Skip to main content

A Comparison of System Dynamics-Based Simulators for Project Management Training: A Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Software Engineering

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 1135))

  • 248 Accesses

Abstract

The constant pressure on the industrial workforce to successfully achieve projects’ scope within time, resources and budget constraints is constantly increasing because of the volatile market conditions worldwide. To palliate this issue, Project Management (PM) has been proposed as a suitable approach to cope with the varied sources of pressure. For instance, PM facilitates the control and tracking of multiple steps involved in delivering value to customers. However, to fully take advantage of a PM implementation in an organization, managers need hands-on experience to properly use PM principles in real-life situation. Nowadays, simulation-based training has become an affordable approach to provide novice project managers with situational-based learning they need during different stages in the career in PM. Unfortunately, little is known about the effectiveness of simulation as a training tool for new and current project managers. To fill the knowledge gap in how effective simulation has been to train project managers, this work presents the results of a systemic literature review study. A key finding of this work is a paucity in computer-based simulation approaches to train project managers, particularly in the agile paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ford, D. N., & Lyneis, J. M. (2020). System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8790-0_658

  2. Otsuki, M., Akiyoshi, M., & Samejima, M. (2017). Identification method of improvements in user operations on project manager skill-up simulator. IEEE Access, 5, 5811–5818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2673019

  3. Ching, P. M., & Mutuc, J. E. (2018). Modeling the dynamics of an Agile scrum team in the development of a single software project. In 2018 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 386–390). Bangkok: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607430

  4. Negrete-Rodriguez, M. A., Elizondo-Noriega, A., Guemes-Castorena, D., & Muñoz, M. (2023). A review of the state-of-the-art scientific methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of training approaches. In Proceedings of the American society of engineering management annual conference.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tiruvengadam, N., Elizondo-Noriega, A., Gemes-Castorena, D., & Beruvides, M. G. (2022). Opportunities for system dynamics implementation in project management evaluation. In Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology (PICMET) (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET53225.2022.9882860

  6. Shatte, A. B. R., Hutchinson, D. M., & Teague, S. J. (2019). Machine learning in mental health: A scoping review of methods and applications. Psychological Medicine, 49(9). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719000151

  7. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., & Clarke, M. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P). Systematic Review, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

  8. Pahlevan, S., Saeed, M., Paolo, W., & Wijesinghe, S. N. R. (2019). Systematic reviews in Asia: Introducing the “PRISMA” protocol to tourism and hospitality scholars: current status and future directions.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Negrete, M., Elizondo-Noriega, A., Tiruvengadam, N., Muñoz, M., & Gúemes-Castorena, D. (2023). A literature review of simulation-based approaches to train managers in waterfall and agile project management. In 2023 Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology (PICMET), July (pp. 1–8). Monterrey, Mexico: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET59654.2023.10216822

  10. Muñoz, M., Negrete, M., & Mejía, J. (2019). Proposal to avoid issues in the DevOps implementation: A systematic literature review. In Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L. P., & Costanzo, S. (Eds.), New knowledge in information systems and technologie. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 930, pp. 666–677). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_63

  11. Arakelyan, E. K., Rubashkin, V. A., Andriushin, A. V., & Mezin, S. V. (2020). The use of modern computer-based training-simulator complexes in the educational process. In 2020 V international conference on information technologies in engineering education (Inforino) (pp. 1–4). Moscow, Russia: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/Inforino48376.2020.9111772

  12. Isoc, D., & Surubaru, T. (2020). Engineering education using professional activity simulators. In Auer, M. E. & Tsiatsos, T. (Eds.), The challenges of the digital transformation in education. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 916, pp. 520–531). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_50

  13. Jääskä, E., & Aaltonen, K. (2022). Teachers’ experiences of using game-based learning methods in project management higher education. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100041

  14. Elsawah, S., McLucas, A., & Mazanov, J. (2017). An empirical investigation into the learning effects of management flight simulators: A mental models approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(1), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.011

  15. Khatib, M. E., Alhosani, A., Alhosani, I., Matrooshi, O. A., & Salami, M. (2022). Simulation in project and program management: Utilization, challenges and opportunities. AJIBM, 12(4), 731–749. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.124037

  16. Shafieezadeh, M., Kalantar Hormozi, M., Hassannayebi, E., Ahmadi, L., Soleymani, M., & Gholizad, A. (2020). A system dynamics simulation model to evaluate project planning policies. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 40(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2019.1596779

  17. Nasirzadeh, F., Khanzadi, M., & Mir, M. (2018). A hybrid simulation framework for modelling construction projects using agent-based modelling and system dynamics: An application to model construction workers’ safety behavior. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1285485

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armando Elizondo-Noriega .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table 3.

Table 3 Primary papers found in the SLR

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Negrete-Rodriguez, M.A., Elizondo-Noriega, A., Muñoz, M., Güemes-Castorena, D. (2024). A Comparison of System Dynamics-Based Simulators for Project Management Training: A Literature Review. In: Mejía, J., Muñoz, M., Rocha, A., Hernández Pérez, Y., Avila-George, H. (eds) New Perspectives in Software Engineering. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50590-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics