Abstract
In the five decades since the identification of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) as an important pediatric pathogen, no effective vaccine has been developed. Previous attempts to develop inactivated RSV vaccines resulted in vaccine-enhanced disease, resulting in a greater focus on the generation of live attenuated RSV vaccines. However, identifying a live attenuated vaccine candidate that is appropriately attenuated and sufficiently immunogenic has proven to be difficult. Recently, reverse genetics systems have been developed for RSV, allowing researchers to introduce specific mutations into the genomes of recombinant vaccine candidates. These systems provide a means of determining the effects of known attenuating mutations and identifying novel methods of attenuating the virus without decreasing immunogenicity. In addition, different mutations can be combined in a single genome to fine-tune the level of attenuation and immunogenicity to achieve the proper balance in a viable vaccine candidate. Current research into RSV attenuation includes investigation of point mutations responsible for temperature sensitivity, nontemperature-sensitive attenuating mutations, and deletion of nonessential viral genes that play roles in viral RNA synthesis and/or inhibition of innate immune responses. Development of an effective RSV vaccine will likely rely on using reverse genetics systems to optimize the attenuation and immunogenicity of a live vaccine candidate, while preserving viral replication in vitro.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Live attenuated vaccines
- Paramyxoviruses
- Pediatric vaccines
- Recombinant vaccines
- Respiratory infections
- Vaccine development
1 Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most important etiologic agent of pediatric viral respiratory infection and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among infants. Infection rates for RSV in infants have been found to be 68.8 per 100 children for the first year of life, reaching 82.6 per 100 children for the second year [1]. Lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) is more common during year 1, though LRTI occurs frequently during year 2. Approximately half of all children are reinfected by age 2, but most children experience only 1 LRTI [1]. RSV infection accounts for between 70,000 and 120,000 hospitalizations in the United States of infants under 6 months of age and ~70% of hospitalizations due to bronchiolitis [2–5]. Severe RSV infection has been associated with long-term effects such as asthma and wheezing and can cause significant mortality in high-risk groups, such as premature infants or children with immunodeficiency, chronic pulmonary disease, or cardiovascular disease [6–9]. In addition, RSV infection is a serious complication in immunocompromised subjects, particularly bone marrow transplant patients, and the elderly [10].
Previously, RSV bronchiolitis was thought to be caused by an overactive antiviral immune response, similar to allergic asthma [11–13]. However, recent evidence indicates that severe RSV disease is likely due to virus-induced cell death and sloughing of apoptotic cells into the lumen of the bronchioles [14]. Examination of autopsy specimens from fatal cases of RSV bronchiolitis showed the presence of overwhelming RSV antigen and massive apoptotic sloughing of epithelial cells, but a relative dearth of infiltrating T cells. In addition, infants who suffered nonfatal cases of RSV showed decreased expression levels of cytokines, particularly IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-4, and IL-6, compared to infants infected by influenza [14, 15]. Cytokine expression levels in RSV-infected infants did not appear to correlate with the severity of RSV infection. However, viral replication levels directly correlated with the severity of RSV disease [14, 16]. Thus, severe RSV LRTI is likely due to high levels of RSV replication in ciliated and nonciliated airway cells, resulting in cell death and a large influx of neutrophils and macrophages. This hypothesis also fits with the time course of RSV infection and the observation that corticosteroids are ineffective in treating RSV bronchiolitis [17]. These results suggest that reducing viral replication levels by the induction of protective immune responses via vaccination is likely to reduce the morbidity and mortality due to RSV infection.
Infection by RSV causes severe disease in the very young (infants under 6 months of age) and the elderly [18]. One distinctive characteristic of RSV infection is that it does not induce long-lived immunity upon exposure, resulting in recurrent infection throughout life. Reinfections occur frequently throughout life, though the symptoms of subsequent infection are generally milder [18]. Thus, the target populations for RSV vaccines would be individuals at the extremes of age. In both populations, lung function is suboptimal due to relatively inelastic lungs, either due to developmental immaturity or loss of elasticity. Premature infants are particularly susceptible to severe RSV disease due to interrupted lung development, leading to decreased lung function with reduced airway diameter and increased smooth muscle. In addition, both populations present challenges to vaccination because of deficiencies in their immune responses. For infants, there are two major hurdles to effective immunization: (1) developmental immaturity of the immune system and (2) presence of maternal antibodies. Neonatal immune responses are both quantitatively and qualitatively different from those in adults, and these differences persist throughout the first year of life. The neonatal immune system appears to be biased toward Th2-like responses, although Th1 responses can be induced in neonates with certain stimuli including certain microbes [19–21]. This effect is likely due in part to immaturity of dendritic and other accessory cell populations. Serum antibodies derived from the mother pose a challenge for vaccine take, as seen in the experience with the measles virus vaccine. In contrast, premature infants born before 28 weeks of gestation, when maternal antibody transfer occurs, have increased susceptibility to RSV. Premature infants born closer to full term are likely better protected, as maternal antibody levels are proportional to gestational age.
At the other end of the age spectrum, immunosenescence is a hurdle for RSV vaccination in the elderly population. Not only are adaptive immune responses blunted in the elderly, but innate immune function appears to be decreased as well [22–24]. Protection from RSV by vaccination will likely require the induction of both B- and T-cell responses in the elderly, similar to influenza vaccination [19, 25, 26]. Thus, a more complete understanding of the mechanisms responsible for immunosenescence is required to improve the efficacy of RSV vaccines in the elderly.
Immunologic protection from RSV infection requires induction of high-affinity neutralizing antibody responses. Both infants and the elderly show decreased B-cell responses compared with healthy adults [27–29]. Moreover, these two populations display a limited ability to generate diversity in their antibody responses to antigenic stimulation [27, 30]. The exact mechanisms for these defects are not well understood. However, increasing the diversity and affinity of the immunoglobulin response in vaccinees is essential for efficient protection.
2 Agent
RSV is an enveloped virus classified in the family Paramyxoviridae in the order Mononegavirales, and is the prototype member of the Pneumovirus genus. The nonsegmented, negative-sense RNA genome of RSV is 15,222 nucleotides long and contains 10 genes from which 11 proteins are translated (Fig. 1). The genome is encapsidated by the viral nucleocapsid (N) protein, and this ribonucleocapsid complex serves as the template for viral transcription and RNA replication. RSV enters cells by direct fusion of its envelope with the plasma membrane and replicates solely in the cytoplasm. RSV packages its own viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), which is essential for the initial transcription of its genome upon infection. The RdRP for RSV transcription is minimally composed of P, M2-1, and L. L encodes the large enzymatic subunit of the polymerase, and P is an essential cofactor for RNA synthesis. M2-1 is specific for the viral transcriptase and is an antitermination/processivity factor. The polymerase complex accesses the genome at a single promoter at the 3′ end of the genome and initiates transcription at the first gene (NS1). Each gene is bounded by conserved transcription initiation and termination signals and is separated from the adjacent genes by a variable length of intergenic sequence. The linear array of viral genes is transcribed sequentially in a start/stop fashion, resulting in a polar gradient of mRNA production, whereby genes proximal to the 3′ promoter are transcribed more efficiently than those that are promoter-distal. At a low frequency, the RdRP will fail to terminate, resulting in an oligocistronic or “readthrough” mRNA that is terminated at a subsequent transcription termination signal, or will fail to reinitiate, resulting in transcription attenuation and a gradient of expression inversely proportional to the distance from the 3′ end of the genome. After primary transcription has occurred, the polymerase complex begins replicating the viral genome, synthesizing a full-length copy of the vRNA called the antigenome (cRNA). The regulation of the switch from transcription to replication by RdRP is not clear; however, the M2-2 protein is thought to be involved in this process. The antigenome is also encapsidated by N protein and serves as a template for synthesis of more vRNA. In infected cells, there is more vRNA than cRNA [10]. Encapsidated vRNA interacts with the matrix (M) protein and traffics to the plasma membrane where the viral N interacts with the cytoplasmic tails of the attachment (G) and fusion (F) proteins. Virion morphogenesis occurs at lipid raft domains in the membrane where F is localized. In addition to G and F, the RSV viral envelope contains a small hydrophobic (SH) protein of unknown function. Importantly, G and F are the major neutralizing antigens for RSV. The two remaining RSV proteins, NS1 and NS2, are nonstructural proteins that have been shown to inhibit IFN-β induction and signaling but are otherwise dispensable for viral replication in vitro [31, 32].
3 Treatment
Currently, there are no effective antiviral drugs to treat RSV infection. Ribavirin has been previously used to treat severe RSV disease, but the efficacy of this treatment is questionable and the cost is high [33–35]. Supportive care with supplemental oxygen is the most common treatment option, although treatment with corticosteroids and/or β-agonists has been tried with limited success [35]. Nebulized hypertonic saline with or without epinephrine has been found to decrease length of stay in infants hospitalized with viral bronchiolitis [36, 37]. Immunoprophylaxis has been the mainstay for the prevention of RSV infection in high-risk infants. Synagis (palivizumab), a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to the RSV F protein, has been shown to be effective in preventing infection in premature infants and children with underlying risk factors for severe RSV disease [38–40]. The recent development of a higher affinity monoclonal antibody to F has improved the efficacy profile of RSV immunoprophylaxis [41, 42]. However, Synagis treatment is not cost-effective in normal populations due to the need to administer the drug monthly during RSV season and the lower incidence of hospitalization for severe RSV bronchiolitis.
4 RSV Vaccines
Although RSV is the most important cause of viral lower respiratory tract disease in infants, initial attempts to develop an RSV vaccine by using inactivated virus met with failure. In the early 1960s, vaccination of infants with a formalin-inactivated (FI)-RSV vaccine not only failed to protect against RSV disease during the following RSV season but some vaccinees developed enhanced disease upon infection with RSV, resulting in increased rates of severe pneumonia and two deaths [43–45]. Studies on autopsy samples as well as in the mouse model suggested that the enhanced disease due to FI-RSV vaccination was due to an imbalanced T helper cell response, predisposing the vaccinees to a response resembling allergic asthma upon subsequent infection by RSV (reviewed in [46]). More recently, it has been determined that the FI-RSV vaccine has reduced the capacity for inducing high avidity antibodies, due to reduced TLR stimulation, likely resulting in the deposition of complement in the lungs [47, 48].
In the intervening years, a number of different approaches have been evaluated including subunit vaccines, vectored vaccines, and live attenuated vaccines; however, as of the writing of this chapter there remains no licensed RSV vaccine. Currently, the most promising vaccine candidates for RSV are live attenuated viruses. These viruses have several benefits: (1) enhanced RSV disease has not been observed either after natural infection or vaccination with live attenuated viruses [49–53]; (2) administration of live attenuated RSV vaccines induces balanced immune responses that more closely match natural immunity compared with parenterally administered subunit (or inactivated) vaccines [54, 55]. Also, vaccination with live attenuated viruses intranasally would likely induce better local immunity compared with intramuscular injection of subunit or killed vaccines [56]. Live attenuated RSV vaccines have been in development for several decades, using a combination of cold passage (cp) and chemical mutagenesis to induce temperature sensitivity (ts) (reviewed in [57, 58]). The initial RSV vaccine candidates were either under- or over-attenuated, with reversion of one of the ts mutants in vaccinated children [50, 59–61]. However, children vaccinated with these live attenuated viruses did not show enhanced disease upon subsequent infection with RSV [62]. Therefore, further development of live attenuated vaccine candidates was performed, combining cold passage and chemical mutagenesis to generate temperature-sensitive RSV. A spectrum of cptsRSV vaccine candidates were produced by this method, with a range of temperature sensitivity in culture and attenuation in animal models (Fig. 2a) [53, 63–66]. Candidate vaccines from this method were immunogenic and protected against RSV challenge in both rodent and nonhuman primate models. Two candidate vaccines (cpts248/955 and cpts530/1009) were chosen for testing in the clinic [53]. These candidates induced protective immune responses in seronegative children; however, both candidates were underattenuated in this age group, precluding further analysis in infants (Table 1). One additional candidate, cpts248/404, was found to be sufficiently attenuated and immunogenic in seronegative children and was tested in 1- to 3-month-old infants [49]. However, cpts248/404 caused nasal congestion in these infants, an unacceptable adverse effect in this population [49].
Production of live attenuated RSV vaccine candidates by mutagenesis and screening for temperature sensitivity is a laborious and inefficient process. Therefore, it is essential to develop a method of systematically deriving tsRSV and identifying additional attenuating mutations that can be incorporated into RSV vaccine candidates. The recent advent of reverse genetics systems for RSV has allowed the development of live attenuated RSV vaccine candidates encoding specific attenuating mutations, rather than relying on random mutagenesis. The ability to generate recombinant RSV (rRSV) from cDNAs also allows the identification of novel viral targets for attenuation through the investigation of the virus–host interactions important for viral pathogenesis. Reverse genetics systems for RSV rely on the coexpression of the viral polymerase components (N, P, M2-1, and L) with a complete copy of the viral genome [67, 68]. Coexpression is achieved by transfection of plasmids encoding each of the viral polymerase genes and a plasmid encoding the full-length cDNA of the viral genome into cultured cells. Expression from the plasmids is driven by the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase, which is supplied exogenously. For the purposes of vaccine development, T7 RNA polymerase is expressed by cotransfection of an expression plasmid with the other plasmids into qualified Vero cells [69]. Upon expression of viral components, transcription and replication of the viral genome initiates the RSV infectious cycle, resulting in the production of infectious rRSV. The cDNA copy of the viral genome can be mutated by standard molecular biology techniques in order to attenuate the resultant rRSV.
Initial studies using rRSV focused on two different means of attenuating RSV. The first method involved combining the known mutations from the cptsRSV isolates in rRSV strain A2 (rA2) to increase attenuation of the vaccine candidates. This resulted in the generation of rA2cpts248/404/1009 and rA2cpts248/404/1030, combining the cpts248/404 mutations with those of 530/1009 and 530/1030 [70]. These new mutants were more attenuated than the cpts248/404 parental virus, indicating that some mutations have additive effects in attenuation. However, these studies also showed that certain mutations are incompatible with others, as the rA2cpts248/404/530 could not be recovered, due to incompatibility of the 530 mutation with, particularly, the 248 mutation [70]. Therefore, it would be desirable to have a panel of attenuating mutations from which to select to incorporate into rRSV vaccine candidates, so that the level of attenuation can be properly tuned. In order to increase the number of attenuating mutations that could potentially be combined in a vaccine candidate, specific viral proteins have been mutagenized to replace charged amino acids with a noncharged amino acid (e.g., alanine). This procedure has been employed to identify a number of mutations in both P and L that result in attenuation of RSV, both in culture and in rodents [71–73]. These mutations thus add to the panel of mutations available for inclusion in future vaccine candidates, either alone or in combination with the previously identified cpts L mutations.
Another avenue of attenuation for RSV has been the deletion of nonessential genes. Gene deletion should be more stable than the point mutations responsible for temperature sensitivity, reducing the risk of reversion to virulence of the vaccine candidate. rRSVs (rA2) lacking one or a combination of NS1, NS2, M2-2, and SH were generated and shown to be attenuated in preclinical trials [31, 74–76]. RSV lacking SH (rA2ΔSH) replicated similarly to wild-type (wt) RSV (rA2) in culture but showed a low level of attenuation in the respiratory tracts of rodents and nonhuman primates [77]. Because clinical trials indicated that rA2cpts248/404 was only slightly underattenuated, the SH gene deletion was incorporated into this vaccine candidate to increase the level of attenuation (Fig. 2b). However, this vaccine candidate (rA2cpts248/404ΔSH) was not further attenuated in adults, seropositive or seronegative children (Table 1) [52]. It was not possible to determine from these observations whether the SH deletion mutation confers attenuation to RSV in humans, even though rA2ΔSH was attenuated in mice and chimpanzees. These results indicate that attenuation of RSV by combining different mutations is not necessarily additive. However, subsequent addition of the 1030 mutation to rA2cpts248/404ΔSH resulted in a virus that was more ts and more attenuated in seronegative children [52]. Further trials in seronegative infants showed that rA2cpts248/404/1030ΔSH was well tolerated and appropriately attenuated (Table 1) [52]. Only a minority of vaccinees produced increased neutralizing antibody responses, even after a second dose of the vaccine virus. However, replication of the second dose of vaccine was significantly reduced, indicating that some protective immunity had been induced by the initial dose [52].
Preclinical testing of RSV lacking NS1 or NS2 (rA2ΔNS1 and rA2ΔNS2, respectively) showed that these viruses were deficient in replication in culture and also attenuated in rodents and nonhuman primates [31, 32, 76, 78]. In chimpanzees, rA2ΔNS2 displayed an attenuation phenotype similar to rA2cpts248/404, and rA2ΔNS1 was significantly more attenuated in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts [74, 75]. However, both deletion mutants induced levels of serum-neutralizing antibodies against RSV to levels comparable or slightly lower than wt RSV. In addition, chimpanzees immunized with rA2ΔNS2 were protected against subsequent challenge with RSV. Therefore, an NS2-deletion rA2 derivative was then tested in clinical trials as a vaccine for the elderly because it was less attenuated in chimpanzees than the cpts248/404 vaccine candidate (Fig. 2b) [79]. rA2cpΔNS2 was shown to be overattenuated in adults; however, it was also underattenuated in children, a contraindication for testing in infants (Table 1). The NS2 deletion virus was further attenuated by inclusion of the ts mutations 248/404 or 530/1009. These vaccine candidates were more attenuated than their parental strains and modestly immunogenic when tested in seronegative children [79].
5 Live Vectored RSV Vaccines
An alternative means of delivering RSV antigens in attenuated virus vaccines has been the use of heterologous viral vectors expressing RSV F and/or G. Early efforts focused on vaccinia viruses (VV) expressing RSV proteins. VV-F and VV-G together were immunogenic and protective in the mouse model of RSV; however, these VV recombinants did not induce protective immunity in chimpanzees [80–83]. In addition, VV is likely too virulent to use as a vector for current vaccine development. More recently, use of the attenuated modified vaccinia Ankara as a vector for RSV antigens has shown some efficacy, though a prime-boost strategy may be required to elicit sufficiently protective immunity [84, 85].
Adenovirus vectors were initially used to immunize against RSV F and G over 15 years ago and, with the advent of replication-deficient adenovirus vectors, have been further investigated more recently [86–90]. Adenovirus-vectored F and/or G have been shown to provide protection to RSV in mice and ferrets; however, this vaccine modality does not immunize chimpanzees against RSV, indicating that this strategy will likely not be clinically useful [88, 89]. Alphavirus replicons have also been tested for their ability to vaccinate against RSV [91–94]. Immunization via either the intranasal or intramuscular route with Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus replicons expressing RSV F induces balanced Th1/Th2 immunity, protects mice and cotton rats against RSV challenge, and induces serum antibodies in macaques [91, 92].
The recent proliferation of reverse genetics systems for the paramyxovirus family has provided the possibility that RSV antigens can be expressed in the context of a number of different paramyxoviruses, including Sendai virus, Newcastle disease virus (NDV), and human parainfluenza viruses (HPIV) 1, 2, and 3 (reviewed in [95–97]). Sendai virus and NDV are murine and avian viruses, respectively, and thus are naturally attenuated in humans due to host range restriction. NDV is a strong inducer of IFN-β and may therefore provide better stimulation of dendritic cell (DC) maturation and T-cell responses than RSV infection [98]. Both of these vector systems have been shown to be immunogenic and protective against RSV challenge in animal model systems [98–102].
An additional consideration is the possibility of combining vaccines against multiple pediatric viral pathogens into a single recombinant virus. Infection of children by HPIV1 and HPIV2 generally occurs later in life (approximately 6 months of age), so immunization would occur in older infants. Thus, an HPIV1- or HPIV2-vectored RSV vaccine may be useful as a booster to prevent secondary disease or as a vaccine in the elderly. In addition, attenuated HPIV1 and HPIV2 are being developed for use as vaccine candidates [103–109].
Because HPIV3 is also an important cause of pediatric respiratory tract disease, significant effort has been put into developing a live attenuated HPIV3 vaccine that could also be used as a vector for an RSV vaccine (Table 1). One candidate vaccine utilizes the bovine PIV3 (BPIV3) backbone, which has been shown to be safe and immunogenic in infants [110, 111]. In order to generate a bivalent HPIV3/RSV vaccine, the BPIV3 F and HN genes were replaced by their HPIV3 counterparts and RSV F was inserted into the B/HPIV3 chimera; thus, the resulting virus expresses both RSV and HPIV3 surface antigens. Recombinant B/HPIV3-RSV-F was slightly more attenuated than the parent virus, but remained immunogenic and was protective against both RSV and HPIV3 in animal model systems [112–115]. This vaccine candidate (MEDI-534) has recently been tested in clinical trials. Although the vaccine was attenuated and safe, it was minimally immunogenic in both adults and children, indicating that further modification may be required [116, 117]. However, the major advantage of this approach is that the viral vector is also a vaccine, thus providing protection against multiple pathogens. Because the RSV F protein is likely not incorporated into its viral envelope, RSV-specific antibodies were ineffective at neutralizing the chimeric virus [112], suggesting it could be also used as to boost anti-RSV immune responses.
6 Future Directions
There remain a number of challenges to the development of an efficacious RSV vaccine. First, it will be important to develop additional animal models for RSV challenge that more faithfully represent the target populations of infants and the elderly. Although nonhuman primate models have yielded important information on both vaccine safety and immunogenicity, these models also have not recapitulated some aspects of the replication of vaccine candidates in humans. For example, ΔNS2 was immunogenic in chimpanzees but not in seropositive children [75, 79]. In addition, the partial reversion of the ts phenotype seen with the 248/404/1030 mutations in infants was not detected in animal experiments [49, 52, 70, 118]. Defining the correlates of protection and attenuation in animal models will aid in the selection of vaccine candidates for clinical trials. In addition, a model that recapitulates stimulation of the immature immune system in the presence of maternal antibodies will be important for the development of a pediatric RSV vaccine.
Perhaps the most important challenge in the development of an effective RSV vaccine has been achieving the proper balance between immunogenicity and attenuation. The rA2cpts248/404/1030ΔSH vaccine candidate, which was appropriately attenuated in infants, was only mildly immunogenic [52]. It is possible to enhance immunogenicity of vaccines by increasing the dose or boosting with multiple inoculations. However, the target population of a pediatric RSV vaccine would be infants who are entering their first RSV season, thus shortening the window in which immunization would be effective. Therefore, a better understanding of the induction of immune responses in the target populations for RSV vaccines will be essential. Identifying signals (e.g., TLR agonists, cytokines) that can induce DC maturation and/or activate other antigen-presenting cell populations stimulate Th1 responses that can augment the immunogenicity of an RSV vaccine. For example, studies in mice suggest that deletion of NS1 results in a virus that has enhanced capacity to induce DC maturation, likely due to increased production of IFN-β [119]. In addition, NS1 appears to play a role in viral replication beyond IFN antagonism, indicating that deletion of this gene might be both attenuating and immunomodulatory [31].
An alternative method to enhancing immune responses that has been explored is the expression of cytokine genes as an additional transcription unit in rRSV [120–122]. Stable expression of additional gene products in the rRSV genome has been shown for a variety of genes [123]. rRSV encoding GM-CSF as an additional gene shows reduced replication in the respiratory tracts of mice with a concomitant increase in the number of pulmonary DCs and in the expression of IFN-γ and IL-12 [121]. By contrast, insertion of genes for the cytokines IL-4 and IFN-γ into rRSV results in viruses that caused increased pathogenesis after immunization and/or challenge [120]. Skewing of the T helper response can have adverse effects on secondary exposure and even to unrelated viruses [124]. Thus, significant care must be taken in identifying specific immunomodulators that will increase the immunogenicity of an RSV vaccine candidate without causing enhanced disease.
One potential mechanism of improving B-cell responses to RSV is increasing the expression of the RSV F and G proteins, which serve as the major protection antigens [18]. Because of the linear nature of the RSV genome, the promoter-proximal genes are expressed to a greater extent than the promoter-distal genes [18]. Rearrangement of the gene order in the related vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has been shown to result in genome site-specific levels of expression for the viral genes [125]. These rearranged viruses displayed an attenuated phenotype both in vitro and in vivo and were able to vaccinate pigs against subsequent VSV infection [126, 127]. For RSV, rearrangement of the gene order in a recombinant virus, such that the F and/or G genes are the promoter-proximal, resulted in an approximately twofold increase in protein expression [128]. Unlike VSV, these viruses replicated slightly better than wt virus in culture and similarly to wt in the respiratory tracts of mice [128]. Thus, gene rearrangement alone in the context of RSV is not attenuating. In addition, shifting F to a promoter-proximal position resulted in an increase in anti-F serum antibody responses in mice, suggesting that increased F expression may be desirable in a vaccine candidate [128]. Expression of F and G might be further increased by optimizing the codon usage of these genes for translation [129]. Combining these relatively small increases in antigen expression might allow for an additive effect for vaccination. Studies with anti-RSV F antibody prophylaxis show significant increases in efficacy with even minor increases in antibody titer [130, 131]. Thus, increasing the amount of antigen available for presentation to the immune system may allow for a more robust anti-RSV response.
RSV G is unique among paramyxovirus attachment proteins in that it is produced in both a membrane-bound and a secreted form. Secreted G (sG) is produced from the G mRNA by alternative initiation from a downstream AUG [132, 133]. Ablation of this translation initiation codon in rRSV results in RSV that produces only membrane-bound G [134]. Studies have shown that the sG can act both as an antigenic decoy in vitro and as an immunomodulatory factor in mice [135]. Importantly, sG appeared to affect restriction of RSV replication in vivo by both anti-G and anti-F antibodies through a mechanism involving FcγR-bearing immune cells [135]. Thus, a vaccine candidate that does not express sG may have increased immunogenicity and may be more efficiently controlled by the immunity induced. In addition, sG showed proinflammatory functions in the lungs of mice, likely via its CX3C (fractalkine) motif [135]. Because pulmonary inflammation is associated with increased pathogenicity of RSV, removal of this factor may result in decreased reactogenicity. However, sG may be necessary for vaccine take in infants in the presence of maternal antibody. Further studies will clarify these disparate effects of sG on RSV pathogenesis and immunity. An alternative to ablating the expression of sG might be removal of the CX3C motif from G; studies have shown that mutagenesis or deletion of this sequence does not affect viral replication in vitro or in mice [136].
One important characteristic of vaccine candidates is genotypic and phenotypic stability. Genomic stability is important during the scaling up of production for the vaccine viruses, which undergo multiple rounds of replication and thus have a greater chance for mutation. In addition, phenotypic stability is essential during vaccination, during which reversion to virulence can cause increased pathogenicity and shedding. In this case, the attenuated phenotype is more important than specific genotype provided that immunity to the major protective antigens is achieved. Deletion of nonessential viral genes should provide the most stable attenuating mutations because genetic recombination of RSV is extremely rare and has only been observed in the laboratory under optimal conditions [137]. In addition to the NS2 and SH deletion viruses, RSVs lacking NS1 or M2-2 (Fig. 2c) are significantly attenuated and protective in animal models and are potentially good vaccine candidates [31, 74, 76, 78].
All of the ts mutations identified in the RSV vaccine candidates that have undergone clinical trials are point mutants. ts248, ts530, ts1009, and ts1030 are all missense mutations within the viral polymerase (or L protein), and ts404 is a point mutation in the M2 gene start sequence [65, 66, 70]. Characterization of virus shed from vaccinees has shown that these point mutations can readily revert, resulting in less ts RSV, in some cases despite the “stabilization” of these mutations in rRSV by changing two residues of the specific codon encoding the ts mutant. For example, analysis of nasal wash specimens from seronegative infants vaccinated with rA2cpts248/404/1030ΔSH showed that approximately one-third of the samples had lost a measure of their ts phenotype, displaying a 1–3°C increase in permissive temperature [52]. Sequencing of these clinical specimens identified reversion mutations at either the ts248 or the ts1030 mutation [52]. Although these partial revertants retained four of the five attenuating mutations and a measure of attenuation, these results demonstrate the difficulty of using point mutations to attenuate RNA viruses, which encode an error-prone viral polymerase. To counteract this problem, there are a number of possibilities to generate genotypically and phenotypically stable ts RSV vaccine candidates.
It is possible to generate phenotypically stable attenuated RSV viruses by introducing several ts point mutations in a variety of places in the RSV genome. The difficulty with this approach is that some combinations of mutations might increase the attenuation of the vaccine virus beyond the level required for inducing protective immunity. In addition, some ts mutations are not compatible with each other, resulting in a nonviable virus [70]. Thus, the spectrum of mutations that can be combined would have to be empirically defined. The benefit to this strategy is that reversion at any one site should be compensated by the presence of the additional attenuating mutations. However, as seen with rA2cpts248/404/1030ΔSH, particular mutations have a more prominent effect on attenuation of the vaccine virus and reversion at these sites may result in a significant loss in attenuation.
One method of preventing reversion is to “stabilize” existing ts mutations by altering the codon usage to require two mutation events in order for the mutant to revert to the wt phenotype. Theoretically, the viral polymerase would not be likely to introduce two mutations at the same site. Recently, Luongo et al. have constructed rRSV that have mutations at position 831 of L (ts248) encoding every possible amino acid residue. Although most mutants could be recovered, only two mutants were found to confer temperature sensitivity (831I and 831F) to the rRSV in addition to the 831L mutation [138]. Furthermore, neither 831I nor 831F was as attenuated as 831L in the respiratory tracts of mice, suggesting that 831L has an attenuating function beyond temperature sensitivity. Interestingly, using the different codons for Leu resulted in different frequencies of reversion (to wt genotype) or pseudoreversion (to wt phenotype) [138]. These data suggest that careful selection of mutant codons may offer a strategy for increasing genotypic stability of attenuating point mutations. However, the genetic code precludes certain mutations from being “stabilized” by this method, as not all mutations can be made with two nucleotide differences from the wt assignment.
A novel potential mechanism of providing genotypic stability for point mutations is increasing the fidelity of the viral polymerase. Recent studies with poliovirus (PV) have shown that mutations that alter replication fidelity and/or replication speed of the PV RdRp produce attenuated viruses that protect mice transgenic for the PV receptor from a lethal challenge with wt PV [139–141]. Furthermore, mutation of a single amino acid residue that is conserved in all viral RdRps appears to control both replication speed and replication fidelity. This amino acid residue is a lysine that is present in conserved structural motif D of the RdRp [142, 143]. In the PV model, changes to this residue produce slow, high-fidelity RdRps [143]. Biochemical analysis shows that mutation of the homologous lysine in HIV RT and T7 RNA polymerase results in similar effects on polymerase speed and fidelity [143]. Thus, application of this technology to RSV could allow the identification of an additional attenuating mutation and could prevent or delay the emergence of more virulent variants of the vaccine candidates. Combinations of L mutations that increase polymerase fidelity and known attenuating mutations could allow for even finer tuning of vaccine efficacy and prevent outgrowth of more virulent viruses, which could then be spread to naive individuals.
7 Summary
Much progress has been made recently toward the development of an effective, live attenuated RSV vaccine; however, a number of hurdles remain. Most importantly, achieving the proper balance of attenuation and immunogenicity has been difficult because of the lack of animal models and immune correlates to investigate induction of immune responses in infants, a target population for RSV vaccines. Future studies into the molecular biology of the virus may lead to novel ways to address current difficulties in RSV vaccine development.
References
Glezen WP, Taber LH, Frank AL, Kasel JA (1986) Risk of primary infection and reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus. Am J Dis Child 140:543–546
Anderson LJ, Parker RA, Strikas RL (1990) Association between respiratory syncytial virus outbreaks and lower respiratory tract deaths of infants and young children. J Infect Dis 161:640–646
Paramore LC, Ciuryla V, Ciesla G, Liu L (2004) Economic impact of respiratory syncytial virus-related illness in the US: an analysis of national databases. Pharmacoeconomics 22:275–284
Shay DK, Holman RC, Newman RD, Liu LL, Stout JW, Anderson LJ (1999) Bronchiolitis-associated hospitalizations among US children, 1980–1996. JAMA 282:1440–1446
Shay DK, Holman RC, Roosevelt GE, Clarke MJ, Anderson LJ (2001) Bronchiolitis-associated mortality and estimates of respiratory syncytial virus-associated deaths among US children, 1979–1997. J Infect Dis 183:16–22
Altman CA, Englund JA, Demmler G, Drescher KL, Alexander MA, Watrin C, Feltes TF (2000) Respiratory syncytial virus in patients with congenital heart disease: a contemporary look at epidemiology and success of preoperative screening. Pediatr Cardiol 21:433–438
Huang M, Bigos D, Levine M (1998) Ventricular arrhythymia associated with respiratory syncytial viral infection. Pediatr Cardiol 19:498–500
Yount LE, Mahle WT (2004) Economic analysis of palivizumab in infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 114:1606–1611
Kaneko M, Watanabe J, Ueno E, Hida M, Sone T (2001) Risk factors for severe respiratory syncytial virus-associated lower respiratory tract infection in children. Pediatr Int 43:489–492
Collins PL, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (2001) Respiratory syncytial virus. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds) Fields virology. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1443–1485
van Drunen L, van den Hurk S, Mapletoft JW, Arsic N, Kovacs-Nolan J (2007) Immunopathology of RSV infection: prospects for developing vaccines without this complication. Rev Med Virol 17:5–34
Welliver RC Sr (2008) The immune response to respiratory syncytial virus infection: friend or foe? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 34:163–173
Hoffman SJ, Laham FR, Polack FP (2004) Mechanisms of illness during respiratory syncytial virus infection: the lungs, the virus and the immune response. Microbes Infect 6:767–772
Welliver TP, Garofalo RP, Hosakote Y, Hintz KH, Avendano L, Sanchez K, Velozo L, Jafri H, Chavez-Bueno S, Ogra PL et al (2007) Severe human lower respiratory tract illness caused by respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus is characterized by the absence of pulmonary cytotoxic lymphocyte responses. J Infect Dis 195:1126–1136
Welliver TP, Reed JL, Welliver RC Sr (2008) Respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus infections: observations from tissues of fatal infant cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 27:S92–S96
DeVincenzo JP, El Saleeby CM, Bush AJ (2005) Respiratory syncytial virus load predicts disease severity in previously healthy infants. J Infect Dis 191:1861–1868
Somers CC, Ahmad N, Mejias A, Buckingham SC, Carubelli C, Katz K, Leos N, Gomez AM, Devincenzo JP, Ramilo O et al (2009) Effect of dexamethasone on respiratory syncytial virus-induced lung inflammation in children: results of a randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 20:477–485
Collins PL, Crowe JEJ (2007) Respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumoviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, Straus SE (eds) Field's virology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Marchant A, Goetghebuer T, Ota MO, Wolfe I, Ceesay SJ, De Groote D, Corrah T, Bennett S, Wheeler J, Huygen K et al (1999) Newborns develop a Th1-type immune response to Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination. J Immunol 163:2249–2255
Vekemans J, Amedei A, Ota MO, D'Elios MM, Goetghebuer T, Ismaili J, Newport MJ, Del Prete G, Goldman M, McAdam KP et al (2001) Neonatal bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination induces adult-like IFN-gamma production by CD4+ T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 31:1531–1535
Stensballe LG, Nante E, Jensen IP, Kofoed PE, Poulsen A, Jensen H, Newport M, Marchant A, Aaby P (2005) Acute lower respiratory tract infections and respiratory syncytial virus in infants in Guinea-Bissau: a beneficial effect of BCG vaccination for girls community based case-control study. Vaccine 23:1251–1257
Panda A, Arjona A, Sapey E, Bai F, Fikrig E, Montgomery RR, Lord JM, Shaw AC (2009) Human innate immunosenescence: causes and consequences for immunity in old age. Trends Immunol 30:325–333
Fujihashi K, Kiyono H (2009) Mucosal immunosenescence: new developments and vaccines to control infectious diseases. Trends Immunol 30:334–343
Chen WH, Kozlovsky BF, Effros RB, Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Edelman R, Sztein MB (2009) Vaccination in the elderly: an immunological perspective. Trends Immunol 30:351–359
Fulton RB, Varga SM (2009) Effects of aging on the adaptive immune response to respiratory virus infections. Aging health 5:775
Sambhara S, McElhaney JE (2009) Immunosenescence and influenza vaccine efficacy. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 333:413–429
Siegrist CA, Aspinall R (2009) B-cell responses to vaccination at the extremes of age. Nat Rev Immunol 9:185–194
Siegrist CA (2007) The challenges of vaccine responses in early life: selected examples. J Comp Pathol 137(Suppl 1):S4–S9
Morein B, Blomqvist G, Hu K (2007) Immune responsiveness in the neonatal period. J Comp Pathol 137(Suppl 1):S27–S31
Williams JV, Weitkamp JH, Blum DL, LaFleur BJ, Crowe JE Jr (2009) The human neonatal B cell response to respiratory syncytial virus uses a biased antibody variable gene repertoire that lacks somatic mutations. Mol Immunol 47:407–414
Jin H, Zhou H, Cheng X, Tang R, Munoz M, Nguyen N (2000) Recombinant respiratory syncytial viruses with deletions in the NS1, NS2, SH, and M2-2 genes are attenuated in vitro and in vivo. Virology 273:210–218
Teng MN, Collins PL (1999) Altered growth characteristics of recombinant respiratory syncytial viruses which do not produce NS2 protein. J Virol 73:466–473
Hall CB (2004) Managing bronchiolitis and respiratory syncytial virus: finding the yellow brick road. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158:111–112
Ventre K, Randolph AG (2007) Ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infection of the lower respiratory tract in infants and young children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000181
Chavez-Bueno S, Mejias A, Welliver RC (2006) Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis: current and future strategies for treatment and prophylaxis. Treat Respir Med 5:483–494
Kuzik BA, Al-Qadhi SA, Kent S, Flavin MP, Hopman W, Hotte S, Gander S (2007) Nebulized hypertonic saline in the treatment of viral bronchiolitis in infants. J Pediatr 151:266–270, e261
Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP (2008) Nebulized hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006458
Elhassan NO, Sorbero ME, Hall CB, Stevens TP, Dick AW (2006) Cost-effectiveness analysis of palivizumab in premature infants without chronic lung disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 160:1070–1076
Chavez-Bueno S, Mejias A, Merryman RA, Ahmad N, Jafri HS, Ramilo O (2007) Intravenous palivizumab and ribavirin combination for respiratory syncytial virus disease in high-risk pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26:1089–1093
Cardenas S, Auais A, Piedimonte G (2005) Palivizumab in the prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 3:719–726
Carbonell-Estrany X, Simoes EA, Dagan R, Hall CB, Harris B, Hultquist M, Connor EM, Losonsky GA (2010) Motavizumab for prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus in high-risk children: a noninferiority trial. Pediatrics 125:e35–e51
Wu H, Pfarr DS, Johnson S, Brewah YA, Woods RM, Patel NK, White WI, Young JF, Kiener PA (2007) Development of motavizumab, an ultra-potent antibody for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection in the upper and lower respiratory tract. J Mol Biol 368:652–665
Kapikian AZ, Mitchell RH, Chanock RM, Shvedoff RA, Stewart CE (1969) An epidemiologic study of altered clinical reactivity to respiratory syncytial (RS) virus infection in children previously vaccinated with an inactivated RS virus vaccine. Am J Epidemiol 89:405–421
Kim HW, Canchola JG, Brandt CD, Pyles G, Chanock RM, Jensen K, Parrott RH (1969) Respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants despite prior administration of antigenic inactivated vaccine. Am J Epidemiol 89:422–434
Kim HW, Arrobio JO, Brandt CD, Wright P, Hodes D, Chanock RM, Parrott RH (1973) Safety and antigenicity of temperature sensitive (TS) mutant respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and children. Pediatrics 52:56–63
Castilow EM, Olson MR, Varga SM (2007) Understanding respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine-enhanced disease. Immunol Res 39:225–239
Delgado MF, Polack FP (2004) Involvement of antibody, complement and cellular immunity in the pathogenesis of enhanced respiratory syncytial virus disease. Expert Rev Vaccines 3:693–700
Delgado MF, Coviello S, Monsalvo AC, Melendi GA, Hernandez JZ, Batalle JP, Diaz L, Trento A, Chang HY, Mitzner W et al (2009) Lack of antibody affinity maturation due to poor Toll-like receptor stimulation leads to enhanced respiratory syncytial virus disease. Nat Med 15:34–41
Wright PF, Karron RA, Belshe RB, Thompson J, Crowe JE Jr, Boyce TG, Halburnt LL, Reed GW, Whitehead SS, Anderson EL et al (2000) Evaluation of a live, cold-passaged, temperature-sensitive, respiratory syncytial virus vaccine candidate in infancy. J Infect Dis 182:1331–1342
Wright PF, Shinozaki T, Fleet W, Sell SH, Thompson J, Karzon DT (1976) Evaluation of a live, attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in infants. J Pediatr 88:931–936
Karron RA, Buonagurio DA, Georgiu AF, Whitehead SS, Adamus JE, Clements-Mann ML, Harris DO, Randolph VB, Udem SA, Murphy BR et al (1997) Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) SH and G proteins are not essential for viral replication in vitro: clinical evaluation and molecular characterization of a cold-passaged, attenuated RSV subgroup B mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13961–13966
Karron RA, Wright PF, Belshe RB, Thumar B, Casey R, Newman F, Polack FP, Randolph VB, Deatly A, Hackell J et al (2005) Identification of a recombinant live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine candidate that is highly attenuated in infants. J Infect Dis 191:1093–1104
Karron RA, Wright PF, Crowe JE Jr, Clements-Mann ML, Thompson J, Makhene M, Casey R, Murphy BR (1997) Evaluation of two live, cold-passaged, temperature-sensitive respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in chimpanzees and in human adults, infants, and children. J Infect Dis 176:1428–1436
Johnson PR Jr, Feldman S, Thompson JM, Mahoney JD, Wright PF (1985) Comparison of long-term systemic and secretory antibody responses in children given live, attenuated, or inactivated influenza A vaccine. J Med Virol 17:325–335
Johnson PR, Feldman S, Thompson JM, Mahoney JD, Wright PF (1986) Immunity to influenza A virus infection in young children: a comparison of natural infection, live cold-adapted vaccine, and inactivated vaccine. J Infect Dis 154:121–127
Jt M, Van Kirk JE, Wright PF, Chanock RM (1971) Experimental respiratory syncytial virus infection of adults. Possible mechanisms of resistance to infection and illness. J Immunol 107:123–130
Polack FP, Karron RA (2004) The future of respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development. Pediatr Infect Dis J 23:S65–S73
Collins PL, Whitehead SS, Bukreyev A, Fearns R, Teng MN, Juhasz K, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (1999) Rational design of live-attenuated recombinant vaccine virus for human respiratory syncytial virus by reverse genetics. Adv Virus Res 54:423–451
Pringle CR, Filipiuk AH, Robinson BS, Watt PJ, Higgins P, Tyrrell DA (1993) Immunogenicity and pathogenicity of a triple temperature-sensitive modified respiratory syncytial virus in adult volunteers. Vaccine 11:473–478
Wright PF, Mills J, Chanock RM (1971) Evaluation of a temperature-sensitive mutant of respiratory syncytial virus in adults. J Infect Dis 124:505–511
Wright PF, Belshe RB, Kim HW, Van Voris LP, Chanock RM (1982) Administration of a highly attenuated, live respiratory syncytial virus vaccine to adults and children. Infect Immun 37:397–400
Wright PF, Karron RA, Belshe RB, Shi JR, Randolph VB, Collins PL, O'Shea AF, Gruber WC, Murphy BR (2007) The absence of enhanced disease with wild type respiratory syncytial virus infection occurring after receipt of live, attenuated, respiratory syncytial virus vaccines. Vaccine 25:7372–7378
Whitehead SS, Firestone CY, Collins PL, Murphy BR (1998) A single nucleotide substitution in the transcription start signal of the M2 gene of respiratory syncytial virus vaccine candidate cpts248/404 is the major determinant of the temperature-sensitive and attenuation phenotypes. Virology 247:232–239
Whitehead SS, Juhasz K, Firestone CY, Collins PL, Murphy BR (1998) Recombinant respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bearing a set of mutations from cold-passaged RSV is attenuated in chimpanzees. J Virol 72:4467–4471
Juhasz K, Whitehead SS, Boulanger CA, Firestone CY, Collins PL, Murphy BR (1999) The two amino acid substitutions in the L protein of cpts530/1009, a live-attenuated respiratory syncytial virus candidate vaccine, are independent temperature-sensitive and attenuation mutations. Vaccine 17:1416–1424
Juhasz K, Whitehead SS, Bui PT, Biggs JM, Crowe JE, Boulanger CA, Collins PL, Murphy BR (1997) The temperature-sensitive (ts) phenotype of a cold-passaged (cp) live attenuated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine candidate, designated cpts530, results from a single amino acid substitution in the L protein. J Virol 71:5814–5819
Jin H, Clarke D, Zhou HZ, Cheng X, Coelingh K, Bryant M, Li S (1998) Recombinant human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from cDNA and construction of subgroup A and B chimeric RSV. Virology 251:206–214
Collins PL, Hill MG, Camargo E, Grosfeld H, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (1995) Production of infectious human respiratory syncytial virus from cloned cDNA confirms an essential role for the transcription elongation factor from the 5' proximal open reading frame of the M2 mRNA in gene expression and provides a capability for vaccine development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11563–11567
Surman SR, Collins PL, Murphy BR, Skiadopoulos MH (2007) An improved method for the recovery of recombinant paramyxovirus vaccine candidates suitable for use in human clinical trials. J Virol Methods 141:30–33
Whitehead SS, Firestone CY, Karron RA, Crowe JE Jr, Elkins WR, Collins PL, Murphy BR (1999) Addition of a missense mutation present in the L gene of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cpts530/1030 to RSV vaccine candidate cpts248/404 increases its attenuation and temperature sensitivity. J Virol 73:871–877
Lu B, Brazas R, Ma CH, Kristoff T, Cheng X, Jin H (2002) Identification of temperature-sensitive mutations in the phosphoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus that are likely involved in its interaction with the nucleoprotein. J Virol 76:2871–2880
Lu B, Ma CH, Brazas R, Jin H (2002) The major phosphorylation sites of the respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein are dispensable for virus replication in vitro. J Virol 76:10776–10784
Tang RS, Nguyen N, Zhou H, Jin H (2002) Clustered charge-to-alanine mutagenesis of human respiratory syncytial virus L polymerase generates temperature-sensitive viruses. Virology 302:207–216
Teng MN, Whitehead SS, Bermingham A, St Claire M, Elkins WR, Murphy BR, Collins PL (2000) Recombinant respiratory syncytial virus that does not express the NS1 or M2-2 protein is highly attenuated and immunogenic in chimpanzees. J Virol 74:9317–9321
Whitehead SS, Bukreyev A, Teng MN, Firestone CY, St Claire M, Elkins WR, Collins PL, Murphy BR (1999) Recombinant respiratory syncytial virus bearing a deletion of either the NS2 or SH gene is attenuated in chimpanzees. J Virol 73:3438–3442
Jin H, Cheng X, Traina-Dorge VL, Park HJ, Zhou H, Soike K, Kemble G (2003) Evaluation of recombinant respiratory syncytial virus gene deletion mutants in African green monkeys for their potential as live attenuated vaccine candidates. Vaccine 21:3647–3652
Bukreyev A, Whitehead SS, Murphy BR, Collins PL (1997) Recombinant respiratory syncytial virus from which the entire SH gene has been deleted grows efficiently in cell culture and exhibits site-specific attenuation in the respiratory tract of the mouse. J Virol 71:8973–8982
Jin H, Cheng X, Zhou HZ, Li S, Seddiqui A (2000) Respiratory syncytial virus that lacks open reading frame 2 of the M2 gene (M2-2) has altered growth characteristics and is attenuated in rodents. J Virol 74:74–82
Wright PF, Karron RA, Madhi SA, Treanor JJ, King JC, O'Shea A, Ikizler MR, Zhu Y, Collins PL, Cutland C et al (2006) The interferon antagonist NS2 protein of respiratory syncytial virus is an important virulence determinant for humans. J Infect Dis 193:573–581
Collins PL, Purcell RH, London WT, Lawrence LA, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (1990) Evaluation in chimpanzees of vaccinia virus recombinants that express the surface glycoproteins of human respiratory syncytial virus. Vaccine 8:164–168
Olmsted RA, Buller RM, Collins PL, London WT, Beeler JA, Prince GA, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (1988) Evaluation in non-human primates of the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the F or G glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus. Vaccine 6:519–524
Olmsted RA, Elango N, Prince GA, Murphy BR, Johnson PR, Moss B, Chanock RM, Collins PL (1986) Expression of the F glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus by a recombinant vaccinia virus: comparison of the individual contributions of the F and G glycoproteins to host immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:7462–7466
Elango N, Prince GA, Murphy BR, Venkatesan S, Chanock RM, Moss B (1986) Resistance to human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection induced by immunization of cotton rats with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the RSV G glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1906–1910
Wyatt LS, Whitehead SS, Venanzi KA, Murphy BR, Moss B (1999) Priming and boosting immunity to respiratory syncytial virus by recombinant replication-defective vaccinia virus MVA. Vaccine 18:392–397
de Waal L, Wyatt LS, Yuksel S, van Amerongen G, Moss B, Niesters HG, Osterhaus AD, de Swart RL (2004) Vaccination of infant macaques with a recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing the respiratory syncytial virus F and G genes does not predispose for immunopathology. Vaccine 22:923–926
Shao HY, Yu SL, Sia C, Chen Y, Chitra E, Chen IH, Venkatesan N, Leng CH, Chong P, Chow YH (2009) Immunogenic properties of RSV-B1 fusion (F) protein gene-encoding recombinant adenoviruses. Vaccine 27:5460–5471
Yu JR, Kim S, Lee JB, Chang J (2008) Single intranasal immunization with recombinant adenovirus-based vaccine induces protective immunity against respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Virol 82:2350–2357
Hsu KH, Lubeck MD, Bhat BM, Bhat RA, Kostek B, Selling BH, Mizutani S, Davis AR, Hung PP (1994) Efficacy of adenovirus-vectored respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in a new ferret model. Vaccine 12:607–612
Hsu KH, Lubeck MD, Davis AR, Bhat RA, Selling BH, Bhat BM, Mizutani S, Murphy BR, Collins PL, Chanock RM et al (1992) Immunogenicity of recombinant adenovirus-respiratory syncytial virus vaccines with adenovirus types 4, 5, and 7 vectors in dogs and a chimpanzee. J Infect Dis 166:769–775
Fu Y, He J, Zheng X, Wu Q, Zhang M, Wang X, Wang Y, Xie C, Tang Q, Wei W et al (2009) Intranasal immunization with a replication-deficient adenoviral vector expressing the fusion glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus elicits protective immunity in BALB/c mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 381:528–532
Mok H, Lee S, Utley TJ, Shepherd BE, Polosukhin VV, Collier ML, Davis NL, Johnston RE, Crowe JE Jr (2007) Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus replicon particles encoding respiratory syncytial virus surface glycoproteins induce protective mucosal responses in mice and cotton rats. J Virol 81:13710–13722
Elliott MB, Chen T, Terio NB, Chong SY, Abdullah R, Luckay A, Egan MA, Boutilier LA, Melville K, Lerch RA et al (2007) Alphavirus replicon particles encoding the fusion or attachment glycoproteins of respiratory syncytial virus elicit protective immune responses in BALB/c mice and functional serum antibodies in rhesus macaques. Vaccine 25:7132–7144
Chen M, Hu KF, Rozell B, Orvell C, Morein B, Liljestrom P (2002) Vaccination with recombinant alphavirus or immune-stimulating complex antigen against respiratory syncytial virus. J Immunol 169:3208–3216
Fleeton MN, Chen M, Berglund P, Rhodes G, Parker SE, Murphy M, Atkins GJ, Liljestrom P (2001) Self-replicative RNA vaccines elicit protection against influenza A virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and a tickborne encephalitis virus. J Infect Dis 183:1395–1398
Murata Y (2009) Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development. Clin Lab Med 29:725–739
Collins PL, Murphy BR (2002) Respiratory syncytial virus: reverse genetics and vaccine strategies. Virology 296:204–211
Collins PL, Murphy BR (2005) New generation live vaccines against human respiratory syncytial virus designed by reverse genetics. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2:166–173
Martinez-Sobrido L, Gitiban N, Fernandez-Sesma A, Cros J, Mertz SE, Jewell NA, Hammond S, Flano E, Durbin RK, Garcia-Sastre A et al (2006) Protection against respiratory syncytial virus by a recombinant Newcastle disease virus vector. J Virol 80:1130–1139
Voges B, Vallbracht S, Zimmer G, Bossow S, Neubert WJ, Richter K, Hobeika E, Herrler G, Ehl S (2007) Recombinant Sendai virus induces T cell immunity against respiratory syncytial virus that is protective in the absence of antibodies. Cell Immunol 247:85–94
Takimoto T, Hurwitz JL, Zhan X, Krishnamurthy S, Prouser C, Brown B, Coleclough C, Boyd K, Scroggs RA, Portner A et al (2005) Recombinant Sendai virus as a novel vaccine candidate for respiratory syncytial virus. Viral Immunol 18:255–266
Takimoto T, Hurwitz JL, Coleclough C, Prouser C, Krishnamurthy S, Zhan X, Boyd K, Scroggs RA, Brown B, Nagai Y et al (2004) Recombinant Sendai virus expressing the G glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) elicits immune protection against RSV. J Virol 78:6043–6047
Hurwitz JL (2008) Development of recombinant Sendai virus vaccines for prevention of human parainfluenza and respiratory syncytial virus infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 27:S126–S128
Kawano M, Kaito M, Kozuka Y, Komada H, Noda N, Nanba K, Tsurudome M, Ito M, Nishio M, Ito Y (2001) Recovery of infectious human parainfluenza type 2 virus from cDNA clones and properties of the defective virus without V-specific cysteine-rich domain. Virology 284:99–112
Skiadopoulos MH, Vogel L, Riggs JM, Surman SR, Collins PL, Murphy BR (2003) The genome length of human parainfluenza virus type 2 follows the rule of six, and recombinant viruses recovered from non-polyhexameric-length antigenomic cDNAs contain a biased distribution of correcting mutations. J Virol 77:270–279
Bartlett EJ, Amaro-Carambot E, Surman SR, Collins PL, Murphy BR, Skiadopoulos MH (2006) Introducing point and deletion mutations into the P/C gene of human parainfluenza virus type 1 (HPIV1) by reverse genetics generates attenuated and efficacious vaccine candidates. Vaccine 24:2674–2684
Bartlett EJ, Amaro-Carambot E, Surman SR, Newman JT, Collins PL, Murphy BR, Skiadopoulos MH (2005) Human parainfluenza virus type I (HPIV1) vaccine candidates designed by reverse genetics are attenuated and efficacious in African green monkeys. Vaccine 23:4631–4646
Bartlett EJ, Castano A, Surman SR, Collins PL, Skiadopoulos MH, Murphy BR (2007) Attenuation and efficacy of human parainfluenza virus type 1 (HPIV1) vaccine candidates containing stabilized mutations in the P/C and L genes. Virol J 4:67
Nolan SM, Skiadopoulos MH, Bradley K, Kim OS, Bier S, Amaro-Carambot E, Surman SR, Davis S, St Claire M, Elkins R et al (2007) Recombinant human parainfluenza virus type 2 vaccine candidates containing a 3' genomic promoter mutation and L polymerase mutations are attenuated and protective in non-human primates. Vaccine 25:6409–6422
Nolan SM, Surman SR, Amaro-Carambot E, Collins PL, Murphy BR, Skiadopoulos MH (2005) Live-attenuated intranasal parainfluenza virus type 2 vaccine candidates developed by reverse genetics containing L polymerase protein mutations imported from heterologous paramyxoviruses. Vaccine 23:4765–4774
Clements ML, Belshe RB, King J, Newman F, Westblom TU, Tierney EL, London WT, Murphy BR (1991) Evaluation of bovine, cold-adapted human, and wild-type human parainfluenza type 3 viruses in adult volunteers and in chimpanzees. J Clin Microbiol 29:1175–1182
Karron RA, Makhene M, Gay K, Wilson MH, Clements ML, Murphy BR (1996) Evaluation of a live attenuated bovine parainfluenza type 3 vaccine in two- to six-month-old infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 15:650–654
Haller AA, Mitiku M, MacPhail M (2003) Bovine parainfluenza virus type 3 (PIV3) expressing the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) attachment and fusion proteins protects hamsters from challenge with human PIV3 and RSV. J Gen Virol 84:2153–2162
Schmidt AC, McAuliffe JM, Murphy BR, Collins PL (2001) Recombinant bovine/human parainfluenza virus type 3 (B/HPIV3) expressing the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) G and F proteins can be used to achieve simultaneous mucosal immunization against RSV and HPIV3. J Virol 75:4594–4603
Schmidt AC, Wenzke DR, McAuliffe JM, St Claire M, Elkins WR, Murphy BR, Collins PL (2002) Mucosal immunization of rhesus monkeys against respiratory syncytial virus subgroups A and B and human parainfluenza virus type 3 by using a live cDNA-derived vaccine based on a host range-attenuated bovine parainfluenza virus type 3 vector backbone. J Virol 76:1089–1099
Tang RS, MacPhail M, Schickli JH, Kaur J, Robinson CL, Lawlor HA, Guzzetta JM, Spaete RR, Haller AA (2004) Parainfluenza virus type 3 expressing the native or soluble fusion (F) Protein of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) confers protection from RSV infection in African green monkeys. J Virol 78:11198–11207
Tang RS, Spaete RR, Thompson MW, MacPhail M, Guzzetta JM, Ryan PC, Reisinger K, Chandler P, Hilty M, Walker RE et al (2008) Development of a PIV-vectored RSV vaccine: preclinical evaluation of safety, toxicity, and enhanced disease and initial clinical testing in healthy adults. Vaccine 26:6373–6382
Gomez M, Mufson MA, Dubovsky F, Knightly C, Zeng W, Losonsky G (2009) Phase-I study MEDI-534, of a live, attenuated intranasal vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza-3 virus in seropositive children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:655–658
Crowe JE Jr, Bui PT, Davis AR, Chanock RM, Murphy BR (1994) A further attenuated derivative of a cold-passaged temperature-sensitive mutant of human respiratory syncytial virus retains immunogenicity and protective efficacy against wild-type challenge in seronegative chimpanzees. Vaccine 12:783–790
Munir S, Le Nouen C, Luongo C, Buchholz UJ, Collins PL, Bukreyev A (2008) Nonstructural proteins 1 and 2 of respiratory syncytial virus suppress maturation of human dendritic cells. J Virol 82:8780–8796
Bukreyev A, Whitehead SS, Bukreyeva N, Murphy BR, Collins PL (1999) Interferon gamma expressed by a recombinant respiratory syncytial virus attenuates virus replication in mice without compromising immunogenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2367–2372
Bukreyev A, Belyakov IM, Berzofsky JA, Murphy BR, Collins PL (2001) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor expressed by recombinant respiratory syncytial virus attenuates viral replication and increases the level of pulmonary antigen-presenting cells. J Virol 75:12128–12140
Bukreyev A, Belyakov IM, Prince GA, Yim KC, Harris KK, Berzofsky JA, Collins PL (2005) Expression of interleukin-4 by recombinant respiratory syncytial virus is associated with accelerated inflammation and a nonfunctional cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response following primary infection but not following challenge with wild-type virus. J Virol 79:9515–9526
Bukreyev A, Camargo E, Collins PL (1996) Recovery of infectious respiratory syncytial virus expressing an additional, foreign gene. J Virol 70:6634–6641
Harker J, Bukreyev A, Collins PL, Wang B, Openshaw PJ, Tregoning JS (2007) Virally delivered cytokines alter the immune response to future lung infections. J Virol 81:13105–13111
Ball LA, Pringle CR, Flanagan B, Perepelitsa VP, Wertz GW (1999) Phenotypic consequences of rearranging the P, M, and G genes of vesicular stomatitis virus. J Virol 73:4705–4712
Flanagan EB, Zamparo JM, Ball LA, Rodriguez LL, Wertz GW (2001) Rearrangement of the genes of vesicular stomatitis virus eliminates clinical disease in the natural host: new strategy for vaccine development. J Virol 75:6107–6114
Flanagan EB, Ball LA, Wertz GW (2000) Moving the glycoprotein gene of vesicular stomatitis virus to promoter-proximal positions accelerates and enhances the protective immune response. J Virol 74:7895–7902
Krempl C, Murphy BR, Collins PL (2002) Recombinant respiratory syncytial virus with the G and F genes shifted to the promoter-proximal positions. J Virol 76:11931–11942
Ternette N, Tippler B, Uberla K, Grunwald T (2007) Immunogenicity and efficacy of codon optimized DNA vaccines encoding the F-protein of respiratory syncytial virus. Vaccine 25:7271–7279
Saez-Llorens X, Castano E, Null D, Steichen J, Sanchez PJ, Ramilo O, Top FH Jr, Connor E (1998) Safety and pharmacokinetics of an intramuscular humanized monoclonal antibody to respiratory syncytial virus in premature infants and infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The MEDI-493 study group. Pediatr Infect Dis J 17:787–791
Subramanian KN, Weisman LE, Rhodes T, Ariagno R, Sanchez PJ, Steichen J, Givner LB, Jennings TL, Top FH Jr, Carlin D et al (1998) Safety, tolerance and pharmacokinetics of a humanized monoclonal antibody to respiratory syncytial virus in premature infants and infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. MEDI-493 study group. Pediatr Infect Dis J 17:110–115
Lichtenstein DL, Roberts SR, Wertz GW, Ball LA (1996) Definition and functional analysis of the signal/anchor domain of the human respiratory syncytial virus glycoprotein G. J Gen Virol 77(Pt 1):109–118
Roberts SR, Lichtenstein D, Ball LA, Wertz GW (1994) The membrane-associated and secreted forms of the respiratory syncytial virus attachment glycoprotein G are synthesized from alternative initiation codons. J Virol 68:4538–4546
Teng MN, Whitehead SS, Collins PL (2001) Contribution of the respiratory syncytial virus G glycoprotein and its secreted and membrane-bound forms to virus replication in vitro and in vivo. Virology 289:283–296
Bukreyev A, Serra ME, Laham FR, Melendi GA, Kleeberger SR, Collins PL, Polack FP (2006) The cysteine-rich region and secreted form of the attachment G glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus enhance the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response despite lacking major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted epitopes. J Virol 80:5854–5861
Teng MN, Collins PL (2002) The central conserved cystine noose of the attachment G protein of human respiratory syncytial virus is not required for efficient viral infection in vitro or in vivo. J Virol 76:6164–6171
Spann KM, Collins PL, Teng MN (2003) Genetic recombination during coinfection of two mutants of human respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol 77:11201–11211
Luongo C, Yang L, Winter CC, Spann KM, Murphy BR, Collins PL, Buchholz UJ (2009) Codon stabilization analysis of the “248” temperature sensitive mutation for increased phenotypic stability of respiratory syncytial virus vaccine candidates. Vaccine 27:5667–5676
Arnold JJ, Vignuzzi M, Stone JK, Andino R, Cameron CE (2005) Remote site control of an active site fidelity checkpoint in a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 280:25706–25716
Korneeva VS, Cameron CE (2007) Structure-function relationships of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase: fidelity, replication speed, and initiation mechanism determined by a residue in the ribose-binding pocket. J Biol Chem 282:16135–16145
Vignuzzi M, Wendt E, Andino R (2008) Engineering attenuated virus vaccines by controlling replication fidelity. Nat Med 14:154–161
Castro C, Smidansky E, Maksimchuk KR, Arnold JJ, Korneeva VS, Gotte M, Konigsberg W, Cameron CE (2007) Two proton transfers in the transition state for nucleotidyl transfer catalyzed by RNA- and DNA-dependent RNA and DNA polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4267–4272
Castro C, Smidansky ED, Arnold JJ, Maksimchuk KR, Moustafa I, Uchida A, Gotte M, Konigsberg W, Cameron CE (2009) Nucleic acid polymerases use a general acid for nucleotidyl transfer. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:212–218
Acknowledgment
The author would like to gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Kim C. Tran for producing the figures and table for this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Basel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teng, M.N. (2011). Live Attenuated Vaccines for Respiratory Syncytial Virus. In: Dormitzer, P., Mandl, C., Rappuoli, R. (eds) Replicating Vaccines. Birkhäuser Advances in Infectious Diseases. Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0277-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0277-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0346-0276-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-0346-0277-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)