Abstract
This research aimed to investigate the dissemination of information about Indonesia’s G20 presidency in 2022, particularly through the social media platform of Twitter (Web.2.0), which allows interaction between the providers and other users. A qualitative methodology was employed with content analysis of social media discussions, specifically Twitter. Furthermore, computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) was used, namely NVivo 12 Plus (QSR International, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA), which can generate data for sentiment analysis, top influencers, dominant hashtags, top mentions, and dominant words. The Twitter data were collected during the G20 summit on 15–16 November 2022 using the keywords “#G20Indonesia” and “KTT G20”. The two keywords were selected since they were becoming a trending topic. The results found that using the “KTT G20” keyword, a message on Indonesia’s G20 presidency was widely distributed and received positive sentiment from locals. The use of the hashtag “#G20Indonesia”, the presidency attracted international attention while generating additional negative sentiment.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Keywords
1 Introduction
Understanding the dissemination of information about the G20 Summit in Bali is critical, particularly for the Indonesian government. President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) stated that Indonesians should be proud of the G20 presidency. According to the President, becoming the first developing country to hold the G20 Presidency is significant because it shows respect, value, and development. The Indonesian people should overcome their “colonized” mindset and become more confident before other countries [1]. The election of the G20 Presidency [2] is meaningful because it raises various hopes for strategic benefits. With the theme “Recover Together, Recover Stronger”, Indonesia hopes to gain at least three advantages, namely (1) economic - driving domestic consumption, (2) social development - increasing vaccine production and distribution, and (3) political - demonstrating Indonesia’s success in implementing the Job Creation Law and the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) [3].
The question is, “How is the information dissemination in Indonesia as G20 Presidency at the general public level?” amid high expectations from the government. To respond to this query, it is vital to conduct social media research to understand the spread of information and identify the issues that the general public is debating concerning the G20 Presidency. Twitter is a social media platform that has gained popularity and is a useful tool for comprehending the social discourse taking shape. However, the unrestricted nature can also propagate hoaxes or false information, as was the case with the Covid-19 pandemic [4].
The majority-Muslim nation understands the idea of “tabayyun” or confirmation as a crucial means of halting the spread of false information and ensuring integrity. A research found that most respondents did not conduct “tabayyun” or confirm the news heard [5]. Since Twitter (Web.2.0) allows interactions between information disseminators and other users, this research intended to evaluate the online dissemination of the G20 presidency in 2022. It unpacks the information about the influencers, the most popular hashtags, and sentiment analysis concerning the G20 presidency. The analysis can serve as a policy recommendation to the government, the primary party responsible for realizing the concept. Therefore, the following paragraphs will discuss ICT and Twitter as public diplomacy.
2 Literature Review
2.1 ICT and Public Diplomacy
Public diplomacy was still conventional before the rapid development of ICT. Diplomacy is carried out using a variety of methods, such as cultural diplomacy as practiced by Korea [6], the United States [7], Turkey [8], and Taiwan [9], as well as efforts to establish diplomatic relations at the regional government level or paradiplomacy [10].
The emergence of social media, which falls under the Web 2.0 umbrella, is one of the key advances in ICT. This indicates that the pattern of information dissemination has changed dramatically compared to earlier technologies. For instance, it seems to be a monologue, and there is no interactivity on the website platform (Web 1.0). In contrast, social media (Web 2.0) is more interactive because it involves direct two-way dialogue between information suppliers and recipients [11].
The existence of social media platforms such as Twitter has compelled policymakers to adapt to these changes in information dissemination. Direct contact with the general public also influences the pattern of diplomacy. Therefore, social media is a reality that the government should deal with to manage information and communicate with the public directly. Other countries recognize that social media should be utilized to communicate and gain public support for policies. For instance, public diplomacy using social media is carried out by China [12], Russia [13], India [14], the United States [15], and others. The construction of the literature that examines social media and public diplomacy especially related to the G20 Presidency, is still relatively minor.
