Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Framework Proposal to Combine Models and Standards in Multi-model Environments to Software Development Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Software Engineering

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 1135))

  • 238 Accesses

Abstract

Software development organizations are implementing different quality models and standards to guide the development process. In this context, it is common for these types of organizations to have different models or standards implemented. This article shows a framework proposal for combining models and standards in software development. This framework highlights nine proposal steps to consider when adopting different models or standards. Moreover, this article identified the importance of two steps: the first step is to establish the objective of why the organization wants to combine models or standards, and the second set a mathematical formalization to ensure compliance of process structure in each model or standard, to minimize the risk in the combination processes among them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/IEC WG24, ISO/IEC TR 29110–5–1–2. (2011). Software engineering—Lifecycle profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) Part 5–1–2. Management and engineering guide: Generic profile group. Basic profile., 1 ed., pp. 1–83. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SEI, CMMI for development, version 1.3, vol. 1, SEI, Ed., Hanscom, AFB, MA: Software Engineering Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lindsay, E. (2014). An introduction to Six Sigma & Process Improvement, 2nd ed. In J.R. Evans, (Ed). Kentuchy, Kentuchy: CENGAGE Learning, pp. 1–368.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO/IEC, ISO/IEC 12207:2008 Systems and software engineering−Software life cycle processes. ISO/IEC.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ehsan, N., Perwaiz, A., Arif, J., Mirza, E., & Ishaque, A. (2010). CMMI/SPICE based process improvement. In 2010 IEEE international conference on management of innovation & technology, vol. 0, no. 0 (pp. 859–862).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Niazi, N., Wilson, D. & Zowghi, D. (2007). A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement: an empirical study. Systems and Software, 74(2), 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stelzer, D. & Mellis, W. (2000). Success factors of organizational change in software process improvement. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 4(4), 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crisóstomo, J., Flores, L., Melendez, A. & Dávila, A. (2016). Convergence analysis of ISO/IEC 12207 and CMMI-DEV: A systematic literature review. In 2016 XLII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI), vol. 0, no. 0 (pp. 1–8), 26 enero.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang, S.M. and Yeom, H.G. (2009) Analysis of relationship among ISO/IEC 15504, CMMI and K-model. In 2009 10th ACIS international conference on software engineering, artificial intelligences, networking and parallel/distributed computing, vol. 0, no. 0 (pp. 306–309).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kamalakshi, H., & Naganna, N. (2009). CMMI and six sigma-relationship & integration. In 2009 International conference on signal acquisition and processing, vol. 0, no. 0 (pp. 174–176).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mejía, J., Muñoz, M., Maciel-Gallegos, P., & Quiñonez, Y. (2021). Proposal to integrate security practices into the ISO/IEC 29110 standard to develop mobile apps. In New perspectives in software engineering. CIMPS 2021. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol. 1416 (pp. 29−40). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maciel-Gallegos, P., Mejía, J.,& Quiñones, Y. (2022). 29110-ST: Integrated Security ractices. Case study. In New perspectives in software engineering. CIMPS 2022., vol. 576 (pp. 113-125). SpringerLink.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jo, A. S., & Ovalle, C. (2022). Framework integrating RUP, Scrum and ISO 9126 to improve Quality during Software Construction in SMEs. In 2022 IEEE Engineering International Research Conference (EIRCON), vol. 0, no. 0 (pp. 1–4).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baldassarre, M. T., Piattini, M., Pino, F. J., & Visaggio, G. (2009). Comparing ISO/IEC 12207 and CMMI-DEV: Towards a mapping of ISO/IEC 15504–7. In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Quality, vol. 0, no. 0 (pp. 59–64).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suteeca, K., & Ramingwong, S. (2016). A framework to apply ISO/IEC29110 on SCRUM. In 2016 International computer science and engineering conference (ICSEC), vol. 0 (pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferreira, A. I. F., Santos, G., Cerqueira, R., Montoni, M., Barreto, A., Barreto, A.O.S., & Rocha, A. R. (2007). Applying ISO 9001:2000, MPS.BR and CMMI to achieve software process maturity: BL Informatica’s Pathway. In 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07), vol. 0, no. 0 (pp. 642–651).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bourdeau, S., Hadaya, P., & Lussier, J.-E. (2018). Assessing the strategic alignment of information systems projects: A design science approach. Projectics/Proyéctica/Projectique, 20(2), 115–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brogui, A., Cámara, J., Canal, C., Cubo, J., & Pimentel, E. (2007). Dynamic contextual adaptation. Theoretical Computer Science, 175(2), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mirna, M., Jezreel, M., Giner, A., Calvo-Manzano, J. A. (2011). Tom's San Feliu advantages of using a multi-model environment in software process improvement. In 2011 IEEE Electronics, robotics and automotive mechanics conference (pp. 397-402), Cuernavaca, México, IEEE Xplore.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kempe, E., & Massey, A. (2021). In 2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (pp. 46–57).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carvalho, J.A., Sousa, R.D., & Sá, J. O. (2010). Information systems development course: Integrating business, IT and IS competencies. In 2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments (pp. 1-20). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaur, S., Sehra, S.K., & Sehra, S. S. (2016). A framework for software quality model selection using TOPSIS. In IEEE International conference on recent trends in electronics information communication technology (pp. 1–4).

    Google Scholar 

  23. École de technologie supérieure. (2002). QSPM Chapter 7: Defining the goaland scope of the software project. In Quality Software Project Management (pp. 1–15). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Terrón, V., Mejía, J. (2023). Propuesta de mejoras para la implementación del estándar ISO/IEC 29110. Revista Ibérica de sistemas y tecnologías de la Información,(49), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  25. OECD. (2023). OECD/Legal/0413. OECD Legal Instruments, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suda Lawrence, V. (2007). The meaning and importance of culture for project success. PMI® Global Congress, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ergasheva, S., Kruglov, A., & Shulhan, I. (2019). Development and Evaluation of GQM method to improve adaptive systems. CEUR-WS, 2525(33), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bjerke, M.B., & Renger, R. (2017). Being smart about writing SMART objectives. Evaluation and Program Planning, (61), 125–127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Parque Quantum, Ciudad del Conocimiento, Av. Lassec, Andador Galileo Galilei, Manzana, 3, Lote, 7, 98160, Zacatecas, ZAC, México

    Jezreel Mejía, Victor Terrón-Macias & Mirna Muñoz

  2. Universidad Tecnológica de Tlaxcala, A el Carmen Xalpatlahuaya S/N, TLAX, 90513, Huamantla, México

    Miguel Terrón Hernández

Authors
  1. Jezreel Mejía
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victor Terrón-Macias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mirna Muñoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Miguel Terrón Hernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jezreel Mejía or Mirna Muñoz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Quantum Park Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico

    Jezreel Mejía

  2. Quantum Park Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico

    Mirna Muñoz

  3. Lisbon, Portugal

    Alvaro Rocha

  4. Interior Internado Palmira S/N, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

    Yasmin Hernández Pérez

  5. Ameca, Jalisco, Mexico

    Himer Avila-George

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mejía, J., Terrón-Macias, V., Muñoz, M., Hernández, M.T. (2024). Framework Proposal to Combine Models and Standards in Multi-model Environments to Software Development Organizations. In: Mejía, J., Muñoz, M., Rocha, A., Hernández Pérez, Y., Avila-George, H. (eds) New Perspectives in Software Engineering. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50590-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation