Abstract
The esophagus has a peculiar anatomy: (a) it is surrounded by important organs and structures, (b) it crosses three cavities: neck, thorax and abdomen, (c) its lymphatic distribution is abundant and erratic, (d) the organs and structures of the mediastinum frequently present anatomic variations, and (e) the classic anatomic description is different from clinical presentation. In addition, minimally invasive surgery also brought a restricted but magnified view of the esophagus, and available imaging technology forces the understanding of sectional and regional anatomy. For all these reasons, the knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the esophagus is essential for surgeons before performing an esophagectomy. This chapter reviews the surgical anatomy of the esophagus and neighbor structures of interest to perform an esophagectomy.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
The esophagus has a peculiar anatomy. It is the only digestive organ that does not digest or absorb nutrients and lacks a serosa layer. From a surgical anatomy point of view, the esophagus has an exuberant lymphatic drainage able to spread metastasis quickly and far but is short of vascularization without a single artery bearing its name. The esophagus crosses three cavities (neck, thorax and abdomen) and it is surrounded by vital organs in a small container called mediastinum [1]. All these characteristics make the resection of the esophagus and the subsequent alimentary tract reconstruction a challenging procedure.
Anatomists frequently portrait the esophagus in didactic books in a stylized fashion commonly not useful for surgeons. In addition, minimally invasive surgery also brought a restricted but magnified view of the esophagus, and available imaging technology forces the understanding of sectional and regional anatomy. Thus, a strong knowledge of the anatomy of the esophagus is essential to all esophageal surgeons interested in performing an esophagectomy.
Esophageal Anatomy
The esophagus is a hollow organ with a four-layer structure: mucosa, submucosa, muscularis propria, and adventitia [2]. The mucosa is made of squamous epithelium overlying a lamina propria and a muscularis mucosa. The submucosa is made of elastic and fibrous tissue and is the strongest layer of the esophageal wall. The esophageal muscle is composed of an inner circular and outer longitudinal layer. The upper third of the esophageal musculature consists of skeletal muscle and the lower two thirds consist of smooth muscle. The adventitia consists in connective tissue that merges with connective tissue of surrounding structures. Unlike the remainder of the gastrointestinal tract, the esophagus does not have a serosal layer.
The upper esophageal sphincter is formed by the cricopharyngeus muscle along with the inferior constrictors of the pharynx and fibers of the esophageal wall. The lower esophageal sphincter is not a distinct anatomic structure.
Microscopic anatomy of the esophageal wall is further divided for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes to allow a more refined staging and guide endoscopic resection in early esophageal cancer [3, 4]. Thus, mucosa layer is subdivided in: (a) M1—epithelium (defining a carcinoma in situ); (b) M2—lamina propria mucosae; and (c) M3—muscularis mucosae. Submucosal layer is also subdivided in three layers: (a) SM1—upper third of the submucosa; (b) SM2—middle third of the submucosa; and (c) SM3—lower third of the submucosa. Endoscopic resection is suitable for early cancers invading up to the SM1 [5].
Macroscopically, the esophagus is divided in three portions: cervical, thoracic/mediastinal, and abdominal, according to the boundaries of the cavities that it crosses (i.e. the thoracic outlet at the level of the manubrium and the diaphragm). The cervical esophagus lies left of the midline and posterior to the larynx and trachea. The thoracic portion may also be subdivided in: (a) Upper thoracic esophagus—from the sternal notch to the tracheal bifurcation; (b) Middle thoracic esophagus—the proximal half of the two equal portions between the tracheal bifurcation and the esophagogastric junction; and (c) Lower thoracic esophagus—the thoracic part of the distal half of the two equal portions between the tracheal bifurcation and the esophagogastric junction (Fig. 1). The upper thoracic esophagus passes behind the trachea and tracheal bifurcation, while the middle and lower thoracic esophagus passes behind the left atrium and then enters the abdomen through the esophageal hiatus of the diaphragm. The abdominal portion may be absent in the case of a hiatal hernia.
Vascularization and Lymphatic Drainage
Esophageal vascularization is shared by small branches from adjacent organs. Arterial blood supply comes from branches of the inferior thyroid arteries, unnamed vessels originating directly from the thoracic aorta, bronchial arteries, inferior phrenic arteries, and left gastric artery. Blood is drained into the inferior thyroid, hemiazygos, azygos and left gastric vein [6].
Anatomy textbooks rarely describe a specific lymphatic drainage of the esophagus. Abundant lymphatics form a dense submucosal plexus. Thoracic lymph nodes are shown in a regular disposition seldom seen in an operation. Gray’s anatomy textbook simply describes esophageal lymphatic drainage as “a plexus around that tube, and the collecting vessels from the plexus drain into the posterior mediastinal glands” [7]. Lymph from the cervical and upper-mid thoracic esophagus drains mostly into the cervical, paratracheal and subcarinal lymph nodes, whereas the lower thoracic and abdominal esophagus drains preferentially into the diaphragmatic, paracardial, left gastric, and celiac nodes [8].
Esophageal Surgical Anatomy
Cervical Esophagus
The access to the cervical esophagus may be obtained through an oblique incision parallel to the medial border of the left sternocleidomastoid muscle or a necklace incision. The former is simpler and the latter allows bilateral access if a complete lymphadenectomy is anticipated. The oblique incision allows access to the esophagus after dividing the platysma muscle (in the subcutaneous) and the deep cervical fascia which will expose the infrahyoide muscles (sternothyroid muscle mainly) that are retracted or divided. These muscles are responsible for larynx depression and its division may impair swallowing and fonation thus preservation is preferred [9]. The esophagus will then be found between the trachea and the carotid sheath [10]. The anterior jugular vein and inferior thyroid vein may occasionally be ligated without consequences. The left recurrent laryngeal nerve lies in the groove between the trachea and esophagus where it is prone to be damaged [11].
A complete cervical lymphadenectomy is best accomplished through a collar incision. This bilateral access allows the resection of the internal jugular nodes below the level of the cricoid cartilage, supraclavicular nodes, and cervical paraesophageal nodes [12] (Fig. 2). Muscles are usually spared.
Thoracic Esophagus
The access to the thoracic esophagus may be accomplished through a thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. A right approach allows access to the whole esophagus while a left approach is reserved when the interest is in the distal esophagus only. A thoracotomy is usually performed in the lateral position with the surgeon standing in the right side of the patient that allows a panoramic view of the posterior mediastinum after the lung is retracted (Fig. 3). A minimally invasive approach brings a restricted view but with a magnified image (Fig. 4). Some surgeons advocate the operation to be performed in prone position with putative advantages of lower pulmonary complications and increased number of resected lymph nodes [13] (Fig. 5).
The important structures that are intimately related to the thoracic esophagus are the trachea and pericardium ventrally; the azygos vein and right pleura on the right laterally, the spine and thoracic duct dorsally, and the aorta and left pleura left laterally [14].
The anatomy of the vagus had some relevance at the time when vagal-sparing esophagectomy was attempted in order to prevent morbidity related to vagotomy [15]. Currently, this procedure is seldom performed but a selective preservation of pulmonary vagal branches is proposed [16].
Pleural preservation is desired during a transhiatal esophagectomy to minimize the consequences of thoracic drainage. Pleural lesion may occur during dissection of the mid-thoracic esophagus if a recess of the pleura intervenes between the esophagus and the azygos vein on the right side below the pulmonary veins. However, the pleura is more commonly injured during the dissection of the distal left esophagus where they are in close contact [11].
The azygos system anatomy is of interest during an esophagectomy since the arch of the azygos vein is divided to allow a better exposure of the upper thoracic esophagus, and these veins are resected during an en-bloc esophagectomy [17]. Some authors, on the other side, believe the resection of the azygos system is not considered essential since it does not affect the number of retrieved lymph nodes [18]. Variations of the azygos system are uncountable and related to the origin of the veins or the communication between the left and right-side systems. However, the clinical importance of these variations is negligible since they can be promptly recognized during an esophagectomy and comprise small caliber vessels that can be easily ligated without any consequences [11].
The recurrent laryngeal nerve has a thoracic course and can be injured during the dissection of the lymph nodes present along its course (node stations 2 and 4) [19]. The right recurrent nerve originates at the origin of the right subclavian artery behind the sternoclavicular joint, loops around the artery and ascends to the neck. The left recurrent nerve originates at the inferior border of the aortic arch, them it loops around the aorta and ascends to the neck [20]. Anatomic variations are uncommon. Non-recurrence may occur in 10% of the cases but since the nerve does not have a thoracic course in these cases, it is automatically protected from injury [11].
The thoracic duct origins in the cisterna chyli in the abdomen, ascends to the posterior mediastinum, to the right of the midline, between the descending thoracic aorta on the left and the azygos vein on the right. The duct inclines to the left, enters the superior mediastinum, and ascends toward the thoracic inlet along the left edge of the esophagus. The thoracic duct usually ends at the junction of the left subclavian and internal jugular veins [21]. There are commonly major anatomical variations that may lead to intraoperative injury during an esophagectomy [11]. The intraoperative identification of the injury and the duct itself may be difficult. Therefore, mass ligation of the duct including all tissue between the aorta, spine, esophagus, and pericardium is recommended in cases of suspect lesion of the duct [22]. Mass ligation is preferred over identification and individual ligation since duplication or plexiform ducts are common [11].
A proper lymphadenectomy is an essential part of an oncologic esophagectomy [23]. Thus, the knowledge of the anatomy of the lymph nodes that drain the esophagus is mandatory. Unfortunately, anatomy textbooks frequently show a regular disposition of nodes not useful for surgeons (Fig. 6). In addition, there is no standard classification and nomenclature of mediastinal lymph nodes, and the number and location of lymph nodes is commonly erratic (Table 1) [24].
Abdominal Esophagus
The esophagus has a constant and short course in the abdomen that is familiar to surgeons used to laparoscopic surgery of benign esophageal disorders at the esophagogastric junction [25].
A 2 or 3-field lymphadenectomy will include the lymph nodes of the upper abdomen in a similar fashion to the D2 lymphadenectomy of the gastric cancer [26, 27] (Fig. 6).
Anatomy for Esophageal Replacement
Alimentary tract reconstruction after an esophagectomy is regularly accomplished with a gastric tube as a graft. However, the colon may be used in particular situations [28, 29]. The vascular anatomy of these organs is therefore important to establish an adequate blood supply to the replacing organ.
For a gastric tube, the left gastric artery and coronary vein are divided, as well as the short gastric vessels. The blood supply will be provided by the right gastric artery and the right gastroepiploic artery [30] (Fig. 7).
For a colonic interposition, diverse segments of the colon can be used (Table 2). The most common reconstruction options are the left colon, with the ascending branch of the left colic vessels, and the right colon with the middle colic vessels or even with the left colic vessels [29,30,31,32,33] (Fig. 8). Since a segment of transverse colon is need irrespective if right or left colon is used, vascularization of the graft is dependent on anastomosis between the different colic pedicles. In a series of mesenteric arteriograms, the marginal artery in the right colon was present in only 30% of the cases, while in the left colon it was present in all cases [34]. Thus, the blood supply of the right colon is less reliable than that of the stomach and left colon [35]. Some surgeons prefer to have a preoperative angiography in order to identify the anatomy of the arteries and the continuity of the marginal artery [36] while others do not consider it necessary [37].
The replacing organ may reach the neck through different routes: posterior mediastinum, anterior mediastinum, transpleural (rare) and subcutaneous (rare). There are controversial results on the length of the anterior (retrosternal) as compared to the posterior route [39, 40]. The anterior path, however, is more constricted at the level of thoracic inlet [41].
Esophageal Radiologic Anatomy
The development of clinical imaging has allowed surgeons to better stage patients with esophageal cancer and plan the surgical approach. The old barium esophagram has been replaced by newer studies.
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic ultrasound allows visualization of the esophageal wall and adjacent structures. The sonographic image distinguishes 5 distinct layers (Fig. 9): the innermost layer with increased echogenicity and a thin hypoechoic layer immediately deep to it correspond mainly to the mucosa and partly to the muscularis mucosae, and the next echogenic layer corresponds to the submucosa. The fourth hypoechoic layer is the muscularis propria layer and the outermost echogenic layer is the adventitia with fat appendage [42]. Lymph nodes can also be identified by endoscopic ultrasound [43].
Computed Tomography
Computed tomography of the neck, chest and abdomen allows high quality imaging of the esophagus and 3D reconstruction [44] (Fig. 10). The detection of lymph nodes by computed tomography correlates well to anatomic findings [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].
Magnetic Resonance
Dedicated techniques of magnetic resonance protocols increased esophageal anatomy visualization as compared to computed tomography. Magnetic resonance is able to detect individual layers of the esophageal wall, the thoracic duct, a connective tissue layer attaching the esophagus to the anterior wall of the aorta, and a fascial plane passing between layers of the right and left parietal pleura posterior to the esophagus [46]. Some surgeons believe the study of these planes and layers allow a more detailed dissection of the esophagus in order to preserve nerves and retrieve lymph nodes more efficiently [14].
References
Oezcelik A, DeMeester SR. General anatomy of the esophagus. Thorac Surg Clin. 21(2):289–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.01.003.
Rice TW, Bronner MP. The esophageal wall. Thorac Surg Clin. 2011;21(2):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.01.005.
Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14(1):1–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-016-0551-7.
Shimamura Y, Ikeya T, Marcon N, Mosko JD. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early esophageal squamous neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9(9):438–47. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i9.438.
Rizvi QU, Balachandran A, Koay D et al. Endoscopic management of early esophagogastric cancer. Surg Oncol Clin. 2017;26(2):179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2016.10.007.
Patti MG, Gantert W, Way LW. Surgery of the esophagus. Anatomy and physiology. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(5):959–70. PMID: 9347826.
Gray H. Lymphatic drainage of thorax. In: Williams PL, editor. Gray’s anatomy. 38th ed. New York, Edinburgh, London, Tokyo, Madrid and Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 1624–6.
Wang Y, Zhu L, Xia W, et al. Anatomy of lymphatic drainage of the esophagus and lymph node metastasis of thoracic esophageal cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;26(10):6295–303. https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s182436.
Yasuda T, Yano M, Miyata H, et al. Evaluation of dysphagia and diminished airway protection after three-field esophagectomy and a remedy. World J Surg. 2013;37:416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1822-7.
Orringer MB. Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy. Operative Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;10(1):63–83. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.optechstcvs.2005.03.001.
Takassi GF, Herbella FAM, Patti MG. Anatomic variations in the surgical anatomy of the thoracic esophagus and its surrounding structures. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo). 2013;26(2):101–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202013000200006.
Yajima S, Oshima Y, Shimada H. Neck dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:750456. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/750456.
Markar SR, Wiggins T, Antonowicz S et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Oncol. 2015;24(3):212–219. ISSN 0960-7404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2015.06.001.
Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MDP, et al. New insights into the surgical anatomy of the esophagus. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(Suppl 8):S675–80. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.03.172.
Herbella FA, Regatieri CV, Moreno DG et al. Vagal integrity in vagal-sparing esophagectomy: a cadaveric study. Diseases of the Esophagus, Volume 19, Issue 5, 1 October 2006, 406–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00595.x.
Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MD, et al. Preserving the pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:3816–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4683-y.
Altorki N, Skinner D. Should en bloc esophagectomy be the standard of care for esophageal carcinoma? Ann Surg. 2001;234(5):581–7.
Boone J, Schipper MEI, Bleys RLAW, et al. The effect of azygos vein preservation on mediastinal lymph node harvesting in thoracic esophagolymphadenectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00760.x.
Gelpke H, Grieder F, Decurtins M, Cadosch D. Recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during esophagectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection. World J Surg. 2010;34:2379–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0692-0.
Wang J, Li J, Liu G, Deslauriers J. Nerves of the mediastinum. Thorac Surg Clin. 2011;21:239–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.01.006.
Hematti H, Mehran RJ. Anatomy of the thoracic duct. Thorac Surg Clin. 2011;21(2):229–238. (ix). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.01.002.
