Abstract
Following the COVID-19 emergency and ensuing Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) practices, this chapter reflects on how learning strategies associated with the post-war technology of the language lab can inform contemporary teaching through technology—within blended, face-to-face, or predominantly online education settings. Based on a behaviourist approach, the foreign language lab was considered state of the art for schools and universities for most of the second half of the twentieth century. The concept was as compelling as it was faulty, assuming that the best results for language learners could be achieved through memorising pre-set sentence and dialogue structures. While the practice of oral pattern drills has been widely criticised and has long been considered out of date by theorists and practitioners alike, the focus on learners’ oral production, feedback, and self-correction offers some valuable lessons for today’s technology-enhanced language classroom. This chapter explores and expands on these topics and, in so doing, it also subsequently describes as exemplars a series of activities that were delivered in 2020–2021. In particular, the chapter explores how videoconferencing software allows learners to interact with each other in a virtual classroom setting while also enabling them, at a later stage, to analyse and correct their own language production, just as the language lab did. It will then demonstrate how some of the features of online language teaching can broaden teachers’ pedagogical toolbox within the sphere of formative feedback, even outside the need for social distancing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer-Kath, J., et al. 1994. Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology 134: 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9922999.
Arroyo, D.C., and Y. Yilmaz. 2018. An open for replication study: The role of feedback timing in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning 68 (4): 942–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12300.
Barr, S.H., and E.J. Conlon. 1994. Effects of distribution of feedback in workgroups. Academy of Management Journal 37: 641–655.
Betoncu, O., et al. 2021. Designing an effective learning environment for language learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752083.
Bräuer, G. 2001. Language learning centres: Bridging the gap between high school and college. In Pedagogy of language learning in higher education: An introduction, ed. G. Bräuer, 185–192. Westport, CT; London: Ablex.
Bunderson, J.S., and K.M. Sutcliffe. 2003. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (3): 552–560.
Bygate, M. 2009. Teaching and testing speaking. In The handbook of language teaching, ed. M.H. Long and C.J. Doughty, 412–444. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Daniels, C.D., and J.E. Daniels. 2006. Performance management. Atlanta: Performance Management Publications.
Dewaele, J.M., et al. 2022. Is flow possible in the emergency remote teaching foreign language classroom? Education Sciences 12 (7): 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070444.
Dzakiah, D., et al. 2020. Smartphone video recording as a learning tool to improve Indonesian EFL students speaking performance. Indonesian EFL Journal 6 (2): 10.25134/ieflj.v6i2.3384.
Fu, M., and S. Li. 2020. The effects of immediate and delayed corrective feedback on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44 (1): 2–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000388.
Guttridge, J. 2002. The language laboratory is useful and fun. Modern English Teacher 11 (4): 37–40.
Hayes, A.S. 1963. Language laboratory facilities: Technical guide for the selection, purchase, use, and maintenance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Hsu, H.-C. 2016. Voice blogging and L2 speaking performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29 (5): 968–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1113185.
Hunter, J. 2012. ‘Small talk’: Developing fluency, accuracy, and complexity in speaking. ELT Journal 66 (1): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq093.
———. 2021. Comsem.net: An online platform for providing and tracking delayed corrective feedback. WAESOL Educator 46 (2): 29–32. https://waesol.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/11. Accessed 11 August 2022.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., and K.J. Klein. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, ed. K.J. Klein and S.W.J. Kozlowski, 3–90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lay, T., and K. Giblett. 2020. Zoom, Padlet, Screencast + Co.—Fremdsprachen lehren und lernen in Zeiten der Corona-Krise. MehrSprachen Lernen und Lehren 25 (2): 553–565.
Lenkaitis, C.A. 2020. Technology as a mediating tool: Videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning 33 (5–6): 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572018.
Lestari, N. 2019. Improving the speaking skill by vlog (video blog) as learning media: The EFL students perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 9 (1): 915–925.
Li, L., et al. 2022. To zoom or not to zoom: A longitudinal study of UK Population’s activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One 17 (7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270207.
London, M. 2003. Job feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
London, M., and V. Sessa. 2006. Group feedback for continuous learning. Human Resource Development Review 5: 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484306290226.
MacDonald, L. 2011. The ‘virtual language lab’: Virtually painless, simply real. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies 41: 137–160.
McCormick, D.E., and M.L. Vercellotti. 2013. Examining the impact of self-correction notes on grammatical accuracy in speaking. TESOL Quarterly 47 (2): 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.92.
Quinn, P. 2014. Delayed versus immediate corrective feedback on orally produced passive errors in English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto. https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.item?id=TC-OTU-65728&op=pdf&app=Library&is_thesis=1&oclc_number=1032908200. Accessed 10 August 2022.
Richards, J.C., and T.S. Rodgers. 2014. Approaches and methods in language teaching. 3rd ed. Cambridge: CUP.
Robinson, P. 1995. Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning 45 (2): 283–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x.
Roby, W.B. 2004. Technology in the service of foreign language learning: The case of the language laboratory. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, ed. D.H. Jonassen, 2nd ed., 523–541. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rojas, M.A., and S.M. Arteaga. 2019. Perceptions about self-recording videos to develop EFL speaking skills in two Ecuadorian universities. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 10 (1): 60–67. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1001.07.
Schmidt, R.W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 129–158.
———. 2001. Attention. In Cognition and second language instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 3–32. Cambridge: CUP.
Schnaars, S., and C. Wymbs. 2004. On the persistence of lacklustre demand—The history of the video telephone. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73 (3): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00410-9.
Schneider, C. 2020. Setting up a language learning environment in Microsoft Teams. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal 11 (3): 263–270. https://doi.org/10.37237/110312.
Shehadeh, A. 2001. Self- and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly 35 (3): 433–457. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588030.
Shute, V.J. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78: 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.
Stillwell, C., et al. 2010. Students transcribing tasks: Noticing fluency, accuracy, and complexity. ELT Journal 64 (4): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp081.
Tecedor, M., and G. Campos-Dintrans. 2019. Developing oral communication in Spanish lower-level courses: The case of voice recordings and videoconferencing activities. ReCALL 31 (2): 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000083.
Turner, E.D. 1969. Correlation of language class and language laboratory. ERIC focus reports on the teaching of foreign languages. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED034451.pdf. Accessed 23 December 2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heinrich, T. (2023). Revisiting the Language Lab in the Age of Online Learning: Videoconferencing, Teacher Feedback, and Learner Self-Correction. In: Fiorucci, W. (eds) Language Education During the Pandemic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35855-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35855-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35854-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35855-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)