Abstract
In this chapter, I aim to take a first step toward developing a phenomenological theory of modern society. My focus is on one of the partial tasks of this ambitious project: exploring what is it like to experience society in the first-person perspective. Specifically, I limit my analysis to a mode of subjective experience of society that I term macro-social awareness via cognitive mapping. The chapter is divided into three sections. Section “The Project of a Phenomenological Theory of Society” outlines the project of a phenomenological theory of society. Section “What Is It Like to Experience Modern Society?” addresses the general issue of how society is experienced in the first-person perspective. Finally, the last and central section (“Cognitive Mapping as a Way to Overcome the Transcendence of Society”) offers a preliminary phenomenological analysis of macro-social cognitive mapping in everyday life.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In this connection, it is important to acknowledge the existence of “multiple modernities,” that is, different versions or modes of manifestation of modernity in divergent geographical and historical contexts (Reckwitz & Rosa, 2021, pp. 263–264).
- 2.
I am referring here to Marx & Engels’ (see 1958, pp. 26–27) conception of “ideology” as “false consciousness” and to Durkheim’s (1986, p. 17) account of “pre-notions.” Despite the undeniable differences between the Marxian and the Durkheimian theories of society, both conceive of doxa as a veil blocking access to true social-scientific knowledge.
- 3.
The contemporary influence of conspiracy theories on a large part of the population of Western societies should not be overlooked here (see Butter, 2020). Arguably, however, these theories primarily operate on the level of explicit self- and world-interpretations, not at that of pre-reflective agency. For an analysis of the different levels of self-interpretation and their potential discrepancies, see Rosa (2012, pp. 111–117).
- 4.
This concept is loosely inspired by Merton’s (1968, pp. 39–40) idea of “middle-range theories.”
- 5.
Marion (2002) has developed a phenomenological account of “exceedance” or “excess” in connection with his analysis of “saturated phenomena.” The idea of conceptualizing the macro-social as a saturated phenomenon stems from Carlos Belvedere.
- 6.
Schutz borrows all these concepts from Husserl.
- 7.
Gunderson (2021) offers an interesting analysis of the experience of macro-social structures as a form of horizonal or marginal consciousness not far from the one I provide here.
- 8.
In contrast to Schutz, Gurwitsch (see 2012, p. 4) speaks of three fundamental “domains” of the field of consciousness, namely, the “theme,” the “thematic field,” and the “margin.”
- 9.
Importantly, with the emergence of the cyberspace in the last decades, the Umwelt has expanded to include people located in the Mitwelt but with whom I can establish quasi-face-to-face relationships, either via videotelephony or via chat. These alter egos have been called “consociates contemporaries” (see Zhao, 2004). Along these lines, WhatsApp chat groups could be understood as quasi-primary groups.
References
Adorno, T. W. (2003). Einleitung in die Soziologie. Suhrkamp.
Anderson, B. (1985). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory. The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Bachmann-Medick, D. (2016). Cultural turns: New orientations in the study of culture. De Gruyter.
Belvedere, C. (2011). Problemas de fenomenología social. Prometeo.
Belvedere, C. (2022). A treatise in phenomenological sociology: Object, method, findings, and applications. Lexington Books.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Bongaerts, G. (2012). Sinn. transcript.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2013). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
Butter, M. (2020). “Nichts ist wie es scheint.” Über Verschwörungstheorien. Suhrkamp.
Celikates, R. (2009). Kritik als soziale Praxis. Gesellschaftliche Selbstverständigung und kritische Theorie. Campus.
Dilthey, W. (1981). Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Suhrkamp.
Dreher, J., & Figueroa-Dreher, S. (2011). De Bandido a Héroe: el poder integrador del simbolismo gaucho en la Argentina. In S. Figueroa-Dreher et al. (Eds.), Construcciones de identidad y simbolismo gaucho en Argentina (pp. 153–186). Prometeo.
Durkheim, É. (1984). The division of labour in society. Macmillan.
Durkheim, É. (1986). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Presses Universitaires de France.
Eberle, T. (1993). Schütz’ Lebensweltanalyse: Soziologie oder Protosoziologie? In A. Bäumer & M. Benedikt (Eds.), Gelehrtenrepublik – Lebenswelt: Edmund Husserl und Alfred Schütz in der Krisis der phänomenologischen Bewegung (pp. 293–320). Passagen.
Eberle, T. (2009). In search for Aprioris. Schutz’s life-world analysis and Mises’s praxeology. In H. Nasu et al. (Eds.), Alfred Schutz and his intellectual partners (pp. 493–518). UVK.
