Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: Refiguring the Digital Tools of Cultural Production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creative Tools and the Softwarization of Cultural Production

Part of the book series: Creative Working Lives ((CWL))

  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter has three aims. The first is to define what we mean by the softwarization of cultural production and how investigating creative tools provides insights into this process. Our second aim is to sketch how this approach to cultural production connects with existing research. The third and final aim is to preview the works collected in this volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. (1985). In search of Wagner (R. Livingstone, Trans.; 2005 ed.). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alperson, P. (2008). The instrumentality of music. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvatov, B. (1926/2017). Art and Production (J. Roberts & A. Penzin, Eds.; S. Avagyan, Trans.; English edition). Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, D., & Conor, B. (2016). Screenwriting, higher education and digital ecologies of expertise. New Writing, 13(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2015.1131304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439609526455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. B. (2007). Alan Kay: Transforming the computer into a communication medium. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 29(2), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2007.17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (Eds.). (2010). Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts inquiry. I.B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J., & Bishop, R. (2020). Technocrats of the imagination: Art, technology, and the military-industrial Avant-Garde. Duke Univ Pr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardzell, J. (2007). Creativity in amateur multimedia: Popular culture, critical theory, and HCI. Human Technology, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.200768

  • Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In The Atherton Press Behavioral Science Series. Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado. (pp. 1–30). Atherton Press. (2008–16115-001). https://doi.org/10.1037/13117-001.

  • Campbell-Kelly, M., Aspray, W., Ensmenger, N., & Yost, J. R. (2013). Computer: A history of the information machine (3 edition). Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M., Mack, R. L., & Kellogg, W. A. (1988). Interface metaphors and user Interface design. In Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 67–85). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-70536-5.50008-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, B. (2022). Sound practices in the global south: Co-listening to resounding Plurilogues. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99732-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, W. H. K. (2004). On software, or the persistence of visual knowledge. Grey Room.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, W. H. K. (2011). Programmed vision: Software and memory. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E., & Fujimura, J. H. (1992). The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life sciences / edited by Adele E. Clarke and Joan H. Fujimura. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Cole, J. (2014). The open mind: Cold war politics and the sciences of human nature. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, K. (2019). Decomposed: A political ecology of music. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. A. (1917/2010). Creative intelligence: Essays in the pragmatic attitude. Project Gutenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D. (2020). Creativity: A Business Imperative. Retrieved January 10, 2023, from https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2020/07/13/creativity-a-business-imperative

  • Engelbart, D. (1988). The augmented knowledge workshop. In A history of personal workstations (pp. 185–248). Association for Computing Machinery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensmenger, N. L. (2012). The Computer Boys take over: Computers, programmers, and the Politics of technical expertise. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. (2004). A conversation with Alan Kay. Queue, 2(9), 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, H. M. (1967). Instructional media and creativity. The proceedings of the sixth Utah creativity research conference held at Torrey pines inn, La Jolla. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 113(496), 346–347. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.113.496.346-c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flichy, P. (2007). The internet imaginaire (L. Carey-Libbrecht, Trans.). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsler, I., & Velkova, J. (2018). Efficient worker or reflective practitioner? Competing technical rationalities of media software tools. In P. Bilić, J. Primorac, & B. Valtýsson (Eds.), Technologies of Labour and the politics of contradiction (pp. 99–119). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frabetti, F. (2015). Software theory: A cultural and philosophical study. Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, S. (2019). Edited by: Women film editors. http://womenfilmeditors.princeton.edu/“><meta property=

  • Fuller, M. (Ed.). (2008). Software studies: A lexicon. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaboury, J. (2021). Image objects: An archaeology of computer graphics. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giblin, R., & Doctorow, C. (2022). Chokepoint capitalism: How big tech and big content captured creative labor markets and how We’ll win them Back. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitelman, L. (2014). Paper knowledge: Toward a media history of documents. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gittins, D. (1986). Icon-based human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80007-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (1973). Computer-assisted Instruction: The application of theorem-proving to adaptive response analysis. Ph.D. University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, L. (1964/2023). Creativity: Process and personality. mediastudies.press. https://doi.org/10.32376/3f8575cb.60b97b6f

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E., Wertheimer, M., & Terrell, G. (Eds.). (1962). Contemporary approaches to creative thinking: A symposium held at the University of Colorado. Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (2017). From tool to partner: The evolution of human-computer interaction. Morgan & Claypool. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00745ED1V01Y201612HCI035

