Abstract
This paper presents a flexibility analysis as a practical procedure to evaluate large-scale capital-intensive projects considering market uncertainty. It considers the combined effects of the time value of money, economies of scale, and learning, and demonstrates the additional benefits stemming from considerations of uncertainty and flexibility in the early stages of design and project evaluation. This study focuses on the long-term deployment of liquefied natural gas (LNG) technology in a target market to supply the transportation sectors. Two design alternatives are considered: 1) fixed design, a big centralized production facility; 2) flexible modular designs, either using phasing approach at the big plant site or the same flexible approach with an option to move modular plants at distance. To compare the design alternatives, a structured flexibility methodology is applied based on several economic lifecycle performance indicators (e.g. Net Present Value, Initial CAPEX, etc.). Results indicate that a flexible modular deployment strategy improves the economic performance as compared to optimum fixed designs. They also indicate that factoring flexibility to locate modules at a distance further improves system performance. Such improvement enhances as learning rate increases. Overall, the study shows that flexibility in engineering design has multiple, supporting advantages due to uncertainty, location and learning.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Kumar, S., Kwon, H.-T., Choi, K.-H., Hyun Cho, J., Lim, W., Moon, I.: Current status and future projections of LNG demand and supplies: A global prospective. Energy Policy 39(7), 4097–4104 (2011)
ECS. Western Australia Natural gas Demand and Supply - A Forecast. Economics Consulting Services (ECS) (2011), http://www.latentpet.com/_content/documents/575.pdf
de Neufville, R., Scholtes, S.: Flexibility in Engineering Design. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
Cardin, M.-A.: Enabling Flexibility in Engineering Systems: A Taxonomy of Procedures and a Design Framework. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 136(1) (2014), doi:10.1115/1.4025704
Trigeorgis, L.: Real options: managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT Press (1996)
Wang, T.: Real Options in Projects and Systems Design – Identification of Options and Solutions for Path Dependency. Doctoral Dissertation in Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States (2005)
Fitzgerald, M.E., Ross, A.M., Rhodes, D.H.: Assessing uncertain benefits: a valuation approach for strategic changeability (VASC). In: INCOSE International Symposium. Citeseer (2012)
Ross, A.M.: Managing unarticulated value: changeability in multi-attribute tradespace exploration. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2006)
Ross, A.M., Rhodes, D.H.: Using natural value-centric time scales for conceptualizing system timelines through epoch-era analysis (2008)
Özelkan, E.C., D’Ambrosio, A., Teng, S.G.: Optimizing liquefied natural gas terminal design for effective supply-chain operations. International Journal of Production Economics 111(2), 529–542 (2008), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.028
Grønhaug, R., Christiansen, M.: Supply chain optimization for the liquefied natural gas business. In: Innovations in Distribution Logistics, pp. 195–218. Springer (2009)
Andersson, H., Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K.: Transportation planning and inventory management in the LNG supply chain. In: Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics, pp. 427–439. Springer (2010)
Cardin, M.-A., Ranjbar Bourani, M., de Neufville, R., Deng, Y., Chong, W.S., Atapattu, R., Sheng, X.X., Foo, K.S.: Quantifying the Value of Flexibility in Oil and Gas Projects: A Case Study of Centralized vs. Decentralized LNG Production. Keppel Offshore and Marine Technology Review, Singapore (2013)
Savage, S.L.: The Flaw of Averages: Why We Underestimate Risk in the Face of Uncertainty. John Wiley and Sons (2009)
Cardin, M.-A., Kolfschoten, G.L., Frey, D.D., Neufville, R., Weck, O.L., Geltner, D.M.: Empirical Evaluation of Procedures to Generate Flexibility in Engineering Systems and Improve Lifecycle Performance. Research in Engineering Design 24(3), 277–295 (2013), doi:10.1007/s00163-012-0145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cardin, MA., Ranjbar-Bourani, M., de Neufville, R. (2015). Design and Management of Flexible On-Shore LNG Production Engineering Systems. In: Cardin, MA., Krob, D., Lui, P., Tan, Y., Wood, K. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management Asia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12544-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12544-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12543-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12544-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)