Abstract
Theories of international relations tend to reduce Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War (the History) to a tragic narrative. International thinkers of war, like Machiavelli, Hobbes or Clausewitz, also overemphasise fear and tragedy in their readings of history. Thucydides, however, offers deeper psychological insights than these classic thinkers, and a more ambiguous reading of history than the one afforded by tragedy. This chapter reads the History in a non-tragedy-centric way. It instead focuses on the role of three social processes: civilisation, war and civil war. It demonstrates the limitations of simplistic event comparisons, like that between the siege of Melos and the campaign of the Spartan General Brasidas in Northern Greece, highlights the Thucydidean ambiguities of the narrative in the latter case, and suggests a reading that reconciles them. From this viewpoint, Brasidas’ military and diplomatic campaign is an example of the ability of strategy to mobilise people, shift power balances, shape identities and reinvigorate the civilising process; the master social process of Thucydides. Ultimately, this novel interpretation of Thucydides illuminates challenges and opportunities of grand strategy and supports a view of international politics that is processual.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
All other translated quotations are from (Thucydides 2009).
References
Allison, Graham. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Allison, June W. 1997. Word and Concept in Thucydides. Atlanta, Ga: Scholars Press.
Bagby, Laurie M. Johnson. 1994. The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations. International Organization 48 (1): 131–153.
Bosworth, A.B. 1993. The Humanitarian Aspect of the Melian Dialogue. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 113: 30–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/632396.
Burns, T. 2011. The Virtue of Thucydides’ Brasidas. The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000065.
Cogan, Marc. 1981. The Human Thing: The Speeches and Principles of Thucydides' History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coker, Christopher. 2010a. ‘The Conflict in Afghanistan’. Online resource. British Politics and Policy at LSE. Blog post from London School of Economics & Political Science. 20 April 2010a. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/.
———. 2010b. Barbarous Philosophers: Reflections on the Nature of War from Heraclitus to Heisenberg. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 2017. Rebooting Clausewitz: ‘On War’ in the Twenty-First Century. London: Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd.
Doyle, Michael W. 1990. Thucydidean Realism. Review of International Studies 16 (3): 223–237.
Finley, John Huston. 1942. Thucydides. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Fragoulaki, Maria. 2013. Kinship in Thucydides: Intercommunal Ties and Historical Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilpin, R.G. 1988. The Theory of Hegemonic War. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 (4): 591–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/204816.
———. 1984. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization 38 (2): 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026710.
Goddard, S.E., and D.H. Nexon. 2016. The Dynamics of Global Power Politics: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Global Security Studies 1 (1): 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogv007.
Greenwood, Emily. 2005. Thucydides and the Shaping of History. London: Bristol Classical Press.
Hanson, Victor Davis. 2020. The Scab and the Wound Beneath. The New Criterion 38 (9): 4.
Herberg-Rothe, Andreas. 2007. Clausewitz’s Puzzle: The Political Theory of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hornblower, Simon. 1991. A Commentary on Thucydides: Volume I: Books I‒III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 1996. A Commentary on Thucydides: Volume II: Books IV‒V. 24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, R. Gerald., and Alexandros Koutsoukis. 2019. Clausewitz First, and Last, and Always: War, Strategy and Intelligence in the Twenty-First Century. Intelligence and National Security 34 (3): 438–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2018.1530867.
Hunter, Virginia J. 1982. Past and Process in Herodotus and Thucydides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jackson, P.T., and D.H. Nexon. 2019. Reclaiming the Social: Relationalism in Anglophone International Studies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (5): 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1567460.
Jaffe, S.N. 2017. Thucydides on the Outbreak of War: Character and Contest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jervis, R. 2000. Timing and Interaction in Politics: A Comment on Pierson. Studies in American Political Development 14 (1): 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X00213023.
Kagan, Donald. 2005. The Peloponnesian War: Athens and Sparta in Savage Conflict 431–404 BC. New. London: Harper Perennial.
Kokaz, Nancy. 2001. Moderating Power: A Thucydidean Perspective. Review of International Studies 27 (1): 27–49.
