Skip to main content

Abstract

User studies, involving both qualitative and quantitative data about user experiences, can complement and contextualize the insights and data afforded by web and social media analytics, providing an extension to these analytics areas, which we refer to as user study analytics. In this chapter, we discuss some of the dos and don’ts of user studies, including what user studies are, how they are planned and created, and how user study results can be analyzed for positive effects on usability and user experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blascheck, T., John, M., Koch, S., Bruder, L., Ertl, T.: Triangulating user behavior using eye movement, interaction, and think aloud data. In: The Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, pp. 175–182 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carrol, J.M.: Five reasons for scenario-based design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32., vol. Track3, p. 11 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher, R.J.: Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consumer Res. 20(2), 303–315 (1993). US Publisher: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gwizdka, J., Hosseini, R., Cole, M., Wang, S.: Temporal dynamics of eye-tracking and EEG during reading and relevance decisions. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68(10), 2299–2312 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jansen, B.J., Salminen, J., Jung, S.g., Almerekhi, H.: The illusion of data validity: why numbers about people are likely wrong. Data Inf. Manage. 6(4), 100020 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kramer, A.D.I., Guillory, J.E., Hancock, J.T.: Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 111(24), 8788–8790 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen, L., Salminen, J., Jung, S.G., Jansen, B.J.: Think-aloud surveys. In: IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 504–508. Springer, Cham (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salminen, J., Jansen, B.J., An, J., Jung, S.g., Nielsen, L., Kwak, H.: Fixation and confusion-investigating eye-tracking participants’ exposure to information in personas. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR 2018), pp. 110–119. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salminen, J., Jung, S.g., Chowdhury, S.A., Sengün, S., Jansen, B.J.: Personas and analytics: A comparative user study of efficiency and effectiveness for a user identification task. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20). ACM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salminen, J., Jung, S.g., Jansen, B.J.: Suggestions for online user studies. In: Stephanidis, C., Soares, M.M., Rosenzweig, E., Marcus, A., Yamamoto, S., Mori, H., Rau, P.L.P., Meiselwitz, G., Fang, X., Moallem, A. (eds.) HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Papers: Design and User Experience, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 127–146. Springer International Publishing (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salminen, J., Jung, S.g., Kamel, A., Froneman, W., Jansen, B.J.: Who is in the sample? an analysis of real and surrogate users as participants in user study research in the information technology fields. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 8, e1136 (2022). PeerJ Inc

    Google Scholar 

  12. Turner, C.W., Lewis, J.R., Nielsen, J.: Determining usability test sample size. Int. Encyclop. Ergonom. Human Factors 3(2), 3084–3088 (2006). CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson, T.D.: On user studies and information needs. J. Document. 37(1), 3–15 (1981). MCB UP Ltd

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard J. Jansen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jansen, B.J., Aldous, K.K., Salminen, J., Almerekhi, H., Jung, Sg. (2024). User Study Analytics. In: Understanding Audiences, Customers, and Users via Analytics. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41933-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41933-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41932-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41933-1

  • eBook Packages: Synthesis Collection of Technology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics