Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to describe rehabilitative techniques and their clinical impacts on fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation. Anal electric stimulation, biofeedback, pelvic floor muscle training, and sensory retraining have been used to treat the symptoms of people with these fecal disorders. Many patients may be cured and their quality of life improves. Moreover, rehabilitation offers a harmless mode for identifying those “nonresponder patients” who should be next in line for more invasive and expensive therapeutic procedures (sacral neuromodulation, surgery).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Biofeedback
- Anal Electrical Stimulation
- Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
- Sensory Retraining
- Obstructed Defecation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
6.1 Fecal Disorder Rehabilitation
The conservative management of defecation disorders in adults is based on education and lifestyle interventions, diet and fluid intake, bowel management, and retraining programs. The rehabilitative treatment of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation is the first-line therapy in patients who have not responded to simple dietary programs and medication [1, 2]. Anal electric stimulation, biofeedback, pelvic floor muscle training, and sensory retraining have been used to treat the symptoms of people with these fecal disorders. Nevertheless, because there are no international agreements on the use of these various rehabilitative techniques, the main problems in this field are related to the absence of standards and guidelines. Moreover, rehabilitation requires a highly trained therapist and is time-consuming both for the therapist and the patient. Therefore, the patient must be strongly motivated. In spite of these negative factors, rehabilitative treatment has a high success rate of about 70 %, and the patient’s quality of life after treatment is significantly better than it was before [3, 4].
The aim of this chapter is to describe rehabilitative techniques and their clinical impacts on fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation.
6.2 Anal Electrical Stimulation
Anal electrical stimulation was first described about 50 years ago for the treatment of fecal incontinence [5, 6]. Skin or intra-anal plugs, connected to clinical work stations or portable devices, have been used, and the rehabilitative treatment is usually performed daily for some months by the patient in a home environment. The purpose of anal electrical stimulation is to induce muscle contraction by direct stimulation or indirectly via peripheral nerve stimulation. The device delivers a square wave of current alternating between a period of a few seconds of work and a double rest period, according to a standard sequence of pulses (width in ms; frequency in Hz) reported in a printed instruction sheet that is given to patients. There is at present no experimental evidence to guide optimum electrical stimulation parameters for different symptoms and clinical conditions. Therefore, there is no universally accepted protocol, and electrical parameters that can be used for anal stimulation vary among centers: the work and rest periods, width and frequency of pulses, and ramp up and ramp down of waves are not standardized. A stimulator is usually used for 20 min daily, but it can be applied twice/day: however, regular outpatient monitoring is needed to verify the application of electrical stimulating protocol. How electrical stimulation works on anal function has not yet been defined. It is postulated that chronic axonal stimulation increases the efficacy of neuromuscular transmission, activates dormant axons, and increases the conduction rate of pudendal nerves [7]: the effect seems to be an improvement in anal and perineal awareness [8]. Several uncontrolled studies have reported clinical benefit of anal electrical stimulation when used in patients affected by fecal incontinence [9–11]. On the contrary, other studies have not shown any therapeutic advantage and have underlined the superiority of biofeedback when compared to electrical stimulation [12–14]. A Cochrane review of trials of electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence concluded that “At present there are insufficient data to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn on the effects of electrical stimulation in the management of fecal incontinence. There is a suggestion that electrical stimulation may have a therapeutic effect, but this is not certain” [15]. So, on the basis of currently available evidence, it is not possible to recommend electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence [2]. On the other hand, electrical stimulation, when used in combination with biofeedback and sphincter exercises, enhances their effects [16–19]. A recent review concluded that there is sufficient evidence of the efficacy of the combination of biofeedback plus electrical stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence [20].
Isolated reports point to the positive use of electrical anal stimulation in patients affected by obstructed defecation [4, 21, 22]. The same remarks, made for electrical anal stimulation used in patients affected by fecal incontinence, are valid also for this topic.
