Abstract
This chapter presents an analysis of metajournalistic discourse surrounding coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. ‘Metajournalistic discourse’ refers to statements that provide articulations of the meaning and role of journalism which, alongside other factors, influence both its production and reception. Drawing on the work of scholars who have approached COVID-19 as a ‘critical incident’ for journalism, the chapter examines examples of journalists and media commentators reflecting on and appraising the quality of journalism during the pandemic. Through this analysis, it identifies three broad ways in which metajournalistic discourse is deployed: (1) as a process of discursive reproduction wherein metajournalistic discourse reiterates contrasting and contesting models of journalism; (2) as a process of contestation, in which the field reflects on its values and practices in the face of both an immediate situation and wider currents of change; and (3) as a process of adaptation, which involves journalists reflecting on how to navigate novel challenges. In illustrating their arguments, the authors discuss key issues and controversies for journalism during the pandemic, including alarmism, objectivity, politicisation, misinformation and the public ‘performance’ of journalism at livestreamed press conferences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beattie, A. 2023. Messenger, inquisitor and newsgatherer? Press Gallery journalists on their role(s) at COVID-19 briefings in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 53 (2): 193–208.
Boykoff, M.T., and J.M. Boykoff. 2004. Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change 14 (2): 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001.
Carlson, M. 2016. Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory 26 (4): 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088.
Carlson, M., and N. Usher. 2016. News startups as agents of innovation: For-profit digital news startup manifestos as metajournalistic discourse. Digital Journalism 4 (5): 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1076344.
Faine, J. 2021. The good, the bad and Sydney’s COVID outbreak. The Age, June 27. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/what-is-good-for-sydney-in-fighting-this-cluster-is-good-for-all-of-us-20210625-p5849p.html. Accessed 2 June 2023.
Finneman, T., and R.J. Thomas. 2022. ‘Our company is in survival mode’: Metajournalistic discourse on COVID-19’s impact on US community newspapers. Journalism Practice 16 (10): 1965–1983. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1888149.
Fisher, C., D. Marshall, and K. McCallum. 2018. Bypassing the press gallery: From Howard to Hanson. Media International Australia 167 (1): 57–70.
Hackett, R.A., and Y. Zhao. 1998. Sustaining democracy? Journalism and the politics of objectivity. Toronto: Garamond.
Hobbs, M., and D. McKnight. 2014. ‘Kick this mob out’: The Murdoch media and the Australian Labor Government (2007 to 2013). Global Media Journal 8 (2): 1–13.
Hobbs, M., and S. Owen. 2015. Stifling dissent: The Murdoch press and its campaign against its ‘critics’. Communication Research & Practice 2 (2): 137–158.
Jenkins, J., E.C. Tandoc Jr., R.J. Thomas, and O. Westlund. 2021. Critical incidents in journalism: Pivotal moments reshaping journalism around the world. London: Routledge.
Jericho, G. 2019. The trouble with journalism. Meanjin. https://meanjin.com.au/essays/the-trouble-with-journalism. Accessed 2 June 2023.
———. 2021. Public interest journalism and influencing the narrative during the pandemic. News & Media Research Centre seminar, University of Canberra. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_9vN08__Gw. Accessed 2 June 2023.
Koziol, M. 2021. Leigh Sales versus the trolls: How the 7.30 host handles the COVID hot seat—the ABC’s flagship current affairs program vows it won’t be swayed by ‘intense bullying’ on social media. Sydney Morning Herald, June 6.
Mannix, L. 2021. Are we ignoring the hard truths about the most likely cause of COVID-19? COVID-19 originating from a lab leak in Wuhan is a fascinating theory, but that doesn’t mean we should believe it. The Age & Sydney Morning Herald, June 1.
McFarlane, A. C., & Norris, F. H. 2006. Definitions and concepts in disaster research. In F. H. Norris, S. Galea, M. J. Friedman, & P. J. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health research. Guilford Press.
McNair, B. 2017. After objectivity? Journalism Studies 18 (10): 1318–1333.
Media Watch. 2020. Today Show ‘whack jobs’. ABC TV, July 20. https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/ep-24/12474992. Accessed 2 June 2023.
Mellado, C. 2015. Professional roles in news content six dimensions of journalistic role performance. Journalism Studies 16 (4): 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.922276.
