Abstract
Here I shall try to reproduce, briefly, the main direct and indirect influences that served as a context for the origins of Russell’s mathematical philosophy. Boole and Peirce (rather than De Morgan) constituted the main antecedent of all ‘mathematical’ considerations of logic, and then of all logicism. Couturat and Whitehead, whose influence on Russell could not have been more direct, added an essential element: the construction of all mathematics from the simplest operations and elements by trying to form chains of definitions (in the Peanesque style). With regard to Dedekind and Cantor, they were the main precedents of Russell’s constructive methodology in the field of pure mathematical objects; besides, Dedekind explicitly agreed with logicism (without ever detailing his approach) and Cantor reduced arithmetic operations to relations between classes. On the other hand, Bradley and Moore created the philosophical framework providing, as methodological paradigms, respectively, the search for genuine logical forms and definitions as based on simples. In the last section I shall consider the basic ideas of FG, though only in so far as this work, previous to the influence of Moore, already shows some traces of the subsequent method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodríguez-Consuegra, F.A. (1991). Methodological and logicist background. In: The Mathematical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell: Origins and Development. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7533-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7533-2_2
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-7535-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-7533-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive