Abstract
I set out to provide a richer account of Romantic literature on two levels: the level of form and the level of subjectivity. In this chapter I conclude my investigation. I make the case that the concept of ‘representation’ can provide a suitable ‘architectonic’ for the study of Romantic form. In Romantic literature, the challenge of representation has two moments: (1) Romantic writers held that the self was a subject, which made its representation by an object problematic; (2) some writers doubted the wholeness or unity of the subject, which would make its representation by a single object impossible. I have shown that the challenge of representation can be met in three ways. If the subject is unified, then the self is necessary and can be represented by an object in the text. If some part of the subject exceeds its unity, then the self and its portrayal are monstrous. If the parts of the self fail to cohere at all, then the self and its portrayal are multiple. I propose that this more capacious understanding of Romantic selfhood and Romantic form provide tools for understanding a wider range of Romantic texts. The forms I identify are not confined to the representation of subjectivity: representation, monstrosity and multiplicity can in principle be ‘thematised’ in infinite ways. It is no surprise that scholars have been especially drawn to monstrous and multiple varieties of Romantic writing in recent decades, as individualism has ceased to be a compelling ideology in academic settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Aleida Assmann, Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), p. 8.
- 2.
Denise Gigante, Life: Organic Form and Romanticism (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2009), p. 23.
- 3.
See especially James Chandler, Wordsworth’s Second Nature: A Study of the Poetry and Politics (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984).
References
Assmann, Aleida, Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011)
Chandler, James, Wordsworth’s Second Nature: A Study of the Poetry and Politics (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984)
Gigante, Denise, Life: Organic Form and Romanticism (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Falk, M. (2024). Conclusion. In: Romanticism and the Contingent Self. Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49959-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49959-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49958-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49959-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)