Eberle, T., & Srubar, I. (2010). Einleitung. In A. Schütz (Ed.), Zur Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften. Alfred Schütz Werkausgabe, Bd. 4 (pp. 9–44). UVK.
Embree, L. (2010). Interdisciplinarity within phenomenology. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 10(1), 1–7.
Endreß, M., & Lindemann, G. (2021). Phänomenologien und Gesellschaftstheorien, Call for Papers der Interdisziplinären Arbeitskreis Phänomenologie und Soziologie, Sommertagung der DGS-Sektion Soziologische Theorien. https://soziologie.de/fileadmin/sektionen/iaps/6._Tagung_des_IAPS_-_Gesellschaftstheorien__Delmenhorst_2022_.pdf
Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
Gardiner, M. (2000). Critiques of everyday life: An introduction. Routledge.
Gehlen, A. (1949). Sozialpsychologische Probleme in der industriellen Gesellschaft. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Geißler, R. (2014). Die Sozialstruktur Deutschlands. Springer.
Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and critiques in social theory. Macmillan.
Giddens, A. (1995). The consequences of modernity. Polity Press.
Gros, A. (2022). A phenomenology of modernity? Alfred Schutz’s contributions to a theory of modern society. In M. Barber (Ed.), The Anthem companion to Alfred Schutz (pp. 115–136). Anthem Press.
Gros, A. (2023). ¿Qué es la fenomenología? Una introducción breve y actualizada para sociólogos. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 46(1), 293–324.
Gros, A. (2019). Towards a Phenomenological Critical Theory: Hartmut Rosa’s Sociology of the Relationship to the World. Revista Científica Foz, 2(1), 8–46.
Guenther, L. (2021). Six senses of critique for critical phenomenology. Puncta, 4(2), 5–23.
Gunderson, R. (2021). How do social structures become taken for granted? Social reproduction in calm and crisis. Human Studies, 44, 741–762.
Gurwitsch, A. (2012). The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973): Volume III: The field of consciousness: Theme, thematic field, and margin. Springer.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Bd. 2. Suhrkamp.
Heidegger, M. (2000). Die Frage nach der Technik. In M. Heidegger (Ed.), Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 7, Vorträge und Aufsätze (pp. 1–53). Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2006). Sein und Zeit. Max Niemeyer.
Henry, M. (1990). Phénoménologie matérielle. Presses Universitaires de France.
Hörnqvist, M. (2022). Critique and cognitive capacities: Towards an action-oriented model. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 48(1), 62–85.
Husserl, E. (1950). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Husserliana I. Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1954). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Husserliana VI. Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1962). Phänomenologische Psychologie: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925. Husserliana IX. Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1972). Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Felix Meiner.
Jaeggi, R. (2014). Kritik von Lebensformen. Suhrkamp.
Jameson, F. (1988). Cognitive mapping. In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 347–358). Macmillan Education.
Keller, R. (2012). Das interpretative Paradigma. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Lindemann, G. (2009). Das Soziale von seinen Grenzen her denken. Velbrück Wissenschaft.
López, D. (2021). Schutzian social cartography. Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 124(1), 69–90.
Löwy, M. (1996). Figures of Weberian Marxism. Theory and Society, 25(3), 431–446.
Luckmann, T. (1979). Phänomenologie und Soziologie. In W. M. Sprondel & R. Grathoff (Eds.), Alfred Schütz und die Idee des Alltags in den Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 196–206). Enke.
Luckmann, T. (1980). Lebenswelt und Gesellschaft: Grundstrukturen und geschichtliche Wandlungen. Schöningh.
Luckmann, T. (1991). Protosoziologie als Protopsychologie? In M. Herzog & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Sinn und Erfahrung: Phänomenologische Methoden in den Humanwissenschaften (pp. 155–168). Roland Asanger.
Luckmann, T. (2002). Wissen und Gesellschaft. UVK.
Luckmann, T., & Schütz, A. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. UVK.
Luckmann, T. (2007). Lebenswelt, Identität und Gesellschaft. UVK.
Lukács, G. (1967). Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein: Studien über marxistische Dialektik. Luchterhand.
Manzo, G. (2015). Macrosociology-microsociology. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, Vol. 14 (pp. 414–421). Elsevier.
Marcuse, H. (1955). Eros and civilization: An inquiry into Freud. Beacon Press.
Marion, J. L. (2002). In excess: Studies of saturated phenomena. Fordham University Press.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1958). Werke, Bd. 3. Dietz.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1960). Werke, Bd. 8. Dietz.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1962). Werke, Bd. 23. Dietz.
