Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

1 Design of Solar Panel Tracking System

A newly developed solar tracking system is introduced with its adjustable orientation angle to track daily sunlight in 3D directions in order to receive the maximum solar energy via systematic photovoltaic arrays. The driving mechanisms designed with gear train unit in this solar tracking system can orientate solar system between east and west and a rotating table can orientate solar unit between north and south. The prototype of this new solar tracking system is depicted in Figs. 4.1 and 4.2.

Fig. 4.1
figure 1

Solar panel system front view

Fig. 4.2
figure 2

Solar panel system rear view

Figure 4.1 shows the prototype of this new solar tracking system that has an orientation rack and orientation base (with stepper motor and gear reducer inside) installed to rotate solar panel frame in the eastern-western direction and has motor driving system, base plate, and orientation plate mounted to keep solar panel frame gradually rotating to follow sun’s yearly travel in north-south orbit. Several detecting sensors are installed to trace the sunlight through receiving varied current signals from photodiodes in order to automatically manipulate the solar panel rotation in eastern-western and northern-southern 3D directions.

2 Computer-Aided Simulation of Solar Panel Tracking System

This new solar tracking system is designed based on analysis of computer-aided modeling and numerical simulation. The 3D modeling of the solar tracking system is performed by 3D CAD software and structure analysis is carried out by FEA technique. The structure analysis includes validating the functionality and strength of driving system in east-west and north-south solar panel orientation.

  1. 1.

    Calculation of wind force:

The wind load required should be considered in the solar tracking system design to make sure that all the functioning parts, such as panel frame, lateral channel beam, longitudinal channel beam, orientation adaptor, orientation rack, orientation base, orientation driver support, and orientation link, will still work under the maximum wind load in worst conditions. The wind load equation can be expressed as follows (Mehta and Coulburne 2010):

$$ {F}_{\mathrm{wind}}={A}_{\mathrm{project}}\times {P}_{\mathrm{wind}}\times {D}_{\mathrm{drag}} $$
(4.1)

The wind pressure P wind can be defined by the following equation:

$$ {P}_{\mathrm{wind}}=0.00256\times {V}_{\mathrm{wind}}^2 $$
(4.2)

Here, F wind—load caused by wind (lbf), A project—projected surface area of solar panel at different orientation (ft2), P wind—pressure caused by wind (psf), D drag—coefficient of drag, and V wind—speed of wind (mph).

  1. 2.

    Calculation of gear-train force in solar panel orientation:

To keep the gears from damage during solar panel tracking system operation, the gear train must be able to handle the resultant force from force of wind, weight of solar panel and hardware, and other related frictional forces. The resultant force can be determined as follows (Mehta and Coulburne 2010):

$$ {T}_{\mathrm{p}\mathrm{anel}}\left(\mathrm{torque}\ \mathrm{to}\ \mathrm{orientate}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{solar}\ \mathrm{panel}\right)={N}_{\mathrm{d}}\times 0.5\times {d}_{\mathrm{p}}={F}_{\mathrm{R}}\times 0.5\times {D}_{\mathrm{gear}} $$
(4.3)
$$ {F}_{\mathrm{R}}={W}_{\mathrm{total}\ \mathrm{weight}}\times {C}_{\mathrm{f}} $$

Here, N d—force to drive gear (N), d—gear pitch diameter, F R—orientation force (N), D O—outside gear diameter, W TW—total weight of solar panel system (kg), and C f—friction coefficient of different contact materials. The force to drive gears changes when solar panel orientates to the different angles which can be determined through computer-aided modeling and simulation.

Figures 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18, 4.19, 4.20, 4.21, 4.22, 4.23, 4.24, 4.25, 4.26, 4.27, 4.28, and 4.29 show the 3D part models, stress profile, and deflection profile of critical components in this new solar tracking system.

Fig. 4.3
figure 3

Solar panel

Fig. 4.4
figure 4

Stress profile in solar panel

Fig. 4.5
figure 5

Deflection profile in solar panel

Fig. 4.6
figure 6

Solar panel frame

Fig. 4.7
figure 7

Stress profile in panel frame

Fig. 4.8
figure 8

Deflection profile in panel frame

Fig. 4.9
figure 9

Lateral channel beam

Fig. 4.10
figure 10

Stress profile in lateral channel beam

Fig. 4.11
figure 11

Deflection profile in lateral channel beam

Fig. 4.12
figure 12

Longitudinal channel beam

Fig. 4.13
figure 13

Stress profile in longitudinal channel beam

Fig. 4.14
figure 14

Deflection profile in longitudinal channel beam

Fig. 4.15
figure 15

Orientation adaptor

Fig. 4.16
figure 16

Stress profile in orientation adaptor

Fig. 4.17
figure 17

Deflection profile in orientation adaptor

Fig. 4.18
figure 18

Orientation rack

Fig. 4.19
figure 19

Stress profile in orientation rack

Fig. 4.20
figure 20

Deflection profile in orientation rack

Fig. 4.21
figure 21

Orientation base

Fig. 4.22
figure 22

Stress profile in orientation base

Fig. 4.23
figure 23

Deflection profile in orientation base

Fig. 4.24
figure 24

Orientation driver support

Fig. 4.25
figure 25

Stress profile in orientation driver support

Fig. 4.26
figure 26

Deflection profile in orientation driver support

Fig. 4.27
figure 27

Orientation link

Fig. 4.28
figure 28

Stress profile in orientation link

Fig. 4.29
figure 29

Deflection profile in orientation link

The computer-aided simulation and analysis in Figs. 4.4 and 4.5 demonstrate the stress and deflection profiles of newly designed solar panel system. The analytic results present that the maximum stress of 2,267.076 psi in this solar panel system is less than the material yield strength of 36,300 psi and maximum deflection of 0.00507 in. is within material allowable deformation limit.

The computer-aided simulation and analysis in Figs. 4.10 and 4.11 indicate the stress and deflection profiles of lateral channel beam in newly designed solar panel system. The analytic results state that the maximum stress of 15,877.88 psi in this lateral channel beam is less than the material yield strength of 36,300 psi and maximum deflection of 0.00828 in. is within material allowable deformation limit.

The computer-aided simulation and analysis in Figs. 4.13 and 4.14 display the stress and deflection profiles of longitudinal channel beam in newly designed solar panel system. The analytic results exhibit that the maximum stress of 17,589.58 psi in this longitudinal channel beam is less than the material yield strength of 36,300 psi and maximum deflection of 0.02748 in. is within material allowable deformation limit.

The computer-aided simulation and analysis in Figs. 4.16 and 4.17 present the stress and deflection profiles of orientation adaptor in newly designed solar panel system. The analytic results demonstrate that the maximum stress of 14,196.50 psi in this orientation adaptor is less than the material yield strength of 36,300 psi and maximum deflection of 0.00017 in. is within material allowable deformation limit.

The computer-aided simulation and analysis in Figs. 4.19 and 4.20 indicate the stress and deflection profiles of orientation rack in newly designed solar panel system. The analytic results state that the maximum stress of 16,842.35 psi in this orientation rack is less than the material yield strength of 36,300 psi and maximum deflection of 0.0511 in. is within material allowable deformation limit.

The computer-aided simulation and analysis in Figs. 4.22 and 4.23 display the stress and deflection profiles of orientation base in newly designed solar panel system. The analytic results exhibit that the maximum stress of 17,384.07 psi in this orientation base is less than the material yield strength of 36,300 psi and maximum deflection of 0.00345 in. is within material allowable deformation limit.

The computer-aided simulation and analysis in Figs. 4.25 and 4.26 present the stress and deflection profiles of orientation driver support in newly designed solar panel system. The analytic results exhibit that the maximum stress of 17,788.09 psi in this orientation base is less than the material yield strength of 36,300 psi and maximum deflection of 0.00016 in. is within material allowable deformation limit.

The computer-aided simulation and analysis in Figs. 4.28 and 4.29 demonstrate the stress and deflection profiles of orientation link in newly designed solar panel system. The analytic results indicate that the maximum stress of 18,023.74 psi in this orientation link is less than the material yield strength of 36,300 psi and maximum deflection of 0.01921 in. is within material allowable deformation limit.

Based on computer-aided analysis, shown in Figs. 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18, 4.19, 4.20, 4.21, 4.22, 4.23, 4.24, 4.25, 4.26, 4.27, 4.28, and 4.29, the maximum stresses generated in all important components including panel frame, lateral channel beam, longitudinal channel beam, orientation adaptor, orientation rack, orientation base, orientation driver support, and orientation link are all less than the material yield stress and the relevant maximum deflections of these components are all within allowable deformation limits of the materials. The above computational simulations have shown good performance of this newly developed solar tracking system.

3 Experiment on Solar Panel Tracking System

New solar panel tracking system has been prototyped and tested to compare and verify the computer-aided simulation results. Table 4.1 demonstrates the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of solar panel in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.1 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of solar panel in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of solar panel in Table 4.1 verify the proper function of this new solar panel system because the average maximum stress 2,267.160 psi and average maximum deflection 0.00519 in. are approximately equal to the results of maximum stress 2,267.076 psi and maximum deflection 0.00507 in. that are represented, respectively, in Figs. 4.4 and 4.5 by computer-aided simulation.

Table 4.2 expresses the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of solar panel frame in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.2 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of solar panel frame in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of solar panel frame in Table 4.2 prove the normal function of solar panel frame as the average maximum stress 14,343.15 psi and average maximum deflection 0.03126 in. are almost same as the results of maximum stress 14,343.03 psi and maximum deflection 0.03143 in. that are indicated, respectively, in Figs. 4.7 and 4.8 by computer-aided simulation.

Table 4.3 records the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of lateral channel beam in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.3 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of lateral channel beam in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of lateral channel beam in Table 4.3 confirm the appropriate function of lateral channel beam since the average maximum stress 15,877.69 psi and average maximum deflection 0.00842 in. are approximately same as the results of maximum stress 15,877.88 psi and maximum deflection 0.00827 in. that are laid out, respectively, in Figs. 4.10 and 4.11 by computer-aided simulation.

Table 4.4 states the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of longitudinal channel beam in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.4 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of longitudinal channel beam in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of longitudinal channel beam in Table 4.4 verify proper function of this longitudinal channel beam because the average maximum stress 17,589.44 psi and average maximum deflection 0.02761 in. are very close to the results of maximum stress 17,589.58 psi and maximum deflection 0.02748 in. that are shown, respectively, in Figs. 4.13 and 4.14 by computer-aided simulation.

Table 4.5 presents the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation adaptor in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.5 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation adaptor in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of orientation adaptor in Table 4.5 prove the normal function of orientation adaptor as the average maximum stress 14,196.38 psi and average maximum deflection 0.00011 in. are similar to the results of maximum stress 14,196.50 psi and maximum deflection 0.00017 in. that are presented, respectively, in Figs. 4.16 and 4.17 by computer-aided simulation.

Table 4.6 expresses the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation rack in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.6 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation rack in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of orientation rack in Table 4.6 confirm the appropriate function of orientation rack since the average maximum stress 16,842.22 psi and average maximum deflection 0.05118 in. are almost equal to the results of maximum stress 16,842.35 psi and maximum deflection 0.05107 in. that are indicated, respectively, in Figs. 4.19 and 4.20 by computer-aided simulation.

Table 4.7 conveys the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation base in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.7 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation base in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of orientation base in Table 4.7 prove the normal function of orientation base as the average maximum stress 17,384.20 psi and average maximum deflection 0.00331 in. are closely equal to the results of maximum stress 17,384.07 psi and maximum deflection 0.00335 in. that are recorded, respectively, in Figs. 4.22 and 4.23 by computer-aided simulation.

Table 4.8 lays out the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation driver support in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.8 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation driver support in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of orientation driver support in Table 4.8 verify the proper function of orientation driver support because the average maximum stress 17,788.20 psi and average maximum deflection 0.00025 in. are almost same as the results of maximum stress 17,788.09 psi and maximum deflection 0.00016 in. that are displayed, respectively, in Figs. 4.25 and 4.26 by computer-aided simulation.

Table 4.9 shows the experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation link in this new solar panel tracking system.

Table 4.9 Experimental results of maximum stress and maximum deflection of orientation link in this new solar panel tracking system

The prototype experimental results of orientation link in Table 4.9 confirm the appropriate function of orientation link since the average maximum stress 18,023.61 psi and average maximum deflection 0.01912 in. are approximately equal to the results of maximum stress 18,023.74 psi and maximum deflection 0.01921 in. that are exhibited, respectively, in Figs. 4.28 and 4.29 by computer-aided simulation.

4 Discussion and Future Improvement on Solar Panel Tracking System

Solar power system can transfer the natural sunlight energy to the electrical mechanical energies. It has the major advantages including safe and clean features compared to the traditional energy resources. This chapter introduces the methodologies using computational simulation and prototype testing to determine the important factors affecting the performance of this new solar panel tracking system. Both computational simulation and prototype experiment show its reliable function. Future improvement has been planned to optimize this solar tracking system by computer-aided modeling and analysis to determine the optimal working condition, further reduce system weight to save system cost, and revise the gear train for more quiet operation.