Skip to main content

Method for Studying the Process of Growing Onions (Allium Cepa L.) Under Controlled Microclimate: A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fundamental and Applied Scientific Research in the Development of Agriculture in the Far East (AFE-2022) (AFE 2023)

Abstract

The purpose of the analytical review is: to identify weaknesses in the methodology for studying onion (Allium cepa L.), to determine the modes of controlled microclimate and the parameters of the light regime in terms of spectrum, intensity and photoperiod. Onion (Allium cepa L.) is a complex object for experimental research. Onions have the properties of a functional product, but require a special approach to the choice of growing technology and the selection of microclimate parameters. In this literature review, we have focused on studies that provide insight into promising directions for further research into the process of growing green onions in a controlled microclimate: the choice of the ratio of the spectra of red, blue, green and white in LED lighting; selection of the optimal photoperiod; choice of method and parameters of dynamic lighting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fotev YuV, Pivovarov VF, Artemyeva AM et al (2018) Concept of producing of the Russian national system of functional food. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov J Genet Breed 22(7):776–783. https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ18.421

  2. Stein AJ, Sachdev HPS, Qaim M (2006) Potential impact and cost-effectiveness of Golden Rice. Nat Biotechnol 24:1200–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lambert JE, Parnell JA, Tunnicliffe JM et al (2016) (2016) Consuming yellow pea fiber reduces voluntary energy intake and body fat in overweight/obese adults in a 12-week randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr S0261–5614(16):00004–00012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2015.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Best practice for food-based clinical trials. Guidance for planning, conducting and reporting on human studies tosupport health claims. Minister of Agriculture and Anti-Food Canada, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tarakanov GI, Mukhin VD, Shuin KA (2003) Vegetable growing. Kolos, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naumova NL, Berestovaya NS, Krivenko AYu (2017) On the results of assessing the quality of onion vegetables. Bull Altai State Agrarian Univ 2(148):161–167

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brewster JL (2008) Onions and other vegetable alliums. CABI, Wallingford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Khosa JS, McCallum J, Dhatt AS, Macknight R (2016) Enhancing onion breeding using molecular tools. Plant Breed 135:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Poorter H, Fiorani F, Stitt M et al (2012) The art of growing plants for experimental purposes: a practical guide for the plant biologist. Funct Plant Biol 39:821–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwarz D, Thompson AJ, Klaring HP (2014) Guidelines to use tomato in experiments with a controlled environment. Front Plant Sci 5:625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khosa J, Lee R, Joshi S et al (2018). A guide for the cultivation of onion under controlled environment conditions. HortScience Horts 53(12):1746–1749. https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/53/12/article-p1746.xml

  12. McCallum J, Baldwin S, Thomson S et al (2014) Molecular genetics analysis of bulb onion (Allium cepa L.) adaptive physiology. Acta Hort 1110:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lercari B, Deitzer G (1987) Time-dependent effectiveness of far-red light on the photoperiodic induction of bulb formation in Allium cepa L.. Photochem Photobiol 45(S1):831–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Christie JM, Blackwood L, Petersen J, Sullivan S (2015) Plant flavoprotein photoreceptors. Plant Cell Physiol 56:401–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Polevoy VV (2001) Physiology of the integrity of the plant organism. Plant Physiol 48(4):631–643

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rakhmankulova ZF (2009) Levels of regulation of energy metabolism in plants. Bull Bashkir Univ 14(3) (I):1141–1154

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poudel PR, Kataoka I, Mochioka R (2007) Effect of red- and blue-light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of grapes. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 92:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dutta Gupta S, Kumar A, Agarwal A (2019) Impact of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on the growth and morphogenesis of encapsulated shoot buds of Curculigo orchioides Gaertn., an endangered medicinal herb. Acta Physiol Plant 41:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ward JM, Cufr CA, Denzel MA, Neff MM (2005) The Dof transcription factor OBP3 modulates phytochrome and cryptochrome signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17:475–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu M, Hou C, Jiang C et al (2007) A novel approach of LED light radiation improves the antioxidant activity of pea seedlings. Food Chem 101:1753–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Erdei N, Barta C, Hideg E, Boddi B (2005) Light-induced wilting and its molecular mechanism in epicotyls of dark-germinated pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol 46:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu X, Chen Z, Jahan MS et al (2020) RNA-Seq analysis reveals the growth and photosynthetic responses of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under red and blue LEDs with supplemental yellow, green, or white light. Hortic Res 7:206

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rajapakse, NC, Shahak Y (2007) Light-quality manipulation by horticulture industry. In: Whitelam GC, Halliday KJ (eds) Annual plant reviews: light and plant development, vol 30. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 290–312

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu X, Lv Y, Gao S, Xu K (2021) Ofloxacin induces etiolation in Welsh onion leaves. Chemosphere 267:128918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoneda K, Mori Y (2004) Method of cultivating plant and illuminator for cultivating plant. European Patent Office. No. EP 1374665A1. 2004

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chen L, Yang Y, Jiang Y et al (2019) RNA-Seq analysis reveals differential responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plantlets cultured in vitro to red, blue, green, and white light-emitting diodes (LEDs). J Plant Growth Regul

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gao S, Liu X, Liu Y et al (2020). Photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure of welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L.) grown under different LED wavelengths. BMC Plant Biol 20:78

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tehrani PF, Majd A, Mahmoodzadeh H, Satari TN (2016) Effect of red and blue light-emitting diodes on germination, morphological and anatomical features of Brassica napus. Adv Stud Biol 8:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meng Q, Runkle ES (2017) Moderate-intensity blue radiation can regulate flowering, but not extension growth, of several photoperiodic ornamental crops. Environ Exp Bot 134:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Runkle E, Heins R, Cameron A, Carlson W (2001) Minireview of research activity: horticultural flowering of herbaceous perennials. Flowering Nwsl 31:34–43

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng L, Van Labeke MC (2017) Chrysanthemum morphology, photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant capacity are differentially modified by light quality. J Plant Physiol 213:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu XY, Jiao XL, Chang TT, Guo SR, Xu ZG (2018) Photosynthesis and leaf development of cherry tomato seedlings under different LED-based blue and red photon flux ratios. Photosynthetica 56:1212–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zheng L, Van Labeke MC (2017) Long-term effects of red- and blue-light emitting diodes on leaf anatomy and photosynthetic efficiency of three ornamental pot plants. Front Plant Sci 8:917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Richter G, Wessel K (1985) Red light inhibits blue light-induced chloroplast development in cultured plant cells at the mRNA level. Plant Mol Biol 5:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Muneer S, Kim EJ, Park JS, Lee JH (2014) Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.). Int J Mol Sci 15:4657–4670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoffmann AM, Noga G, Hunsche M (2015) High blue light improves acclimation and photosynthetic recovery of pepper plants exposed to UV stress. Environ Exp Bot 109:254–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li H, Tang C, Xu Z et al (2012) Effects of different light sources on the growth of non-heading Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L.). J Agric Sci 4:262–273

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nanya K., Ishigami Y, Hikosaka S, Goto E (2012) Effects of blue and red light on stem elongation and flowering of tomato seedings. In: International society for horticultural science (ISHS), 956 ed. Acta Hortic, pp 261–266

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pashkovskiy PP, Kartashov AV, Zlobin IE et al (2016) Blue light alters miR167 expression and microRNA-targeted auxin response factor genes in Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 104:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hernández R, Kubota C (2016) Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs. Environ Exp Bot 121:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu Y, Wang T, Fang S et al (2018) Responses of morphology, gas exchange, photochemical activity of photosystem II, and antioxidant balance in Cyclocarya paliurus to light spectra. Front Plant Sci 9:1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Su N, Wu Q, Shen Z et al (2013) Effects of light quality on the chloroplastic ultrastructure and photosynthetic characteristics of cucumber seedlings. Plant Growth Regul 73:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li C-X, Xu Z-G, Dong R-Q et al (2017) An RNA-Seq analysis of grape plantlets grown in vitro reveals different responses to blue, green, red LED light, and white fluorescent light. Front Plant Sci 8

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gao S, Liu X, Liu Y et al (2021) Response of growth, photosynthetic electron transfer, and chloroplast ultrastructure to different LED light combination in green onion (Allium fistulosum L.). Physiol Plant 172:1662–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin K-H, Huang M-Y, Huang W-D et al (2013) The effects of red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata). Sci Hortic 150:86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zheng C, Ma J-Q, Ma C-L, Shen S-Y, Liu Y-F, Chen L (2019) Regulation of growth and flavonoid formation of tea plants (Camellia sinensis) by blue and green light. J Agric Food Chem 67:2408–2419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fu X, Chen Y, Mei X et al (2015) Regulation of formation of volatile compounds of tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves by single light wavelength. Sci Rep 5:16858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bliznikas Z, Samuolien G, Viršil A, Žukauskas A, Brazaityt A, Jankauskien J (2012) Effect of supplementary pre-harvest LED lighting on the antioxidant and nutritional properties of green vegetables. Acta Hortic 939:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sirtautas R, Samuolienė G (2013) The Effect of red-LED lighting on the antioxidant properties and nitrates in red baby leaf lettuces. In: 6th International science conference, vol 6, pp 237–240, 28–29 Nov 2013

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lillo C, Appenroth K-J (2001) Light regulation of nitrate reductase in higher plants: Which photoreceptors are involved? Plant Biol 3:455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Baroli I, Price G, Badger M, Caemmerer S (2008) The Contribution of photosynthesis to the red light response of stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol 146:737–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bian Z, Yang Q, Liu W (2014) Effects of light quality on the accumulation of phytochemicals in vegetables produced in controlled environments: a review. J Sci Food Agric 95(5):869–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Konovalova IO, Berkovich YuA, Smolyanina SO et al (2015) Influence of light regime parameters on the accumulation of nitrates in the aboveground biomass of Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis L.) when grown with LED irradiators. Agrochemistry 11:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  54. Golovatskaya IF, Karnachuk RA (2015) The role of green light in the life of plants. Plant Physiol 62(6):776–791