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardjowirogo, S.-I. (2017). Instrumentality: On the construction of instrumental identity. In T. Bovermann, A. de Campo, H. Egermann, S.-I. Hardjowirogo, & S. Weinzierl (Eds.), Musical instruments in the 21st century: Identities, configurations, practices (pp. 9–24). Springer Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D., & Saha, A. (2013). Race, ethnicity, and cultural production. Popular Communication, 11(3), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2013.810068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivins, W. M. (1969). Prints and visual communication. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kātz, B. (2015). Make it new: The history of Silicon Valley design. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. (1984). Computer software. Scientific American, 251(3), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. (1990). User Interface: A personal view. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 191–208). Addison-Wesley Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A., & Goldberg, A. (1977). Personal dynamic media. Computer, 10(3), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/C-M.1977.217672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, M. G. (2016). Track changes: A literary history of word processing. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, B. (1993). Computers as theatre. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, F., & André, G. (2017). The social constructivist mode of operation for personal computing—Digital Culture & Education. Digital Culture and Education, 9(1), 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, F. (2022). Mediatized skill: How capabilities with application software are collectively performed, perceived, and organized as part of contemporary media practices. International Journal of Communication, 16, 4801–4824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyshon, A. (2009). The software slump?: Digital music, the democratisation of technology, and the decline of the recording studio sector within the musical economy. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1309–1331. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, T. (2019). Sonic writing: Technologies of Material, symbolic, and signal inscriptions. Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (1994). The engineering of vision and the aesthetics of computer art. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 28(4), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1145/193234.193242

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2002). Generation Flash. In W. H. K. Chun & T. Keenan (Eds.), New media, old media: A history and theory reader (pp. 209–218). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCray, W. P. (2020). Making art work: How cold war engineers and artists forged a new creative culture. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. (1996). Abstracting craft: The practiced digital hand. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuirk, J., & McGetrick, B. (Eds.). (2017). Selling freedom: Tools of personal liberation. In California: Designing freedom (pp. 9–15). Phaidon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (2001). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industries. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meintjes, L. (2003). Sound of Africa!: Making music Zulu in a south African studio. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, J. D. (2021). Ethnographic photobomb: The materiality of decolonial image manipulation. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920976654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll, B., & Keogh, B. (2019). The Unity game engine and the circuits of cultural software. In The Unity game engine and the circuits of cultural software (pp. 1–21). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, L., & Starosielski, N. (2015). Signal traffic: Critical studies of media infrastructures. University of Illinois Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Anand, N. (2004). The production of culture perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & Duffy, B. E. (2022). Platforms and cultural production. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2017). The invention of creativity: Modern society and the culture of the new (English edition.). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieder, B., Peeters, S., & Borra, E. (2022). From tool to tool-making: Reflections on authorship in social media research software. Convergence, 13548565221127094. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221127094

  • Rheingold, H. (1985). Tools for thought: The people and ideas behind the next computer revolution. Computer Book Division/Simon & Schuster; Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, W. (2019). The software arts. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A., & Piper, A. M. (2020). Understanding audio production practices of people with vision impairments. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416993.

  • Star, S. L. (2002). Infrastructure and ethnographic practice: Working on the fringes. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1991). Creating sociological awareness: Collective images and symbolic representations. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2011). Anthropological relocations and the limits of design. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syvertsen, T. (2020). Digital detox: The politics of disconnecting. Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. D. (2014). When the machine made art: The troubled history of computer art. Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2019). A practitioner concept of contemporary creativity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 82(4), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519882400

  • Terren, M. (2021, March 23). The hegemony of the DAW. Disclaimer. https://disclaimer.org.au/contents/where-and-how-to-gather/the-hegemony-of-the-daw

  • Tresch, J., & Dolan, E. I. (2013). Toward a new organology: Instruments of music and science. Osiris, 28(1), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1086/671381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart brand, the whole earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, K., Wieringa, M., & Schäfer, M. T. (2018). Tool criticism: From digital methods to digital methodology. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Studies (pp. 24–27). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240431.3240436.

  • Velkova, J. (2016). Free software beyond radical politics: Negotiations of creative and craft autonomy in digital visual media production. Media and Communication, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.693

  • White, H. C., & White, C. A. (1965). Canvases and careers: Institutional change in the French painting world. John Wiley & sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F. E. (1966). Creativity in learning. Educational Technology, 6(22), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Frédérik Lesage

  2. Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Michael Terren

  3. University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

    Michael Terren

Authors
  1. Frédérik Lesage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Terren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédérik Lesage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

    Frédérik Lesage

  2. Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Michael Terren

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lesage, F., Terren, M. (2024). Introduction: Refiguring the Digital Tools of Cultural Production. In: Lesage, F., Terren, M. (eds) Creative Tools and the Softwarization of Cultural Production. Creative Working Lives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45693-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation