric nodal basins are dissected en bloc with the specimen. While retracting the stomach anteriorly and superiorly, the left gastric artery and coronary vein are ligated; in patients with a replaced left hepatic artery, the left gastric artery should be ligated distal to its takeoff. Dissection of all the remaining nodal tissue around the crus of the diaphragm and aorta is then completed. After the diaphragmatic hiatus is opened, it is widened by ligating the inferior phrenic vein and dividing the crus anteriorly. The gastroesophageal junction is then encircled with umbilical tape to aid with traction during the mediastinal dissection. Dissection of the distal esophagus is carried out under direct vision to the level of the carina laterally between the pleura, anteriorly from the pericardium, and posteriorly from the aorta, using electrocautery and hemoclips. Hemostasis in the mediastinum is best achieved with surgical packing.
15.1.3 Cervical Phase
The neck is entered via an incision along the anterior border of the left sternocleidomastoid muscle, beginning just above the suprasternal notch. The platysma is incised and the sternocleidomastoid muscle is retracted laterally, followed by division of the central tendon of the omohyoid muscle and middle thyroid vein. A blunt, self-retaining retractor is used to retract the sternocleidomastoid muscle laterally and the trachea and thyroid medially, with care to avoid injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve located in the tracheoesophageal groove (Fig. 15.1). A Penrose drain is used to encircle the cervical esophagus, which is bluntly dissected under direct vision to the level of the innominate artery (Fig. 15.2).
15.1.4 Mid and Upper Mediastinal Phase
With downward retraction on the umbilical tape around the gastroesophageal junction, the posterior attachments of esophagus are dissected bluntly with a hand through the diaphragmatic hiatus to the level of the cervical dissection. Next, the anterior attachments are dissected manually, while staying directly on the anterior surface of the esophagus. Care must be taken to avoid injury to the membranous portion of the trachea and to avoid excessive pressure on the heart during dissection, which can cause hypotension. (This hypotension can be readily corrected with volume resuscitation.) Using a sweetheart retractor, the inferior lateral attachments are ligated and divided between large hemoclips. The cervical and upper mediastinal esophagus is brought out through the cervical incision, and after withdrawal of the nasogastric tube, the esophagus is divided with a GIA™ stapler (Covidien, Minneapolis, MN), securing a long Penrose drain marked to maintain its orientation during passage through the mediastinum (Fig. 15.3). With the stomach and mid/distal esophagus brought out through the abdominal incision, the gastric tube is carefully fashioned to a diameter of 4–5 cm with multiple firings of the GIA™ stapler, preserving the greater curvature and its blood supply (Fig. 15.4). The lesser curvature and a portion of the fundus and cardia are removed with the esophagus, nodal basins, and tumor (Fig. 15.5). The Penrose drain that traverses the mediastinum from the cervical to the abdominal incision is now sutured to the posterior aspect of the gastric conduit to maintain orientation during transposition to the neck.
15.1.5 Gastric Transposition and Anastomosis
An automatic purse-string applier is used to place a nylon purse-string suture around the proximal cut end of the cervical esophagus. The anvil of a 25-mm EEA™ circular stapling device (Covidien, Minneapolis, MN) is passed into the cervical esophagus and the purse-string suture is secured (Fig. 15.6). The gastric conduit is gently pushed through the diaphragmatic hiatus while simultaneously gently pulling on the Penrose drain from the cervical incision until 6–8 cm of the stomach is mobilized into the cervical field (Fig. 15.7). Avoid excessive pulling of the gastric conduit during transposition, as the result may be trauma and ischemia that could compromise the anastomosis. Through an anterior gastrotomy, a 25-mm EEA™ circular stapling device is used to anastomose the cervical esophagus to the proximal posterior gastric wall (Figs. 15.8 and 15.9). After the nasogastric tube is replaced to the level of the gastric antrum, excess gastric tissue proximal to the anastomosis (including the anterior gastrotomy site) is excised with a TA™ 60-mm stapler (Covidien) (Fig. 15.10). The anastomosis is interrogated for an air leak and reinforced with silk sutures if necessary. The gastric tube is secured to surrounding tissue with care to avoid placing sutures in the prevertebral fascia, which could predispose to abscess formation. The platysma is reapproximated and the skin is closed with staples. Through the abdominal incision, the antrum of the stomach is secured to the hiatus and a needle catheter feeding jejunostomy tube is placed. Drains are unnecessary.
15.2 Contraindications
The only absolute contraindications for the transhiatal approach are tracheobronchial adherence or invasion by tumor of the upper or middle third of the esophagus, or severe adhesions of the esophagus to vital structures. Therefore, thoracotomy is rarely necessary for additional exposure to ensure a safe esophageal resection.
15.3 Postoperative Management
15.3.1 Pain Management
A thoracic epidural catheter aids in a more effective cough, allows vigorous physiotherapy, and facilitates early mobilization.
15.3.2 Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury
Most injuries result in temporary hoarseness, but prevention is paramount, as dysphagia and aspiration can result in serious postoperative morbidity.
15.3.3 Anastomotic Leak
Leaks can be managed conservatively by opening the cervical incision and local wound care. Early endoscopy with dilation of the anastomosis may help decrease fistula output and promote fistula closure.
15.3.4 Gastric Tube Necrosis
This uncommon complication requires proximal diversion and delayed reconstruction with a colonic interposition or a jejunal free flap.
15.3.5 Anastomotic Stricture
Strictures are more common after anastomotic leaks and can be managed with dilations.
15.3.6 Chylothorax
Injury to the thoracic duct may occur in patients with locally advanced tumors. These injuries should be managed with early thoracoscopy and ligation.
Selected Reading
Barreto JC, Posner MC. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3804–10.
Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;254:894–906.
Chang AC, Ji H, Birkmeyer NJ, Orringer MB, Birkmeyer JD. Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:424–9.
Chu KM, Law SY, Fok M, Wong J. A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1997;174:320–4.
Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, Zhang L, Si MS, Lee J, et al. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:177–84; discussion 184–5.
Goldminc M, Maddern G, Le Prise E, et al. Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1993;80(3):367–70.
Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.
Ng JM. Perioperative anesthetic management for esophagectomy. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26:293–304.
Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, Reitsma JB, Fockens P, van Dekken H, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:992–1000; discussion 1000–1.
Orringer MB. Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1984;200:282–8.
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg. 2007;246:363–72; discussion 372–4.
Wright CD, Zeitels SM. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries after esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006;16:23–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Namm, J.P., Posner, M.C. (2015). Transhiatal Esophagectomy. In: Fisichella, P., Patti, M. (eds) Atlas of Esophageal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13015-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13015-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13014-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13015-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)