Abstract
Lipid particulates as the name suggests are a breed of novel delivery systems consisting of lipids or lipid based excipients as its major components. Functionalized lipid particulates are designed preferably by incorporation of specific lipid based excipients which can confer targeting ability. The chapter focuses on functionalized lipid particulates like passively targeted liposomes via PEGylation; actively targeted liposomes functionalized via use of monoclonal antibodies, carbohydrates, charged lipids, or other type of targeting ligands; solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers functionalized with a targeting ligand; cationic emulsions and other functionalized lipid systems.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Lipids have been of major interest and importance in field of drug delivery systems. Their application in formulation science has been diverse and promising in different ways. The number of reports published each year on lipid based formulations and lipid based formulations in market establish critical role of lipids in drug delivery. Of considerable importance is the application of lipids in design of particulate systems which are amenable to surface modifications for improved drug/gene delivery. In the past few years, reports on different lipid based particulate systems have increased tremendously with major focus on liposomes and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) [1–7]. Other lipid based particulate systems that are evaluated include nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) [6, 8–11], emulsions [12–17], lipid–drug conjugates (LDCs) and recently reported lipid nano-particulates in the form of LeciPlex [18, 19], and polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticles (PLN) [20–22]. One of the various reasons responsible for success of lipids in formulation of particulate systems is their bio-compatible and biodegradable nature [2, 19, 23]. Thus, lipid based particulate systems can suitably be employed for delivery through not only noninvasive routes, such as oral and topical, but also through parenteral routes which are very demanding with reference to delivery system design.
Lipid particulate systems, over the years, have undergone stupendous modifications. Initially lipid particulate system of micron size were reported which were followed by lipid particulates in nanosize range. The nanosize range of particles made them capable of targeting tumors better, primarily because of enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect [24–31]. Subsequently the use of pH and/or temperature sensitive lipids to suit drug release in tumor environment made them more pronounced tool for tumor drug delivery [32, 33]. Another worthwhile modification was to render surface of lipid nanosystems more hydrophilic using different agents such as polyethylene glycols (PEGs) [33–35], which increased the systemic circulation time, resulting in prolonged drug release in plasma. Another significant achievement in lipid based particulate systems is conjugation of surface lipids to ligands that conferred ability to selectively target certain organs/tissue mass, and has been of great use in treatment of various infectious diseases and cancer in particular as depicted in Fig. 13.1 [3, 23, 25, 33, 36–45].
The chapter throws light on some key functional lipids employed in drug delivery and their final fate in human body. The chapter also focuses upon various lipid based particulate systems, their feasibility to functionalization and consequently their role in drug delivery.
2 Lipids as Excipients
The classification of lipids is very diverse. Lipids can be classified on the basis of their HLB values; their chemical structure such as glycerides, fatty acids, and so on; on the basis of their fatty acid chain length; depending on the charge they possess or even on the basis of their uses. The lipids discussed here are the ones predominantly employed in pharmaceutical formulations.
2.1 Phospholipid
Phospholipids comprise a huge family of lipids that have been instrumental in giving birth to a very important class of novel formulations known today, the vesicular drug delivery systems, better known as liposomes. Phospholipids are biocompatible as they are the key component of human cell membrane [46–51]. They are known to permeate skin as well as other cell membranes very effectively owing to structural similarity to cell membrane components [52–54]. Most phospholipids generally consist of a diglyceride, a phosphate group and a polar head group such as ethanolamine or choline, attached to phosphate moiety. This imparts them, both hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions in same molecule enabling them to act as efficient stabilizers at liquid–solid or liquid–immiscible liquid interface. Phospholipids have been extensively used as emulsifiers and stabilizers for a plethora of particulate systems such as nano-emulsions, micro-emulsions, polymeric and lipidic nanoparticles, and so on.
2.2 Liquid and Solid Lipids
Lipids comprise fatty acids, their monoglycerides, diglycerides, or triglycerides with C-chain length of 10 and more; waxes; sterols (cholesterol); and partial glycerides. Generally, short and medium chain glycerides fall in category of liquid lipids while long chain glycerides constitute most of solid lipids. Various solid lipids reported widely in recent literature reports include glyceryl behenate, glyceryl monostearate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl palmitostearate, cetyl palmitate, tristearin, tripalmitin, trimyristin, trilaurin, SOFTISAN® 142, long chain fatty acids like stearic acid, palmitic acid, decanoic acid, behenic acid, to name a few [1, 55–59]. Lipids help in better permeation of drug with poor permeability. Lipids also aid in improving solubilization of drug in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) by increase in micellization of drug by fatty acids liberated upon lipid digestion by pancreatic lipase and other enzymes [60–64]. Lipids also offer improvement in stability of photo- or pH dependent unstable drug [6, 19]. Importantly, both solid as well as liquid lipids, are amenable to chemical modifications imparting target specificity to them [23]. Some of these can be directly conjugated to active drug molecules to render a lipidic prodrug with better physicochemical properties which releases active molecule on reaching the desired site of action [65–67].
2.3 Lipids for Functionalization
Numerous reports are available on capability of functionalized lipids to improve drug delivery. Functionalization makes them either more target specific, or renders them a charge, or makes them capable of yielding pH/temperature-sensitive nanoparticles or nanoparticles with greater plasma circulation half-life or a combination of all above mentioned attributes [68–74]. Attempts have been directed to conjugate hydrophilic molecules such as PEGs to lipids thus rendering stealth properties to the surface of nanoparticles fabricated from them. Conjugation of lipids to molecules possessing charge (+ve/−ve) renders them either a cationic or anionic charge, for instance dipalmitoyl phosphoglycerol (DPPG) imparts negative [75] and didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB) imparts positive charge [76] respectively. Various ligands based on immunoglobulins, carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, and so on have been conjugated to lipids mentioned in greater detail later, to make them target specific. Another example of functionalizing lipids is of cholesteryl hemisuccinate molecule which is cholesterol ester of hemisuccinic acid which upon incorporation has been reported to impart pH sensitivity to the fabricated liposomes [77]. Functionalization of lipids has revolutionized the area of drug delivery, as elucidated, in the next sections of the chapter.
3 Fate of Lipid Particulate Systems
The major route of administration for a functionalized lipid based particulate system is the intravenous route, though a few functionalized lipid systems improve oral and transdermal absorption of actives. As is well known for metabolism of ingested lipids, and as is true for any lipid systems, whether functionalized or not, after oral delivery, lipids are acted upon by enzymes, especially pancreatic lipases, and the triglycerides are broken down to glycerol and free fatty acids or monoglycerides. After absorption in GIT, these free fatty acids are again reformed to triglycerides that are instrumental in formation of chylomicrons and lipoproteins. The lipoproteins are again responsible for utilization and excretion of cholesterol and also in formation of bile salts. The excess fatty acids is utilized for energy production inside the mitochondria of cells after their uptake as they enter TCA cycle.
Final fate of lipids even when administered intravenously as functionalized nanoparticles remains the same with a few differences. The functionalized lipid owing to target specificity reaches the target cells, helps in internalization of particles via receptor mediated endocytosis or carrier mediated uptake. However, once inside the cell, the biochemical pathway for the lipids remains the same as for lipids ingested by any other route, except that the targeted lipid is initially acted upon by enzymes to break the bond between the targeting ligand and lipid.
In addition to conferring targeting ability, lipid ligand employed for functionalization in lipid particulate system may influence in vivo course. It can render the surface of lipid nanosystems hydrophilic or charged depending on the property of ligand associated with lipid. This is beneficial with respect to reduced opsonization and RES uptake thus resulting in slower clearance and improved circulation times. PEGylation of lipids significantly improves circulation half-life of lipid nanosystems. The complex process of opsonization determines the eventual fate of the lipid particulate system like its rate of clearance from the blood stream, volume distribution, organ distribution and its elimination from the body. PEGylation is an obligatory requirement to prolong circulation for delivery systems functionalized via antibodies, due to their known interaction with reticuloendothelial system leading to faster clearance of antibody functionalized delivery system from the circulation. Functionalization can change the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics of the lipid based delivery system having a negative or positive effect on the therapeutic efficacy of the system [78].
4 Formulation Considerations for Functionalized Lipid Nanosystems
As in case of any formulation, the major concern for functionalized lipid nanosystem from point of view of formulation scientist is its ease to scalability and commercialization. Till the early 1990s, there were no high hopes about the viability of nanoparticulate based delivery systems in market, though the scenario started to change from late 1995, after introduction of Doxorubicin and Amphotericin B loaded liposomes (Doxil®, Caelyx®; and Ambisome®). Since then, various nanoparticulate systems, and predominantly lipid based nanosystems, have been introduced in market.
Today, functionalized lipid nanoparticles find themselves in similar situation as nanoparticles did two decades ago. But their future will depend on the ease of functionalization provided if those techniques can be scaled up without compromising the yield.
Tremendous efforts have been observed recently to effect functionalization of lipids to render delivery systems target specific. Ligands specific to receptors (targets) have been conjugated to lipids by either strong covalent bonds or weak van der Waal forces or hydrogen bonding. Covalent linkages generally employ esterification, amidation or sulfonation reactions between lipids and the ligand. Lipids used possess an acid, amine, sulfate, or alcohol functional group which is accordingly conjugated to its counterpart functional group/s on ligands. One important consideration during functionalization is that the ligand after being coupled to lipid should not show reduction in its affinity for target site. The alternative method of coupling ligands to fabricated lipid nanosystem as reported by many scientists is incubation or lyophilization of ligand together with the nanosystem. In such cases, the association of ligand to surface of lipid nanocarriers has been confirmed by various techniques, but predominantly by measurement of surface charge (zeta potential).
Literature also mentions use of linkers to couple ligand and lipid together. Linkers which are reported include pyridylditiopropionoylamino-PEG, hydrazide-PEG, maleimide-PEG, p-nitrophenylcarbonyl-PEG-PE, pyridylthiopropionoyl-amino-PEG-distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine (PDP-PEG-DSPE) to name a few [79, 80]. It is hypothesized that the linker allows the ligand to be extended from the surface for better interaction with receptors; however, ligand–lipid conjugates without linkers have also been observed to be equally effective in targeting [81].
Once the lipid–ligand conjugate is prepared, it is then incorporated in suitable amounts in the formula to ensure target specific lipid nanosystem is designed. Different percentages of conjugate are used in preparation of system and based on further in vitro experimentation; the right combination could be selected for further in vivo studies.
The various ligands which have been coupled to lipids as reported in literature are mentioned in Table 13.1 [25, 33, 82]
5 Route of Administration
The major concern with functionalized lipid particulates is toxicity. They should be safe at doses to be administered and for the route that they will be employed for. Most functionalized lipid particulates are designed to be administered by parenteral route (mainly intravenous delivery) in order to utilize their target specificity. Lipid particulates wherein surface is rendered more hydrophilic (by association with PEGs or gangliosides) or cationic (use of cationic lipids) are employed for intravenous delivery to improve plasma circulation time by minimizing opsonization and RES uptake. Positively charged lipid based delivery system are also known to improve oral absorption.
Functionalized lipid particulates have been employed for improving drug delivery through other routes including transdermal, pulmonary, vaginal, rectal, nasal, and ocular as reported in scientific literature (Table 13.2).
6 Applications in Drug Delivery
6.1 Liposomes
Liposomes are the most researched and preferred vesicular drug delivery system due to its versatility, safety, and in vivo advantage. Functionalization of liposomes is achieved via many techniques. The primary and the simplest technique is adsorption. In this technique, the preformed liposomal dispersion is incubated with the solution of targeting ligand. This approach of functionalization is not preferred as it is nonspecific and in most of the cases the rate of desorption is fast during storage as well as in vivo. Other technique of functionalization employs covalent link formation between targeting ligand and appropriate component of liposomes. This is usually achieved via chemical attachment of long carbon chain to functional groups like hydroxyl, carboxyl present on the targeting ligand. An important consideration for chemical modification is that the groups chosen for chemical modification do not alter the receptor ligand interaction significantly. Another technique for functionalization involves chemical modification of preformed liposomes. In this technique, the preformed liposomes are incubated with linkers that covalently bind to the phospholipid head groups present on the surface of liposomes. These linker tagged liposomes after separation are treated with a solution of targeting ligand wherein the free end of the linker covalently attaches itself to the functional group present on targeting ligand, imparting targeting ability to liposomes.
Vodovozova et al. showed improvement in efficacy of a synthetic drug octadecylmerphalan after its incorporation in a liposomal delivery system functionalized by use of lectin specific carbohydrate ligand Sialyl Lewis X using its 3-aminopropyl glycoside derivative [65]. In vivo results confirmed superior therapeutic efficacy of Lectin functionalized liposomes as compared to liposomes devoid of it. Tsuruta et al. successfully loaded doxorubicin in an actively targeted liposomal delivery system using Sialyl Lewis X for preventing stenosis after angioplasty [100]. Study established superior activity of doxorubicin liposomes functionalized with Sialyl Lewis X as rats treated with functionalized liposomes had larger lumen area as compared to those treated with Doxorubicin liposomes. Kawakami et al. investigated the effect of glycosylation using galactose, mannose, and fucose on the clearance of liposomes. They concluded that galactose coated liposomes were taken up by the asialoglycoprotein receptor of the parenchymal cells of liver, mannose coated liposomes were taken up by the mannose receptor on the non-parenchymal cells of the liver and fucose coated liposomes were taken up by the fucose receptor on the non-parenchymal cells of the liver. A higher molar concentration of galactose coated liposomes were also taken up by the non-parenchymal cells of the liver [91]. Shah et al. successfully fabricated actively targeted liposomal delivery system using asialoglycoprotein receptor specific arabinogalactan as the targeting ligand using covalent link to lipid component [36]. For further reading on use of carbohydrate mediated liposomal targeting, readers are referred to an excellent review by Malcolm N. Jones [101].
Wolff and Gregoriadis successfully fabricated monoclonal anti-Thy1IgG1 coated immunoliposomes for targeting to AKR-A cells [90]. Debs et al. successfully fabricated anti-Thy 1.1 monoclonal antibody MRCOX7 conjugated liposomes which demonstrated enhanced uptake in lymph nodes that express high levels of target antigen [84]. Koning et al. showed high intracellular delivery of cytotoxic agent by developing immunoliposomes using monoclonal antibody against rat colon carcinoma containing 5-fluorodeoxyuridine as the cytotoxic agent [86]. Suzuki et al. developed long circulating immunoliposome containing doxorubicin using murine monoclonal antibody HBJ127 that recognizes a peptide epitope of gp125 which is expressed on almost all human cancer cells [88, 89]. Mercadal et al. fabricated My-10 monoclonal antibody coated immunoliposome against CD34 antigen using carboxyfluorescein as marker compound [102]. Yang et al. formulated PEGylated immunoliposome loaded with paclitaxel using Herceptin as targeting ligand for cells overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [103]. Lukyanov et al. modified commercially available doxorubicin loaded long circulating liposomes Doxil® with monoclonal nucleosome specific 2C5 antibody that identifies tumors via surface bound nucleosomes [85, 87]. Biswas et al. reported enhanced suppression of tumor in vivo by surface functionalization of doxorubicin loaded long circulating liposome Doxil® using a cell penetrating peptide Octa-arginine [97].
Kitagawa and Kasamaki improved the intradermal delivery of retinoic acid using positively charged liposomes functionalized with 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propane as cationic surfactant [104]. Knudsen et al. demonstrated improved delivery of calcipotriol by formulating and altering the fluid state of liposomes composed of dipalmitoyl phosphocholine and dilauroyl phosphocholine [105]. Geusens et al. developed ultradeformable cationic liposomes composed of cationic lipid 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propane and the edge activator sodium cholate for delivery if siRNA into human primary melanocytes [106].
6.2 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs) and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs)
SLNs and NLCs have been reported to a good extent for functionalization and targeting. Modifications are reported either by functionalizing the lipid that is employed for SLN/NLC preparation or the surfactant that is employed in its colloidal stabilization. Xu et al. designed hepatoma targeted SLN for effective delivery of docetaxel wherein galactosylated-DOPE was utilized for site-specific delivery [23]. The authors report the potential of galactosylated SLNs in effective treatment of locally advanced as well as metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. In comparison to non galactosylated SLNs, galactosylated-SLNs demonstrated no significant difference in mean particle size, zeta potential, drug loading, and entrapment efficiency. However, remarkable difference was noted in in vitro cytotoxicity and bio-distribution of docetaxel when loaded in targeted SLN as compared to normal SLN. Galactosylated SLNs were superior to nongalactosylated SLN as well as marketed Taxotere formulation for improved delivery of Docetaxel.
Alukda et al. fabricated functionalized SLNs with coats of PLL (polylysine) and heparin, as a delivery template, loaded with vaginal microbicide (tenofovir) for prevention of HIV transmission [39]. The authors reported improved therapeutic efficacy of functionalized SLN as compared to nonfunctionalized SLN with no cytotoxicity to vaginal epithelium.
Yet another interesting example is of Kashanian et al. who functionalized SLN with N-glutaryl phosphatidylethanolamine and employed in the design of SLN to render the SLN pH sensitive, for enhancement in drug release in acidic pH of tumor [40]. When studied under different pH conditions, pH sensitive SLNs exhibited higher in vitro drug release at acidic pH.
NLCs were designed as a modification of SLN to improve their drug loading capacity, improve their colloidal stability, and decrease drug leakage during shelf life of product. They comprise both liquid and solid lipids unlike their SLN counterparts that make them comparatively more versatile as a drug delivery vehicle. NLCs have also been reported to be amenable to functionalization. Yang et al. prepared hyaluronic acid coated NLCs for targeted delivery of Paclitaxel to CD44 overexpressed on tumor cells. The study reports that functionalized NLCs were superior to Taxol in vitro as well as in vivo. Earlier Chen et al. had also published their work for targeted delivery of Paclitaxel. They conjugated Stearyl-2-amino-2-deoxyglucose (2-DG), a glucosamine derivative serving as a broad tumor targeting ligand, to glyceryl monostearate and oleic acid NLCs, for improved delivery of Paclitaxel to tumor cells.
Folate and transferrin have also been anchored to lipid nanoparticles for establishing tumor specific delivery of etoposide [94]. As mentioned earlier, choice of excipients can also render delivery system like SLN/NLCs target specific. Goppert and Muller discovered that SLN stabilized by Tween 80 adsorbs such plasma proteins as may be required for efficient targeting to brain, whereas Poloxamer 188 stabilized SLN adsorb proteins which imparted ability to prolong plasma circulation time [107]. Several reports have been published about binding of Tween 80 to apolipoproteins in plasma and thus capable of targeting and traversing blood–brain barrier. Incorporation of such functional surfactants confers target specificity to delivery system. Similarly, Rezazadeh and coworkers designed tumor targeted NLCs composed of cholesterol, known for targeting LDL receptors overexpressed on tumor cells [108, 109].
