Abstract
Using the monumental work of figures like Bloomfield (1933), Harris (1951) and Chomsky (1965), scientific linguistics has often been centrally concerned with verbal patterns. Yet such views have even older roots. Ever since writing systems first arose in Sumeria, what people do as they talk has gradually been standardised in ways that eventually gave rise to the electronic use of artificial codes. First, iconic signs became ideographic or alphabetic. Then, in Europe, mediaeval scribes introduced spaces between units (and written words) and, in the aftermath of new technologies, there came dictionaries, grammars, printing and, yesterday, computers. As a result, written language bias (Linell, 2005) has dominated philosophy, linguistics and classic cognitive science. Languages are seen as verbal systems whose words and rules are, in some sense, separate from people. Even talk is often modelled around transcriptions that invite comparison with ways of construing verbal sequences. This can be highly misleading. In fact, while ideographic and alphabetic symbols are unsponsored, speech and hearing are coordinated human activity. Language is intrinsic to action and thus partly constitutive of experience: for Sartre (1945), self must be mirrored by others. Although this is a commonplace, many explanatory models reduce doing things with language to how linguistic forms are ‘used’ and/or ‘represented’. In what follows, I adopt the distributed perspective (see, Cowley, 2011b), to offer an alternative.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bakhtin, M.M.: Problems of Dostoyevsky’s poetics. University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis (1984), Emerson, C. (ed.)
Bloomfield, L.: Language. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1933)
Brier, S.: Cybersemiotics: why information is not enough! University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2008)
Browman, C., Goldstein, L.: Toward an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3(1), 219–252 (1986)
Clark, A.: Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)
Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)
Cowley, S.J.: Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology 23(3), 185–209 (2011a)
Cowley, S.J.: Distributed language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2011b)
Cowley, S.J., Moodley, S., Fiori-Cowley, A.: Grounding signs of culture: primary intersubjectivity in social semiosis. Mind, Culture and Activity 11(2), 109–132 (2004)
Cowley, S.J., Vallée-Tourangeau, F.: Systemic cognition: Human artifice in life and language. In: Cowley, S.J., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds.) Cognition Beyond the Brain: Interactivity, Computation and Human Artifice. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Cowley, S.J., Nash, L.: Language, interactivity and solution probing: repetition without repetition. Adaptive Behavior 21(3), 187–198 (2013)
Daniel, D.: Consciousness explained. Little Brown, Boston (1991)
Everett, D.L.: Language: the cultural tool. Profile Books, London (2012)
Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K.: Carving language for social coordination: A dynamical approach. Interaction Studies 13(1), 103–124 (2012)
Gibson, J.J.: The sensesasperceptualsystems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1966)
Gibson, J.J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)
Harris, Z.: Methods in structural linguistics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1951)
Harris, R.: The language myth. Duckworth, Oxford (1981)
Heidegger, M.: On the way to language. Harper & Row, New York (1971); Originally published, Unterwegs zur Sprache (1959)
Hodges, B.H.: Good prospects: Ecological and social perspectives on conforming, creating, and caring in conversation. Language Sciences 29(5), 584–604 (2007)
Järvilehto, T., Nurkkala, V.M., Koskela, K.: The role of anticipation in reading. Pragmatics & Cognition 17(3), 509–526 (2009)
Jeffries, R., Polson, P.G., Razran, L., Atwood, M.E.: A process model for missionaries-cannibals and other river-crossing problems. Cognitive Psychology 9(4), 412–440 (1977)
Knowles, M.E., Delaney, P.F.: ‘Lasting reductions in illegal moves following an increase in their cost: evidence from river-crossing problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(4), 670 (2005)
Kravchenko, A.V.: Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences 29(5), 650–671 (2007)
Lakoff, G.J., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
Linell, P.: The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations, vol. 5. Psychology Press, Brighton (2005)
Linell, P.: Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: is there a convergence between dialogism and neuro-biology? Language Sciences 29(5), 605–620 (2007)
Linell, P.: Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of sense making. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte (2009)
Love, N.: Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences 26(6), 525–544 (2004)
Maturana, H.: Biology of language: the epistemology of reality. In: Miller, G.A., Lenneberg, E. (eds.) Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honour of E- Lenneberg, pp. 27–63. Academic Press, New York (1978)
McNeill, D.: Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992)
Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London (1996)
Mills, G.J.: Dialogue in joint activity: complementarity, convergence and conventionalization. New Ideas in Psychology. Corrected proof (April 24, 2013)
O’Regan, J.K., Noë, A.: A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5), 939–972 (2001)
Port, R.F., Leary, A.P.: Against formal phonology. Language 81(4), 927–964 (2005)
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Kelso, J.A.S.: Reconciling symbolic and dynamic aspects of language: Toward a dynamic psycholinguistics. New Ideas in Psychology 26(2), 193–207 (2008)
Rendall, D., Owren, M.J., Ryan, M.J.: What do animal signals mean? Animal Behaviour 78(2), 233–240 (2009)
Sartre, J.P.: Huis clos. Gallimard, Paris (1945)
Shapiro, L.: Embodied cognition. Routledge, London (2010)
Steffensen, S.V.: Human interactivity: problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In: Cowley, S.J., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds.) Cognition Beyond the Brain: Interactivity, Computation and Human Artifice, pp. 195–221. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Spurrett, D., Cowley, S.J.: The extended infant: utterance-activity and distributed cognition. In: Menary, R. (ed.) The Extended Mind, pp. 275–323. MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)
Thibault, P.J.: First-Order Languaging Dynamics and Second-Order Language: The Distributed Language View. Ecological Psychology 23(3), 210–245 (2011)
Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical investigations, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (1965)
Wittgenstein, L.: On certainty. Blackwell, Oxford (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cowley, S.J. (2014). Human Language and Sensorimotor Contingency. In: Bishop, J., Martin, A. (eds) Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05106-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05107-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)