Mau, S. (2021). Stummer Zwang als besondere Form der Macht. Marx’ Beitrag zur Theorie der abstrakten und unpersönlichen Herrschaft des Kapitals. Prokla. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft, 51(205), 675–696.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2000 [1951–1952]). Les sciences de l’homme et la phénoménologie. In M. Merleau-Ponty, Œuvres, C. Lefort (Ed.) (pp. 1203–1267). Gallimard.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. The Free Press.
Nassehi, A. (2008). Gesellschaft. In S. Farzin & S. Jordan (Eds.), Lexikon Soziologie und Sozialtheorie (pp. 85–90). Reclam.
Nassehi, A. (2019). Muster: Theorie der digitalen Gesellschaft. C.H. Beck.
O’Shiel, D. (2022). The phenomenology of virtual technology: Perception and imagination in a digital age. Bloomsbury.
Popitz, H. (2011). Allgemeine soziologische Theorie. UVK.
Popitz, H., et al. (2018). Das Gesellschaftsbild des Arbeiters. Soziologische Untersuchungen in der Hütterindustrie. Springer.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
Reckwitz, A. (2016). Kreativität und soziale Praxis: Studien zur Sozial- und Gesellschaftstheorie. transcript.
Reckwitz, A. (2017). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne. Suhrkamp.
Reckwitz, A. (2019). Das Ende der Illusionen: Politik, Ökonomie und Kultur in der Spätmoderne. Suhrkamp.
Reckwitz, A. (2021). Gesellschaftstheorie als Werkzeug. In A. Reckwitz & H. Rosa (Eds.), Spätmoderne in der Krise. Was leistet die Gesellschaftstheorie? (pp. 23–151). Suhrkamp.
Reckwitz, A., & Rosa, H. (2021). Spätmoderne in der Krise: Was leistet die Gesellschaftstheorie? Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2005). Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2012). Weltbeziehungen im Zeitalter der Beschleunigung. Umrisse einer neuen Gesellschaftskritik. Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2021). Best account. Skizze einer systematischen Theorie der modernen Gesellschaft. In A. Reckwitz & H. Rosa (Eds.), Spätmoderne in der Krise. Was leistet die Gesellschaftstheorie? (pp. 151–253). Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H., & Oberthür, J. (2020). Einleitung. In H. Rosa et al. (Eds.), Gesellschaftstheorie (pp. 11–35). UVK.
Schimank, U. (2013). Gesellschaft. transcript.
Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers II: Studies in social theory. Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1981). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Suhrkamp.
Schutz, A. (1984). Die Notizbücher. In T. Luckmann & A. Schutz (Eds.), Strukturen der Lebenswelt, Band 2 (pp. 215–405). Suhrkamp.
Schutz, A. (2003). Theorie der Lebenswelt 1: Die pragmatische Schichtung der Lebenswelt. ASW, Bd. V.1. UVK.
Schutz, A. (2011). Collected Papers V. Phenomenology and the Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
Srubar, I. (2007). Phänomenologie und soziologische Theorie. UVK.
Steinbock, A. (2003). Generativity and the scope of generative phenomenology. In D. Welton (Ed.), The New Husserl. A critical reader (pp. 289–327). Indiana University Press.
Ungar, S. (2005). Cognitive maps. In R. Caves (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the City. (pp. 79–80). London: Routledge.
Van Manen, M. (2017). Phenomenology in its original sense. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 810–825.
Waldenfels, B. (2007). The question of the other. The Chinese University Press.
Weber, M. (1984). Soziologische Grundbegriffe. Mohr Siebeck.
Weber, M. (1986). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Bd. 1. Mohr Siebeck.
Weymann, A. (2020). Interaktion, Institution und Gesellschaft. In H. Joas & S. Mau (Eds.), Lehrbuch der Soziologie (pp. 107–135). Campus.
Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2007). Phänomenologie für Einsteiger. UTB.
Zahavi, D. (2018). Phenomenology: The basics. Routledge.
Zahavi, D. (2021). We in me or me in we? Collective intentionality and selfhood. Journal of Social Ontology, 7(1), 1–20.
Zhao, S. (2004). Consociated contemporaries as an emergent realm of the lifeworld: Extending Schutz’s phenomenological analysis to cyberspace. Human Studies, 27, 91–105.
Zoglauer, T. (2023). Constructed truths. Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gros, A. (2023). Macro-social Awareness in Everyday Life: Toward a Phenomenological Theory of Society. In: Belvedere, C., Gros, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Macrophenomenology and Social Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34712-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34712-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34711-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34712-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)