6.3 Nano- and Micro-emulsions
Not many reports are available with respect to functionalization of emulsions involving chemical reactions. However, use of specific surfactants possessing charge, negative or positive, in fabrication of charged nanoglobules of emulsions has been examined for improving bioavailability of actives as well as in gene delivery.
6.4 Miscellaneous Functionalized Lipid Based Systems
PLNs are a class of lipid nanocarriers that have surfaced up about a decade ago and have demonstrated capabilities to functionalization. PLN was viewed as an attempt to combine advantages and avoid disadvantages of polymeric nanoparticles and liposomes. Though dependent on method of preparation, general PLN description mentions presence of a polymer core coated with lecithin (or other lipid) which in turn can be conjugated/anchored to a ligand. Liu Y. et al. demonstrated that PLN composed of PLGA as polymer and mix of lipids, including PEGylated as well as folate conjugated PEGylated phospholipid [110]. The folate and PEG functionalized PLN when loaded with Docetaxel released ~18 % which was at surface of targeted PLN within first 12 h as would be required to exert immediate action on cancer cells. Thereafter, however, release was considerably slow, with only ~60 % Docetaxel released at the end of 72 h and sustained release continued for 168 h. The in vitro release study results correlated well with results of in vitro cytotoxicity study as well as cell uptake study, demonstrating ability of functionalized PLN to improve drug uptake possibly due to receptor mediated endocytosis.
Selection of polymer also in its own way contributes to functionalization of PLNs. Wu and coworkers demonstrated that use of soybean oil based anionic polymer provided adequate loading of cationic drugs such as Doxorubicin HCl due to ionic complexation in PLN in comparison to their SLN counterparts which lack in polymer content [22].
However, one of the interesting studies on PLN was reported by Clawson et al. who reported fabrication of PLN with pH triggered erosion of PEG shell covering PLN coat. The group designed PLN system for effective treatment of cancer with ability to erode the coat of PEG in response to low pH at tumor site. The targeting lipid (succinate ester based PEGylated lipid) used in design of PLN was synthesized by reacting 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho(ethylene glycol) with methoxy polyethylene glycol. At neutral pH (physiological pH), the PEG surface coat will be more stable to hydrolysis whereas, in acidic tumor environment, due to erosion of PEG coat, the system will destabilize and show better fusion with cells at tumor site. However, it was worth noting that more the amount of synthesized functional lipid used in fabricating the PLN system, more stable was the developed PLN system to aggregation and destabilization, possibly due to greater number of ester bonds which need to be hydrolysed. Thus, PLN with 15 mol% functional lipid were not stable at pH below 6.0, with 20 mol %, stability was lost at pH 5.0, with 30 mol %, particles retained stability until pH dropped to 4.0, with 40 mol %, PLN do not destabilize until pH drops to 3.0 and with 50 mol %, PLN system was stable over entire pH ranges evaluated (pH 7.4–3.0).
A great emphasis has been placed on lipid based nanosystems which are amenable to surface functionalization that aids in rendering them target/site specific. However, several novel lipid based nanosystems can be considered functionally distinct from the others owing to their potential in improving delivery of actives. These include various deformable/flexible vesicular systems like LeciPlex, transfersomes, invasomes, and ethosomes. Though all of these are vesicular in nature, the systems do possess notable differences imparting them certain specific characteristics.
LeciPlex is a novel vesicular system that combines advantages of cationic nanoparticles with those of vesicular systems (Fig. 13.2). The distinct advantage of LeciPlex system is ease of formulation and its amenability to scale-up. It employs a single step fabrication involving addition of aqueous phase to solution of phospholipid and cationic agent in a biocompatible solvent leading to formation of vesicular system under simple agitation [18, 19]. LeciPlex are cationic vesicles, and therefore capable of loading both hydrophilic as well as lipophilic drugs, and their cationic nature confers better colloidal stability to the system. Besides, the cationic charge allows them capability to target cancer cells overexpressing negatively charged molecules at their surface [111]. Also, the agents that impart positive charge to the vesicles possess selective cytotoxicity to various cancer cell lines. This makes LeciPlex a useful addition to drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. LeciPlex has been implicated in improving oral bioavailability of actives with different polarities, such as Repaglinide and Quercetin. We have established the utility of LeciPlex in condensing DNA for gene delivery. Besides oral delivery, LeciPlex holds a lot of potential for effective topical delivery, the experimentation for which are under way.
Deformable liposomes, ultradeformable liposomes, ethosomes, and invasomes are all, another important sect of functionalized vesicular carriers that have been mainly explored for dermal/transdermal delivery. Transferosomes consist of flexible bilayers and are the first generation of elastic liposomes [112, 113]. These are reported to enhance skin permeation of loaded actives through intact skin under influence of transdermal hydration and osmotic gradients, when applied under non-occluded conditions [113, 114]. The innovative addition in engineering Transferosomes as a different vesicular carrier than conventional liposomes has been addition of an edge activator. The edge activator is a molecule that provides desired flexibility and deformability to the lipid bilayers to improve its skin permeation wherein the vesicle is able to move into skin layers in intact form, thus improving flux of loaded actives [115]. Examples of edge activators include molecules such as sodium cholate, Span 80, Tween 80, and dipotassium glycyrrhizinate [116–118]. The second generation of deformable liposomes, named as proultraflexible liposomes, was reported by Jain et al., following the proliposomal approach known to enhance stability of vesicles. The formulation demonstrated better permeation of loaded active, levonorgestrel and better stability than proliposomal formulation [119]. Numerous reports are available that enlighten ability of deformable liposomes or their likes, such as ultradeformable liposomes or cationic ultradeformable liposome employing a cationic lipid [120] to improve not only skin permeation of actives, such as diclofenac, bleomycin [121], diclofenac [112], 5-FU [122], but also delivery of vaccines and genetic material like siRNA [106, 123].
Ethosomes, comprising phospholipids, a high ethanol content and water, are another specialized vesicular systems that are able to permeate into deeper layers of skin, as has been reported by few confocal laser scanning microscopy studies, due to their high malleability have improved systemic delivery of few actives. Ethosomes have reportedly improved skin permeation of various loaded agents including ketotifen, 5-aminolevulinic acid, and rhodamine red, to name a few [113, 124–129].