2.2 Twitter as a Public Diplomacy
Several experts researched Twitter’s use in public diplomacy. For example, the Chinese government strongly encourages diplomats to engage with the global community through this social media [16]. As a result, sentiment analysis is generally positive, indicating widespread public support for the Chinese government’s diplomacy. The same tendency exists in Turkey, where Twitter supports the government’s diplomatic policies. The Turkish government has used this strategy to popularize news information sources that are becoming increasingly popular, such as The Republic of Turkiye Directorate of Communications, TIKA, Yunus Emre Institute, and TRT [17]. Even Twitter is useful for spreading propaganda during the South China Sea crisis, which involved numerous accounts from the US, China, and India [18]. It is also used successfully in many cases of public diplomacies, such as Iran – US relations [19], US – Cuba relations [20], and Indonesia [21]. This research is expected to provide a fresh perspective on Twitter and public diplomacy studies, which have received little attention from academics.
3 Methodology
A qualitative approach was employed with content analysis of discussions about Indonesia’s G20 presidency on social media, particularly Twitter. The data were collected during the G20 summit on 15–16 November 2022 using the keywords “#G20Indonesia” and “KTT G20” and utilized computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS), namely NVivo 12 Plus (QSR International, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA). The two keywords were selected since they were becoming a trending topic on Twitter. Additionally, each of the two keywords represented different segments, namely “#G20Indonesia” for the global and “KTT G20” for the local audience. Once the dataset was collected, NVivo 12 Plus was used to conduct the coding process and generate sentiment analysis, top influencers, dominant hashtags, top mentions, and dominant words. Furthermore, the research strategy of Ahmed, Vidal-Alaball, Lopez Segui, and Moreno-Sánchez [22] on the Twitter analysis was adopted. The protocol of this research can be described in the following Fig. 1.
4 Findings
Twitter has given several pieces of information about Indonesia’s G20 presidency. After the coding process using NVivo 12 Plus, the subsequent paragraphs present specific analyses from a Twitter discussion on those particular issues. Using #G20Indonesia the sentiment tends to negative (>55%), while searching keyword “KTT G20” the sentiment tends to positive (>68%). This indicates that on the global level, Indonesia’s G20 presidency was dominated by negative sentiment. In contrast, this achievement was greatly appreciated at the local level. Jokowi’s desire to make Indonesia proud of the G20 presidency has prevailed, and the positive sentiment shows the information disseminated effectively across society. The differences in sentiment analysis correlated with the received message of the audience both at the global and local levels. Measuring Twitter hashtags is crucial to understand the message with the same subject. In this case, NVivo 12 Plus has generated top hashtags for the two different keywords, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1 provides an overview of the most used hashtag during this time frame. At the global level, “#g20indonesia” (n = 8651) and “#g20” (n = 3902) appeared among the most used hashtags. At the local level, the hashtag “#g20pulihlebihcepat” (n = 1980) was ahaead of #g20indonesia (n = 873), #kttg20 (n = 541), #masyaallahgiselle (n = 432), and #presidensig20 (n = 420). Indeed, among the top, irrelevant hashtags constantly appeared, such as “#uae” (n = 1150) and “#masyaallahgiselle” (n = 432). The hashtag in Arabic also appeared as “” (ref: head of state) (n = 1813) and “” (ref: G20 summit) (n = 1636). The hashtag “#masyaallahgiselle” is irrelevant since it is the celebrity-related hashtag of a girls’ band, namely JKT48, which went viral due to one of the members wearing a hijab. The emergence of various hashtags conveys that even though the G20 discourse is held in Indonesia and globally, it also benefits many parties.
Related to influencers, during G20 Summit in Bali, there were Twitter accounts that deliberately influenced the social media discussion. Interestingly, there are significant differences in the influencers in the two keywords, with the global influencers using #G20Indonesia being international figures or institutions who are influential and relevant to the theme. According to Table 2, the top five influencers are @forsan_uae (UAE media & news agency), @bkksnow (a Thai academic), @g20_india (Indian G20 secretariat), @rishisunak (UK Prime Minister), and @thestanislawski (Ukrainian Journalist). Meanwhile, domestic influencers include @jokowi (President of Indonesia), @narendramodi (Prime Minister of India), and @cakiminow (Indonesian politician). Anonymous influencer accounts, namely @ndagels and @txtdarihi, emerged on Twitter and influenced the Indonesian G20 presidency discourse. This demonstrates that international Twitter accounts truly control the flow of information on the G20 presidency. Table 2 provides a listing of the numerous most influential individuals. A huge number of followers does not ensure that other users will positively receive a Twitter account.