Kouskouvelis, Ilias. 2018. Thucydides on Choice and Decision Making: Why War Is Not Inevitable. Illustrated. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
Koutsoukis, Alexandros. 2022. Restoring Thucydides: Testing Familiar Lessons and Deriving New Ones. Diplomacy & Statecraft 33 (3): 606–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2022.2113264.
———. 2017. ‘Challenging Victor Bias and Status Quo Bias in Realist Accounts of Surrender’. Aberystwyth: Aberystwyth University. https://pure.aber.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/challenging-victor-bias-and-status-quo-bias-in-realist-accounts-of-surrender(d853556e-5b06-465a-8c08-412df06dfd7c).html.
Lawson, George. 2006. The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations. International Studies Review 8 (3): 397–423.
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Barry S. Strauss, eds. 1991. Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
———. 2005. Power, Persuasion and Justice. Millennium 33 (3): 551–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031501.
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Robert Kelly. 2001. Thucydides and Hegemony: Athens and the United States. Review of International Studies 27 (4): 593–609.
Linklater, Andrew. 2016. Violence and Civilization in the Western States-Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 2003. The Prince. London: Penguin Classics.
McCann, David R., and Barry S. Strauss. 2000. War and Democracy: A Comparative Study of the Korean War and the Peloponnesian War. Armonk: Routledge.
Monoson, S.S., and M. Loriaux. 1998. The Illusion of Power and the Disruption of Moral Norms: Thucydides’ Critique of Periclean Policy. The American Political Science Review 92 (2): 285–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585664.
Novo, Andrew R., and Jay M. Parker. 2020. Restoring Thucydides: Testing Familiar Lessons and Deriving New Ones. Amherst: Cambria Press.
Ober, Josiah. 2006. Thucydides and the Invention of Political Science. In Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, eds. Antonios Tsakmakis and Antonios Rengakos, 131–159. Leiden: Brill.
Orwin, Clifford. 1994. The Humanity of Thucydides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Platias, Athanassios G., and Constantinos Koliopoulos. 2006. Thucydides on Strategy: Grand Strategies in the Peloponnesian War and Their Relevance Today. Athens: Eurasia Publications.
Porter, Patrick. 2022, April 1. Thucydides Was a Realist. Engelsberg Ideas (blog). https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/in-defence-of-thucydides-the-realist/.
Prantl, J. 2022. Reuniting Strategy and Diplomacy for 21st Century Statecraft. Contemporary Politics 28 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1961387.
Price, Jonathan J. 2001. Thucydides and Internal War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawlings, Hunter R. 2010. Thucydidean Epistemology: Between Philosophy and History. Rheinisches Museum Für Philologie 153 (3/4): 247–290.
de Romilly, Jacqueline. 2012. The Mind of Thucydides. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Rood, Tim. 2006. Objectivity and Authority: Thucydides’ Historical Method. In Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, eds. Antonios Tsakmakis and Antonios Rengakos, 223–249. Leiden: Brill.
Sears, Matthew A. 2020. Brasidas and the Un-Spartan Spartan. Classical Journal 116 (2): 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1353/tcj.2020.0028.
Suganami, Hidemi. 2008. Narrative Explanation and International Relations: Back to Basics. Millennium 37 (2): 327–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097643.
Thucydides. 2020/1910. The History of the Peloponnesian War, Trans. Richard Crawley. Vancouver: Royal Classics.
———. 2009. The Peloponnesian War. Translated by Martin Hammond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Wees, Hans van. 2001. War and Peace in Ancient Greece. In War, Peace and World Orders in European History, eds. Anja V. Hartmann, Beatrice Heuser, 33–47. London: Routledge.
Welch, David A. 2003. Why International Relations Theorists Should Stop Reading Thucydides. Review of International Studies 29 (3): 301–319.
Wheatland, Casey J. 2020. The General as Statesman: The Virtues of Measuredness and Daring in Thucydides’ Account of Brasidas. Perspectives on Political Science 49 (2): 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2020.1725372.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank David Boucher, Andrew Linklater, Alex Mack and David Sullivan for reviewing the manuscript and offering advice and suggestions. All mistakes are my own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koutsoukis, A. (2023). Thucydides and Social Processes: Beyond Tragedy. In: Williams, H., Boucher, D., Sutch, P., Reidy, D., Koutsoukis, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of International Political Theory. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36111-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36111-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36110-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36111-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)