Yet another interesting vesicular carrier class comprises invasomes reported by Fahr A. et al. which in addition to phospholipids consists of mixture of terpenes that act as permeation enhancers. The group reported fabrication of phospholipid based invasomes comprising 3.3 % ethanol and 1 % mixture of terpenes with size less than 150 nm, significantly improved Temoporfin deposition in stratum corneum as compared to conventional liposomes [130].
7 Marketed/Potential Lipid Particulates
There are many lipid particulates which have either entered clinical trials or have been successfully launched commercially [131]. In case of liposomal products, currently, there are 53 under therapeutic investigation and 8 liposomal products available commercially, most in comparison to any other lipid based system. There are 19 and 9 emulsion based products being available for therapeutic investigation and commercial use, respectively [132]. Table 13.3 mentions list of few of such functionalized lipid nanoparticulates which are successful or have promise to reach the market.
8 Summary and Conclusion
Functionalization of lipid particulates make them more promising for their intended use, such as enhanced permeation, increased target specificity, improved lipophilicity, and so on. A number of reports have been available recently on importance of functionalization of lipid nanosystems, as described earlier in the chapter. Task of functionalizing particulates renders excellent opportunity for formulation scientists and chemists to work together and lay foundation of successful novel drug delivery systems. Functionalized lipid nanoparticulates are expected to face the same challenge that was faced by lipid nanoparticulates a few years back with respect to their commercial feasibility. The efforts of multiple formulation scientists made the lipid based nanosystems a commercial success and it can be expected that functionalized lipid nanoparticles also reach market in increasing number and probability in near future.
References
Mehnert W, Mader K (2001) Solid lipid nanoparticles: production, characterization and applications. Adv Drug Del Rev 64(Suppl):83–101
Muller RH, Mader K, Gohla S (2000) Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery—a review of the state of the art. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 50(1):161–177
Tranum, K. and S. Roderick, Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: Tuneable Anti-Cancer Gene/Drug Delivery Systems, in Novel Gene Therapy Approaches. 2013, INTECH. p. 53–73
Wong HL et al (2007) Chemotherapy with anticancer drugs encapsulated in solid lipid nanoparticles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59(6):491–504
Pandey R, Sharma S, Khuller GK (2005) Oral solid lipid nanoparticle-based antitubercular chemotherapy. Tuberculosis 85(5–6):415–420
Jain AS et al (2013) Lipid colloidal carriers for improvement of anticancer activity of orally delivered quercetin: formulation, characterization and establishing in vitro-in vivo advantage. J Biomed Nanotechnol 9:1230–1240
Pathak P, Nagarsenker M (2009) Formulation and evaluation of lidocaine lipid nanosystems for dermal delivery. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 10(3):985–992
Joshi MD, Müller RH (2009) Lipid nanoparticles for parenteral delivery of actives. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 71(2):161–172
Muller RH et al (2007) Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic dermal products. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59(6):522–530
Pardeike J, Hommoss A, Muller RH (2009) Lipid nanoparticles (SLN, NLC) in cosmetic and pharmaceutical dermal products. Int J Pharm 366(1–2):170–184
Teeranachaideekul V et al (2007) Cetyl palmitate-based NLC for topical delivery of Coenzyme Q10—development, physicochemical characterization and in vitro release studies. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 67(1):141–148
Date AA, Nagarsenker MS (2008) Parenteral microemulsions: an overview. Int J Pharm 355(1–2):19–30
Nagarsenker M, Tayade N (2010) Development and evaluation of artemether parenteral microemulsion. Indian J Pharm Sci 72:637–640
Dixit RP, Nagarsenker MS (2008) Formulation and in vivo evaluation of self-nanoemulsifying granules for oral delivery of a combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 34(12):1285–1296
Date AA et al (2010) Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems: formulation insights, applications and advances. Nanomedicine (Lond) 5(10):1595–1616
Dixit RP, Nagarsenker MS (2010) Optimized microemulsions and solid microemulsion systems of simvastatin: characterization and in vivo evaluation. J Pharm Sci 99(12):4892–4902
Ankitkumar S Jain et al (2011) Nanoemulsions: a potential delivery system. Pharma Rev.:113–119
Date AA et al (2011) Lecithin-based novel cationic nanocarriers (LeciPlex) I: fabrication, characterization and evaluation. Nanomedicine (Lond) 6(8):1309–1325
Date AA et al (2013) Lecithin-based novel cationic nanocarriers (leciplex) II: improving therapeutic efficacy of quercetin on oral administration. Mol Pharm 8(3):716–726
Benival DM, Devarajan PV (2011) Lipomer of doxorubicin hydrochloride for enhanced oral bioavailability. Int J Pharm 423(2):554–561
Dhumal R et al (2011) Evaluation of safety of lipomer doxycycline hydrochloride (lipomer DH). J Biomed Nanotechnol 7(1):146–147
Wong HL et al (2007) In vivo evaluation of a new polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticle (PLN) formulation of doxorubicin in a murine solid tumor model. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 65(3):300–308
Xu Z et al (2009) The performance of docetaxel-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles targeted to hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomaterials 30(2):226–232
Matsumura Y, Maeda H (1986) A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res 46(12 (Part 1)):6387–6392
Danhier F, Feron O, Preat V (2010) To exploit the tumor microenvironment: passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. J Control Release 148(2):135–146
Roerdink FH, Dijkstra J, Spanjer HH, Scherphof GL (1984) Interaction of liposomes with hepatocytes and Kupffer cells in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Soc Trans 12:335–336
Palmer TN et al (1984) The mechanism of liposome accumulation in infarction. Biochim Biophys Acta 797(3):363–368
Jain RK (1989) Delivery of novel therapeutic agents in tumors: physiological barriers and strategies. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(8):570–576
Torchilin VP (2000) Drug targeting. Eur J Pharm Sci 11(Suppl 2):S81–S91
Maeda H, Sawa T, Konno T (2001) Mechanism of tumor-targeted delivery of macromolecular drugs, including the EPR effect in solid tumor and clinical overview of the prototype polymeric drug SMANCS. J Control Release 74(1–3):47–61
Maeda H, Bharate GY, Daruwalla J (2009) Polymeric drugs for efficient tumor-targeted drug delivery based on EPR-effect. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 71(3):409–419
Ishida T et al (2001) Targeted delivery and triggered release of liposomal doxorubicin enhances cytotoxicity against human B lymphoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1515(2):144–158
Marcucci F, Lefoulon FO (2004) Active targeting with particulate drug carriers in tumor therapy: fundamentals and recent progress. Drug Discov Today 9(5):219–228
Sant V, Nagarsenker M (2011) Synthesis of monomethoxypolyethyleneglycol-cholesteryl ester and effect of its incorporation in liposomes. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 12(4):1056–1063
Papahadjopoulos D et al (1991) Sterically stabilized liposomes: improvements in pharmacokinetics and antitumor therapeutic efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88(24):11460–11464
Shah SM et al (2012) Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro evaluation of palmitoylated arabinogalactan with potential for liver targeting. Carbohydr Res 367:41–47
Saul JM et al (2003) Controlled targeting of liposomal doxorubicin via the folate receptor in vitro. J Control Release 92(1–2):49–67
Turk MJ, Waters DJ, Low PS (2004) Folate-conjugated liposomes preferentially target macrophages associated with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Lett 213(2):165–172
Alukda D, Sturgis T, Youan B-BC (2011) Formulation of tenofovir-loaded functionalized solid lipid nanoparticles intended for HIV prevention. J Pharm Sci 100(8):3345–3356
Kashanian S, Azandaryani AH, Derakhshandeh K (2011) New surface-modified solid lipid nanoparticles using N-glutaryl phosphatidylethanolamine as the outer shell. Int J Nanomedicine 6:2393–2401
Maruyama K et al (1999) Possibility of active targeting to tumor tissues with liposomes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 40(1–2):89–102
Wu J, Nantz MH, Zern MA (2002) Targeting hepatocytes for drug and gene delivery: emerging novel approaches and applications. Front Biosci 7:d717–d725
Mauk MR, Gamble RC, Gamble JD (1980) Targeting of lipid vesicles: specificity of carbohydrate receptor analogues for leukocytes in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77(8):4430–4434
Vyas SP et al (2000) Ligand directed macrophage targeting of amphotericin B loaded liposomes. Int J Pharm 210(1–2):1–14
Nobs L et al (2004) Current methods for attaching targeting ligands to liposomes and nanoparticles. J Pharm Sci 93(8):1980–1992
Choi J et al (2008) Surface immobilization of biocompatible phospholipid polymer multilayered hydrogel on titanium alloy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 67(2):216–223
Lim SB, Rubinstein I, Onyuksel H (2008) Freeze drying of peptide drugs self-associated with long-circulating, biocompatible and biodegradable sterically stabilized phospholipid nanomicelles. Int J Pharm 356(1–2):345–350
Moro T et al (2008) 553 biocompatible phospholipid polymer grafting on liner surface of artificial hip joints enhances the wear resistance independently of liner cross-linking or femoral head material. Osteoarthr Cartilage 16(Suppl 4):S234
Moro T et al (2010) Surface grafting of biocompatible phospholipid polymer MPC provides wear resistance of tibial polyethylene insert in artificial knee joints. Osteoarthr Cartilage 18(9):1174–1182
Nguyen TTL et al (2010) Biocompatible lecithin-based microemulsions with rhamnolipid and sophorolipid biosurfactants: formulation and potential applications. J Colloid Interface Sci 348(2):498–504
Rubinstein I, Onyuksel H (2007) Biocompatible, biodegradable and sterically stabilized phospholipid nanomicelles improve cryopreservation of oral keratinocytes: a preliminary investigation. Int J Pharm 338(1–2):333–335
Azuma K et al (2002) Combination of lipids and emulsifiers enhances the absorption of orally administered quercetin in rats. J Agric Food Chem 50(6):1706–1712
Chen C-C et al (2010) Effects of lipophilic emulsifiers on the oral administration of lovastatin from nanostructured lipid carriers: physicochemical characterization and pharmacokinetics. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 74(3):474–482
Gershanik T, Benzeno S, Benita S (1998) Interaction of a self-emulsifying lipid drug delivery system with the everted rat intestinal mucosa as a function of droplet size and surface charge. Pharm Res 15(6):863–869
Freitas C, Muller RH (1998) Spray-drying of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNTM). Eur J Pharm Biopharm 46(2):145–151
Domb AJ (1995) Long acting injectable oxytetracycline-liposphere formulations. Int J Pharm 124(2):271–278
Westesen K, Bunjes H (1995) Do nanoparticles prepared from lipids solid at room temperature always possess a solid lipid matrix? Int J Pharm 115(1):129–131
Almeida AJ, Runge S, Muller RH (1997) Peptide-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN): influence of production parameters. Int J Pharm 149(2):255–265
Gasco MR, Cavalli CME (1992) Timolol in lipospheres. Pharmazie 47(2):119–121
Dahan A, Hoffman A (2006) Use of a dynamic in vitro lipolysis model to rationalize oral formulation development for poor water soluble drugs: correlation with in vivo data and the relationship to intra-enterocyte processes in rats. Pharm Res 23(9):2165–2174
Porter CH et al (2004) Susceptibility to lipase-mediated digestion reduces the oral bioavailability of danazol after administration as a medium-chain lipid-based microemulsion formulation. Pharm Res 21(8):1405–1412