President Jokowi (@jokowi) was consistently the most-mentioned account on Twitter among domestic users, surpassing other well-known domestic accounts, as seen in Table 3. However, the popularity of the accounts lags far behind compared to others, such as @g20org (India’s G20 Presidency), @mohamedbinzayed (President of the UAE), @narendramodi (Prime Minister of India), and @uaeembassyjkt (UAE Embassy Jakarta). This gap appears to correspond with the posting locations, as seen in Table 3. Referring to Table 3, foreign Twitter accounts predominate from the dominance of hashtags, influencers, and user locations. The Indonesian account performs exceptionally when the tweet contains the keyword “G20 Summit”, but the outcomes differ when “#G20Indonesia” is used. This indicates that Indonesian Twitter users’ conversations are still not very intense, affecting how information spreads worldwide. Instead, Twitter users dominate conversations using the keyword “G20 Summit”, probably because it is more well-liked and accepted than #G20Indonesia. However, among the mentioned accounts, the official Twitter of Indonesia’s G20 Presidency, namely @Indonesia_G20, is absent in all categories.
In terms of word distribution, it closely aligns with the data presented above. For example, when the keyword #G20Indonesia is used, the NVivo 12 Plus auto-coding results showed that the hashtag is dominant, as evidenced by the bold print on the word-cloud image followed by “https”, indicating a high intensity of the website. Similarly, the keyword “G20 Summit” dominates the spread of words in word-cloud images, followed by “https” printed in bold. Therefore, Twitter has a limited number of characters for sending messages, and users frequently provide additional information through the website URL. The primary aim is for users who intend to learn more about the G20 presidency to log on to related links that provide more detailed information (Fig. 2).
Besides the limited number of characters, Twitter conversations are highly dynamic and can be altered. Concerning the limitations, it only covers the period between 15 and 16 November 2022, the day of the G20 Summit. Future research should be able to dismantle data about the G20 leadership throughout various periods. The content analysis only addresses one component of information distribution, which is quite simplistic. However, this has not delved deeper into the Twitter conversation’s themes as a research on the 2017 French presidential election [23]. Keywords can also be added in future research, as evidenced by the hashtags for anti-vaccine propaganda [24]. The NVivo 12 Plus software greatly aided this research, and the results may differ. For example, the visualization and display of the results are more appealing and complete when using alternative software, such as NodeXL, Python, and R Programming.
5 Conclusion
This research discovered that information dissemination related to Indonesia’s G20 presidency significantly contributed to the literature on digital diplomacy. It uncovered how Twitter data represented information disseminated to the public among Indonesians and the global community. Indeed, using local keywords such as “KTT G20”, a message was widely distributed and received positive sentiment from the locals. Using the hashtag “#G20Indonesia”, the presidency drew international attention and gained more negative sentiment. Despite being one of the largest social media users, Indonesia’s Twitter influencers remain untold compared to global influencers. In the future, the government should focus on improving digital diplomacy in cyberspace, which is critical for a country’s public diplomacy.