Crucitti P, Mangiameli G, Petitti T, et al. Does prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct reduce chylothorax rates in patients undergoing oesophagectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2016;50(6):1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw125.
Tong D, Law S. Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is crucial. World J Surg. 2013;37:1751–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2068-8.
Herbella FA, Del Grande JC, Colleoni R, Japanese society for diseases of the esophagus. Anatomical analysis of the mediastinal lymph nodes of normal Brazilian subjects according to the classification of the Japanese society for diseases of the Esophagus. Surg Today. 2003;33:249–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950300056
Bello B, Herbella FA, Allaix ME, Patti MG. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of benign esophageal disorders. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2012;18(46):6764–70. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6764.
Ma G-W, Situ D-R, Ma Q-L, et al. Three-field vs two-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2014;20(47):18022–30. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18022.
Giacopuzzi S, Bencivenga M, Cipollari C, et al. Lymphadenectomy: how to do it? Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:28. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2017.03.09.
Irino T, Tsekrekos A, Coppola A, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after replacement of the esophagus with gastric, colonic, or jejunal conduits: a systematic literature review. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(12):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dox083.
Marks JL, Hofstetter WL. Esophageal reconstruction with alternative conduits. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92:1287–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2012.07.006.
Liebermann-Meffert DM, Meier R, Siewert JR. Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1110–5.
Peters JH, Kronson JW, Katz M, DeMeester TR. Arterial anatomic considerations in colon interposition for esophageal replacement. Arch Surg. 1995;130(8):858–62; discussion 862–3.
Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, Aoki Y, Okada M. Esophageal reconstruction using the terminal ileum and right colon in esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2012;42:342–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0103-7.
Fürst H, Hartl WH, Löhe F, Schildberg FW. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: an alternative technique based on the use of the right colon. Ann Surg. 2000;231(2):173–8.
Ventemiglia R, Khalil KG, Frazier OH, Mountain CF. The role of preoperative mesenteric arteriography in colon interposition. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;74:98–104.
Rice TW, Right colon Interposition for esophageal replacement. Operative Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;4(3):210–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1522-2942(07)70118-6.
Predescu D, Popa B, Gheorghe M, et al. The vascularization pattern of the colon and surgical decision in esophageal reconstruction with colon. A selective SMA and IMA arteriographic study. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013;108:161–71.
Fisher RA, Griffiths EA, Evison F, et al. A national audit of colonic interposition for esophageal replacement. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(5):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/dow003.
Chen H, Lu JJ, Zhou J, Zhou X, Luo X, Liu Q, Tam J. Anterior versus posterior routes of reconstruction after esophagectomy: a comparative anatomic study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:400–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.016.
Hu H, Ye T, Tan D, et al. Is anterior mediastinum route a shorter choice for esophageal reconstruction? A comparative anatomic study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:1466–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.038.
Coral RP, Constant-Neto M, Silva IS, et al. Comparative anatomical study of the anterior and posterior mediastinum as access routes after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16(3):236–8.
Cooke DT, Calhoun RF. Distance alone does not define the value of the posterior mediastinal route for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(4):1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.036
Fukuda M, Hirata K, Natori H. Endoscopic ultrasonography of the esophagus. World J Surg. 2000;24:216–26.
Dietrich CF, Liesen M, Buhl R, et al. Detection of normal mediastinal lymph nodes by ultrasonography. Acta Radiol. 1997;38:965–9.
Ba-Ssalamah A, Zacherl J, Noebauer-Huhmann IM, et al. Dedicated multi-detector CT of the esophagus: spectrum of diseases. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9290-5.
Quint LE, Glazer GM, Orringer MB, et al. Mediastinal lymph node detection and sizing at CT and autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:469–72. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.147.3.469.
Riddell AM, Davies DC, Allum WH, et al. High-resolution MRI in evaluation of the surgical anatomy of the esophagus and posterior mediastinum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:W37–43. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1795.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Menezes, M.A., Schlottmann, F., Herbella, F.A.M. (2023). Esophageal Anatomy. In: Schlottmann, F., Ferri, L., Molena, D., Patti, M.G. (eds) Esophageal Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39086-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39086-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39085-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39086-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)