Dahan A, Hoffman A (2007) The effect of different lipid based formulations on the oral absorption of lipophilic drugs: The ability of in vitro lipolysis and consecutive ex vivo intestinal permeability data to predict in vivo bioavailability in rats. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 67(1):96–105
Sek L et al (2002) Evaluation of the in-vitro digestion profiles of long and medium chain glycerides and the phase behaviour of their lipolytic products. J Pharm Pharmacol 54(1):29–41
Larsen AT, Sassene P, Müllertz A (2011) In vitro lipolysis models as a tool for the characterization of oral lipid and surfactant based drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm 417(1–2):245–255
Vodovozova EL et al (2000) Antitumour activity of cytotoxic liposomes equipped with selectin ligand SiaLeX, in a mouse mammary adenocarcinoma model. Eur J Cancer (Oxf, Eng 1990) 36(7):942–949
Hashida M, Sato K et al (1988) Characterization of a lipophilic prodrug of 5-fluorouracil with a cholesterol promoiety and its application to liposomes. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 36(8):3186–3189
Sun W et al (2008) Preparation and evaluation of N3-O-toluyl-fluorouracil-loaded liposomes. Int J Pharm 353(1–2):243–250
Fonseca C et al (2005) Targeting of sterically stabilised pH-sensitive liposomes to human T-leukaemia cells. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 59(2):359–366
Roux E et al (2004) Serum-stable and long-circulating, PEGylated, pH-sensitive liposomes. J Control Release 94(2–3):447–451
Shi G et al (2002) Efficient intracellular drug and gene delivery using folate receptor-targeted pH-sensitive liposomes composed of cationic/anionic lipid combinations. J Control Release 80(1–3):309–319
Ferraretto A et al (1996) Characterization of biotinylated liposomes sensitive to temperature and pH: new tools for anti-cancer drug delivery. Chem Phys Lipids 82(2):133–139
Pradhan P et al (2010) Targeted temperature sensitive magnetic liposomes for thermo-chemotherapy. J Control Release 142(1):108–121
Yudina A et al (2011) Ultrasound-mediated intracellular drug delivery using microbubbles and temperature-sensitive liposomes. J Control Release 155(3):442–448
Zhang H et al (2011) Development and characteristics of temperature-sensitive liposomes for vinorelbine bitartrate. Int J Pharm 414(1–2):56–62
Hildebrand A et al (2004) Solubilization of negatively charged DPPC/DPPG liposomes by bile salts. J Colloid Interface Sci 279(2):559–571
Wu J et al (2007) Vascular targeting of doxorubicin using cationic liposomes. Int J Pharm 337(1–2):329–335
Hafez IM, Cullis PR (2000) Cholesteryl hemisuccinate exhibits pH sensitive polymorphic phase behavior. Biochim Biophys Acta 1463(1):107–114
Anthony AA, Mumuni AM, Philip FB (2012) Lipid nanoparticulate drug delivery systems: a revolution in dosage form design and development. In: Sezer AD (ed) Recent advances in novel drug carrier systems. Humana, Totowa
Allen TM et al (1995) A new strategy for attachment of antibodies to sterically stabilized liposomes resulting in efficient targeting to cancer cells. Biochim Biophy Acta 1237(2):99–108
Sapra P, Allen TM (2003) Ligand-targeted liposomal anticancer drugs. Prog Lipid Res 42(5):439–462
Patere SN, Shah SM, Pankaj OP, Nagarsenker MS (2011) Liposomal drug delivery system for receptor based hepatic targeting. In 38th annual meeting and exposition of the controlled release society. 2011, Controlled Release Society: Gaylord National Hotel, National Harbor, Maryland, USA. p. 437
Byrne JD, Betancourt T, Brannon-Peppas L (2008) Active targeting schemes for nanoparticle systems in cancer therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60(15):1615–1626
Chen X-Y et al (2013) Creation of lung-targeted dexamethasone immunoliposome and its therapeutic effect on bleomycin-induced lung injury in rats. PLoS One 8(3):e58275
Debs RJ, Heath TD, Papahadjopoulos D (1987) Targeting of anti-Thy 1.1 monoclonal antibody conjugated liposomes in Thy 1.1 mice after intraveneous administration. Biochim Biophys Acta 901(2):183–190
Elbayoumi TA, Torchilin VP (2007) Enhanced cytotoxicity of monoclonal anticancer antibody 2C5-modified doxorubicin-loaded PEGylated liposomes against various tumor cell lines. Eur J Pharm Sci 32(3):159–168
Koning GA, Kamps JAAM, Scherphof GL (2002) Efficient intracellular delivery of 5-fluorodeoxyuridine into colon cancer cells by targeted immunoliposomes. Cancer Detect Prev 26(4):299–307
Lukyanov AN et al (2004) Tumor-targeted liposomes: doxorubicin-loaded long-circulating liposomes modified with anti-cancer antibody. J Control Release 100(1):135–144
Suzuki S, Uno S, Fukuda Y, Aoki Y, Masuko T, Hashimoto Y (1995) Cytotoxicity of anti-c-erbB-2 immunoliposomes containing doxorubicin on human cancer cells. Br J Cancer 72(3):663–668
Suzuki S et al (1995) Preparation of long-circulating immunoliposomes containing adriamycin by a novel method to coat immunoliposomes with poly(ethylene glycol). Biochim Biophys Acta 1245(1):9–16
Wolff B, Gregoriadis G (1984) The use of monoclonal anti-Thy1IgG1 for the targeting of liposomes to AKR-A cells in vitro and in vivo. Biochim Biophys Acta 802(2):259–273
Kawakami S et al (2000) Biodistribution characteristics of mannosylated, fucosylated, and galactosylated liposomes in mice. Biochim Biophys Acta 1524(2–3):258–265
Kaneo Y, Tanaka T et al (2001) Evidence for receptor-mediated hepatic uptake of pullulan in rats. J Control Release 70(3):365–373
Guhagarkar S et al (2011) Evaluation of pullulan-functionalized doxorubicin nanoparticles for asialoglycoprotein receptor-mediated uptake in Hep G2 cell line. Cancer Nanotechnol 2(1–6):49–55
Amir K, Jaleh V, Abbas Jafarian D (2012) Targeting etoposide to acute myelogenous leukaemia cells using nanostructured lipid carriers coated with transferrin. Nanotechnology 23(40):405101
Garanger E, Boturyn D, Dumy P (2007) Tumor targeting with RGD peptide ligands-design of new molecular conjugates for imaging and therapy of cancers. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 7(5):552–558
Fang B, Jiang L et al (2013) A novel cell-penetrating peptide TAT-A1 delivers siRNA into tumor cells selectively. Biochemie 95(2):251–257
Biswas, S., et al., Surface functionalization of doxorubicin-loaded liposomes with octa-arginine for enhanced anticancer activity. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 84(3): 517-525.