Mitchell, C. 2020a. Coronavirus: Public sick of journalists grandstanding in COVID-19 coverage. The Australian, March 29. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/public-getting-a-bit-sick-of-journalists-grandstanding-in-covid19-coverage/news-story/6b6a6e1a72458f16c84bd83aacb08ef6. Accessed 2 June 2023.
———. 2020b. Coronavirus: Suppressing information a disturbing trend. The Australian, July 13. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/in-battle-to-suppress-a-virus-suppressing-information-a-disturbing-trend/news-story/e20735b9ce9f7f9b05c29638ad15f8e3. Accessed 2 June 2023.
Muller, D. 2020. Coronavirus is a huge story, so journalists must apply the highest ethical standards in how they tell it. The Conversation, March 12. https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-is-a-huge-story-so-journalists-must-apply-the-highest-ethical-standards-in-how-they-tell-it-133347. Accessed 2 June 2023.
Muller, D. 2021. Alarmist reporting on COVID-19 will only heighten people’s anxieties and drive vaccine hesitancy. The Conversation, May 21. https://theconversation.com/alarmist-reporting-on-covid-19-will-only-heighten-peoples-anxieties-and-drive-vaccine-hesitancy-161170. Accessed 2 June 2023.
Nolan, D., C. Hanna, K. McGuinness, and K. McCallum. 2021. Covering COVID-19: How Australian media reported the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. Canberra: News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.
Park, S., K. McGuinness, C. Fisher, J.Y. Lee, K. McCallum, and D. Nolan. 2022. Digital news report: Australia 2022. Canberra: News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.
Perreault, M. F., and G. P. Perreault. 2021. Journalists on COVID-19 journalism: Communication ecology of pandemic reporting. American Behavioral Scientist 65 (7): 976–991.
Perreault, G., M. F. Perreault, and P. Maares. 2021. Metajournalistic discourse as a stabilizer within the journalistic field: Journalistic practice in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journalism Practice 16 (2–3): 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1949630.
Perreault, G., M. F. Perreault, and P. Maares. 2022. Metajournalistic Discourse as a Stabilizer within the Journalistic Field: Journalistic Practice in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journalism Practice, 16(2–3), 365–383.
Sales, L. 2021. Bullying on Twitter has become unhinged. It’s time to call out the personal, sexist attacks. ABC News Online, September 14. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-14/twitter-social-media-bullies-political-journalism/100458714. Accessed 2 June 2023.
Sedorkin, G., and T. Schirato. 1998. Theory and current affairs television. In Journalism: Theory and practice, ed. M. Breen, 104–118. Sydney: Macleay Press.
Simons, M. 2020a. Front row seat to COVID-19 reporting reveals uncomfortable truths: Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews’ daily coronavirus press conferences have turned into a spectator sport and in turn further highlighted the cracks in the media industry. Sydney Morning Herald, August 17.
Simons, M. 2020b. One hundred days of Andrews’ press conferences: What do they tell us about journalism? The Age, October 11. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/one-hundred-days-of-andrews-press-conferences-what-do-they-tell-us-about-journalism-20201009-p563lt.html. Accessed 2 June 2023.
Simons, M. 2021a. When bravado trumps reporting: The pandemic has brought out the best and the worst in journalism. Inside Story, June 1. https://insidestory.org.au/when-bravado-trumps-reporting. Accessed 2 June 2023.
———. 2021b. Bullying must end, but it can’t all be tweet nothings: Trolling public figures is never OK, but news organisations and journalists need to think seriously about how to engage with Twitter. The Age & Sydney Morning Herald, September 14.
———. 2022. Novak Djokovic didn’t have to be the biggest news story in the nation this week: The pandemic could provide a moment for journalists and the community to question long-standing news values. Sydney Morning Herald, January 15.
Turow, J. 2013. Media buying: The new power of advertising. In The Routledge companion to advertising and promotional culture, ed. M.P. McAllister and E.P. West, 99–111. New York: Routledge.
Van Aelst, P., J. Strömbäck, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. De Vreese, J. Matthes, et al. 2017. Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association 41 (1): 3–27.
Yong, E. 2021. What even counts as science writing anymore? The Atlantic, October 2.
Zelizer, B. 1993. Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10 (3): 219–237.
———. 2015. Terms of choice: Uncertainty, journalism, and crisis terms of choice. Journal of Communication 65 (5): 888–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nolan, D., Holland, K., Lewis, M. (2024). Metajournalistic Discourse and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia. In: Lewis, M., Govender, E., Holland, K. (eds) Communicating COVID-19. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41237-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41237-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41236-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41237-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)