References
Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia: Menjadi Presidensi G20, Presiden Jokowi Ingin WNI Bangga pada Indonesia (2021). https://setkab.go.id/menjadi-presidensi-g20-presiden-jokowi-ingin-wni-bangga-pada-indonesia/
Munira, S., Jatmika, S.: Assessing policies, practices and impact of actions and policies in handling Covid-19 pandemic: comparative studies of Bangladesh and Indonesia. J. Islam. World Polit. 6(1), 46–58 (2022)
CNN Indonesia: 3 Manfaat Presidensi G20 bagi Indonesia (2022). https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20220117173120-537-747721/3-manfaat-presidensi-g20-bagi-indonesia
Ahmed, W., Vidal-Alaball, J., Downing, J., López Seguí, F.: COVID-19 and the 5G conspiracy theory: social network analysis of Twitter data. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(5), e19458 (2020)
Reza, I.F.: Counteracting Hoax in social media through Tabayyun by Islamic student community. Ta’dib 24(2), 269–279 (2021)
Dhawan, R.K.: Korea’s cultural diplomacy: an analysis of the Hallyu in India. Strateg. Anal. 41(6), 559–570 (2017)
Ratzlaff, A.: Birds of a feather?: Lessons on U.S. cultural diplomacy from Walt Disney during the Good Neighbor Policy. Int. J. Cult. Policy 1–16 (2022)
Özkan, A.: Strategic practices of public diplomacy policies in educational field and Turkey’s potential for cultural diplomacy. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, 35–43 (2015)
Rawnsley, G.: Soft power rich, public diplomacy poor: an assessment of Taiwan’s external communications. China Q. 232, 982–1001 (2017)
Burksiene, V., Dvorak, J., Burbulytė-Tsiskarishvili, G.: City diplomacy in young democracies: the case of the Baltics. In: Amiri, S., Sevin, E. (eds.) City Diplomacy. PMSGPD, pp. 305–330. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_14
Fesharaki, M.N., Fetanat, A., Shooshtari, D.F.: A conceptual model for Socio-Pragmatic Web based on activity theory. Cogent Educ. 7(1), 1797979 (2020)
Sun, W.: Chinese language digital/social media in Australia: diaspora as ‘double agents’ of public diplomacy. In: Kennedy, L. (ed.) Routledge International Handbook of Diaspora Diplomacy, p. 12. Routledge, London (2021)
Crilley, R., Gillespie, M., Willis, A.: Tweeting the Russian revolution: RT’s #1917LIVE and social media re-enactments as public diplomacy. Eur. J. Cult. Stud. 23(3), 354–373 (2019)
Garud-Patkar, N.: India’s mediated public diplomacy on social media: building agendas in South Asia. In: Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference (2019)
Zhong, X., Lu, J.: Public diplomacy meets social media: a study of the U.S. Embassy’s blogs and micro-blogs. Public Relat. Rev. 39(5), 542–548 (2013)
Anindita, A.N., Elias, R.A., Kibtiah, T.M., Miranda, E., Permana, A.: High-engagement Chinese digital public diplomacy on Twitter. In: Yang, X.-S., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds.) ICICT 2022. LNNS, vol. 464, pp. 437–448. Springer, Singapore (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2394-4_40
Alanka, Ö., Çimen, Ü.: Twitter as a digital channel of public diplomacy in Turkey. In: Elitaş, T. (ed.) Maintaining International Relations Through Digital Public Diplomacy Policies and Discourses Hershey, pp. 176–189. IGI Global (2023)
Nip, J., Sun, C.: Public diplomacy, propaganda, or what? China’s communication practices in the South China sea dispute on Twitter. J. Public Dipl. 2(1), 43–68 (2022)
Duncombe, C.: Twitter and transformative diplomacy: social media and Iran–US relations. Int. Aff. 93(3), 545–562 (2017)
Valencia, R.J., Moscato, D.: Navigating #ObamainCuba: how Twitter mediates frames and history in public diplomacy. Place Brand. Public Dipl. 17(2), 168–179 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00162-7
Madu, L.: Twitter diplomacy @Kemlu_RI: a case study of Bali democracy forum 2019. J. Hub. Internasional 10(1), 31–43 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v10i1.11566
Ahmed, W., Vidal-Alaball, J., Lopez Segui, F., Moreno-Sánchez, P.A.: A social network analysis of tweets related to masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(21), 8235 (2020)
Downing, J., Ahmed, W.: #MacronLeaks as a ‘warning shot’ for European democracies: challenges to election blackouts presented by social media and election meddling during the 2017 French presidential election. Fr. Polit. 17(3), 257–278 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-019-00090-w
Khadafi, R., Nurmandi, A., Qodir, Z., Misran: Hashtag as a new weapon to resist the COVID-19 vaccination policy: a qualitative study of the anti-vaccine movement in Brazil, USA, and Indonesia. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 18(1), 2042135 (2022)
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the Indonesian Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology for funding this research through DRTPM Research Grants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Maksum, A., Sahide, A., Bee Wah, T., Akmal Ma’arif, H.M., Alimuddin, S.Z. (2023). Social Media and Information Dissemination of Indonesia as G20 Presidency. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1835. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36001-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36001-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36000-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36001-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)