Keywords

1 Introduction

Bestone is, an admixture made from natural pozzolan and produced in Nagano Prefecture, Japan, as shown in Fig. 1. It is a pure inorganic high-performance concrete frame waterproofing admixture without polymers and other substances. Its chemical composition is shown in Fig. 2. Bestone adsorbs calcium hydroxide, which is liberated as the cement hydrates to produce an insoluble calcium silicate gel in what is considered a kind of pozzolanic reaction. The calcium silicate gel fills micro voids in the concrete, making the concrete itself waterproof and impermeable. Further, if water leaks through part of a crack caused by external forces induced by contraction or temperature stress, calcium silicate gel is formed in the crack, keeping water shutoff performance and filling the crack. In fact, a structure with Bestone in the concrete has been shown to become impervious to water performance about one to three months after the initial occurrence of water leakage. Figure 3 shows an underground structure that has cracked and is leaking water from the cracks, but the influx of water came to a half after several weeks because the concrete was mixed with Bestone. The estimated reserves of Bestone are about 18 million tons, making it possible to supply it as a product semi-permanently, and it has been applied in the construction of various underground structures in Japan.

This study is an experimental evaluation of the water shutoff performance of Bestone. In order to carry out the evaluation, a water leakage test method is developed and a simulation is carried out of external underground pressure affecting a large subsurface structure including Bestone.

Fig. 1.
figure 1

Bestone-producing area.

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Components of Bestone

Fig. 3.
figure 3

Concrete mixed with Bestone improves water stopping performance and can be stopped in a few months.

2 Evaluation of Basic Properties and Water Shutoff Performance

In this study, researchers examine water shutoff performance of Bestone with various cement powders is investigated.

2.1 Materials and Mixing Conditions

The materials used in this work are listed in Table 1. In recent years, watertight structures of larger size are being constructed, so the use of moderate heat cement, low heat cement, blast furnace cement, etc. has been increasing to prevent thermal cracking. These cements are used in the experiments carried out here so as to compare any differences in results.

Table 1. Materials.

Table 2 shows the composition of mixes studied. The water-cement ratio was fixed at 50% for all experience and the amount of Bestone was set at 6% by mass of the standard amount of cement powder used. The volume corresponding to the calculated unit volume was replaced with a portion of fine aggregate.

Table 2. Mix proportions.

2.2 Method of Mixing

Mixing was carried out using a pan-type mixer in batches of 13L. First, the powder and Bestone were added and mixed for 30 s, followed by the water and AE water reducing agent which were mixed for 1 min 30 s. Finally, after scraping off, AE water reducing agent was added in the same way and mixed for 1 min before discharge.

2.3 Tests and Methods

Flow Value Test and Target Values.

Flow testing was conducted in accordance with ASTM C1437. The target flow value was 150 ± 30 mm.

Air Content Test.

The air content was measured in accordance with BS EN 1015–7. The target value of air volume was set at no more than 1.5% in order to minimize variation in the area of the fracture according to the amount of air appearing on the fracture surface of the specimen in the water leakage test.

Compressive Strength Test.

Compressive strength testing was conducted in accordance with BS EN 1015–11 after curing in water for 7 and 28 days. The target value of compressive strength was 45 N/mm2 at 28 days.

Water Leakage Test.

Specimens for the water leakage testing measured 150mm x 150 mm x 400 mm. Two steel reinforcing bars of diameter 5 mm were cast in the axial center to prevent the destruction. Further, four bolts for attaching the water flow device were set into one side of the form before casting. These details are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. After filling the form with mixed mortar, the cast specimen was removed after 24 h. Following warm-water curing in 60 ℃ water for 7 days, curing continued in 20 ℃ water for further 28 days. In order to induce cracking, a slot was cut on the upper and lower faces of the specimen with a concrete cutter. Then a concrete bending test device was used to form crack of about 0.5 mm through the center of the specimen. The cracking procedure is shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.

Figures 8 and 9 shows the equipment used for water leakage testing. Compressed air pressurizes the water in a tank, forcing it into the water pressurization equipment attached to the test piece. Leakage was measured at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after the water flow was turned on, then at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h, and then every 24 h after the second day. In principle, the total measurement period was 7 days, but if the water flow rate through the Bestone-blended mortars did not fall below 5% of the peak leakage rate during the first 7 days, the measurement period was extended up to a maximum of 10 days.

All measured values were converted into water flow rates per minute, and were divided by the peak water flow rate to obtain the water flow rate ratio, as follows:

$$Flow\, rate (\%) =\frac{flow\, rate \,at\, time \times after\, start(g)}{peak \,flow \,rate (g)}\times 100$$
(1)
Fig. 4.
figure 4

The specimens of water leakage tests

Fig. 5.
figure 5

The detail of the specimen

Fig. 6.
figure 6

The state of forming cracks.

Fig. 7.
figure 7

The formed microcrack.

Fig. 8.
figure 8

Water leakage test in progress

Fig. 9.
figure 9

Overview of water leakage test device

2.4 Results of Fresh Properties and Compressive Strength Testing

Table 3 shows the result of the fresh property tests. The target values were achieved by setting the addition ratio of AE water reducing agent to 0.2% and that of the defoaming agent to 0.6%.

