Zusammenfassung
Mit dem Begriff Online-Research wird im weitesten Sinn die Datenerhebung in computerbasierten Netzwerken bezeichnet (Batinic, 2004), also die Nutzung von Erhebungsverfahren, die das Internet auf irgendeine Weise als Medium nützen. Ein einheitlicher Begriff für die Forschung mit Hilfe des Internets hat sich noch nicht eingebürgert, Bezeichnungen wie web— oder internetbasierte Erhebungen oder Online-Untersuchungen werden ebenfalls verwendet. Online-Research kann grundsätzlich in allen Bereichen der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung stattfinden. (2005) zählen unter anderem folgende Erscheinungsformen auf:
-
Grundlagen- und angewandte Forschung
-
Quantitative und qualitative Forschung
-
Deskriptive, hypothesentestende und-entwickelnde Forschung
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
10. Literatur
Bailey R. D., Foote W. E. & Throckmorton B. (2000). Human Sexual Behavior: A Comparison of College and Internet Surveys. In: Birnbaum M. H. (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 141–168). San Diego: Academic Press.
Batinic B. (2004). Online-Research. In: Mangold R., Vorderer P. & Bente G. (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 251–270). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Batinic B. & Bosnjak M. (2000). Fragebogenuntersuchungen im Internet. In B. Batinic (Hrsg.), Internet für Psychologen (2., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage) (S. 287–317). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Bellman S., Johnson E. J., Kobrin S. J. & Lohse G. L. (2004). Regional Differences in Privacy Preferences, Implications for the Globalization of Electronic Commerce. The Information Society, 20 (5), 313–324. Verfügbar unter: http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/journals/files/chazen/Info_Privacy.pdf [25.07.2006].
Birnbaum M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.
Booth-Kewley S., Edwards J. E. & Rosenfeld P. (1992). Impression Management, Social Desirability, and Computer administration of Attitude Questionnaires: Does the Computer Make a Difference? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (4), 562–566.
Booth-Kewley S., Larson G. E. & Miyoshi D. K. (2007). Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Computer in Human Behavior, 23 (1) 463–477.
Bortz J. & Döring N. (2002). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.
Bosnjak M. (2001). Participation in Non-Restricted Web Surveys: A Typology and Explanatory Model for Item None-Response. In: Reips U.-D. & Bosnjak M. (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 193–208). Lengerich: Pabst.
Brengman M., Geuens M., Weijters B., Smith S. M., Swinyard, W. R. (2005). Segmenting Internet shoppers based on their Web-usage-related lifestyle: a cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Research, 58, 79–88.
Couper M. P., Kapteyn A., Schonlau M. & Winter J. (2007). Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet survey. Social Science Research, 36 (1), 131–148.
Dillmann A. D. & Bowker D. K. (2001). The Web Questionnaire Challenge to Survey
Methodologists . In: Reips U.-D. & Bosnjak M. (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 159–179). Lengerich: Pabst.
Dillmann A. D., Singer E., Clark J. R. & Treat J. B. (1994). Effects of Benefits Appeals, Mandatory Appeals and Variations in Statements of Confidentiality on Completion Rates for Census Questionnaires. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section ASA, 1333–1338. Verfügbar unter: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/ Proceedings/papers/1994_234.pdf[25.06.2006].
Dillmann A. D., Singer E., Clark J. R. & Treat J. B. (1996). Effects of Benefits Appeals, Mandatory Appeals and Variations in Statements of Confidentiality on Completion Rates for Census Questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60 (3), 376–389.
Döring N. (2003): Sozialpsychologie des Internet. Die Bedeutung des Internet für Kommunikationsprozesse, Identitäten, soziale Beziehungen und Gruppen (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Erdfelder E., Faul F. & Buchner A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1–11.
Eysenbach G., Powell J., Englesakis M. & Stern A. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 328, 1166–1170.
Frick A., Bächtiger M. T. & Reips U.-D. (1999). Financial Incentives, Personal Information and Drop-Out Rate in Online Studies. In: Reips U.-D., Batinic B., Bandilla W., Bosnjak M., Gräf L., Moser K. & Werner A. (Eds.), Current Internet Science, Trends, Techniques, Results. Verfügbar unter: http://www.dgof.de/tband99/pdfs/a_h/frick.pdf[04.07.2006]
Fricker S., Galesic M., Tourangeau R. & Yan T. (2005). An Experimental Comparision of Web and Telephone Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (3), 370–392.
Fisher R. J. & Katz J. E. (2000). Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Self-Reported Values. Psychology & Marketing, 17 (2), 105–120.
Gnambs T. & Strassnig B. (2007). Experimentelle Online-Untersuchungen. In: Welker M. & Wenzel O. (Hrsg.), Online-Forschung 2007 — Grundlagen und Fallstudien (S. 233–251). Köln: Halem.
Göritz A. S. (2006). Incentives in Web studies: Methodological issues and a review. International Journal of Internet Science, 1(1), 58–70.
Göritz A. S. & Birnbaum M. H. (2005). Generic HTML Form Processor: A versatile PHP Script to save Web-collected data into a MySQL database. Behavior Research Methods, 37 (4), 703–710.
Haley K. J. & Fessler D. M. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity ain an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–256.
Hancock D. R. & Flowers, C. P. (2003). The World Wide Web’s Effect on Social Desirability Responding: An Investigation of the Motivation of Survey-Takers. International Journal on E-Learning, 2 (3), 5–12.
Hauptmanns P. (1999). Grenzen und Chancen von quantitativen Befragungen mit Hilfe des Internets. In: Batinic B., Werner A., Gräf L. & Bandilla W. (Hrsg.), Online-Research: Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse (S. 277–295). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Joinson A. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31 (3), 433–438.
Knapp F. & Heidingsfelder M. (2001). Drop-Out Analysis: Effects of Research Design. In: Reips U.-D. & Bosnjak M. (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 221–230). Lengerich: Pabst.
Lautenschlager G. J. & Flaherty V. L. (1990). Computer Administration of Questions: More Desirable or More Social Desirability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (3), 310–314.
Lippe P. von Der & Kladroba A. (2002). Repräsentativität von Stichproben. Marketing, 24, 227–238.
Mummendey H. D. (1981). Methoden und Probleme der Kontrolle sozialer Erwünschtheit (Social Desirability). Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 2 (3), 199–218.
Musch J. & Reips U.-D. (2000). A Brief History of Web Experimenting. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 61–88). San Diego: Academic Press.
Goeritz A. (2006). Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review. International Journal of Internet Science, 1 (1), pp. 58–70.
Nederhof A. J. (1984). Visibility of response as a mediating factor in equity research. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 211–25.
O’Neil K. M. & Penrod S. D. (2001). Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33 (2), 226–233.
Reips U.-D. (2000). The Web Experiment Method: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Solutions. In: Birnbaum M. H. (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 89–117). San Diego: Academic Press.
Reips U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49 (4), 243–256.
Reips U.-D. & Neuhaus C. (2002). WEXTOR: A Web-based tool for generating and visualizing experimental designs and procedures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 234–240.
Rhodes S. D., Bowie D. A. & Hergenrather K. C. (2003). Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 68–73.
Schaefer D. R., & Dillman D. A. (1998). Development of standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62 (3), 378–397.
Schiano D. J. (1997). Convergent methodologies in cyber-psychology: A case study. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29 (2), 270–273.
Schmidt W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29 (2), 274–279.
Schmidt W. C. (2000). The Server Side of Psychology Web Experiments. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 285–310). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shannon D. & Bradshaw C. (2002). A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70 (2), 179–187.
Singer E. (2003). Exploring the Meaning of Consent: Participation in Research and Beliefs about Risks and Benefits. Journal of Official Statistics, 19 (3), 273–285.
Singer E., Hippler H.-J. & Schwarz N. (1992). Confidentiality Assurances in Surveys: Reassurance or Threat? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4 (3), 256–268.
Singer E., Mathiowetz N. A. & Couper M. P. (1993). The impact of privacy and confidentiality Concerns on survey participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57 (5), 465–482.
Strassnig B. (2007). Subjective Anonymity in Online-Surveys. Vortrag, 9. Tagung für General Online-Research (GOR 07), Leizig, Deutschland, (28.–28.03.2007).
Utz S. (1999). Untersuchungsformen in MUDs. In: Bantinic B., Werner A., Gräf L. & Bandilla W. (Hrsg.), Online-Research. Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse (S. 305–318). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Welker M., Werner A. & Scholz J. (2005). Online-Research. Markt-und Sozialforschung im Internet. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag.
Welker M. (2007). Was ist Online-Forschung? Eine Tour d’horizon zu einem erfolgreichen Forschungsfeld. In: Welker M. & Wenzel O. (Hrsg.), Online-Forschung 2007 — Grundlagen und Fallstudien (S. 19–51). Köln: Halem.
Werner A. (1999). Kontaktmessung im WWW. In: Bantinic B., Werner A., Gräf L. & Bandilla W. (Hrsg.), Online-Research. Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse (S. 227–244). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Wright K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (3). Verfügbar unter: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/wright.html [23.06.2006].
Yun G. W., & Trumbo C. W. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, email, and web form. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (1). Verfügbar unter: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/yun.html [26.07.2006].
Zerbe W. J. & Paulhus D. L. (1987). Socially Desirable Responding on Organizational Behavior: A Reconception. Academy of Management Review, 12 (2), 250–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strassnig, B. (2009). Einblicke in Online-Research — Das Internet als Medium zur Datenerhebung. In: Gesundheit und Neue Medien. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-72015-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-72015-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-72014-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-72015-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)