Banerjee R, Tyagi P et al (2004) Anisamide-targeted stealth liposomes: a potent carrier for targeting doxorubicin to human prostate cancer cells. Int J Cancer 112(4):693–700
Mukherjee A, Prasad TK et al (2005) Haloperidol-associated stealth liposomes: a potent carrier for delivering genes to human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 280:15619–15627
Tsuruta W et al (2009) Application of liposomes incorporating doxorubicin with sialyl Lewis X to prevent stenosis after rat carotid artery injury. Biomaterials 30(1):118–125
Jones MN (1994) Carbohydrate-mediated liposomal targeting and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 13(3):215–249
Mercadal M et al (1998) Preparation of immunoliposomes directed against CD34 antigen as target. Biochim Biophys Acta 1371(1):17–23
Yang T et al (2007) Preparation and evaluation of paclitaxel-loaded PEGylated immunoliposome. J Control Release 120(3):169–177
Kitagawa S, Kasamaki M, Kasamaki M (2006) Enhanced delivery of retinoic acid to skin by cationic liposomes. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 54(2):242–244
Knudsen NÃs et al (2011) Targeting of liposome-associated calcipotriol to the skin: effect of liposomal membrane fluidity and skin barrier integrity. Int J Pharm 416(2):478–485
Geusens B et al (2009) Ultradeformable cationic liposomes for delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) into human primary melanocytes. J Control Release 133(3):214–220
Goppert TM, Muller RH (2003) Plasma protein adsorption of Tween 80- and poloxamer 188-stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles. J Drug Target 11(4):225–231
Rezazadeh M, Emami J, Varshosaz J (2012) Cellular uptake of targeted nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) and cytotoxicity evaluation of encapsulated paclitaxel in HT29 cancer cells. Res Pharm Sci 7(5):S191
Emami J et al (2012) Formulation of LDL targeted nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with paclitaxel: a detailed study of preparation, freeze drying condition, and in vitro cytotoxicity. J Nanomater 2012:10
Liu Y, Li K et al (2010) Folic acid conjugated nanoparticles of mixed lipid monolayer shell and biodegradable polymer core for targeted delivery of Docetaxel. Biomaterials 31(2):330–338
Vyas SP, Subhedar R, Jain S (2006) Development and characterization of emulsomes for sustained and targeted delivery of an antiviral agent to liver. J Pharm Pharmacol 58(3):321–326
Cevc G, Blume G (2001) New, highly efficient formulation of diclofenac for the topical, transdermal administration in ultradeformable drug carriers, Transfersomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1514(2):191–205
Elsayed MMA et al (2006) Deformable liposomes and ethosomes: mechanism of enhanced skin delivery. Int J Pharm 322(1–2):60–66
Cevc G, Blume G (1992) Lipid vesicles penetrate into intact skin owing to the transdermal osmotic gradients and hydration force. Biochim Biophys Acta 1104(1):226–232
Cevc G (1996) Transfersomes, liposomes and other lipid suspensions on the skin: permeation enhancement, vesicle penetration, and transdermal drug delivery. Crit Rev Drug Carrier Syst 13(3–4):257–388
El Maghraby GMM, Williams AC, Barry BW (2000) Oestradiol skin delivery from ultradeformable liposomes: refinement of surfactant concentration. Int J Pharm 196(1):63–74
El Maghraby GMM, Williams AC, Barry BW (2000) Skin delivery of oestradiol from lipid vesicles: importance of liposome structure. Int J Pharm 204(1–2):159–169
Trotta M et al (2004) Deformable liposomes for dermal administration of methotrexate. Int J Pharm 270(1–2):119–125
Jain S, Sapre R et al (2005) Proultraflexible lipid vesicles for effective transdermal delivery of levonorgestrel: development, characterization, and performance evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech 6(3):E513–E522
Kim A et al (2004) In vitro and in vivo transfection efficiency of a novel ultradeformable cationic liposome. Biomaterials 25(2):305–313
Hiruta Y et al (2006) Novel ultra-deformable vesicles entrapped with bleomycin and enhanced to penetrate rat skin. J Control Release 113(2):146–154
Maghraby GMME, Williams AC, Barry BW (2001) Skin delivery of 5-fluorouracil from ultradeformable and standard liposomes in-vitro. J Pharm Pharmacol 53(8):1069–1077
Gupta PN et al (2005) Non-invasive vaccine delivery in transfersomes, niosomes and liposomes: a comparative study. Int J Pharm 293(1–2):73–82
Fang Y-P et al (2009) Topical delivery of 5-aminolevulinic acid-encapsulated ethosomes in a hyperproliferative skin animal model using the CLSM technique to evaluate the penetration behavior. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 73(3):391–398
Dubey V, Mishra D, Jain NK (2007) Melatonin loaded ethanolic liposomes: physicochemical characterization and enhanced transdermal delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 67(2):398–405
Bhadra D et al (2004) Ethosomes: a novel vesicular carrier for enhanced transdermal delivery of an antiHIV agent. J Pharm Sci 66:72–81
Lopez-Pinto JM, Gonzalez-Rodreguez ML, Rabasco AM (2005) Effect of cholesterol and ethanol on dermal delivery from DPPC liposomes. Int J Pharm 298(1):1–12
Paolino D et al (2005) Ethosomes for skin delivery of ammonium glycyrrhizinate: In vitro percutaneous permeation through human skin and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity on human volunteers. J Control Release 106(1–2):99–110
Touitou E et al (2000) Ethosomes as novel vesicular carriers for enhanced delivery: characterization and skin penetration properties. J Control Release 65(3):403–418
Dragicevic-Curic N et al (2009) Development of different temoporfin-loaded invasomes as novel nanocarriers of temoporfin: characterization, stability and in vitro skin penetration studies. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 70(2):198–206
Bawa R (2008) Nanoparticle-based therapeutics in humans: a survey. Nanotechnol Law Bus 5(2):135–155
Etheridge ML et al (2013) The big picture on nanomedicine: the state of investigational and approved nanomedicine products. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 9(1):1–14
Acknowledgments
Ankitkumar S. Jain is thankful to Amrut Mody Research Fund (AMRF), Mumbai, India and University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India for financial assistance. Sanket M. Shah is thankful to Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India for financial assistance. We would also like to extend our acknowledgement to Mukul Ashtikar, Frank Steiniger, Jana Thamm, and Prof. Alfred Fahr from Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany for expertise and support in investigating the vesicular structure of LeciPlex, as a part of Indian Council of Medical Research ICMR–Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung BMBF funded project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Controlled Release Society
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagarsenker, M.S., Jain, A.S., Shah, S.M. (2015). Functionalized Lipid Particulates in Targeted Drug Delivery. In: Devarajan, P., Jain, S. (eds) Targeted Drug Delivery : Concepts and Design. Advances in Delivery Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11355-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11355-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11354-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11355-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)