The results of compressive strength tests are shown in Fig. 10. Bestone is a naturally occurring pozzolan-reactive material, so the strength of mixes including Bestone is higher as a result of their porous hydrated structure after aging. The compressive strength of the Bestone mix with blast furnace cement is lower than that of the one made with ordinary Portland cement, because the alkali required by the Bestone reaction is consumed by the latent hydraulic properties of the blast furnace cement fine powder.

Table 3. Fresh properties of mixes.
Fig. 10.
figure 10

Compressive strength after 7days and 28 days curing in water.

2.5 Result of Water Leakage Testing

The results of leakage tests in Figs. 1114 show that the initial water flow rate and the water flow rate ratio decreased earlier in mixes including Bestone for each cement. Further, Bestone mixes with all cements except BB had water flow rates below 5% after 7 or 10 days. This indicates that adding Bestone can be expected to not only to impart water shutoff performance but also to have the effect of early cracks repair.

The OPC, MC and LC mixes contain a large amount of Ca(OH)2 generated by the hydration reaction of cement. This enables the pozzolanic reaction through reaction with SiO2 contained in the Bestone to form hydrates. This is thought to reduce the amount of water passing through the Bestone mixes compared with the non Bestone mixes.

On the other hand, in the case of BB mixes, blast furnace cement has the property of latent hydraulicity and hardening in the presence of Ca(OH)2 and gypsum produced by the cement hydration reaction. The Ca(OH)2 is consumed in the reaction, which proceeds faster than the pozzolan reaction, leaving insufficient Ca(OH)2 to for the pozzolanic reaction of Bestone. This means the quantity of hydrates formed by reaction with SiO2 in the Bestone is minimal, so the water flow through Bestone and non Bestone mixes is little different in the BB combinations (Fig. 12 and Fig. 13).

Fig. 11.
figure 11

Influence of water flow rate on using ordinary cement with Bestone.

Fig. 12.
figure 12

Influence of water flow rate on using low-heat cement with Bestone.

Fig. 13.
figure 13

Influence of water flow rate on using medium heat cement with Bestone.

Fig. 14.
figure 14

Influence of water flow rate on using blast furnace cement with Bestone.

2.6 Discussion

Following the water leakage test, each crack surface was examined by SEM observations and X-ray diffraction. Here, OPC (BE 6%), which showed the greatest decrease in water flow rate, is compared with BB (BE 6%), which showed minimal water shutoff performance. Each surface in contact with water was observed at 1, 3, 7, and 28 day, but results on 1 day and 28 days were excerpted.

The SEM results are shown in the Fig. 15 and 16. Small needle-like crystals and thin plate-like crystals can be observed crack surface before starting water leakage test in the OPC with Bestone combination only. The needle-like crystals are considered to be the cement pore phase or ettringite, while the plate-like crystals are thought to be calcium hydroxide. The number of small needle-like crystals decreased from between 3 days and 7 days of age in the Bestone mix, and needle-like crystals joined together became visible on the 28 days. This is because the insoluble calcium silicate gel formed when Bestone combined with calcium hydroxide in the cement was combined with water, etc., and fine hydrates filled in the gaps. In the BB combination, only the admixed Bestone showed small needle-like crystals on the first day of age. In addition, plate-like crystals were observed in the admixed Bestone and non-admixed Bestone at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days of age.

In BB mixes with Bestone, the linear or thin plate-like structure is less prominent and the gap is densified by the latent hydraulic properties of blast furnace slag and the pozzolanic reaction of Bestone. The combinations of the 28 days SEM of OPC and BB admixed Bestone shows that OPC is denser. This is because the latent hydraulicity of the blast furnace slag fine powder consumes calcium hydroxide, which is necessary for Bestone's pozzolanic reaction. Therefore, Bestone's reactivity is lower in BB cement.

Fig. 15.
figure 15

Crack surface in the water leakage test after 1day and 28 days using OPC.

Fig. 16.
figure 16

Crack surface in the water leakage test after 1 day and 28 days using BB

The X-ray diffraction results are shown in Fig. 16 and 17. The mixes with Bestone show a notable peak of SiO2, while the non-Bestone mixes do not. This is attributable to the high content of active silica in the Bestone. Although not confirmed by X-ray diffraction, previous studies have confirmed the formation of calcium silicate, which is not found in the OPC-only mix. This is because calcium silicate gel is formed when the silica contained in Bestone combines with calcium hydroxide in the cement. The wide distribution of SiO2 confirms that the pozzolanic reaction takes place with Bestone. In the mix of OPC with Bestone, the SiO2 peak tends to decrease with age. This suggests that the pozzolanic reaction progress, but further investigation is needed to confirm this.

Fig. 17.
figure 17

Result of X-ray diffraction at the crack surface during the water leakage test after 1 day and 28 days using OPC.

3 Conclusions

The findings of this study are as follows:

  1. 1.

    The addition of Bestone does not affect compressive strength.

  2. 2.

    Mixes including Bestone are more effective in terms of water shutoff performance than those with no Bestone as demonstrated by the earlier decrease in water flow rate.

  3. 3.

    The addition of Bestone not only delivers water shutoff performance but also leads to early repair of cracks.

  4. 4.

    Since Ca(OH)2 is consumed by the latent hydraulic property of the slag in BB mixes, Bestone delivers little the water shutoff performance in these cases (Fig. 18).

Fig. 18.
figure 18

Result of X-ray diffraction at crack surface during the water leakage test after 1 day and 28 days using BB.