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chang A, Yang T, Riskowski G (2013) Ascorbic acid, nitrate, and nitrite concentration relationship to the 24 hour light/dark cycle for spinach grown in different conditions. Food Chem 138:382–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dodd AN et al (2005) Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309:630–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Michael TP et al (2008) Network discovery pipeline elucidates conserved time-of-day-specific cis-regulatory modules. PLoS Genet 4:e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Facella P et al (2008) Diurnal and circadian rhythms in the tomato transcriptome and their modulation by cryptochrome photoreceptors. PLoS ONE 3:e2798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Covington M et al (2008) Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol 9:R130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Mas P, Yanovsky MJ (2009) Time for circadian rhythms: plants get synchronized. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:574–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Poire R et al (2010) Diel time-courses of leaf growth in monocot and dicot species: endogenous rhythms and temperature effects. J Exp Bot 61:1751–1759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Graf A et al (2010) Circadian control of carbohydrate availability for growth in Arabidopsis plant sat night. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:9458–9463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Pruneda-Paz JL, Kay SA (2010) An expanding universe of circadian networks in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 15:259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Harmer SL (2009) The circadian system in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:357–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Gould PD et al (2006) The molecular basis of temperature compensation in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 18:1177–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Cameron AC, Padhye SR, Whitman CM (2007) Control of flowering in herbaceous perennials. Acta Hort 755:112–119

    Google Scholar 

  67. Erwin JE, Warner RM (2002) Determination of photoperiodic response group and effect of supplemental irradiance on flowering of several bedding plant species. Acta Hort 580:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mattson NS, Erwin JE (2005) The impact of photoperiod and irradiance on flowering of several herbaceous ornamentals. Scientia Hort 104:275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Dorais M, Gosselin A (2002) Physiological response of greenhouse vegetable crops to supplemental lighting. Acta Hortic 580:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Demers D-A et al (1998) Effects of supplemental light duration on greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants and fruit yields. Sci Hortic 74:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hwang H, An S, Pham MD et al (2020) The combined conditions of photoperiod, light intensity, and air temperature control the growth and development of tomato and red pepper seedlings in a closed transplant production system. Sustainability 12:9939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Lefsrud MG, Kopsell DA, Auge RM, Both AJ (2006) Biomass production and pigment accumulation in kale grown under increasing photoperiods. Hortic Sci 41:603–606

    Google Scholar 

  73. Min H, Sherman LA (2010) Hydrogen production by the unicellular, diazotrophic cyanobacterium Cyanothece sp. strain ATCC 51142 under conditions of continuous light. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4293–4301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Eroglu E et al (2010) Photosynthetic bacterial growth and productivity under continuous illumination or diurnal cycles with olive mill wastewater as feedstock. Int J Hydrogen Energ 35:5293–5300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Jijun D et al (2010) The cultivation of mixed microalgae and CO2 fixation in a photo-bioreactor. In: Weiguo L et al (eds) 4th International conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering (iCBBE). IEEE, Chengdu, China, pp 1–4, 18–20 June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  76. Lepisto A et al (2009) Chloroplast NADPH-thioredoxin reductase interacts with photoperiodic development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 149:1261–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Handford MG, Carr JP (2007) A defect in carbohydrate metabolism ameliorates symptom severity in virus-infected Arabidopsis thaliana. J Gen Virol 88:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Gaudreau L et al (1994) Photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux influence growth and quality of greenhouse-grown lettuce. Hortic Sci 29:1285–1289

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wheeler RM, Tibbitts TW (1986) Growth and tuberization of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under continuous light. Plant Physiol 80:801–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Pettersen RI et al (2007) Growth of pot roses and post-harvest rate of water loss as affected by air humidity and temperature variations during growth under continuous light. Sci Hortic 114:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Suthaparan A et al (2010) Continuous lighting reduces conidial production and germinability in the rose powdery mildew patho system. Plant Dis 94:339–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. García-Caparrós P, Sabio F, Barbero FJ et al (2020) Physiological responses of tomato and cucumber seedlings under Di_erent light-dark cycles. Agronomy 10:945. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10070945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Barta DJ, Tibbitts TW, Bula RJ, Morrow RC (1992) Evaluation of light emitting diode characteristics for a space-based plant radiation source. Adv Space Res 12(5):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Olvera-Gonzalez E, Alaniz-Lumbreras D, Ivanov-Tsonchev R et al (2013) Chlorophyll fluorescence emission of tomato plants as a response to pulsed light based LEDs. Plant Growth Regul 69(2):117–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-012-9753-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Massa GD, Emmerich JC, Morrow RC et al (2006) Plantgrowth lighting for space life support: a review. Gravit Space Biol 19(2):19–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evgeniya Klyuchka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Klyuchka, E., Lukyanov, A., Zotov, A. (2024). Method for Studying the Process of Growing Onions (Allium Cepa L.) Under Controlled Microclimate: A Review. In: Zokirjon ugli, K.S., Muratov, A., Ignateva, S. (eds) Fundamental and Applied Scientific Research in the Development of Agriculture in the Far East (AFE-2022). AFE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 733. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37978-9_113

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics