Skip to main content
  • 637 Accesses

Abstract

Newton remarked that the laws of nature are expressed by the differential equations that he devised. Individual, and at times very important, differential equations had been considered and solved even earlier, but Newton turned them into an independent and very powerful mathematical instrument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. G. Khovanskii, The geometry of formulas, Soviet Scientific Reviews — C, Mathematical Physics Reviews, Vol. 4, Harwood, New York, 1984, pp. 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. N. Parshin explained to me that Leibniz’s “characteristic” essentially coincides with the “Gödei numbering”, by means of which Godei proved the incompleteness of all sufficiendy rich theories, thus disproving the Leibniz-Hilbert programme of formalizing mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  3. “A good legacy is better than the most beautiful problem of geometry”, wrote Leibniz to l’Hôpital, “since it plays the role of a general method and enables us to solve many problems”. (18) Reference to the idea of universality does not justify the cynicism of this joke of Leibniz: a similar blasphemous phrase would have been unthinkable in the mouth of Barrow and even Newton.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Only after the death of Hooke in 1703 did Newton agree to take on the position of President of the Royal Society. One of the first acts of Newton in this position was to destroy all the instruments of the late Hooke, and also his papers and portraits. So now the Royal Society had portraits of all its members except Hooke. Not one drawing of Hooke, who was a member, curator and secretary of the Royal Society, was preserved. In the folder of Hooke’s biography recently published in the Soviet Union (20) there is a portrait, but this portrait is not genuine, but made up by the methods of modern crime detection from verbal descriptions of Hooke.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnol’d, V.I. (1990). Mathematical Analysis. In: Huygens and Barrow, Newton and Hooke. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9129-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9129-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-2383-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-9129-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics