Abstract
To infinity, and beyond!
Buzz Lightyear
Let’s begin with a story. Once upon a time, a king was challenged to a game of chess by a poor scholar. If he lost, the king would have to pay the scholar a chessboard’s worth of grain, defined as one kernel of grain on the first square, two grains on the second square, four grains on the third square, and so on, with each subsequent square receiving double what was on the previous square. The king accepted the wager but lost the game. A chessboard has eight rows and eight columns, so the king had to pay 264–1 grains. (See Section 1.4 for an explanation of the math behind this formula.) Rice is 7,000 grains per pound (~ 65 mg each), so the king owed the scholar 1.199 x 1015 kg of rice, which is more than 150 tons of rice for every person currently on planet Earth (worth about $40,000 per person). For reference, people eat about 35 tons of food in a lifetime, so this is 4.4 lifetimes’ supply of food for every person on the planet. Clearly, the scholar’s winnings won’t all fit on an ordinary chessboard!
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jonathan Sanderman, Tomislav Hengl, and Gregory J. Fiske. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36):9575–9580, 2017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706103114.
Matt Davis, Søren Faurby, and Jens-Christian Svenning. Mammal diversity will take millions of years to recover from the current biodiversity crisis. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(44):11262–11267, 2018. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804906115.
T A. Graedel and B. R. Allenby. Industrial Ecology and Sustainable Engineering. Prentice Hall, Boston, 2010. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Graedel- Industrial-Ecology-and-Sustainable-Engineering/PGM121237.html
Simon Dietz and Eric Neumayer. Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement. Ecological Economics, 61(4):617–626, March 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.007.
Nuno Quental, Julia M. Lourenço, and Fernando Nunes da Silva. Sustainable development policy: Goals, targets, and political cycles. Sustainable Development, 19(1):15–29, 2011. doi: 10.1002/sd.416.
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, 1987.
Ferruccio Ferroni and Robert J. Hopkirk. Energy return on energy invested (ERoEI) for photovoltaic solar systems in regions of moderate insolation. Energy Policy, 94:336–344, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.034.
Energy return on investment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_return_on_ investment Accessed December 15, 2021.
Energy return on investment, March 2020. https://world-nuclear.org/information- library/energy- and- the- environment/energy- return- on- investment.aspx Accessed December 15, 2021.
Ethanol fuel in Brazil. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel_in_Brazil Accessed December 15, 2021.
Tiziano Gomiero. Are biofuels an effective and viable energy strategy for industrialized societies? A reasoned overview of potentials and limits. Sustainability, 7(7):8491-8521, 2015. doi: 10.3390/su7078491.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Antwerp, J., Heun, M.K. (2022). Introduction. In: A Framework for Sustainability Thinking. Synthesis Lectures on Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79179-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79179-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-79174-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-79179-6
eBook Packages: Synthesis Collection of Technology (R0)eBColl Synthesis Collection 11