6.3 Biofeedback
Biofeedback is considered to be an operant conditioning technique for the defecation reflex [23]. It consists of sphincteric coordination exercises together with visual/verbal feedback training: it employs a trial-and-error process whereby learning takes place and the patient must be aware of the desired response (signals). Biofeedback training is aimed at improving voluntary external anal sphincter contraction and relaxation [24, 25] and restoring the synchrony of internal and external sphincter response during rectal distension [26]. Biofeedback may make use of electromyographic or pressure devices in the clinic using a working station or at home by means of portable electronics, but there is no standardization: instrumentation, training procedures, and operative protocols differ between one center and another. Because of this, it is very difficult to compare rehabilitative outcomes. Biofeedback, either alone or in combination with other rehabilitative techniques [27, 28], is generally attempted only after pharmacological therapy has failed in the treatment of defecation disorders. The response rate, which includes both symptom improvement and cure rates, ranges from 50 to 80 % in the treatment of fecal incontinence [2] and from 35 to 75 % in patients affected by obstructed defecation [29, 30]. Clinical improvement is maintained in the long term, but continuing exercises are needed to sustain the success rate [28, 31].
6.4 Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
The aim of pelvic floor muscle training is to improve performance, extension, and elasticity of the levator ani and perineal muscles. The main targets of pelviperineal rehabilitative exercises are on resting tone and voluntary contraction/relaxation of the puborectalis muscle that becomes strengthened and coordinated. Post-defecatory reflex and the stress abdominoperineal reflex also become more effective. These results are achieved by means of sequential exercises performed weekly in outpatient sessions. Usually, pelvic floor muscle training is combined with biofeedback [27, 32]. The variety and sequence of pelviperineal exercises are not standardized and each clinic dedicated to pelvic floor rehabilitation has its own treatment protocol. However, some rehabilitative steps may be proposed. After a preliminary lesson on relaxed breathing and corporeal consciousness, the patient is taught to locate and focus on agonist, antagonist, and synergic muscles on the perianal plane. The next main steps of pelvic floor training are anteversion and retroversion pelvic movements, anal contractions/relaxations, perianal and perivaginal stretching, stretch reflexes of the puborectalis muscles, abdominopelvic synergy, and finally anal corticalization [19, 27]. Pelvic floor muscle training is mainly used in patients with obstructed defecation who have pelvic floor dyssynergia, because it is specific training for uncoordinated pelvic floor muscles [27, 33]. It is also used in patients with fecal incontinence and pelvic floor defects [19] or descending perineum syndrome [34]. The success rate is high: symptom severity and quality of life improve in about 90 % of patients affected by pelvic floor dyssynergia, and the results are long-lasting [4, 33].
6.5 Sensory Retraining
Defective rectal sensitivity may be involved in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence [35, 36]. Intact rectal sensation plays a key role in fecal continence and normal defecation: a normal perception of fecal bolus and gas sustains basal continence and is decisive in triggering and maintaining defecation. Rectal hyposensitivity [37] and rectal hypersensitivity [38] are the pathophysiological mechanisms which impair rectal sensation. Sensory retraining is thus aimed at restoring the defective rectal sensitivity. Hyposensitivity and hypersensitivity occur when sensory threshold values fall outside normal limits: hyposensitivity is detected when the manometric sensory threshold is higher than normal values, hypersensitivity when the threshold is lower. Retraining of the rectal sensory threshold, restoration of elastic properties of the rectum, and retraining of external anal sphincter response to rectal distension are the targets of sensory retraining. Such rehabilitation treatment may be performed through biofeedback [39], an inflated balloon [40], or water enemas of decreasing/increasing volume [19]. Unfortunately, evidence of targeted therapy on defective rectal sensitivity is lacking, with no randomized controlled trials available. However, sensory retraining has been shown to objectively improve symptoms in up to 92 % of patients [37] and subjectively improve obstructed defecation [29, 41] and incontinence [42] with sustained improvement for at least 12 months [43].
In conclusion, the rehabilitative treatment of fecal disorders is a good therapeutic option: many patients improve and some of them become symptom-free. Moreover, rehabilitation offers a harmless mode for identifying those “nonresponder patients” who should be next in line for more invasive and expensive therapeutic procedures (sacral neuromodulation, surgery).
References
Khaikin M, Wexner SD (2006) Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 28:3168–3173
Norton C, Whitehead WE, Bliss DZ, Harari D, Lang J (2010) Management of fecal incontinence in adults. Neurourol Urodyn 29:199–206
Heymen S, Jones KR, Ringel Y, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE (2001) Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence: a critical review. Dis Colon Rectum 44:728–736
Pucciani F, Raggioli M, Ringressi MN (2012) Obstructed defecation: what is the role of rehabilitation? Colorectal Dis 14:474–479
Caldwell KP (1963) The electrical control of sphincter incompetence. Lancet 2:174–175
Haskell B, Rovner H (1967) Electromyography in the management of the incompetent anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 10:81–84
Healy C, Brannigan AE, Connolly EM, Eng M, O’Sullivan MJ, McNamara DA, Cusack C, Deasy JM (2006) The effects of low-frequency endo-anal electrical stimulation on faecal incontinence: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:802–806
Norton C, Gibbs A, Kamm MA (2006) Randomized controlled trial of anal electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:190–196
Larpent JL, Cuer JC, Da Poigny M (1987) Clinical and manometric results of electrical stimulation in patients with anal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol 3:183–184
Pescatori M, Pavesio R, Anastasio G, Daini S (1991) Transanal electrostimulation for fecal incontinence: clinical. Psychologic and manometric prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 34:540–545
Osterberg A, Graf W, Eeg-Olofsson K, Hallden M, Pahlman L (1999) Is electrostimulation of the pelvic floor an effective treatment for neurogenic fecal incontinence? Scand J Gastroenterol 34:319–324
Leroy AM, Karoui S, Touchais JY, Berkelmans I, Denis P (1999) Electrostimulation is not a clinically effective treatment of anal incontinence. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:1045–1047
Surh S, Kienle P, Stern J, Herfarth C (1998) Passive electrostimulation therapy of the anal sphincter is inferior to active biofeedback training. Lagenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 115:976–978
Kienle P, Weitz J, Koch M, Brenner A, Herfath C, Schmidt J (2003) Biofeedback versus electrostimulation in treatment of anal sphincter insufficiency. Dig Dis Sci 48:1607–1613
Hosker G, Cody JD, Norton CC (2007) Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001310.pub2
Boselli AS, Pinna F, Cecchini S, Costi R, Marchesi F, Violi V, Sarli L, Roncoroni L (2010) Biofeedback therapy plus anal electrostimulation for fecal incontinence: prognostic factors and effects on anorectal physiology. World J Surg 34:815–821
Norton C, Cody JD (2012) Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (7). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002111.pub3
Schwandner T, Hemmelmann C, Heimert T, Kierer W, Kolbert G, Vonthein R, Weinel R, Hirschburger M, Ziegler A, Padberg W (2011) Triple-target treatment versus low-frequency electrostimulation for anal incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108:653–660
Pucciani F, Iozzi L, Masi A, Cianchi F, Cortesini C (2003) Multimodal rehabilitation of faecal incontinence: experience of an Italian centre devoted to faecal disorder rehabilitation. Tech Coloproctol 7:139–147
Vonthein R, Heimerl T, Schwandner T, Ziegler A (2013) Electrical stimulation and biofeedback for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1567–1577
Chiarioni G, Chistolini F, Menegotti M, Salandini L, Vantini I, Morelli A, Bassotti G (2004) One-year follow-up study on the effects of electrogalvanic stimulation in chronic idiopathic constipation with pelvic floor dyssynergia. Dis Colon Rectum 47:346–353
Nicastro A, Stella LP, Nicolai AP (2006) Constipation. Proposal for a new classification and therapy. Chir Ital 58:203–212
Engel BT, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM (1974) Operant conditioning of rectosphincteric response in the treatment of fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 190:646–649
Marcello PW, Barrett RC, Coller JA, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Rusin LC (1998) Fatigue rate index as a new measurement of external sphincter function. Dis Colon Rectum 41:336–343
Palsson OS, Heymen S, Whitehead WE (2004) Biofeedback treatment for functional anorectal disorders: a comprehensive efficacy review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 29:153–174
Loening-Baucke V (1990) Biofeedback therapy for fecal incontinence. Dig Dis 8:112–124
Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A, Cianchi F, Forconi S, Cutellè M, Cortesini C (1998) Pelvic floor dyssynergia and bimodal rehabilitation: results of combined pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback training. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:124–130
Schwandner T, König IR, Heimerl T, Kierer W, Roblick M, Bouchard R, Unglaube T, Holch P, Ziegler A, Kolbert G (2010) Triple target treatment (3T) is more effective than biofeedback alone for anal incontinence: the 3T-AI study. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1007–1016
Rao SSC, Welcher KD, Pelsang RE (1997) Effects of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function in obstructive defecation. Dig Dis Sci 42:2197–2205
Byoung HL, Nayoung K, Sung-Bum K, So Yeon K, Kyoung–HO L, Bo Youn I, Jung Hee J, Jane C, Young Soo P, Dong Ho L (2010) The long-term clinical efficacy of biofeedback therapy for patients with constipation or fecal incontinence. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 16:177–185
Lacima G, Pera M, Amador A, Escaramis G, Piqué JM (2010) Long-term results of biofeedback treatment for faecal incontinence: a comparative study with untreated controls. Colorectal Dis 12:742–749
Battaglia E, Serra AM, Buonafede G, Dughera L, Chistolini F, Morelli A, Emanuelli G, Bassotti G (2004) Long-term study on the effects of visual biofeedback and muscle training as a therapeutic modality in pelvic floor dyssynergia and slow transit constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 47:90–95
Lewicky-Gaupp C, Morgan DM, Chey WD, Muellerleile P, Fenner DE (2008) Successful physical therapy for constipation related to puborectalis dyssynergia improves symptom severity and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1686–1691
Harewood GC, Coulie B, Camilleri M, Rath-Harvey D, Pemberton JH (1999) Descending perineum syndrome: audit of clinical and laboratory features and outcome of pelvic floor retraining. Am J Gastroenterol 94:126–130
Gosselink MJ, Schouten MR (2001) Rectal sensory perception in females with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1337–1344
Pucciani F (2013) Faecal soiling: pathophysiology of post-defecatory incontinence. Colorectal Dis 15:987–992
Burgell RE, Scott SM (2012) Rectal hyposensitivity. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 18:373–384
Ludidi S, Conchillo JM, Keszthelyi D, Van Avesaat M, Kruimel JW, Jonkers DM, Masclee AA (2012) Rectal hypersensitivity as hallmark for irritable bowel syndrome: defining the optimal cutoff. Neurogastroenterol Motil 24:729–733
Whitehead W, Wald A, Norton J (2001) Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:131–144
Wald A (2007) Clinical practice. Fecal incontinence in adults. N Engl J Med 356:1648–1655
Peticca L, Pescatori M (2002) Outlet obstruction due to anismus and rectal hyposensation: effect of biofeedback training. Colorectal Dis 4:67
Chiarioni G, Bassotti G, Stanganini S, Vantini I, Whitehead WE (2002) Sensory retraining is the key to biofeedback therapy for formed stool incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 97:109–117
Ozturk L, Niazi S, Stessman M, Rao SS (2004) Long-term outcome and objective changes of anorectal function after biofeedback therapy for faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:667–674
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pucciani, F. (2015). Electrical Stimulation, Biofeedback, and Other Rehabilitative Techniques. In: Martellucci, J. (eds) Electrical Stimulation for Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06947-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06947-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06946-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06947-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)