Skip to main content

Music’s Aesthetic Untology: Understanding’s InMaterial Improvisations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gadamer, Music, and Philosophical Hermeneutics

Part of the book series: Contributions to Hermeneutics ((CONT HERMEN,volume 12))

Abstract

Music provides a provocative landscape to consider a posthuman ontology of immanence for interpretive research. Since it is not an object per se, it challenges taken-for-granted beliefs about sense-making. This chapter reworks ontology as untology to reaffirm the aesthetics of hermeneutic understanding as a being always becoming anew as it differentiates itself from the flow of existence as sensible, and thus, as also inescapably implicated in world-making. The movement of understanding reverberates through unsettled meanings of sense, language, and being, opening up spaces for improvisations that disrupt their taken-for-granted definitions. Gadamer’s affinity for listening undermarks this hermeneutic process of re-composition. Since rhythms are immanent to linguisticality’s being and to world-making, interpreters are called upon to become compositional partners who attune their bodies to the polyphonic universe in which they find themselves immersed. The chapter concludes by suggesting a poetics of dissensus as a way to heed the ethical implications of rethinking interpretive inquiry as understanding’s improvisational attunements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Researching and living are both interpretive practices so there is no hidden meaning behind my uses of researcher or interpreter; both denote an interpreting being.

  2. 2.

    As will become clear later, the very idea that entities might not pre-exist the research act or assemblage is an oxymoron that is provocative of ontologically oriented research.

  3. 3.

    See for example, Abram 2010; Braidotti 2013; Grusin 2015, to name a few.

  4. 4.

    At least not a Being that is potentially intelligible to humans.

  5. 5.

    The full quote states that “being outside oneself is the positive possibility of being wholly with something else” is “being present.” I removed the beginning statement not because I do not believe there is no separation between our bodies and the object encountered, but to avoid adding concepts such as inside and outside to an already dense argument.

References

  • Abram, D. 2010. Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S. 2008. Trans-Corporeal Feminisms and the Ethical Space of Nature. In Material Feminisms, eds. S. Alaimo and S. Hekman, 237–264. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, B., S. Fowles, M. Holbraad, Y. Marshall, and C. Witmore. 2011. “Worlds Otherwise”: Archaeology, Anthropology, and Ontological Difference. Current Anthropology 52 (6): 896–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. 1993. Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music. New York: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B.E. 2003. The Improvisation of Musical Dialogue: A Phenomenology of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertinetto, A. 2013. Musical Ontology: A View Through Improvisation. CoSMo. Comparative Studies in Modernism 2: 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cage, J. 1961. Silence. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancer, A. 2009. The Soundscape in Poetry. In Poetic Inquiry: Vibrant Voices in the Social Sciences, ed. M. Prendergast, C. Leggo, and P. Sameshima, 31–42. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, N. 2013. Unfinished Worlds: Hermeneutics, Aesthetics and Gadamer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. 2016. Emergent Listening. In Qualitative Inquiry Through a Critical Lens, ed. N.K. Denzin and M.D. Giardina, 73–84. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What is Philosophy? Trans. H. Tomlinson, and G. Burchell. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, É. 2016. Untology. Philosophy & Rhetoric 49 (4): 571–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. 1986. The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Ed. R. Bernasconi, Trans. N. Walker. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Gadamer on Celan: “Who Am I and Who Are You?” And Other Essays. Trans. and ed. R. Heinemann and B. Krajewski. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Gadamer in Conversation: Reflections and Commentary. Trans. and ed. R.E. Palmer. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of The Later Writings. Trans. and ed. R.E. Palmer. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Truth and Method, 2nd revised ed. Trans. J. Weinsheimer, and D.G. Marshall. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, S. 2016. Ordinary Atmospheres and Minor Weather Events. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research 5 (4): 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, J. 2012. Introduction to Metaphysics: From Parmenides to Levinas. Trans. Lukas Soderstrom. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, R., ed. 2015. The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, J. 2010. The Vibrations of Affect and Their Propagation on a Night Out on Kingston’s Dancehall Scene. Body & Society 16 (1): 57–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2019. Noise, Sound, Silence. In Sensorial Aesthetics in Music Practices, ed. K. Coessens, 47–60. Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, B. 2015. Sound Studies Without Auditory Culture: A Critique of the Ontological Turn. Sound Studies 1 (1): 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2015.1079063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz Taguchi, H. 2012. A Diffractive and Deleuzian Approach to Analysing Interview Data. Feminist Theory 13 (3): 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112456001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, F. 2019. Sense Versus Sensitivity in Composition: A Phoney Debate? In Sensorial Aesthetics in Music Practices, ed. K. Coessens, 73–87. Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millican, S. 2011. Turn Off the Tuner for Better Ensemble Intonation. School Band and Orchestra 14 (8): 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. 2007. Listening. Trans. Charlotte Mandell. Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C.R. 2016. Gadamer on The Event of Art, The Other, and a Gesture Toward a Gadamerian Approach to Free Jazz. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics: Article 6. https://doi.org/10.11575/jah.v0i0.

  • Phalen, S. 2015. Making Music as Embodied Dialogue. Qualitative Inquiry 21 (9): 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415572393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. 2007. What Does It Mean to Be Un? Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 21 (4): 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Aesthetic Dimension: Aesthetics, Politics, Knowledge. Critical Inquiry 36 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Thinking of Dissensus: Politics and Aesthetics. In Reading Rancière, ed. P. Bowman and R. Stamp, 1–17. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. 2020. Resonant Bodies in Immersive Space. Architectural Design 90 (6): 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Y. 2017. Aesthetics of the Familiar: Everyday Life and World-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheringham, M. 2009. Everyday Life: Theories and Practices From Surrealism to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E.A. 2019. Post Qualitative Inquiry in an Ontology of Immanence. Qualitative Inquiry 25 (1): 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, D. 2001. Ways of the Hand: A Rewritten Account. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. 2014. Uncertain Ontologies. Foucault Studies 17: 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone, J.J. 1985. Musical Improvisation as Interpretative Activity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 44 (2): 193–194. https://doi.org/10.2307/430522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voegelin, S. 2019. The Political Possibility of Sound: Fragments of Listening. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinsheimer, J. 2004. Meaningless Hermeneutics? In Gadamer’s Repercussions: Reconsidering Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. B. Krajewski, 158–166. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinsheimer, J., and D. G. Marshall. 2013. Translator’s Preface. In H.-G. Gadamer, Truth and Method, 2nd revised ed. Trans. J. Weinsheimer, and D. G. Marchall, x–xix. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S., and J. Lezaun. 2013. The Wrong Bin Bag: A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies? Social Studies of Science 43 (3): 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa Freeman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Freeman, M. (2024). Music’s Aesthetic Untology: Understanding’s InMaterial Improvisations. In: McAuliffe, S. (eds) Gadamer, Music, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Contributions to Hermeneutics, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41570-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics